If the speech had been 19 minutes and 48 seconds, there's a Q drop #1948. If it had been 20 minutes and 10 seconds, there a drop #2010.
Not everything has some deep and hidden meaning, sometimes a video just ends where it ends because that's where it happened to end, and for no other reason.
Well, there are indeed many Q drops, and I'm not entirely convinced the runtime of this film is a nod to the 1947th Q drop, but that Q drop does seem strikingly relevant.
Q drop 1948, for example, has no message that would be relevant. Here's a sample of it:
"Was HUSSEIN a prominent political figure or a person of influence at the time?
No.
Who is Valerie Jarrett?
Where was she born?
When did Valerie Jarrett hire Michelle Robinson?
1991
Timeline."
Do you think there's value in that? If so, I may do it if I have some time.
It wouldn't be too difficult to do it empirically. Build a database of all Q drops & Trump tweets. Randomly sample pairs of the two, and label as related in content or not. Sample enough pairs to your desired level of accuracy.
The second step would be the most time consuming. Manual human labeling would be the most accurate, but it could be time prohibitive if you're sampling tens of thousands of pairs.
But an automated 'relatedness' score could assigned based off of edit distance weighted by the commonality of combinations of words occurring together. Also, a word meaning space could be trained a la Word2Vec which could pick up on similar meanings in words even when the words aren't exactly the same.
(I'm finishing up a Ph.D. in computer science and I'd much rather work on this than my own dissertation for a few days, lmao.)
But, my gut feeling is that none of this is necessary. Sticking around here long enough is enough to assure anyone, even without pinning it down to an exact number, that the odds of it being a coincidence are astronomically low. And I say that as someone who's only really dug in to Q for about a week, lmao.
I'd be terribly curious to hear more of what you have to say.
I'm awful at math and don't really like it, so to have yet another math anon on-board here with us is great.
Very glad to hear you found that probability of coincidence is extremely low.....
Welcome aboard, u/orlando_pede !!!
Thanks for the welcome! I just want to clarify that I haven't formally computed anything, but I think anyone that has two braincells to rub together and is even remotely quantitatively oriented cannot deny, upon digging into the various Q proofs, that Q has been coordinating closely with Trump over the past 4+ years.
Everything else is up to debate, but that fact cannot be denied by any reasonable, informed person. I've personally chosen to swallow the red-pill in its entirety because of my own personal assessment of Trump's character, the content of Q drops, etc. But, an assessment of Q's motives (vs. merely concluding that he / they are not a LARP) now goes beyond the realm of what can be argued quantitatively, and I'll freely admit that. But even the evidence in favor of that is stronger than the contrary, in my opinion.
I definitely regret not digging into this from the very start.
Thanks for the welcome! I just want to clarify that I haven't formally computed anything, but I think anyone that has two braincells to rub together and is even remotely quantitatively oriented cannot deny, upon digging into the various Q proofs, that Q has been coordinating closely with Trump over the past 4+ years.
Everything else is up to debate, but that fact cannot be denied by any reasonable, informed person. I've personally chosen to swallow the red-pill in its entirety because of my own personal assessment of Trump's character, the content of Q drops, etc. But, an assessment of Q's motives (vs. merely concluding that he / they are not a LARP) now goes beyond the realm of what can be argued quantitatively, and I'll freely admit that. But even the evidence in favor of that is stronger than the contrary, in my opinion.
I definitely regret not digging into this from the very start.
I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
I was watching everytime the camera switched to a close up of him. It happened so many times at first thought maybe it would come out to 17 times switching, but I counted 19 times, so that didn't work how I thought, but kept looking for clues.
I wrote down the times of each switch to close up & then wrote how many seconds in each time frame, then added them all up (because they were all different times). All totalled it came to 3 minutes & 13 seconds (3:13), so then looked up Q posts.
I'm still learning how to look up clues, so please don't beat me up too bad if I'm way way off. I'm not even sure if I looked in the right place for Q's posts.
https://qposts.online/?q=313&s=keyword
This takes you to the search I was looking at, I scrolled down & I found these two posts with 313 in the qresearch numbers.
The picture in this one is of Pelosi holding a bible
gallery_medium.jpg
https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1268268026131935232
POTUS walk to Church.
MSDNC: POTUS cleared peaceful protestors using tear gas, rubber bullets [attack on humanity _racist] etc.
PELOSI walk.
MSDNC: PELOSI [D]s are one with the people and the black community ["protestors" reaching out for her hand _peaceful]
POTUS holds Bible
MSDNC: Fake pictures created of Hitler holding Bible [project white supremacy narrative]
PELOSI holds Bible
MSDNC: PELOSI [D]s are a blessing for our black communities
Attempt to divide and control?
Q
4393
03-Jun-2020 1:21:55 AM CDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
8kun/qresearch9443138
EZkF5V9X0AAsLYP.jpg
10.31.2017_10:00:15
Full circle.
Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate?
What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism?
What happens if mayors/ police comms/chiefs do not enforce the law?
Think recent events.
You have more than you know.
Q****
The Presidential Succession Act was adopted in 1947.
The Presidential Succession Act refers specifically to officers beyond the vice president acting as president rather than becoming president when filling a vacancy. The Cabinet currently has 15 members, of which the secretary of state is first in line;
Normally I would thing this is crazy, but I've seen that the first Back to the Future movie is 116 minutes long, which is 911 rotated 180 degrees. Also a ton of other 9/11 references like that the movie starts on October 26 which is the date the Patriot Act was signed.
I just have to believe that at least some of this stuff isn't a coincidence.
There are over 4,000 Q drops. His speach could have been anywhere between 1-4,000 minutes or seconds, and there would be a drop that correlated with that number.
This place gets too desperate for things to have meaning...
Coincidence. I think not.
I will never get any sleep tonight!
Also, luck = 47, remainder of 47 seconds.
Q drop #47 says Major False Flag
I'm no Q guy, just visiting......... But this crap is unbelievably compelling.
I mean, wtf?
Checkout Josh on Redpill Project...great Q decoder. Also Redpillpatrons.com ??
Yes, actually you can. With over 4k Q drops, no matter how long this speech was, you could find a Q drop that matches that number.
Pay attention to context. Participate in the GA.W according to the rules of this forum or get lost squid.
I didn't see anywhere in the rules where you were supposed to shit on people's bread crumbs with your condescending mouth diarrhea.
Nothing wrong with challenging something that is obviously a huge stretch of the imagination.
If you don't like discussion or differing opinions, then go join the CCP, they are looking for people just like that.
And 'mouth diarrhea'? Jesus, dial back the hyperbole, lol.
Fuck off Antifa!
Get some sleep dude, lol.
nothing is a coincidence, past proves future, it was a prerecorded farewell speech, it was no coincidence that he times it that long
If the speech had been 19 minutes and 48 seconds, there's a Q drop #1948. If it had been 20 minutes and 10 seconds, there a drop #2010.
Not everything has some deep and hidden meaning, sometimes a video just ends where it ends because that's where it happened to end, and for no other reason.
Well, there are indeed many Q drops, and I'm not entirely convinced the runtime of this film is a nod to the 1947th Q drop, but that Q drop does seem strikingly relevant.
Q drop 1948, for example, has no message that would be relevant. Here's a sample of it:
"Was HUSSEIN a prominent political figure or a person of influence at the time? No. Who is Valerie Jarrett? Where was she born? When did Valerie Jarrett hire Michelle Robinson? 1991 Timeline."
This is my view. The guy actually brings up a good point, but the odds of Q drop 1947 having to do with tech censorship and trap setting?
Also there's the fact that this is prerecorded with different camera cutaways so the length could have been meticulously scripted
Is that your idea? Or your handlers.
Is your world really that small and scary?
Jesus, this place is getting overrun with uncritically thinking conspiracy nuts.
And guess what?
POTUS Trump made a very clear statement on censorship during this speech.
HOLY.
FUCKING.
KEK
IT IS HABBENING!!!!!!!!!!!
Dude come ON; there's NO WAY all of these little things are just randomly happening....right?????
LUCK = 47
TODAY = 19
1947 twice confirmed
Where does 47 come for the word luck?
Alphabet cipher. a=1 z=24
Ah, thank you!
Why would z be 24 and not 26?
lmao. It's because he doesn't know the alphabet.
This is completely wrong.
The alphabet is 26 letters.
Y would equal 25.
EDIT::I'm a dummy and don't look at calendars.
today is the 19th.
AH, gotcha. Thx!
Tough..
Did you even look 1947 up? Protect Goog? That's your take?
Can someone tell me if this is mathematically possible?
Coincidentally, I cannot.
Do you think there's value in that? If so, I may do it if I have some time.
It wouldn't be too difficult to do it empirically. Build a database of all Q drops & Trump tweets. Randomly sample pairs of the two, and label as related in content or not. Sample enough pairs to your desired level of accuracy.
The second step would be the most time consuming. Manual human labeling would be the most accurate, but it could be time prohibitive if you're sampling tens of thousands of pairs.
But an automated 'relatedness' score could assigned based off of edit distance weighted by the commonality of combinations of words occurring together. Also, a word meaning space could be trained a la Word2Vec which could pick up on similar meanings in words even when the words aren't exactly the same.
(I'm finishing up a Ph.D. in computer science and I'd much rather work on this than my own dissertation for a few days, lmao.)
But, my gut feeling is that none of this is necessary. Sticking around here long enough is enough to assure anyone, even without pinning it down to an exact number, that the odds of it being a coincidence are astronomically low. And I say that as someone who's only really dug in to Q for about a week, lmao.
If things go south we will be targeted and censored. We could assemble and publish open source statistical data that proves Q and Trump are connected
I'd be terribly curious to hear more of what you have to say. I'm awful at math and don't really like it, so to have yet another math anon on-board here with us is great.
Very glad to hear you found that probability of coincidence is extremely low..... Welcome aboard, u/orlando_pede !!!
Thanks for the welcome! I just want to clarify that I haven't formally computed anything, but I think anyone that has two braincells to rub together and is even remotely quantitatively oriented cannot deny, upon digging into the various Q proofs, that Q has been coordinating closely with Trump over the past 4+ years.
Everything else is up to debate, but that fact cannot be denied by any reasonable, informed person. I've personally chosen to swallow the red-pill in its entirety because of my own personal assessment of Trump's character, the content of Q drops, etc. But, an assessment of Q's motives (vs. merely concluding that he / they are not a LARP) now goes beyond the realm of what can be argued quantitatively, and I'll freely admit that. But even the evidence in favor of that is stronger than the contrary, in my opinion.
I definitely regret not digging into this from the very start.
Thanks for the welcome! I just want to clarify that I haven't formally computed anything, but I think anyone that has two braincells to rub together and is even remotely quantitatively oriented cannot deny, upon digging into the various Q proofs, that Q has been coordinating closely with Trump over the past 4+ years.
Everything else is up to debate, but that fact cannot be denied by any reasonable, informed person. I've personally chosen to swallow the red-pill in its entirety because of my own personal assessment of Trump's character, the content of Q drops, etc. But, an assessment of Q's motives (vs. merely concluding that he / they are not a LARP) now goes beyond the realm of what can be argued quantitatively, and I'll freely admit that. But even the evidence in favor of that is stronger than the contrary, in my opinion.
I definitely regret not digging into this from the very start.
Okay doomer
Where was there any semblance of dooming in my comment that you responded to?
"that the odds of it being a coincidence are astronomically low."
Yeah, as in, it's virtually certain that Trump's farewell speech was intentionally linked to #1947.
Again, how is that dooming? Because I'm saying it's 99.9 ... 9 percent certain instead if 100 percent certain? What?
I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
Bro, go grab another cup of covfefe.
Your brain isn't working right.
He's not dooming.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
u/orlando_pede is NOT dooming; he's awesome.
?
holy shit you are literally retarded. Low chance of coincidence = deliberate ffs
I was watching everytime the camera switched to a close up of him. It happened so many times at first thought maybe it would come out to 17 times switching, but I counted 19 times, so that didn't work how I thought, but kept looking for clues. I wrote down the times of each switch to close up & then wrote how many seconds in each time frame, then added them all up (because they were all different times). All totalled it came to 3 minutes & 13 seconds (3:13), so then looked up Q posts. I'm still learning how to look up clues, so please don't beat me up too bad if I'm way way off. I'm not even sure if I looked in the right place for Q's posts.
https://qposts.online/?q=313&s=keyword This takes you to the search I was looking at, I scrolled down & I found these two posts with 313 in the qresearch numbers.
The picture in this one is of Pelosi holding a bible
4398 03-Jun-2020 3:44:46 PM CDT Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 8kun/qresearch9453134
Archived links: 1
gallery_medium.jpg https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1268268026131935232 POTUS walk to Church. MSDNC: POTUS cleared peaceful protestors using tear gas, rubber bullets [attack on humanity _racist] etc. PELOSI walk. MSDNC: PELOSI [D]s are one with the people and the black community ["protestors" reaching out for her hand _peaceful] POTUS holds Bible MSDNC: Fake pictures created of Hitler holding Bible [project white supremacy narrative] PELOSI holds Bible MSDNC: PELOSI [D]s are a blessing for our black communities Attempt to divide and control? Q
*The picture with this post was of the image in one of Pompeo's tweets, but with "Military Intelligence & State Secrets" above it, and clues under the image Image: https://qposts.online/assets/images/35aed4259f84cc54ed29aa78e37183e35489dec3db783f4479b63b5df51684ac.jpg
4393 03-Jun-2020 1:21:55 AM CDT Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 8kun/qresearch9443138
EZkF5V9X0AAsLYP.jpg 10.31.2017_10:00:15 Full circle. Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate? What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism? What happens if mayors/ police comms/chiefs do not enforce the law? Think recent events. You have more than you know. Q****
please, please, please let it be so
There's another post that says do people really think this can happen with no consequences. 3740 https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233740
I'll take that extra lil dose o' hopium
The Presidential Succession Act was adopted in 1947.
Normally I would thing this is crazy, but I've seen that the first Back to the Future movie is 116 minutes long, which is 911 rotated 180 degrees. Also a ton of other 9/11 references like that the movie starts on October 26 which is the date the Patriot Act was signed.
I just have to believe that at least some of this stuff isn't a coincidence.
Just spend time reading here man. Will try to toss you some resources soon. Check the sidebar too. On the right.
I bet he's been releasing more things than is being reported anywhere, and they have the receipts to prove it.
Hopium straight to the vein!! Don't judge me ....
I pray it’s so!
I’ve been on TD.win for a long time, although I forgot my password a couple times and am on my third account.....
But I need hope. That’s why I’m here. I don’t know if I believe it, but I pray it’s true!
America needs it to be true!
God give us mercy! God give us justice!
There are over 4,000 Q drops. His speach could have been anywhere between 1-4,000 minutes or seconds, and there would be a drop that correlated with that number.
This place gets too desperate for things to have meaning...
?