1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't understand why President Trump didn't repeal that as soon as he was elected. I strongly hope he'll do it this time. You can't trust anyone if the law says it's ok for them to lie to you.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hit my breaking point. I'm done with the Olympics. My apologies to the athletes - you are awesome but the system is corrupted beyond fixing.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our doctor recommended Costco brand fish oil. Reason: it's microdistilled.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many states have to admit fraud before it changes the outcome of the election? I'm sure the Trump team is keeping track. Maybe that's how President Trump is reinstated before the November elections??

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

...the only place that Hollyweird is still relevant.

4
summerstormAK 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just bought a big bag of popcorn to pop during the DNC. Kek!

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does seem a lot. Take a break, fren and come back when you're ready to fight again. We'll cover for you until then...

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you related to Kamala? Because that sounded like a word salad.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

OK, give me a 5-minute training on how to "get off Google".

6
summerstormAK 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm expecting it to be a cat fight. I wouldn't put it past them to ditch Kamala.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden can blame his lapses on a cognitive disease. Unfortunately, Kamala doesn't have that luxury. Wake up, folks.

4
summerstormAK 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Focusing on Harris’ record, rather than launching personal attacks, will be an effective strategy for beating her in November, (Luntz) said."

THIS. DJT must lay off the personal attacks - it causes listeners to get defensive, and when they get defensive they don't hear anything about her terrible policies and non-accomplishments.

0
summerstormAK 0 points ago +1 / -1

DJT - focus on her stance on the issues vs. your stand on the issues and quit with the insults. Let the listener judge her for themselves. You hurt yourself when you attack her character or intelligence.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about they each take an hour and talk about their policies and beliefs, and answer (the same) set of questions submitted by hosts or a bipartisan committee. The other person doesn't even have to be there. Then each candidate can respond to their talk, just like the opposing party does after the State of the Union speech.

This approach should encourage each candidate to focus on issues rather than insults. I hope.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Left's plan is to keep her away from questions and interviews as long as possible, try to create a "left wave" of support for her, then rig the election - again.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not if it went through his jaw into his brain. But we don't see any jaw - or brain - damage in the photos.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Strongly disagree, fren. What could be more foundational or critical to the republic than to clearly define what is meant by "natural born citizen", thus determining exactly who is eligible to run for President or VP? In our Founders' eyes, I don't believe she'd be eligible.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is an admission of guilt. Get the men out of women's competitions. I tell ya, I'm losing interest in anything having to do with the Olympics fast.

8
summerstormAK 8 points ago +8 / -0

Reserve a room at Gitmo for this man. He's lying through his teeth.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good. IF they were responsible for 9/11, they should get the death penalty. But if the Deep State was responsible for 9/11, this could be a strategic move to take the focus from the Deep State and put it back on the prisoners. Will they get the death penalty? This is an interesting twist to the movie.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›