Bright kid, but I'm .... I don't know if people are going to go for this "America was a corporation" story. It's sort of an inside-baseball argument and would be a weak reason for removing Biden.
Now, Biden because an agent for China who did treason to steal the election? That's a much better argument. The corporation story is details.
Yes, here's an explanation by Sgt. Horton, he's special forces. It's long but it's well worth the watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv0QG63ORkA&t=1821s This is also about capturing the flag back from the queen. You may have to watch several times, it is complicated. The video of the young man above is a very quick overview.
This is complete fantasy. First off, he's a psy ops officer. Second off, being in special forces doesn't make you 1) a legal expert or 2) need to know status for any of that.
Going to his video on Admiralty law - All of his examples early on like "doctors registering with the department of transportation" or "hospitals are considered ports or dry docks" are completely made up. Totally baseless. There's no law that states this, there's no paperwork anywhere that backs this up, and nobody involved with hospitals - doctors, administrators, directors, etc - know anything about any of this. The admiralty law comes from the fact that the flags in a US court have gold fringes. That's the only actual evidence for any of this guys claims and it's weak.
"Central banking theory stuff" did you take the red pill yesterday? Time to do some homework pal. I bet you think pizzagate is a stretch as well, black budgets are far fetched.
The corporation thing is made up. The law they cite that defines the United States as a corporation is from the 90's, not from the incorporation of DC in the 1800's (every city or town is incorporated in america, it's a way of joining the land under a city gov't). The "corporation" law is also taken completely out of context. It's defining who counts as "the United States" for legal proceedings, and the law includes any companies owned by the Govt. It defines a bunch of parts of gov't that get to count as the gov't in legal proceedings like lawsuits and debt proceedings.
every city or town is incorporated in america, it's a way of joining the land under a city gov't
What about literally unincorporated town / cities? They exist.
Do you mean the citizens of the state/city/town are property of the corporation through their social security number?
No, Incorporation of cities is common and doesn't make people property. It's just an organization of the assets and land and laws and everything. Most big cities and town are incorporated because it makes the management easier.
Aktshually imo if you want to work up the masses you leave out China. Too spy novel. You simply keep talking about the pizza boxes in windows. The million vote drop at 3am. And maybe one more
I love bill cooper, he interviews maxwell in his mystery Babylon series. It's pretty damn funny actually....
Outside of his "movie" stuff I agree with most of what he says.
Linking to Twitter ought to be banned across .win. People say, "Dont buy Chinese goods," then go and link YouTube and Twitter. Its literally the same practice of buying from those that seek to rule you.
This is nonsense. The original constitution wasn't instituted in 1776; it was instituted in 1789. Washington DC was incorporated as a municipality in 1871, but not by the 'founding fathers', who were generally dead at this point in time. Washington DC, moreover, has never been 'owned' by the Vatican, or London, whatever that means; it's simply a federal district of the United States.
I am willing to try to take Q stuff seriously, but not if this kind of imbecilic gibberish genuinely does reflect the local intellectual standard.
Actually, I'm virtually certain to be the commentator on these boards with by far the most direct acquaintance with either. That has nothing to do with my initial post, though.
Which claim? That the constitution was instituted in 1789 and not 1776, or that the founding fathers were generally dead by 1871, almost a century after American independence?
If you're asking me to prove that Washington DC isn't owned by the Vatican or London - the obvious response is that it's not even clear what this claim would mean, legally. It was established as a US municipal corporation in 1871. Nothing about Vatican or London sovereignty or "ownership" (which itself is a bizarre claim; municipal corporations don't have "owners" in the first place).
Hey Dingle berry, balls whatever your name is ........you are a fucking bore dude!!!I Take it somewhere else!! The information is there, don't be fucking lazy!!
No, the United States did not default on its sovereign debt obligations in 1913, nor did the English establish sovereignty in the federal district of Washington DC at that time - that's an idea which is patently ridiculous, given that Washington DC has been governed by US federal law and courts, not British ones.
No government or court in the United States or the United Kingdom considers DC to be sovereign territory of any nation other than the United States.
Here's a novel idea that is practiced here.You don't get to show up demanding proof.You have to prove your statements.Autocrat,"I'm educated" language ain't gonna fly whistle britches.
People need to understand the difference between someone explaining something well (this whole 1871 theory) and someone actually proving the claim. Yes, he describes the theory, whether the facts are true or not is our job.
Depends on how much you know about this topic. If you knew nothing, this guy gives you an outline, that's all I'm saying. An overview. The concept. etc.
I’m not 100% on board with this corporation theory but at least he’s aware that Biden isn’t president of anything except the pantry where they store his tapioca pudding. Pantry? I guess I should say cabinet since that’s the only real cabinet he will have.
So maybe Trump Bankrupt the corporation that Biden swore an oath to? This could very well mean that Biden is president of a bankrupt corporation and is not the true president of the United States LMFAO - HE IS A FAKE President and that's why this is an illusion like, Lyne and all the rest were saying. Fake inaguration etc...
Kid thinks that the constitution was instituted in 1776, when it was instituted in 1789, and that the founding fathers were alive after the civil war (!). Also this weird crap about DC being owned by the Vatican and London.
Prove him wrong about what? Do you think that the constitution was instituted in 1776, and not 1789, then? That's embarrassing.
Washington DC is a municipal corporation under the sovereignty of the United States, which is blindingly obvious from the fact that it's under US jurisdiction - hence the enforcement of US laws within its confines, by US courts, and not the British or Vatican ones. The idea that the British or Vatican "own" Washington DC is also, frankly, embarrassing, since, y'know, municipal corporations don't have owners.
Why on earth are you asking me for proof that he's wrong, as opposed to proof that any of these ridiculous claims he's making are true? Like, it's not controversial that the constitution was instituted in 1789. It's a basic fact of American history. Nor does anyone think that the British courts are hearing cases that take place in DC, or that people in DC obey British laws, etc. Do you believe otherwise? If so, why?
These beliefs are embarrassing.
This would be nice until you read the full history of Lincoln and you then understand how and why he was assassinated. I'd look up Charles Chiniquy and his relationship with the Vatican and Lincoln and how their entire story entwines and sadly involves the assassination of the most prolific and Godly president we've ever had at that point.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You need to prove the claims, not just believe them out of faith and tell everyone else to prove you wrong.
Huh? The Vatican is a city-state, if you like, but neither the City of London or DC are; the City of London is under British jurisdiction, while DC is under US jurisdiction. None of the three "own" each other.
Much better than some videos I've heard that have constant rambling. He doesn't go into as much detail but he makes the point short and sweet for others to listen to. It's up to them to do more research.
This reminds me of a story I once heard about restraining orders. A woman got a restraining order against her husband. He showed up at her work so she grabbed her piece of paper and ran outside to confront him. See I have a restraining order. You have to leave. She held up the paper in front of her. He drew a pistol and shot her in the head. The bullet passed through the paper on its way to kill her.
This bullshit about corporations and being owned by the Vatican is like saying that a restraining order actually matters when that man made up hid mind he was just going to shoot her. It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Everyone needs to wake the hell up.
Someone else reminded me of this quote. "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" - Mao Zedong
Guess who has all the guns in the USA. 1 - The Military. 2 - Law Enforcement. 3 - tens of millions of US Citizens. Its just like Q says the only way they will ever beat us is to pit us against each other. So unless the US military is going to attack and defeat the civilian population all this bullshit about corporations is just Kabuki theater. Of the three factions LEO are by far the least powerful. They are the only ones that have been somewhat corrupted.
Trump purged the traitors from the military. Or at least the ones that really mattered. So everyone needs to stop listening to fairy tails, pay attention to what really matters, and chill. The military has this and if they don't then We The People will take care of it.
This is the real problem with America. We've grown soft and fat. We have no idea what logic and power actually mean any more. The world is full of violence yet we recoil away from it like it never happens. You're all living in a fantasy fed to you by communist propaganda. Come back to reality.
1st off the story about the woman isn't a conspiracy it actually happened in Macon GA like 20+ years ago. The reason you've never heard about it is because the media didn't want you to. They don't want you to realize those lame ass restraining orders they harp on so much mean absolutely nothing. If you realize that you might go out and buy a gun to defend yourself.
The only conspiracy theory I see is this non-sense about the USA being made a corporation in the 1870s. Show me some proof? I just searched Q for "corporation" and its all about the MSM and how 6 corporations own everything. He doesn't even hint at this non-sense. This is strait out of the wacky sovereign citizen BS. But I'm the one not in reality?
Yeah, I'm old school so I'm going to go with don't feed the trolls. which is what you appear to be. you just want me to waste my time arguing with you. Later.
To start, Trump was elected with a legitimate election, while Biden wasn't. That put America into a state of terror, something that happened since foreign contries took action in the elections, this put the base for the I.A to be called(and to be active doesn't need an EBS) where now Fema and Miller have command and at this precise moment there is no President.
Bright kid, but I'm .... I don't know if people are going to go for this "America was a corporation" story. It's sort of an inside-baseball argument and would be a weak reason for removing Biden.
Now, Biden because an agent for China who did treason to steal the election? That's a much better argument. The corporation story is details.
But is it true? Aren't pretty much all towns and cities incorporated? What is the proof for London and Vatican "owning" DC?
Yes, here's an explanation by Sgt. Horton, he's special forces. It's long but it's well worth the watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv0QG63ORkA&t=1821s This is also about capturing the flag back from the queen. You may have to watch several times, it is complicated. The video of the young man above is a very quick overview.
This is complete fantasy. First off, he's a psy ops officer. Second off, being in special forces doesn't make you 1) a legal expert or 2) need to know status for any of that.
Going to his video on Admiralty law - All of his examples early on like "doctors registering with the department of transportation" or "hospitals are considered ports or dry docks" are completely made up. Totally baseless. There's no law that states this, there's no paperwork anywhere that backs this up, and nobody involved with hospitals - doctors, administrators, directors, etc - know anything about any of this. The admiralty law comes from the fact that the flags in a US court have gold fringes. That's the only actual evidence for any of this guys claims and it's weak.
Well there ya go
This video is a good compliment to the one you suggested. It's done by Gould himself who is praised by Sgt. Horton.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAYbWDrvwq4
themarshallreport.worldpress.com
Honestly, I don't know. I never got all this "central banking" theory stuff.
"Central banking theory stuff" did you take the red pill yesterday? Time to do some homework pal. I bet you think pizzagate is a stretch as well, black budgets are far fetched.
Suggest you do research or you'll never get it.
This isnt a theory lol it's an absolute fact. Even mainstream politicians talk about central banks and their unchecked influence from time to time.
https://greatawakening.win/p/11S13sYTVJ/
The corporation thing is made up. The law they cite that defines the United States as a corporation is from the 90's, not from the incorporation of DC in the 1800's (every city or town is incorporated in america, it's a way of joining the land under a city gov't). The "corporation" law is also taken completely out of context. It's defining who counts as "the United States" for legal proceedings, and the law includes any companies owned by the Govt. It defines a bunch of parts of gov't that get to count as the gov't in legal proceedings like lawsuits and debt proceedings.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002
What about literally unincorporated town / cities? They exist. Do you mean the citizens of the state/city/town are property of the corporation through their social security number?
No, Incorporation of cities is common and doesn't make people property. It's just an organization of the assets and land and laws and everything. Most big cities and town are incorporated because it makes the management easier.
It's literally in the congressional record anybody can look it up 1870 is when it happened
All of you need to watch Empire of the city
1871 or 1870? The Act of 1871 is boring and has nothing to do with almost anything mentioned
Aktshually imo if you want to work up the masses you leave out China. Too spy novel. You simply keep talking about the pizza boxes in windows. The million vote drop at 3am. And maybe one more
Remove him from what? We want to remove the corporation as a whole not just Biden. Try to keep up
Jordan Maxwell ppl, he is a old-timer in this subject 4 min of enlightment. https://youtu.be/mSk3uRRgijE
I love bill cooper, he interviews maxwell in his mystery Babylon series. It's pretty damn funny actually.... Outside of his "movie" stuff I agree with most of what he says.
nitter if you dont wanna use twitter --> https://nitter.net/S_o_l_o_M_a_n/status/1352331725393768453#m
Linking to Twitter ought to be banned across .win. People say, "Dont buy Chinese goods," then go and link YouTube and Twitter. Its literally the same practice of buying from those that seek to rule you.
Sweet sweet faggot child
I hope there are more young people that get this...Kudos young fellow
This is nonsense. The original constitution wasn't instituted in 1776; it was instituted in 1789. Washington DC was incorporated as a municipality in 1871, but not by the 'founding fathers', who were generally dead at this point in time. Washington DC, moreover, has never been 'owned' by the Vatican, or London, whatever that means; it's simply a federal district of the United States.
I am willing to try to take Q stuff seriously, but not if this kind of imbecilic gibberish genuinely does reflect the local intellectual standard.
Sounds like you haven't looked into George Soros or the Rothschild family.
Actually, I'm virtually certain to be the commentator on these boards with by far the most direct acquaintance with either. That has nothing to do with my initial post, though.
Where ever more can you go from the beginning to the end to go into the end of the middle into the the beginning of the end?
Wow, cool!
Dingua, We shall soon see won't we
Shall soon see what?
You got proof!?
Do you have proof that DC is owned by the Vatican?! Where the fuck are you all getting this from?!
Proof of what?
Your claim?
Which claim? That the constitution was instituted in 1789 and not 1776, or that the founding fathers were generally dead by 1871, almost a century after American independence?
If you're asking me to prove that Washington DC isn't owned by the Vatican or London - the obvious response is that it's not even clear what this claim would mean, legally. It was established as a US municipal corporation in 1871. Nothing about Vatican or London sovereignty or "ownership" (which itself is a bizarre claim; municipal corporations don't have "owners" in the first place).
Also thanks for the proof!
You're welcome.
Hey Dingle berry, balls whatever your name is ........you are a fucking bore dude!!!I Take it somewhere else!! The information is there, don't be fucking lazy!!
Wrong Get your facts straight
Huh? Which of those claims are you disputing?
No, the United States did not default on its sovereign debt obligations in 1913, nor did the English establish sovereignty in the federal district of Washington DC at that time - that's an idea which is patently ridiculous, given that Washington DC has been governed by US federal law and courts, not British ones.
No government or court in the United States or the United Kingdom considers DC to be sovereign territory of any nation other than the United States.
Here's a novel idea that is practiced here.You don't get to show up demanding proof.You have to prove your statements.Autocrat,"I'm educated" language ain't gonna fly whistle britches.
People need to understand the difference between someone explaining something well (this whole 1871 theory) and someone actually proving the claim. Yes, he describes the theory, whether the facts are true or not is our job.
Depends on how much you know about this topic. If you knew nothing, this guy gives you an outline, that's all I'm saying. An overview. The concept. etc.
I’m not 100% on board with this corporation theory but at least he’s aware that Biden isn’t president of anything except the pantry where they store his tapioca pudding. Pantry? I guess I should say cabinet since that’s the only real cabinet he will have.
So maybe Trump Bankrupt the corporation that Biden swore an oath to? This could very well mean that Biden is president of a bankrupt corporation and is not the true president of the United States LMFAO - HE IS A FAKE President and that's why this is an illusion like, Lyne and all the rest were saying. Fake inaguration etc...
part 2 https://twitter.com/S_o_l_o_M_a_n/status/1352333120591323137
He explained the situation in a very simple and concise way. He was great.
Kid is smarter the most in the senate and the house.
What is incredible is that everyone in the senate and house and media know Trump won, they also know the capital event was an antifa, BLM false flag.
It looks like the push is for giving Statehood to DC as their counter.
Kid thinks that the constitution was instituted in 1776, when it was instituted in 1789, and that the founding fathers were alive after the civil war (!). Also this weird crap about DC being owned by the Vatican and London.
These are not signs of intelligence.
Prove him wrong......................................... get back to us will ya!!
Prove him wrong about what? Do you think that the constitution was instituted in 1776, and not 1789, then? That's embarrassing. Washington DC is a municipal corporation under the sovereignty of the United States, which is blindingly obvious from the fact that it's under US jurisdiction - hence the enforcement of US laws within its confines, by US courts, and not the British or Vatican ones. The idea that the British or Vatican "own" Washington DC is also, frankly, embarrassing, since, y'know, municipal corporations don't have owners. Why on earth are you asking me for proof that he's wrong, as opposed to proof that any of these ridiculous claims he's making are true? Like, it's not controversial that the constitution was instituted in 1789. It's a basic fact of American history. Nor does anyone think that the British courts are hearing cases that take place in DC, or that people in DC obey British laws, etc. Do you believe otherwise? If so, why? These beliefs are embarrassing.
Why couldn't the corporation charter itself to obey sovereign US law with the right to revoke such election?
This would be nice until you read the full history of Lincoln and you then understand how and why he was assassinated. I'd look up Charles Chiniquy and his relationship with the Vatican and Lincoln and how their entire story entwines and sadly involves the assassination of the most prolific and Godly president we've ever had at that point.
That’s not how it works.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You need to prove the claims, not just believe them out of faith and tell everyone else to prove you wrong.
Are you 14?
What you don't understand city states? The Vatican, City of London and DC?
Huh? The Vatican is a city-state, if you like, but neither the City of London or DC are; the City of London is under British jurisdiction, while DC is under US jurisdiction. None of the three "own" each other.
You have sauce for that?
Much better than some videos I've heard that have constant rambling. He doesn't go into as much detail but he makes the point short and sweet for others to listen to. It's up to them to do more research.
This young man has a lot of promise.
Two Thumbs Up here!
This reminds me of a story I once heard about restraining orders. A woman got a restraining order against her husband. He showed up at her work so she grabbed her piece of paper and ran outside to confront him. See I have a restraining order. You have to leave. She held up the paper in front of her. He drew a pistol and shot her in the head. The bullet passed through the paper on its way to kill her.
This bullshit about corporations and being owned by the Vatican is like saying that a restraining order actually matters when that man made up hid mind he was just going to shoot her. It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Everyone needs to wake the hell up.
Someone else reminded me of this quote. "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" - Mao Zedong
Guess who has all the guns in the USA. 1 - The Military. 2 - Law Enforcement. 3 - tens of millions of US Citizens. Its just like Q says the only way they will ever beat us is to pit us against each other. So unless the US military is going to attack and defeat the civilian population all this bullshit about corporations is just Kabuki theater. Of the three factions LEO are by far the least powerful. They are the only ones that have been somewhat corrupted.
Trump purged the traitors from the military. Or at least the ones that really mattered. So everyone needs to stop listening to fairy tails, pay attention to what really matters, and chill. The military has this and if they don't then We The People will take care of it.
This is the real problem with America. We've grown soft and fat. We have no idea what logic and power actually mean any more. The world is full of violence yet we recoil away from it like it never happens. You're all living in a fantasy fed to you by communist propaganda. Come back to reality.
That would be an awesome plot for a conspiracy book, BUT WHAT WE TALKING ABOUT IS REALITY.
1st off the story about the woman isn't a conspiracy it actually happened in Macon GA like 20+ years ago. The reason you've never heard about it is because the media didn't want you to. They don't want you to realize those lame ass restraining orders they harp on so much mean absolutely nothing. If you realize that you might go out and buy a gun to defend yourself.
The only conspiracy theory I see is this non-sense about the USA being made a corporation in the 1870s. Show me some proof? I just searched Q for "corporation" and its all about the MSM and how 6 corporations own everything. He doesn't even hint at this non-sense. This is strait out of the wacky sovereign citizen BS. But I'm the one not in reality?
Whatever...
I got the same proof that you have about your story it seems.
Yeah, I'm old school so I'm going to go with don't feed the trolls. which is what you appear to be. you just want me to waste my time arguing with you. Later.
Do whatever you wish, offending me isn't changing the fact.
Good for you young Fella! I hope to see you as a leader one day!
Seems like the vid got cut off at the end
Excellent! Smart kid and very well spoken!! I hope he decides to run for office someday!
Fuck!, TIL about the three corporations. Which also runs NZ, Australia and Canada.Evil
Just you wait until this kid gets a load of what the QUEERS are DOING to the SOIL.
Beauty.
Where's the full video?
https://nitter.net/S_o_l_o_M_a_n/status/1352331725393768453#m (scroll and there is the 2nd part)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-845/164240/20201220131128005_Trump%20v%20Boockvar%20Petition.pdf
Stickie this badass
To start, Trump was elected with a legitimate election, while Biden wasn't. That put America into a state of terror, something that happened since foreign contries took action in the elections, this put the base for the I.A to be called(and to be active doesn't need an EBS) where now Fema and Miller have command and at this precise moment there is no President.
So while the cerimony that Trump had was legitimate, the one Biden had wasn't, bcs it was as if he was in foreign soil when he was sworn.
DC is a foreign territory atm since there is a state of terror, so Biden could be president only of the corporation.
pls do a simple research, it will pop up in like 3 seconds on any browser.