Yeah who snuck that in there? I was on board til that. If that's truly the last step then that's a bit of a black pill. U.N. troops on domestic soil is not a good look unless you're DS
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
How is this not several times in this thread? You're actually listening to the podcast, too, I can tell. Nice.
It's interesting to understand that, while we're proceeding here in steps, that we're also seeing multiple things happen at once within those steps as well.
I suspect the journalists Mike Lindell is calling out, repeatedly, by name are on "The List" of provable foreign actors.
I made a post about this late last night: rewatching the marathon a second time really opened my eyes about just how "organized' this whole apparently chaotic fiasco really is...
That's what's in the manual, yes. Last updated 2015. I also thought, "Why?" but as you know we have proofs that the Q team seems to be doing this by the book.
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
2015 would've been under Hilldawg and Barry. If the DS had oversight of the playbook wouldn't it make sense for them to include that last step? Steal the election, make it so obvious that these powers are invoked, only to end with a U.N. takeover. It's George Soros' wet dream. Hope I'm just reading it wrong.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
Yes, I came to the conclusion or at least the question of whether the symposium was a multi use happening, alert/educate the public how we are at war with China but also use the online symp to trap more hackers as they had military spy planes overhead while it has been running. This was always part of the plan and Mike may have been asked to do this or volunteered himself early in POTUS's presidency.
Wow, that’s Awesome!! Should have been more though. I watched a large portion, I had glitchy, crappy signal and had to go back and forth between Frankspeech, Tru News and OAN to hear what I did.
As I understand it, according to the law of war, being able to argue to the military tribunal that a sincere, concerted, and forceful effort has been made made to satisfy 18.10 is enough to move the military justice clock to the next tick.
I invited him to play elsewhere. Not a bad LARP, tho. Hilarious, cerebral, contemporary, and, in light of this board's mission, the guy is an absolute waste of time. Thanks for the heads up.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the DoD law of war manual is the biggest red herring this movement has come up with. 11.3 and 11.6 are dates:
Or those dates are the biggest red herring this movement has come up with and 11.3 and 11.6 are actually from the DoD law of war manual. Bet you didn't think of that did you?
Well if you had clicked on the posts I linked you would quite clearly see that Q straight up CONFIRMS what I said, but just pulling interpretations out of thin air using those numbers out of context from the posts they appeared in makes much more sense, right?
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. If you aren't able to see how stupid the DoD law of manual schizo nonsense is just from that post alone, then may God have mercy on your soul. I bet you were one of those "Corporation of the United States" idiots who thought Trump was gonna be inaugurated on March 4th, despite there not being a single shred of evidence in a single Q post supporting that theory.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
I think we are still months out from direct action. We are all going to have to take a massive bite of this shit sandwich before we are freed from this tyranny.
This is just what's written in the manual. I would expect that the situation evolves if it's proven that the UN is also aligned with the belligerent party.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
Petition to the clowns at UN "security council". Major assumptions there... What if they are a tool of the enemy? I'm sure they would be happy to send a team in to investigate, could work in union with team to see if we're raaassscist.
Yes. The State (as visualized in the Laws) is people. If, say, a state like Syria, with a dictator there, petitions the UN it wouldn't be viewed with the same force as if there were, say, a Trump with his thousands upon thousands at the rallies.
LOL at petition to the UN Security Council!!
Yeah who snuck that in there? I was on board til that. If that's truly the last step then that's a bit of a black pill. U.N. troops on domestic soil is not a good look unless you're DS
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
I missed the "may" - that makes a big difference
If our formalities don’t even pay lip service to our sovereignty, then we are formally fucked.
Definitely.
It’s there as an option
You lost me at UN
It’s not required. It’s suggested.
Breathe.
More optional than suggested. “Here are options you have in this event”
Breathing
"Protests and demands to the offending party"
Remember when Trump said that China owes us $10 trillion?
DING DING DING we have a winner! ☝️
How is this not several times in this thread? You're actually listening to the podcast, too, I can tell. Nice.
It's interesting to understand that, while we're proceeding here in steps, that we're also seeing multiple things happen at once within those steps as well.
Here is some sauce.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/trump-fauci-covid/2021/06/03/id/1023819/
literally the first thing I thought of when I read that line.
This info came from
Lite version: https://rumble.com/vklmkq-lite-law-of-war-the-storm-series-4-i-11.3-end-of-occupation-explained-mini-.html
Full version: https://rumble.com/vl0aqw--law-of-war-the-storm-series-5-the-essential-proofs-22-chapter-18-34-proofs.html
thanks catsfive
Excellent...now I understand how/why Mike Lyndell fits into all of this.
And according to Q and recent videos related to post with 3 year delta (https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvuDwROv/q-post1839packet-hdq-7309217392h/) it looks those part is our job:
"Publication of the facts, with a view to influencing public opinion"
This could legally cover the whole "Sometimes you can't just tell people, you have to show them" and "You are watching a movie".
I suspect the journalists Mike Lindell is calling out, repeatedly, by name are on "The List" of provable foreign actors.
I made a post about this late last night: rewatching the marathon a second time really opened my eyes about just how "organized' this whole apparently chaotic fiasco really is...
We are watching a movie.
Just like POTUS' video on Jan. 6 ordering the crowd to disperse, per the Insurrection Act, I'd say.
He's also mentioned suing Chyna for damages.
Petition to the UN security council?
That's what's in the manual, yes. Last updated 2015. I also thought, "Why?" but as you know we have proofs that the Q team seems to be doing this by the book.
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
They are situational, yes.
2015 would've been under Hilldawg and Barry. If the DS had oversight of the playbook wouldn't it make sense for them to include that last step? Steal the election, make it so obvious that these powers are invoked, only to end with a U.N. takeover. It's George Soros' wet dream. Hope I'm just reading it wrong.
The law of war is not politicized in that way. It's international.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
Lol! This would be my petition I’d send to the UN security council, two words only: Fuuuuuck Yooou!
In the past when I called this up, the background cover color was blue.
MANUAL FOR COURTS MARTIAL
.................UNITED STATES
............................. 2016
It is now RED
https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/MCM2016.pdf?ver=2016-12-08-181411-957
A Sip of HOPIUM u/#Covfefe
Sweet and Spicy Hopium u/#Demolitionman
licking fingers aggressively oh yes my sweet precious hopium
Yes, I came to the conclusion or at least the question of whether the symposium was a multi use happening, alert/educate the public how we are at war with China but also use the online symp to trap more hackers as they had military spy planes overhead while it has been running. This was always part of the plan and Mike may have been asked to do this or volunteered himself early in POTUS's presidency.
Any idea how many viewers hVe been watching?
I've heard 40 million.
I believe Mike Lindell said 10 million have tuned in
Wow, that’s Awesome!! Should have been more though. I watched a large portion, I had glitchy, crappy signal and had to go back and forth between Frankspeech, Tru News and OAN to hear what I did.
Too bad none of the normies know about this Symposium or the election fraud.
Its your job to share. GET ON IT PATRIOT.
I'm a conspiracy theorist. But I still drop my smaller red nukes when time and opportunity presents.
You're a spoiler theorist!
As I understand it, according to the law of war, being able to argue to the military tribunal that a sincere, concerted, and forceful effort has been made made to satisfy 18.10 is enough to move the military justice clock to the next tick.
Good.
/u/#ridetofreedom
It’s there…
https://tjaglcspublic.army.mil/documents/27431/61281/DoD+Law+of+War+Manual+-+June+2015+Updated+Dec+2016/5a02f6f8-eff3-4e79-a46f-9cd7aac74a95
Page 1095
Oooohhh!! Let's go, boys!
Zomg I'm in that exact situation
We know people are being killed and injured by the gene therapy they dishonestly call a vaccine.
How many do we accept before it becomes the fault of those Patriots who have it all and are in control and are still waiting on what we don't know?
Isn't this a problem? How long do we just wave our hands at it, dismiss it, make excuses and call people shills for bringing it up?
I'm not ok with it. Are you? Don't give me the "it's war bs." If it's a war we couod kill them back, but we can't.
As far as I'm concerned, the good guys are on track to being chased down the street, too. Why do they get a pass?
Hi Catsfive, I found a shill called Qstrategy. It's a bad one. How does one recommend an account for deportation?
I apologize for posting it here but for some reason I can't seem to message. Help is appreciated.
I invited him to play elsewhere. Not a bad LARP, tho. Hilarious, cerebral, contemporary, and, in light of this board's mission, the guy is an absolute waste of time. Thanks for the heads up.
Thanks. He made up stuff that looked real at first glance, but when I researched it was a total fake.
You press the deport button. Thx
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the DoD law of war manual is the biggest red herring this movement has come up with. 11.3 and 11.6 are dates:
https://qanon.pub/?#1517
https://qanon.pub/?#1518
https://qanon.pub/?#921
So is 11.11:
https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#2396
https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#2288
https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#1357
Now some idiot is gonna reply with "double meanings exist" as if that is a logical proof.
Or those dates are the biggest red herring this movement has come up with and 11.3 and 11.6 are actually from the DoD law of war manual. Bet you didn't think of that did you?
Well if you had clicked on the posts I linked you would quite clearly see that Q straight up CONFIRMS what I said, but just pulling interpretations out of thin air using those numbers out of context from the posts they appeared in makes much more sense, right?
Or you're just not very bright and those posts went over your head. It's ok, you wouldn't be the first!
I'll try and help you out one more time:
https://qanon.pub/?#1518
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. If you aren't able to see how stupid the DoD law of manual schizo nonsense is just from that post alone, then may God have mercy on your soul. I bet you were one of those "Corporation of the United States" idiots who thought Trump was gonna be inaugurated on March 4th, despite there not being a single shred of evidence in a single Q post supporting that theory.
What's 11.11.18?
https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#3579
An IP address. There's another post where Q links to a twitter user who figured it out but I can't find it right now.
Have you watched the Majic videos?
Link me one, I could use a good laugh.
I don't think petitioning the UN security council will yield the type of results we'd like to see ...
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
I think we are still months out from direct action. We are all going to have to take a massive bite of this shit sandwich before we are freed from this tyranny.
I think you're correct. Sadly. It's a bad thing. People are being murdered in the mean time.
This is just what's written in the manual. I would expect that the situation evolves if it's proven that the UN is also aligned with the belligerent party.
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
By the book. This is the book.
Stick to finding out what enemy is doing, and quit trying to figure out what our forces are doing so you can tell the enemy.
Petition the UN? Fk them. This isn't their fight and they're actually part of the problem.
uh derp alert
final step is petition to the UN security council
It's more about satisfying the bullet points process laid out in the Law of War. Even if the UN rejects our demands, it is not legally permissible to immediacy invoke military tribunals without having first having satisfied these steps.
This said, that's just my read on that one step. I'm not sure what the Q team plans to do with it, but if they petition, the above is why I think that could happen.
Petition to the clowns at UN "security council". Major assumptions there... What if they are a tool of the enemy? I'm sure they would be happy to send a team in to investigate, could work in union with team to see if we're raaassscist.
It's a milestone, simply a line to cross on the way to military law. The outcome of such an appeal is irrelevant. Nothing can stop what is coming.
Sadly the U.N. Security Council is part of the cabal. This has to happen at home!
Yes. The State (as visualized in the Laws) is people. If, say, a state like Syria, with a dictator there, petitions the UN it wouldn't be viewed with the same force as if there were, say, a Trump with his thousands upon thousands at the rallies.
I'm sure the U.N. Security Council will save us.
Not too sure about the last point. What the hell will the UN do, they’re in on it.