8
mayolettuce 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm trying to understand woke liberals. What kind of person at this point still thinks invading, unvetted, illegals is a good thing? Why do they act like every person crossing our border is some affable, innocent, funny Marvel movie character and will call you a bigot for suggesting otherwise. It's so hard to get these people to grow up (these are adults!) and realize their simplistic world view is not as kind and empathetic as they think it is in the long-term. They don't think about the ripple effects, just the initial idea of kindly letting someone in so they can pat themselves in the back for being falsely virtuous instead of considering the long-term consequences which would actually make their actions more destructive than kind.

4
mayolettuce 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem is that liberals are voting as if they're trying to pick someone to win a leading role in a Marvel movie instead of a country leader. They choose someone based on shallow, surface-level qualities, thinking a country can be led and function properly based on vibes, quirkiness, and agreeableness at the expense of other qualities they consider "icky."

Any amount of strength or assertiveness shown by DJT is quickly labeled as toxic. Those people do not live in the real world and it's clear to see any world run by them would be disastrous and be easily taken advantage by others.

44
mayolettuce 44 points ago +44 / -0

This shows the contrast between liberals and conservatives. Liberals are stuck arguing and fighting for aspects of their personal ego in the short-term, all while pretending they are virtuous. Conservatives attempt to fight for values outside their immediate ego, like for their children, good morality, civil society, a far future where they won't personally reap the benefits but their future children will.

I hope more people understand that this is the sort of shift in consciousness that needs to happen. From working towards inflating one's narcissism to fighting for values outside ego.

2
mayolettuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

The foundation of Islam is already quite questionable. An "archangel" pinned Mohammed down to force him to abide by his words. I'm not sure why no Muslims use discernment and question whether the spirit was actually good or not. They simply take at face value that it was good and holy instead of considering the possibility of a satanic nature. Mohammed was actually shook and thought negatively of the experience at first until his wife erroneously convinced him that it was archangel Gabriel.

If you look at how Muslims justify brutality, especially towards women and children, no way that can come from a good god.

Another thing to consider is that evil has difficulty creating things in the material world. Evil usually has to act upon deception (whispering in the ears of others) or by taking over a human vessel with their consent. Compare that to Jesus who is a literal manifestation via a virgin birth and created many miracles for people. To top it all off, he sacrificed himself too.

Here's a video about the concerns of this "archangel" if anyone is interested.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gllUSqHZGMg

4
mayolettuce 4 points ago +4 / -0

The juxtaposition is crazy. Calling native British thugs while ignoring the fact that the most vile crimes are done by others. The crazy thing is, on X you can see liberal women still asleep and arguing on behalf of the invaders even though these past events should've waken any person up already.