Reasons for our US soldier's PTSD was not solely "combat" - it was listening to Afghan "culture" on our own military bases. Our soldiers heard children being RAPED by the very Afghan soldiers we were working with. The EVIL IS ISLAMIC CULTURE.
(media.greatawakening.win)
πβπβππππΈπ ππΈβπ½πΈβπΌ
It isn't just Afghanistan. I saw it in Iraq. In Bahrain, you don't actually "see" this sort of thing. But you hear about it and see men walking around with cross-dressed boys in tow. They look like girls, but if you know what to look for, well... It's kept quiet and undercover in our "allowed" Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, etc.
This was part of their culture long before Islam came about. It was part of Arabian culture, Persian culture, Babylonian culture, most Islamic African nations, etc. This isn't something that will be easily stopped. It's been going on for thousands of years.
Officially, gay sex is outlawed and illegal. But, it's only prosecuted as a way to eliminate political enemies, Islamic apostates, or when it's convenient to the govt as a way of promoting Islamic "superiority" over Western Ideals.
Well then, we can assume that the adult men raping little boys had their own childhood of pain, if they survived it.
I think it's a remnant of ancient hellenic culture tbh. Remember this entire area was basically Alexander the Great's empire and split into the successor kingdoms, which eventually fell but left their cultural mark on the middle east up to this very day.
The Taliban, to their stopped-clock credit, actually took a stab at eliminating it in the 1990s. That is why so many child rapists were quick to turn on them.
Iβve heard of it from people who went to UAE.
Thank you @ u/SuckaFree for your added insight and history knowledge. I had heard of rumors of this looking the other way during Iraq/Afghanistan but, to hear a former Marine post this AND connect it to PTSD from combat just magnifies EVERYTHING. I β€οΈ respect the sacrifices of our military. We owe them so much more here back home. It's rough to think about God's children too.
THE CRIMES OF ABU GRAIB
They put the women in cells next to the husbands. Soldiers undressed the women from the waist up. The soldiers would sit there and sneer telling the men how beautiful their wives boobs were. Then they brought their children in. Undressed them and sodomize them in front of the parents in the cells. This is one of the reasons John Kerry ran and wanted to take out GW Bush for the fact he was a chicken hawk.
There was to be Congressional hearings on these very matters. Congress saw the tapes. A judge ordered all the tapes preserved. They were all destroyed. The only thing that came out from Congress was how difficult it was to be aware of those tapes. They said it wasn't so much the visuals, but the shrieking of pain from the children. They said it was the most horrific thing they had to experience, the sound of it.
We have a problem in our military too, and with voting. 2000 and 2004.
Whatever happened to the crimes of Abu Graib?
Was Kerry any better, or just from a different branch of cabal?
Exactly, all of them are the same and these same monsters are bringing this culture into our west countries. Definitely demons are sick
Or was he accusing military under one control faction of doing what some military under another control faction were doing?
That's what I was getting at. Either way, justice cannot come soon enough.
Amen.
First I'm hearing of children
Bachai boys.
I knew about the goats. This is obviously even worse.
I imagine Goats/donkeys/ animals suffer tremendously, same as the children. God has to bring a wrath to these criminals once and for all. This is inhumane.
That is probably because it is probably made up.
The press was doing everything they could to damage Bush at the time, you would have heard about it.
Your naivete turns my stomach.
Years ago. YEARS AGO we heard at home what our soldiers were witnessing in Afghanistan and elsewhere. And that they were forbidden to interfere to help the children and families. Disgusting levels of shame and guilt because they followed those orders. So we have generations of people crippled in their minds because of what they were told to ignore. May the commanding officers fry in burning stinking hell. I asked many times over the years for someone to explain why there were photos of our soldiers WITH BABIES STUFFED IN THEIR CARGO PANT POCKETS and what was the talk about our military bases being used as "lily pads" during the trafficking of children.
A person is either on the side of demons being left to do as they please, or of torture of innocents to be stopped. Pick a side.
He isn't saying they witnessed it (like the OP) he is saying they did it at Abu Ghraib.
They only thing that ever surfaced was taking femdom pictures of them men being held on leashes for blackmail.
Sorry, don't think US troops were mass sodomizing children for interrogation without any evidence of that.
Oh. Dear Lord, our children... π’
This is really really awful, youβve been warned. https://thewashingtonstandard.com/inspector-general-us-troops-may-criminally-punished-stopping-afghan-soldiers-raping-children/
I think I found one part that isn't awful
Thatβs probably the only part - but then Martland was disciplined for defending the boy. That makes it worse, to attack the defender.
No matter the cost, adults should always protect defenseless children.
This^. No order would contain me from acting against this evil. It went on because of weak men. Too many complied with unlawful orders. Pedofiles should never be afforded the luxury of the title ally. Period. Guess my career wouldnβt have lasted long in that environment but they can only ignore so much rebellion before policy changes.
Trial run down there before they did the same in Europe.
How much of this Muslim "rape culture" has been covered up within our Arabic immigrants living in our communities? . . .by our own school teachers and law enforcement responding to whispers of DV?
I support a Russian invasion of Afghanistan.
And they were told by commanders they couldn't do anything, to ignore it, because it was part of their culture. So our military is guilty as well, for instructing soldiers to just 'ignore it.' As if that were possible.
It's well known that 'boys are for fun and girls are for reproduction.' Many arabs have stated that is part and parcel of the culture. Sickening.
I suppose goats are for fun also.
these same soldiers protected and supplied the Afghan men with children
it's even darker than you think
π³
sorry
Islamophobia means "irrational fear". There is no single word available to indicate the opposite of phobia. The only word is fear, which is a legitimate survival tool.
See: https://yandex.com/search/touch/?text=Word+for+rational+fear&lr=103176
This is the perfect example of how words matter. We need to fear Islam and every ounce of evidence tells us it's rational. Psychology gave us phobias but no opposite descriptive one word reply. Sanity, rational are not hammer words.
Well said @ u/Notimportant81 "We need to fear Islam and every ounce of evidence tells us it's rational."
This is why the entire world needs to reclassify Islam. It is not religion, and should in no way be a protected group. It's nauseatingly clear at this point to anyone paying even a little attention that "wolf in sheep's clothing" fits like a dirty glove.
π― agree @ u/bloggerchick
No! My husband was deployed 2x, he had sleep issues for about 2 months when he first came home, then none. My husband is a very GOOD man, if this was happening he would have done something about it. He also would have heard about it by other soldiers.. No I don't believe this...
I do believe it. Thatβs why we have a rape gang in England who has raped more than 250,000 girls women and boys, and I have seen videos of women beaten and covering their faces with those hijabs they use . I believe the Muslims men created those hijabs to avoid being judged by the world of atrocities doing to women there.
I'm not saying I don't believe in the raping part, I do, but the USA Military soldiers part, No...
Articles from 2015 and 2017.
Soldier punished for interfering in child assault by Afghan
U.S. soldier punished for stopping child rape by Afghan
Inspector General: US Troops May Be Criminally Punished For Stopping Afghan Soldiers From Raping Children
thanks @ u/pepperonishoes for all your sourcing. This is rough subject matter, but I thought it's important to see with all the very dark going on in the UK currently.
Very welcome. As fast as news travels and depending how close people were watching, 2015 and such was a long time ago.
Highly plausible.
I've heard about it from a soldier in 2010 or so. Not on base though. Their CO told them not to be ethnocentric.
Never heard anything like that from Iraq vets though, just Afghanistan. I don't even think it is a secret in Afghanistan. This is well documented in some of the tribes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
Maybe your husband wasn't stationed near them.
Is it really all that hard to believe when the 'refugees' we brought over afterward kept getting caught raping people before they even left the airport?
I don't think anyone is saying that your man was complicit in any way. The situation was actually well documented, so if he never witnessed or heard the screams, I would say that he dodged a bullet. He may also be protecting his woman from having to deal with a miserable truth about the sickness in this world...
Because of this kind of crap more troops die from suicide than battle.
@ u/DarQ2light this is what I did not realize. PTSD reasons I thought were fighting enemy soldiers in combat, turns out were far deeper/darker. I hurt so badly for our service members who had to experience this utter evil.
We were never supposed to even be in that country or interacting with these savages...
General Clark pretending to play dumb...
Trump calls them "TV generals" which helped open my eyes
There is another cause for PTSD that the military is trying to hide. It appears the malaria medicine they used caused brain damage that makes people more vulnerable to PTSD: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2016/08/11/malaria-drug-causes-brain-damage-that-mimics-ptsd-case-study/
I didn't know that - but I have read our soldiers and sailors are guinea pigs for science and medical experiments. The DoD has bloody hands.
I thought they used hydroxychloroquine for malaria, same as can be used for covid along with ivermectin.
As u/RaggedyBritches pointed out, our soldiers are frequently used as guinea pigs to test new drugs.
Islam is absolutely incompatible with US law and culture. In fact only a small minority of countries worldwide do not endorse or believe in sex with children. For proof just look at the UN membership that either engages or tolerates vs those countries that do not. In fact the UN website at one time had a page dedicated to the sexual rights of the child that they stated begin at age six months. That being said it is not just Islam. It is happening right now in every community in America. And the sound of screaming children you don't get over. It was so prevalent here in my neighborhood that you could watch the customers arrive and within 10m or so the leafblower would come out and you could time the sessions to 15 or 30 or 45 or 60 minutes to the second. Ever seen somebody push a mower back and forth between houses in the mud for 15 minutes, exactly, multiple times a day that coincided with arriving and departing traffic? We have. They call that noise cover. And the johns weren't just Pakis they were white and black and mexican all operating with impunity in our neighborhood under the kenyan. We are at war. Good vs evil. Evil wins when good men do nothing. They are not afraid of me but you can pray at them and many will flee. Start there. Best offense and defense. As for the neighbors they no longer flaunt the patterns of behavior. POTUS and the military have them spooked. And I can tell ya God aint real happy either.
I knew from meeting some of my penpals during the war that this was an ongoing issue with our troops. I am sorry you guys were put in that position. I like the rest of you want a reckoning. There will be. IMO we are gonna know what that looks like one way or the other. Remember God wins.
β¦ β¦ π£
Sick. Just sick
This was brought up during early Afghanistan ops in 2002.
Islam is Sodom and Gomorrah on a global scale
The military is the only way, huh.
Those poor little kids
Everyone involved should be tried and when found guilty should be swiftly hung until dead. Everyone. Including the high ranking officials who knew it was happening and allowed it/tolerated it. Evil is evil. Zero tolerance.
Always on Thursdays, the day after is their holy day when all sins are forgiven.
And folks cannot blame the witnesses whether civilian or military. The Bible in Ephesians says that having done all, to stand. Well here we are. We stand. When the cops and judges were so corrupt you had to call the military. And when parts of the military were so corrupt it took somebody like POTUS AND THE WHITE HATS to stand against them. Our world didn't get this way by accident and it didn't happen overnight but for the first time in 250 YEARS there are enough standing together to say NO. And stop it. And that my frens is us, right now.
Amen @ u/Hillbilly1 I will stand.
Amen Raggedy.
Oh God.
π
The Omanis I worked with in the Air Force used to have a saying: "Women are for making babies, but boys are for pleasure."
So yeah, they're all animals to me.
Thank you for your brave service. π―
This behavior needs to be treated as what it is: a foreign atrocity our own government chose to ignore on our own bases.
The reason for our soldiers' PTSD was not solely combat. It was lying in their bunks listening to children being raped by the very Afghan commanders we were propping up, bacha bazi, "boy play." This is documented, not rumor. The New York Times reported it in 2015. Green Beret SFC Charles Martland was pushed out of the Army for body-slamming an Afghan commander who kept a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave. The policy was to look away so we wouldn't offend our "allies." That is the evil here, and it was enabled by men following orders who should have refused.
Now to the threat at home, and I'm going to be precise, because precision is what makes this undeniable.
There is an organized political-Islamist movement operating inside the United States that openly seeks to subordinate constitutional law to Sharia. Not a rumor, not an edited clip, named and on the record:
In Texas, imam Yasir Qadhi and the East Plano Islamic Center pushed a 402-acre enclave project ("EPIC City") that the state moved to block in 2025.
On February 10, 2026, a House Judiciary subcommittee held a hearing titled "Sharia-Free America: Why Political Islam & Sharia Law Are Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution."
On November 19, 2025, Rep. Keith Self laid the whole conflict out on the House floor: the Constitution begins with "We the People"; Sharia begins with "Allah has said." They cannot both be supreme. The enemy is not a faith, it's an ideology of conquest, any ideology, of any creed, that aims to replace American self-government with religious rule.
Our Constitution is the Supreme Law of this land. There is room for one. Any code, Sharia or otherwise, that claims authority over it is in open opposition to the Republic, and any movement working to install it is working to overthrow us. So the standard for office is simple and it applies to everyone: your allegiance must be to the Constitution, not to a foreign power, not to a former country, not to any code that aims to supplant it. Break that oath and you are unfit, period. Anyone who gained citizenship or office through deception about that allegiance should face denaturalization or removal, through due process, by the law, the way free men do it. And any court operating outside the Constitution is rogue and illegal.
Fight this in the courts and in the public square. Pull back the veil. Expose the agenda in the daylight, because daylight is where it dies.
This is also exactly why the founders enshrined the militia. The militia is not a fringe idea, it is in the Constitution. The founders understood the militia as the armed body of the people themselves, standing ready against tyranny, against invasion, and against any threat to the Republic when the ordinary machinery of government fails or refuses to act. That responsibility never expired. It is still ours.
I believe we have a spiritual, moral, and personal duty to protect ourselves, our families, our property, and our communities. Everyone should be armed and genuinely trained on the weapons they own. Every household should have an emergency plan and should rehearse it until each person knows their role cold in a SHTF situation. If you have good and dependable neighbors, take it to the next level and coordinate defensive actions across a wider area of responsibility.
That's the heart of it, well-regulated, in the founders' sense of the word: trained, organized, disciplined, and answerable to the law. Form local community militias. Build regional militia networks state by state. Train together regularly. Stand ready to protect your communities from tyranny, from invasion, and from disaster. The storms that just tore through the Southeast made the case plainly: when catastrophe hits, an organized, prepared citizenry is often the only help that comes.
Because when seconds count, the government is minutes away. In a real crisis it's either absent or it's dictatorial. We need to relearn what it means to be neighbors, to build communities of people who actually have each other's backs.
This is lawful, it's wise, and it's the founders' own design. It means we no longer have to rely on a government that won't show up. We can help ourselves and each other.
Rarely in our history, not since the early days of the Revolution and the War of 1812, has the threat felt this close to home. We answer it the way free men always have: clear-eyed, prepared, lawful, and unafraid.
In the end, the choices you make are the ones you answer for, not to the state, not to any man, but to your Creator, who judges by His law. Choose well.
There's also a genetic component but yall ain't ready for that conversation
I am beyond ready for scientific genetic proof of lower IQ or emotional scale behaviors. Crime waves and clusters result from poor educational results. Successful education, too, not just participants 'passing' grades. DEI in hiring and college degrees have created dystopian cultures.
Aa a scientist you have to ask yourself, is it worth losing your job and funding over? The PC culture over the last 55 years has been a major deterrent. We will hopefully see more honest studies in the future, but this truth absolutely needs space to breathe
This is what PTSD really was.
They didnt call it man love thursday for nothing.
Just on Thursdays, as I recall. Move along soldier. Nothing to see here.
I am sorry, but kind of idiocy is that? "The good guys"? When you are a soldier, you are not a person, you are property. A slave of the state. And the state is nothing but a necessary evil. (Try and do as you like and see how it goes. Refuse to cooperate with those rapists and see how your own "leadership" (the foremen) will treat you.)
I am tired of reading these childish notions
Sure, this post is about Islam evils. Nothing new there either.
Bullshit. Utter bullshit. I'm a former U.S. Soldier who served in combat in Muslim countries, and at no time did I ever feel like a piece of government property. Yes, "property of the state" is a running joke in the military, but a joke is all it is. We were not slaves.
Here's the thing about life: trials and tribulations come for all of us. And no matter your occupation or "station," every one of us keeps the ability to choose. Given an unlawful order, you can obey or refuse. It's that simple. A slave doesn't get that choice. A free man does, and soldiers can exercise it.
Some refused unlawful orders outright; others simply chose conscience over compliance. But every one of them chose:
SPC Michael New β refused to serve under UN command and wear UN insignia.
1st Lt. Ehren Watada - refused to deploy to a war he judged unlawful.
Silas Soule and Lt. Joseph Cramer - refused to fire on the village at Sand Creek, then testified against the man who ordered it.
Capt. Nathan Smith - took the legality of the war to court rather than stay silent.
Desmond Doss - served his country on his own terms, no weapon, and earned the Medal of Honor doing it. The institution bent to him.
Lt. Stanislav Petrov - and yes, a Soviet, which is the whole point. If a man inside the most literal "slave of the state" machine could exercise his own judgment and refuse to start a nuclear war, then "soldier = property" is dead on arrival. Agency isn't issued by a flag.
The inverse? The men who murdered Jews in Nazi Germany and called it duty. Every atrocity in history has the same alibi: I was just following orders. That's the philosophy you're actually defending when you call a soldier property. Property obeys. A man answers for what he does.
And make no mistake, doing the right thing usually costs you. New was court-martialed. Watada faced years in prison. Soule was shot dead in the street for testifying. That's exactly why so few choose it when the stakes are high, and fewer still when the stakes are personal. But that price is the proof. Property has no choice to make. A free man sees the cost, weighs it, and chooses anyway. That's the difference, and it's the whole difference.
And in the end, the choices you make are the ones you answer for, not to the state, not to your commander, but to your Creator. He judges by His law, not man's. "I was only following orders" is no defense at that bar either. Which is exactly why a man is never property. The thing in you that will stand before Him and answer, that was never the state's to own.
Please. Do not be so naive. How many people got dismissed because of the Jab? Or merely forced into it and be done with it. To just pick a random event off my head. In fact, you generally do not have bodily autonomy. When Uncle Sam wants to inject you with something, they just tell you to go to the infirmary and get it done. You have no say on the matter.
You list the exceptions, not the rule. Read the contract. specially when it comes to friendly fire how you are treated as property.
Do you know why you drill in the army? Because you are to be obedient and disciplined. Do as your are told. Do not think. You are literally trained to hear an order and execute it. No thought should ever get in they way of your obedience. And it is ingrained into your brain thru literally a method of brain washing.
Just look at the world right now. How the state dogs oppress their own people without a second thought.
"I was following orders" is the single largest reason why soldiers do evil free of all thoughts regarding their actions. In fact the large majority of humans behave just like that.
Because they cannot help themselves but to follow the "perceived authority". And the army is that x100 because the authority is rank based, extremely clear and to defy it brings VERY bad consequences.
You're right about two things. Training is hard, and refusing an order carries a real cost, sometimes a ruinous one. I never claimed it was free. I said the opposite. New was court-martialed. Watada faced prison. Soule was shot dead in the street. The price is exactly the point.
But you've got the purpose of drilling backwards, and this is the heart of it. You think Soldiers drill to kill thought, to make a man obey without a second's hesitation. That is incorrect. Soldiers drill so a man can function when every nerve in his body is screaming at him to freeze, panic, or run. Under fire, under stress, in the grip of fear, the thinking mind can lock up. Drill puts the mechanics into muscle memory so that loading, clearing a malfunction, moving, communicating, and protecting the man beside you happen cleanly and precisely despite the chaos. The point is to free the mind, not erase it. You make the hands automatic so the man on top of them is still there to judge. A trained soldier is not a man with his conscience removed. He is a man whose hands won't betray him while his conscience does its work. That's why your whole frame collapses. You keep pointing at obedience and consequences as if they prove ownership. They prove the opposite.
An exception proves the thing is possible. A man who pays a terrible price to refuse is demonstrating the choice was his to make. Property has no price to weigh because property has no choice. The cost you keep pointing to is not evidence of ownership. It is evidence of agency. Only a free man stands at that fork with something to lose by taking the hard road.
Now the medical orders, since you think that's your strongest ground. I'll meet you there too, because I stood in that line myself in the Gulf War in 1991. I was one of the soldiers taking the pyridostigmine bromide pills and receiving the shots we were told could keep us alive against a chemical or biological attack. I was not sitting safely decades later reading reports and judging people with hindsight. I was there. I was young. I was deployed. The threat was real. Iraq had used chemical weapons before, and we believed we might face them.
Here's what most people don't know. In December 1990, before Desert Storm, the FDA granted DoD an unprecedented waiver of the informed consent requirement for certain investigational military medical products. Interim Rule, 55 FR 52814. The RAND Corporation later documented the issue. Read why the waiver was sought: consent from hundreds of thousands of soldiers would have been required, and many might have declined. So they removed the requirement to ask. You do not waive a consent that does not exist. The very act of removing informed consent acknowledges there was something there to remove. The system had to override our agency precisely because we had it. That is the opposite of property. You do not create a federal rule to override the wishes of a rifle, a truck, or a piece of equipment. And the betrayal in it actually proves my argument, not yours. If I were just property, no one owed me honesty. You don't deceive a tool. You don't violate the trust of a machine. The fact that leaders had a duty to give us the full picture, and failed in that duty, only makes sense if we were human beings with moral agency who were owed the truth. Accountability requires personhood.
Last point. You say "I was following orders" is why soldiers do evil. Yes. It has been the excuse behind countless atrocities throughout history. But think about what that actually means.
If a soldier truly were property, "I was following orders" would be a complete defense. It would end the discussion. It doesn't. Nuremberg established the principle that following orders alone does not erase personal responsibility. The man inside the uniform remains accountable because the man inside the uniform was never owned.
A trained man can still think. A pressured man can still choose. The fact that the choice may cost him everything is not the refutation of his freedom. It is the proof of it. In the end, every man answers for his choices. Not to the state. Not to his commander. To his Creator, who judges by His law, and before whom "I was only following orders" has never been a defense.
You fail to consider that in hindsight we can judge as we see fit. But the fact remains. They acted as they did precisely because they were following order. Regardless of our judgement and even their own. They did not stop their actions. They just did as they were told. Not a single thought of possible consequences for their actions actually prevented them from following orders. Some may even have felt disgusted with themselves. As they were shoving Jews into the oven non the less. And those who refused were likely shot on the spot and forgotten by history.
But I suspect most did it in a manner no different than how they act when told to put a bunch of boxes into storage. That's how most soldiers act worldwide, and historically as well. Just, plain, callous disregard.
It really is a matter of: "Should had, could had. Didn't". And the "Didn't" part is what I am talking about.
My friend. You seem to be a thinker. As such, you have thinker bias. You believe most people to be like you. (After all, you can clearly think. It can't possibly be that hard for others to do the same.)
Unfortunately, studies (here in the USA) have already demonstrated that most people will blindly follow perceived authority. And when it comes to actual authority, it is even worse still.
(Hell, you live thru COVID. If you were not appalled at how society was acting around you, then I don't know what to tell you.)
I believe you and I are talking about two fundamentally distinct matters. You are explaining the fact that "some" individuals can in fact resist programing. They remain able to act according to their own moral framework regardless of what the authorities tell them to do. This is a fact the very social engineering experiments I am basing my argument on have already demonstrated.
What I am bringing to attention is the larger result of the same experiments. Which is the fact that most people are barely sapient drones who will thoughtlessly follow the directions of the perceived authorities. And it is much worse for soldiers since the authority at play is very much real. And are actually indoctrinated to be obedient under the guise of "discipline".
It is all semantics. "Disciplined" sounds better than "subservient" But their differences are immaterial. One acts like a tough guy while the other acts like a worm. But, in the end; both are obedient and will do as you tell them too. The only actual difference is the tone at which they serve the authority at.
This is actually working as intended. Since the tough guy feels proud of himself, you can ask more of him. And he will serve you all too well. Proudly even. He is a bit of a fool. A tool, if you will.
(Note that I am not trying trying to play down the sacrifices the soldiers have done for their people. The sacrifice is all too real and praise worthy. But more than one thing can be true at the same time.)
I am aware I sound Machiavellian. But this is just the observable truth. And if you are honest with yourself and put your feelings asides, you will be able to see it as clear as daylight.
That is how Nazi Germany, The Soviet Union, and just about every single genocidal madness has taken place in human history. God knows human history is absolutely plagued by this very problem.
You should look up "The chain of obedience" it explains my point far better than me. I also recommend you read a few studies about authority and its psychology. As the large majority are bound by it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcLNoxiPBk
A trained soldier can indeed think (if he is was a thinker to begin with, and has been able to resist his training adequately). But historically and psychologically, the main purpose of drilling is to make sure soldiers follow order without thinking about it. That is why so many drill are still "meaningless" trash like formation and marching. And the emphasis on "discipline" is actually all for the purpose of making you thought free when following orders. (I, greatly enjoy the cynicism of Hell Divers. It is so on the nose)
Many psychological tools have been mastered for this sake. One of the most common in the USA army is the notion of we being "the good guys".
That is why the phenomenon of intrepid and ingenious individuals who accomplished great things in battle are often shun by superiors and quickly gotten rid of in times of peace because their trait of been thinkers puts them at odds with the nature of armed forces. (unless they manage to cunningly make their way up the ranks)
Sure, the USA is far better than other nations and potential hegemons. But we are not "the good guys". The fact that in this very thread it was outlined that USA allied itself with child rapists to fight our enemy child rapists demonstrates the fact that the USA does not care about morals. The USA cares about national interest (as it is necessary to actually run a successful nation)
Just stop and think about it. How many people took the Jab? The soldiers are people, just like everyone else.
If you go into a Burger King and demand they sell you a Big Mac they will laugh at you. Same with this nonsense.
If I heard that in my neighborhood I would find out what I am made out of. To defeat a Christian Nation you have to use children as the way to defeat the nation. Jesus says anyone who harms one of His children will suffer, so they harm children to see what we are made out of.
essentially if we knowingly see them doing such stuff and taunting it in front of us they are turning us into a Judas. It really is that simple.
In the past I would go into a Burger King and demand them sell me a Big Mac and I would get stared at...
another way to put this is... if there was a forest fire would you run into the fire and not survive if no one else is going too? These Islams know the Christian Bible better than a Christian and so does Lucifer.
Once they do their deed they see a Christian is doing nothing.. therefore that is not a Christian. it is a Judas to them and you are now their slave.
I first hand do not know what is going on, but if USA is at a foreign place there is such things that are Biblical to the regard of it being their home and I still do not know how I would react to seeing such a thing nor do I know how the government would justify knowing this is happening and allowing the soldiers to see and witness it. To me it is a larger scale to prove that the USA is their bitch and slave.
The percentage of the people who will willingly go into the forest fire to attempt to do something will be easy prey, but God sees this and so does Jesus. Those very, very few will be the greatest and are the greatest. Yet Islam knows this and that is the trap.
We should have ZERO accountability to Islam and its Sharia Law which is a trap to snare Christians into being Judas and death...
Correct. Everyone who stood by and did not executed those dogs is just like Peter when he was asked if he was a disciple and denied it.