Or just in time to build the narrative before the election.
Biden will be replaced, Trump blamed for the vax.
Maybe they'll try to pull a Kennedy from a 'vax victim' or something. That would be a good narrative, very easy to accept from both sides of the public.
You'll see anger and pitchforks.
And these will be directed against Trump and thus by association Trump supporters.
Olive branches are good and all, but 'antivaxers' will literally be blamed for the vax, don't kid yourself.
They have trained people not to bother.
Even if a movie is good, whatever, it's just not worth the effort. Like you wouldn't go to a steakhouse for a chance of a good steak if 90% of the "steaks" they served were actually little pieces of dry pig shit.
The first goal of the war from the NATO side was regime change in Russia.
The second goal, if the first didn't work was to kill as many Ukrainians as possible as this will hurt Russia long-term way more than it will hurt the USA, which it won't at all.
This is a win-win type situation.
The only real losers are the Ukrainians, who are officially the dumbest fucks ever for going along with this scheme. Mass suicide for a pat in the back from uncle Sam
The trick is to realize thay the default of nature, society and the universe in general is brutal and uncaring.
We live behind virtual walls of safety that were created by an unimaginable effort across literally thousands of generations and we kind of take it for granted that a person isn't likely to be torn apart and/or eaten alive on any given day.
Don't take it for granted. Those walls are more fragile than you think and require maintenance or we will revert to the default, which is being eaten alive
A pure democracy doesn't work even in theory.
The point is that in order to get anything done, you absolutely need a very long time horizon to plan things. For this, you need things like governments and laws and taxes to be inherently stable. But a free-for-all pure democracy is the opposite of inherently stable.
If you cannot count on relative stability, you cannot plan and invest in the long-term and if you cannot do that, you 100% fail to compete with those who can.
This is why the US now has a uniparty and clans of hereditary politicians. Whatever the original idea was, the system necessarily tends towards increased stability. And why the system absolutely went nuts when Trump was elected explicitly to make it less stagnant.
So if you want to fix democracy, you need to figure out how to maximize stability while also making sure the stagnant stable system doesn't become a swamp. Good luck with that :)
You don't train a puppy to poop outside by explicitly letting it poop inside everywhere and then drop-kicking into the wall as soon as it poops on your favorite shoes.
"Stupid games" were explicitly allowed and encouraged, 99% of all actions had absolutely no results.
The only time it started to matter is not when they burned down their communities in mostly peaceful protests, but when they protested against those who are not allowed to be criticized. Which is total bullshit. Enforcing rules selectively means that rules don't actually exist.
The value of all assets is fake and gay and has nothing to do with actual physical supply and demand.
Multiple orders of magnitude more of all assets are sold than physically exist on any given market. Or even on Earth, probably.
So the price will remain whatever the planners of the economy want it to be until such time they can no longer keep it capped, and then it all goes boom anyway.