Poor genocidal Fabian traitors.
Though, having lived in a build of around that height, the top floors are a lot more brutal when the AC is out, heat rises. Real question is, who the hell still organizes a tower sorted bottom to top, lowest rank to highest? I mean it is normal for the big boss to be on the penthouse, but not having it organized by department would be freaking weird.
Then law enforcement needs to actually enforce people not displaying a plate. I see cars without them or with a tattered year expired temporary every day. As is, any criminal with an IQ above 85 will just take theirs off or steal one. All you catch are people so stupid they would have been caught anyway or people who had no intention of committing a crime for random nonsense.
Besides the fact that the oathbreaking creeps who enforced the Wuhan lockdowns don't need any more tools.
I've heard about it from a soldier in 2010 or so. Not on base though. Their CO told them not to be ethnocentric.
Never heard anything like that from Iraq vets though, just Afghanistan. I don't even think it is a secret in Afghanistan. This is well documented in some of the tribes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
Maybe your husband wasn't stationed near them.
Is it really all that hard to believe when the 'refugees' we brought over afterward kept getting caught raping people before they even left the airport?
They only thing that ever surfaced was taking femdom pictures of them men being held on leashes for blackmail.
Sorry, don't think US troops were mass sodomizing children for interrogation without any evidence of that.
US Nuclear inspectors would be allowed into the country
Don't send our people in there without local cover, the Iranian government has a habit of not respecting diplomatic immunity. Normally don't care for the UN, but they are good enough for me on this.
Huh, a guy didn't like someone who put him in prison. I'm shocked.
Also
“At the time of his death, Epstein was alone in his cell in spite of clear guidance to the contrary, while the guards assigned to his section of the jail neglected to conduct their rounds for hours. The jail’s security-camera system partially failed, and the video it did record showed an orange blur — the color of an inmate’s uniform — moving toward Epstein’s corridor shortly before his death. After Epstein’s body was found, evidence from his cell was not cataloged carefully, and photographs and objects gathered there seemed difficult to reconcile with aspects of his autopsy report. Two pathologists present at that autopsy had differing interpretations of the injuries to his neck.
“There were so many people with an ostensible stake, one way or another, in Epstein’s death. Was it possible that all of this just happened?”
“yeah, actually it was,”
Yeah, it is possible, much like it is possible a solid gold asteroid touches down in my back yard and makes me set for life.
You can't just ignore the entire reason I entered the thread
I can, and did. I made a tangential reply, it was not intended as an argument as you had apparently taken it.
The second reply was a bit of an argument as you seemed to want to argue. The third contained a statement to indicate that I agreed OP was full of crap on different grounds.
Those are different topics.
Indeed. I am not opposing you in court, a reply on a threaded forum is just that, a reply, in this case an admittedly tangential one, but I though the specific piece I quoted made that clear. If it wasn't clear the original claim wasn't an argument, I apologize.
I do not give a singular shit about OP. Pay attention. Not one singular crap about OP. My comment in reply to him was that his video was only tangentially related to his assertion, and did not contemplate it further on those grounds as I assumed him a grifting tweeter and do not defend him in any way.
I was a making standalone prediction that Trump would drop off the list if you based it on percentage, I did not make an assertion that he would, but a prediction, as I think my original verbage well implies. I made this in response to a piece(the quoted piece) of your comment and your comment alone, and not even the whole thing. I made the second claim, with data, as a second refutation that Trump's investing strategy is backed by significant insider trading, as if it was, he would be insanely terrible at it.
I did not make the original post or goalposts, so I moved nothing. My statement stood alone. Someone's wealth increasing several fold after being in congress for a few years is not the same as Trump going from 4.5 to 6.5 billion(~3% a year) from 2015 to today, when the VOO SP 500 index went from 184 to 681 (~12% a year)over the same time period, he underperformed the market by a heck of a lot.
Neocon propaganda, always was.
Finland is more free than most of Europe though.