They'll keep on gaslighting. These people think they are godlike. They will never admit that they were wrong.

I'm really starting to notice the tide running on Shwitter. A few months ago, you barely saw any of this kind of stuff there. It would get taken down or the comments would be a leftist rampage.

Now I'm seeing this more and more and there are tons of comments that agree. Shwitter doesn't seem able to keep up with the awakening that's happening.

Exciting times!

The "wishing you were a man" part is fucking harsh. Love it.

I live in Coral Springs. It's been normal here for months. The weirdos now are the people still wearing masks and walking around with a hand sanitizer holster on their belt.

Faking pcaps files is almost impossible with any kind of volume. The timings and packet sequences would be easy to spot if they were out of sequence.

I'm a qualified expert in the field.

In addition to what you stated (which is 100% true; TCP protocol), the fact that they are all TLS packets with origination certificates and fully decrypted... It's virtually impossible to fake this. How they managed to MITM all of this is really an amazing achievement.

Unfortunately, it's a citizens grand jury... So it's basically not actionable and we would need a prosecutor to accept their recommendation and initiate an investigation or issue charges... So let's just hope something comes of this.

It's so exhausting.

mail in ballots are different from early voting ballots or voting on election day

Any rational person understands this. That's the reason I point out the absurdity of early in-person ballots being indistinguishable from mail-in ballots. The user above is reciting the Maricopa BOS explanation verbatim. But when asked to expound upon the reasoning, no one seems able to do so. That's because it's bullshit; and everyone knows it.

I live in the city just south of Parkland. I worked with some people who had kids attending MSD and I remember them all answering their phones, turning ghost white, and running out of the office in a panic. I also know a girl who was a teacher at the school during the shooting and she tells a story about shots being fired through the window in her classroom door and losing one or two (don't remember the exact number) students in her classroom.

Not trying to get into the FF debate, but adding some information that personally I know to be true to the discussion.

So early in-person ballots are indistinguishable from mail-in ballots? Why? How do you track ballots in such a system?

Vaxholes.

Thanks. I actually was fuzzy on the details because it was a few years ago. I do recall that my friend told me to only tip about 5% if the service was good but that I didn't really have to.

This seems fishy to me. When I visited a friend in Canada, I had to get used to the idea of NOT TIPPING because they don't tip servers there.

The only problem I see with this is that while these clerks will have broken federal law, who will prosecute them? Not Garland and certainly not the state AG.

These emails are examples of the FBI strategy of seeding conspiracy theories to political groups. The previous section of the PDF describes the strategy.

So just to add context to this so we don't start getting all worked up, these emails are included as examples of the FBI strategy of seeding conspiracy theories to political groups.

Chappelle's spoof of this is incredible.

antidotal -> anecdotal

Right, but understand the logic there. They are saying they have no way to determine if Cyber Ninjas tampered with the machines, but they are certain they weren't tampered with before the election. Did they have a way to determine that before the audit and not after, or are they just full of shit?

Amazing logic on this one. They have no way to be sure the machines weren't tampered with so they must be replaced... Also, the machines weren't tampered with and the election was perfect so they shouldn't be audited.

It's for search engine optimization.

My point still stands. The certification is the fraud; fraudulent duress or no. It's not going to be undone by the courts. The courts will only grant relief due to that fraud.

You're sort of getting it, but still not quite. The certification is not the decree, it is the fraud. The courts are not going to litigate the fraudulent certification, nor will they rule on the constitutionality of Biden's inauguration as an incident of that fraud. They will only offer a remedy to the harm caused by the fraud... So a new election is the only real choice in the judicial route.

That's the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. This describes why the founders were declaring independence; not the definition of a constitutional process.

If you are suggesting that we amass an army, storm the capital, and overthrow the government, then you have a point. But there is no constitutional mechanism to undo the election.

Nope. I have a solid grasp of the opinion. It is like I said. Fraud does not undo anything; it spoils it. The opinion states explicitly that the point isn't to go back and undo all of the fraud; just that because fraud was present, relief may be granted.

United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 - Supreme Court 1878

We think these decisions establish the doctrine on which we decide the present case; namely, that the acts for which a court of equity will on account of fraud set aside or annul a judgment or decree, between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, have relation to frauds, extrinsic or collateral, to the matter tried by the first court, and not to a fraud in the matter on which the decree was rendered.

It may be hard to comprehend because of the language used. So to summarize what that means: The court may set aside it's own judgements and grant relief (i.e. a redo or new trial) if fraud was used to obtain the judgement, but the court will not attempt to adjudicate the actual fraud.

I see this stated often, but I get the impression that the people repeating it don't understand what it means.

It doesn't mean that fraud undoes everything. It means that fraud spoils everything. Meaning that confirmation of fraud would make Biden the President that cheated to get elected... But he would still be President.