As a matter of curiosity, do you people think the US is the only technically capable nation in this world? And every advance has to come from here? If so, why?
You see, I'm a retired engineer, and I've worked with engineers from virtually everywhere, being in control systems. I have NOT found it to be accurate that those from other countries are less capable, save the few that are/were under control of EU/UN educational standards. Every Russian engineer (white Russians, all) has been very competent and innovative. All of them.
Hogwash. This yahoo has it wrong. He doesn't understand much. While the zionist part is correct, essentially, it's merely something he copied, then claimed to know all about the world. Sorry. But look at it this way: if Allen Dulles funded Hitler, and Hitler was part of the 'world domination plan', WHY WOULD HITLER ATTACK THE BOLSHEVIKS? Operation Barbarossa effectively STOPPED the bolshevik intentions to overrun Europe. Dulles was deeply intertwined with FDR, a cabalist, and without Hitler, the bolsheviks had a nearly clear shot at subjugating all of Europe. And that was according to the cabal plan. The cabal instigated WWI, which effectively depleted war resources of all of Europe, including killing millions of white Europeans (also part of the domination plan), and broke up/screwed over all European countries capable of resisting a bolshevik invasion, such as Germany and the Austro-Hungarian empire. France was depleted of resources as well. Enter Bolsheviks. So again, why would the cabal fund those who could resist them? DotCom needs to do his own research, really, and figure out what really is going on. Somebody call the bunko squad.
Y'all know this sort of crap is that four-dimensional chess, right?? No? Well, you should. This type of crap reinforces the standard narrative that is anti-history and pro-narrative. Germans were the bad guys. No, they were not. They were the good guys. Dig, folks, dig and learn.
Somebody call the bunko squad.
Doesn't anyone understand the chain of command? The pentagon is NOT in the chain of command. The chain goes from CiC to sec'y of defense (optional) to the six theater commanders. That thing you're all calling potus is NOT CiC. CiC is Trump. Nothing the mil does is without his approval (under Q guidance). That is why none, repeat NONE, of the munitions allotted to Ukraine ever left port. pentagon "lost" that stuff. It is why the bidan reply to 'when are you sending troops to Ukraine' got the answer, "We're not allowed to send troops." Same answer Pelosi gave.
Don't be fooled by the psyop tomfoolery. bidan CANNOT initiate or respond to nukes. Only the CiC can do that, and that is Trump. Do you all understand?????? If not, go look it up. Quit getting sucked into this garbage.
Only one observation about this attempt on Trump: while it may have begun as a psyop, or as a DS op, either one, it did NOT end that way. Something else got in there that wasn't in 'the plan'. Regardless what people think or say, or how good someone is with a rifle, how good the rifle, NO ONE WITH A LICK OF COMMON SENSE, KNOWLEDGE OF BALLISTICS, AND WHAT CAN GO WRONG WILL ENGINEER A PSYOP WITH THE INTENTIONAL RESULT BEING A CLIPPED EAR AT A COUPLE HUNDRED YARDS. The FACT is that it is virtually impossible to be that accurate at range and be assured the bullet wouldn't hit Trump in the face.
The rest of this is left to your own judgement.
Go look at the aerial view. Are you a sniper, hunter, rifleman? Know ballistics?
Crap. Why isn't anyone asking how a bullet traveling roughly 3,000fps does a 90 turn to hit Trump's RIGHT ear as his LEFT side was facing the sniper's position?
Or has the information on layout of the building/field been wrong? No? If the bullet(s) hit his right side and the "sniper" was on his left, then it follows that there were two shooters. Anyone?
Well. Trump IS a threat to 'their democracy'. Thank God!!
The lgb BS movement was NOT because of mikey. It is a standard Khazar technique to loosen moral standards, cause societal decay. It was used in Europe post WWI, with the establishment of the "colleges" in France and Germany teaching queers, trannies and transition. Here, it was the "roaring 20s", but wasn't as successful, since we have rednecks.
"believe what you want to believe" refers to your set of beliefs. Long ago I gave up 'trying to convince people' of anything. Same reference is to you. All I do, or can do, is point at things. As to 'sinister plans', you might want to doublethink that. The evidence of said is everywhere, and goes back centuries. You can easily form a teleology, for instance, of the progress towards and means used to eliminate the US as a power. Among many other things. You can palm stuff off as coincidence or chance, but that isn't intelligent. The fact is that there are items that have been introduced years or decades after WWII, for instance, that did NOT exist then. That sort of thing began in the US prior to 1812, and continues.
Not trying to make a sale. What I'm trying to do is get people to dig more deeply to find out what the reality was/is. History books, since I was a child around 70 years ago have been changing, the same way engineering books change: yes, they do, constantly, and contain many errors. You see, I did engineering for decades, with a 5 year sojourn in teaching college; I knew many 'authors' of engineering books, with errors that remained uncorrected.
History has been modified to fit one specific group's intent, such that finding the truth isn't easy. You MUST resort to other sources, such as the declassified materials from the old USSR, the records from Germany and so forth. You MUST find actual pictures from the times, and compare them to what you read/see in the books. You must find statements from people who were there, on occasion some of the officers of the various armies of WWII. No history books used in 'schools', including universities, include any of that. You will find differences between books of the 1950s, 60s, 70s on up to the "revisionist (or "modern") history that completely misrepresent happenings.
Until you have direct experience with the 'powers that be' revising history, you WILL have doubts. Personally, my military time and doings were revised, different dates, different occurrences, different places. If a person reads the "history" of 1867-68, for instance, and compares that to what I did during that time, you'd find me in 3 places at the same time, then 2 places at the same time, and what I did during Tet almost completely erased, including records of the helos I crewed.
But... you will believe what you want to believe, or what you were taught to believe.
Thanks. Saved me from having to do it.
"Read the history and learn." Reading the history is a farce. There is no history book that is accurate. You need to do 'unrelated' history and make connections; you also need to look at the declassified records from KGB, CIA, FBI etc. There is where you make connections and get the reality.
"They" got rid of Nixon because he began to understand who was controlling the govt, and said so. "They" couldn't assassinate him, simply because "they" had done JFK, MLK, RFK, and Malcolm X, all major opponents of "the cabal". Prior to his removal (by the CIA), Nixon was obedient.
"very narrow parts with these guys" - truth.
"Hitler wasn't bad because..." This is something that comes with a lot of research. Adolf had a job to do, and the ONLY way it could be done was through authoritarian rule. Go back a few decades: 1871 dissolved the Republic (USA Inc); Spanish-American war instructed the US Army by showing antique rifles were ineffective, so the 03 Springfield repeater, prep for WWI; Titanic removed overt opposition to the fed, that opposition going covert; 1913, the fed, ADL, etc., which should give you a clue as to the motive force behind it (same as Germany WWI and post war).
WWI executed in ways no proper tactician would have. The only possible conclusion was to eliminate as many whites as possible before the end of the war, which was executed by the US (under tutelage of the previously mentioned group). WWI was also diversionary: the bolsheviks took over Russia, creating the proper 'govt' for also said group.
Adolf, while he was a name, was not a 'leader' until later. Yes, he was sponsored, and instructed as to actions. Among those was replacement of fake currency issued by Rothschild banks with money of worth, immediately removing 'the depression'. His next set of instruction was to build Germany's armed forces, and that couldn't have been without authoritarianism, simply because the Roths crew was everywhere in the Weimar Republic. Adolf was NOT some meathead wanting to conquer the world. All that's necessary to blow that bullshit up is to listen to (or watch subtitles) of his speeches. The function of Germany WWII was to stop the spread of the Bolshevik revolution into Europe. WWI removed all opposition to such a revolution: Austro-Hungarian Empire was broken up, France/Germany/Britain and the others were depleted.
Russia, under Stalin, was preparing the invasion of Europe in the later half of the 30s. Those who went covert knew of this, since that group had intel worldwide under guise of business. It was necessary for the one nation in Europe, Germany, to stop the invasion. Since Russia had a massive military, the covert ones knew it wouldn't be defeated, only depleted, and Operation Barbarossa was mounted a few months before Stalin was ready. That operation depleted Russia enough so Stalin couldn't invade.
The above also is stated by German Eastern Front soldiers of all ranks (post war), along with Adolf's speeches around the time of Stalingrad. "One day, the world will know what we have done here, not for Germany, but for all of Europe." Comes to mind.
Not deep enough. Conclusions about #142 aren't correct. The anon in #187 didn't get deep enough either. Y'all have to go a lot deeper. Main part of the subversion of the Republic began primarily in the 'War' of 1812. Adolf has almost never been under proper analysis, nor has Germany from pre-WWI on to post-WWII. Unless people credit the proper perpetrators, that 50 year period, 1900-1950 will not be understood.
Anyone consider, shall we say, 'non-standard' things? I see a lot of diet, religion, depression and so on. Look. You people, especially, see a lot that most don't. You see a society crumbling (ostensibly), homeless everywhere, illegals scattered around everywhere, threats of WWIII (real or not), and on and on. You see (ostensibly) the govt doing crazy sh*t day after day after day, and on and on and on. Humans are social creatures, tribal if you want. You all see your tribe going down the sewer. Your country, perhaps the world. You aren't REALLY certain that Q is going to "save" this world, or that God won't destroy it. You see people dying from clot shots and so forth, crime going through the roof and on and on.
This doesn't necessarily mean depression, but it does foster a "what's the use" attitude: if the world is going to hell in a handbasket, why bother?
How to stop it? Grow something, a tomato, a pepper or whatever. That's a living thing, and it will lift your spirits.
Sorry for those. I believe I've lost much of my family - relatives - but they claimed I was 'broken', so haven't communicated in years. But... you were right about the Patriot Act. The overt function was spying on Americans, yes; the covert function was No Such Agency as the clearinghouse, the mil having full control over intel, and a solid part of the mil Q. No other agency or whoever had access without permission. That, of course, the deep state overlooked, since they were at the time, overconfident.
Patriot Act was necessary for Q. Also, it was penned long before 9-11, and Kavanaugh had a hand in it. The history considered, it was necessary.
Again, sorry.
Thank you. It has become apparent that most people, including many here, aren't aware of the 13th. The 1825 mil manual includes it in the first chapter as part of the Constitution. I suspect there are very few, if any coincidences.
Yes. BOI was T Roosevelt's initialization of the Bureau Of Investigation, later change to FBI.
Asked when the US will send troops to Ukraine: "We can't." - bidan We're not allowed to." pelosi. When will people understand, if ever, that the 'alliance' between Trump, Xi and Putin exists? Trump IS CiC. Y'all should know that by now. Assuming NATO is trying this crap on their own, they are just saber rattling. Russia would overrun Europe in weeks.
Next, don't make comparisons with WWII Germany/Russia using Operation Barbarossa. The function of Barbarossa wasn't to conquer Russia: it was to deplete Russian military resources so Russia couldn't overrun Europe. That tidbit of info comes directly from declas KGB documents. Look it up. Which means that Adolf was, in fact, aware of the bolshevik plan to dominate all of Europe, and stopped it.
Check the khazars.
They aren't interested in resources, keep that in mind. They are interested in the elimination of whites, primarily.
The US destruction was begun in 1812, with the razing of DC. At that point, the constitution was "burned"; it was replaced with one word changed: "of" became "for" in the preamble. In 1811, the original 13th was ratified, the final being Virginia. The messenger was on his way to DC when the Brits attacked DC and razed it. The 13th was omitted.
As early as 1848, Lincoln became aware of the bolshevik problems in Russia. He then became aware of the Rothschild plan to divide the US. The south was to secede; this would make both north and south vulnerable. The south was to become a 'territory' of France (controlled by Roths), the north ceded to Canada, controlled by Brits. Lincoln stopped that. Consequently, after the assassination, the 1871 act was passed, dissolving the govt of the republic and replacing it with USA Inc. T Roosevelt sealed the deal. The fed was installed, along with the BOI Teddy started, and the ADL and IRS (initial stages).
The Spanish American war was staged to illustrate to the army that its weapons were outmoded: rolling block single shot vs Mauser M95. Army developed the 1903 Springfield, patterned after the M95. Preparatory: the function of WWI was to eliminate as many whites as possible, millions, then turn the tide by introducing Americans into the war in 1917. Also, this drew attention away from the Rockefellers financing the bolshevik revolution.
The other function of WWI was to break up the Austro-Hungarian empire, along with destroying Germany as a military power. The purpose is simple: with those two out of the way, Russia was unmatched. The bolshevik could then, after building a formidable military, cruise over Europe almost unopposed. That was the plan: a communist Europe.
Adolf was almost certainly supported by the remnants of the Astor group. Otherwise, he and his crew of national socialists didn't have the resources: their demands were empty of force. The Astor group I view as the beginning of Q, but that's uncertain. Regardless, Adolf obtained the resources, money, intel, backing of other sorts, enough to gain power. Once that was established, the nat soc movement could rebuild German military power enough to thwart the Stalin plan to overrun Europe. That was accomplished in Operation Barbarossa. This is not speculation: it is supported by KGB records, German records, and actual pictorial evidence. The Russian machine was taken by surprise in 1941: that could not have been done without intel, since the bolsheviks were masters of deceit.
Barbarossa was enough to stop the bolshevik plans.
FDR knew that Germany would be a problem to the bolshevik, and engineered the Pearl attack. This sort of fooled Adolf et al, but no one really understood that the US was capable of the type of mass production. Anyway, the Pearl got us into WWII, with the eye towards destroying Germany. Adolf's mission was accomplished during Barbarossa, and his people were evacuated, including many of my own blood relatives (found out about them in the last decade: we were lied to also).
In short, the bolshevik (Khazar, jew, whatever) aim is world control, with white exterminated.
This might well get me banned. We'll see.
Very refreshing for me to read these comments. Since childhood (long, long ago), I've had questions. More recently, I've discovered interesting things about the German side of my family. We were all told there was only one "Nazi"; some years back, a relative still in Germany (probably gone by now, since he was brainwashed into the jab) started a family page on fake book. Membership required blood relationship. What appeared were dozens of blood relatives living in South America, with both German and Spanish/Portuguese names. The "history" was a lie: those people came to S.A. with Adolf's crew.
As to the other history, one can trace the interference in both the US and Germany (EU), and in Russia, back to 1812. There is a lineage of what "they" planned and accomplished. It is almost mandatory that everyone understand what "they" did, and why. Also, who did it, and the relationships between the power players and the puppeteers.
Good luck. It IS all out there to find.
Yes it is. All you need do is a bit of research on that.