He will likely get "life" with opportunity for parole due to being under 18 at the time. In Texas, that means he might be out in 17 years( (50 / 1.5) / 2 ), when he is in his mid 30s. But he would need to be a model prisoner for that and I doubt he will be.
Would be happy to be wrong, but the above was at least true in the 2000s. They have added life without parole since then, but as stated above, treaties probably make him ineligible.
our training
What cops always say when they kill someone.
Bet the UK definition of murder or aiding/abetting/accessory doesn't mention training either, yet it would probably work here and will probably work there.
To me, it just means the crime had forethought.
I would limit that to the emails between him and others, they are the only thing that is verifiable due to their cryptographic signatures.
The rest are just whatever some fed said or whatever some random single witness said.
Though everything else, and especially the flight logs need a serious looking into.
Greed... fear...
If I went to DC, I would have to haul in canned goods, because I would be afraid that if I ate any food there, that the fear of it being tampered with by the parasitic locals would make me compromise my positions.
Open source would be including the training data.
None of them do that, not our companies, like Meta, or theirs. Usually not even amateurs.
Why? Among other things, that would reveal that they violated copyrights to the point of crossing the federal criminal threshold.
Every major AI pretraining company does it and you can tell because when you jailbreak a model you can get it to recite copyrighted books verbatim.
The government turns a blind eye because they are afraid of a gap like the paranoid generals in Dr. Strangelove.
There is a similar weird looking bust of Winston Churchill in the Bush Library.
Maybe the same, but the base doesn't quite match. Could be the same artist.
East Germany during the cold war did not seem 'liberated'. The Soviets literally cut off American food shipments, forcing an airlift to break their siege.
Still, if he doesn't think the Soviets are liberators, he is a cuck just for not saying plainly one way or the other when asked.
what are you seeing that would signal
so I would expect huge changes because of the election.
There was a missing not from my original comment, a typo. Also, I was referring to the last election, not the upcoming one.
so I would not expect huge changes because of the election.
Republicans have the Senate, conservatives and MAGA apparently(considering they have not passed any conservative policy and have been blocking most of Trump's appointments) does not. We only have the Oval Office and Trump is concerning himself with foreign policy matters.
As far as elections go, we need to oust enough of the swampy Republicans in primaries to put fear into them, and probably get state legislatures to pass anti-corruption legislation at the state level.
If we Democrats gain the house, our best bet long term is if Trump vetoes nearly every funding bill to remove the incentive for corruption, but that will hurt short term, and so Trump probably won't do it.
but we've been in an economic depression since 2009.
2018-2019 Was genuinely pretty good. Note that all of the traitors in congress were calling it a severe labor shortage, which it wasn't, it was just normalcy for once in 17 years. But it was brief.
There are emails between him and a few of the Rothschilds. In the ones I have read, they seem like inbred idiots.
Though with old money there is power, even without competency. Someone working for them runs the show.
Trump can pardon federal charges, like criminal contempt, can't block disbarment and such.
The procedure for how to deal with such pardoning power being abused is impeachment by the House, followed by conviction by the Senate, judges have no say.
Fair.