I'm going to go ahead and propose another theory: drug-use didn't decline at all during the pandemic, but when reporting of it is left to the already half-absent parents not much gets reported. And now why its gone down recently? Many factors I'm sure... maybe some highlights would be increased work-at-home means more-present parents? Maybe people are starting to see that good solid Christian values might not be so bad after all. List goes on.
While this sounds good when narrowing in on those optics alone it doesn't quite fit the grand picture. If arrests were to happen before he was in office who would be directing them? I know "military is the only way" can still come into it here but I wasn't expecting any arrests publicly before Trump is in office. I then don't expect any large arrest moment or for things to happen quickly. But habbenning it is! NCSWIC!
I would argue it like this... (devil's advocate, defending this wording by X): If someone from any violent event denies that it happened this could be a valid flag. However, if someone were to say a violent event didn't actually occur - like questioning it as a narrative like Sandy Hook is that actually denying the violent event? I say its not... I would argue its claiming the reporting of it hasn't been correct. It happened in that it was an event so don't deny that - but questioning things about it isn't denying it. So if someone brings up the convenient lottery winnings from some of the "victim's" families that not denying anything. Ya, ok, I'm not doing a good job of this.
I haven't heard that they make no sound... the closer ones captured clearly sound like drones and this has been talked about quite a bit. I've heard a couple pretty good ones recently; I know at least one from some sheriff's cell phone that sounded unmistakably like a drone and he was reporting it to be the size of a car. Hopefully we find out what they are soon.
no no... legal now since 2013 only :). The law does not allow for propaganda... it allows for gov. produced news meant for people abroad to be seen domestically. It does in no way allow for commercial broadcasters to distribute this content. It does still specifically include verbiage for the "Prohibition on Influencing Public Opinion" - still all part of the act. Probably best to read the whole thing. Its not some gotcha moment find here unfortunately.
This is false info being spread around. Nothing was repealed. There was the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act which allowed US Gov. Media to be shown domestically. This is news put out for the rest of the world to see from the US gov. This is now a legal way for people to get to this content domestically. This was fake news in 2013 and every year/month etc. its brought up since.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DLm9CK9eNQ Just a thought... don't get me wrong - I take a "I'll believe it when I see it" stance on fee-energy. Thought it appropriate to share.
https://downdetector.com/ - good site I always pull up when things are reported down
Painful - first post I saw was some libtard talking about how a grandparent is 'counting her chickens before they are hatched' thinking she'll be able to afford car trade-ins again soon. I chimed in with comparing to people budgeting on not having to pay back their student loans. I'm sure I'll loose some karma... for some reason it looks like I have some to spare though... hmm... need to battle it out on there some more it seems.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0y4kkfx/-can-you-see-how-trump-and-johns/c/