2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

good point.

the amount of mrna need to blanket an area to get adequate inoculation would be likely pretty high. even chemical weapons have problems being effective in enclosed spaces, nevermind the open air.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

an interesting idea, but even then you'd have to produce a metric fuckton of whatever you wanted to release into air, and as another commenter pointed out, taking away the part that makes most people avoid shots in the first place would be simpler, cheaper, and more effective.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the main point U/BakasEverywhere is trying to make about feasibility still stands, though. The amount of mRNA you'd have to produce to be effective would be astronomical. my understanding is even simply spraying a chemical agent isn't as deadly as it's often made out to be (sounds terrifying of course), because whatever agent is used often has trouble achieving a lethal level in the air quick enough and long enough to kill more than a handful of people.

If they can achieve the same result by simply making vaccines/mRNA injections less scary, why bother?

4
yeldarb1983 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not trying to say this isn't happening, I'm just trying to keep both feet planted firmly on the ground is all.

Would the government do it? In a new york minute

are we there yet? probably not.

should we be concerned about this? absolutely.

should we be screaming the sky is falling? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no.

5
yeldarb1983 5 points ago +5 / -0

Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.

There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

...anyone considered the possibility he's doing monologues for fun?

I couldn't tell you the exact reference, but this feels like it came from a movie or a play or something...has that vaguely familiar feeling like I've seen it or something like it before. =/

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

what I'm wondering is where are all the anons who can normally find these guys faster than facial recognition on this one?

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

faggot

my understanding is it went something along the lines of long, thin sticks > bundles of same > poor widows who gathered said bundles to sell within cities (aka, "faggot bearers") > feminine men > homosexuals. Personally, I take it a step further and apply it to inconsiderate, attention hungry assholes of a particularly flashy nature, but YMMV.

Fun linguistic fact: all fascists are by definition faggots.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

posted something similar, but I think I like yours better, lol.

Also, ew.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

...why do people always use the photo of Kash Patel where he looks surprised there's a camera in his face?

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

having your finger cut off at the top most knuckle

...closer to having your feet cut off and having to walk on the stumps, honestly...

cats put all their weight on their toes when they walk/stand.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

wouldn't be shocked, but there's a wide gulf between intelligence and common sense

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

can I just ask a question? when exactly did an anonymous source go from being the starting point to find a story to the story itself?

I know it's been going on for a while now, but it seems like "sources say" didn't used to be a headline ten/twenty years ago

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

...unfortunately, there are no "good guys" in war, only winners and losers, "our guys" and "their guys."

Ultimately, it's the people who suffer the worst, both the grunts on the ground, and the civilians inevitably caught int he crossfire...

4
yeldarb1983 4 points ago +4 / -0

they're democrats, they don't give a shit about the money. they want her career deader than someone with information that will lead to the arrest of hillary rodham clinton

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol. some of the most memorable memes of all time were made with mspaint. use the text tool with a meme template any meme older than last thursday has a template floating around.

beyond that, have fun with it. memes are supposed to be fun.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

mspaint or a clone should be on any computer out there. barring that, there are meme generators you can use for free online, lol. just do a search.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›