A bit of hopium: A former sex slave says justice is coming.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (111)
sorted by:
Apparently she's testifying at the tribunals and knows they are both off the street already. Interdasting.
What tribunals?
Yeah really. Where's the YouTube link for that
YouTube. kek..
I’m on the fence with this one. It’s a huge call to make and I don’t see how Soros & Hanks can be tried in Military Tribunal for sex crimes?? I looked her up and saw some comments about her being a con artist and pathological liar etc. (there are some crazies out there who like to play victim) I’m in no way saying she is a liar but I find it highly unlikely these sick bastards would let her live if she knows all their secrets and is vocal about it.
You must be new here. There are several people in Hollywood that have accused Tom Hanks of being a pedophile. All you have to do is Google it. Of course he try to debunk it, but there are several people in particular that say he’s a pedophile. Openly! Not in secret or conspiracy theory.
Even the picture they took of him holding up his docs looked weird as hell. Like he was thinking "Oh shit, ya'll are gonna publish this? Wtf"
He does NOT look happy in that picture.
Which pic is dis?
It was used in all of the articles about his dual citizenship. Shouldnt be hard to find.
Was it really "Greece" that he went to?
Hanks isn't a teacher or a coach, he is just a dirty old man.
I suppose, just out of a few seconds of pondering, maybe the military tribunals for such crimes due to the sheer scope being too much for any one court system to comprehend and execute. Again, just pondering.
Or an entirely corrupt civilian system...
That's not how any of this works in real life. Military tribunals aren't magical places where higher justice gets served for all baddies. You can't just take a civilian to a military tribunal. A pedophile solder (or any military), yes - because that's the point of a military tribunal - but not a pedophile civilian.
It's increasingly common to see people having the wrong assumption that military tribunals are like when you ask your dad "hey dad can I do thing X" and then he answers "I don't know go ask your mom", or when your mom condones some stupid shit you did but then says "just don't tell your dad". Point is, a military tribunal is not some higher power than a civilian tribunal - it's not like when your mom has a higher jurisdiction than your dad, or when your dad will punish you more severely for a thing your mom turned a blind eye to.
Civilian and military tribunals are completely separate entities that tend to different people. Military tribunals deal with crimes that happened inside the military (like a soldier that commited sabotage) or between militaries (like army/navy or american army/canadian army)
How does that relate to my comment in any way? You're saying that Soros is a rothschild / big evil. What I'm saying is that civilians (like Soros) don't get taken to military tribunals because that's not what military tribunals do, not what they were invented for, not how they work.
It doesn't matter how evil Soros is - he'll never step into a military tribunal, because he's not military. Military tribunals exist for military people - like soldiers, lieutenants, captains, etc - the same way a normal court or tribunal is for civilians. Military tribunals are for crimes committed by the military, for instance a soldier who sabotaged a plane or something.
For some god forsaken reason people in this community are astonishingly oblivious to this. For real, has no one ever been in the military? Not a single vet around here? What gives? People think any big baddie in america (like Soros) will be dragged into a military tribunal just because. Truth is, the military itself wouldn't even let Soros in - because he's civilian and not military.
I'm sorry if I come across as uptight but it just pains me to see people think a square peg goes into a round hole, is all. Civilians go into civilian tribunals, while military people go into military tribunals - the same way a square peg goes into a square hole and a round one into a round hole. Military and civilian tribunals are two separate entities with two separate roles.
If one would need to make a whole essay with links and sources just to clarify such basic laws, I'm afraid the whole endeavor would be moot to begin with, as it means people would simply not want to hear any of it, as it goes against what they desperately hope for. It implies people don't have a single clue about what are military tribunals to begin with, and by this point I honestly kind of fear they don't want to --- meaning I'd be called a shill or whatever latest insult people throw around, for poking a hole in the hopeful 'military tribunal' fantasy.
The one single hypothesis I can think of that involves a military tribunal handling a civilian defendant in such a specific fashion is if it happened after a literal military coup, with a full blown military government, the ones you would have in south american banana republics decades ago (or some recent shithole country etc). That, or after an actual literal war. And I obviously do not vouch for any of those 2 scenarios --- as per the rules of this very community which moderators have dutifully emphasized time and time again. As such, I'll refrain from commenting further on this topic.
No this is illogical - women who have been coerced with or for sex and sexuality purposes are to be trusted 100% when they have no evidence or proof. This is cold hard fact things are happening.
Fml.
So many faggots in here. I’m with you - be skeptical. Question everything. We know very little and at the same time know too much to the point we can find hopium everywhere and habbenings everywhere. Everybody chill and either we get through this and it’s all a bust or some shit finally goes down soon - but we are useless in either outcome if we lose our shit or our ability to be discerning.
Haha! Thank you for being logical! I even said that I wasn’t trying to say she was lying but just pointing out it seems a stretch. I mean if there was a military tribunal going on and she was involved would she be allowed to chat about it openly on social media? I’m all for hopium and all for getting justice for victims of sex crimes...but this just seems fishy.
Yeah same thought ... more disinformation or misinformation or just a psycho chick who wants attention/drama is what I’m ruling this as
Is it possible you subconsciously don’t want to think Forrest Gump could be a pedophile? Food for thought.
Discrediting people talking secret truths is a common practice. I guess we will wait and see what happens.
Believe... Crazy Lord Yes... But look up Spirit Cooking and think have we heard from any of these people in awhile?
I hope it is true. This sick f@cks need to be held accountable. I’m just throwing out my thoughts...
And of course they will just let her tweet about it.
That is on MeWe. Not a tweet.
Do tell!
I pray for this every day, many times!
I was searching for an Orwell movie, and saw Tom Hanks movie, The man with one RED shoe (1985)
?
This is way more than a “bit of hopium”, this is like an entire kilo. This is what appears to be a 1) real victim naming 2) real names, who 3) uses the word military tribunal in a manner like it is happening as we speak. I listened to the interview of her describing it in a lot of detail. If anything gives me hope that something is happening is this. I mean Tom Hanks was actually in the cage on Inauguration Day. Did he actually make it out? Maybe not. Holy shit.
Interview link?
2nd
Someone posted it lower in the thread
Can you give a link to her description of the events?
Someone posted it lower in the thread
how do we know she was a sex slave? This one of Jefferys girls?
I’ve been only following her for a month or two and just ordered her book. So I don’t know a lot but According to her posts she was bought and sold, ended up in the porn industry and got away some how and became a Christian.
Wouldn’t it be easier and more lucrative for her to go with the flow and not speak out? This label will follow her for the rest of her life. She has kids, can you imagine how the other moms whisper about her and maybe even ostracize her? I dunno whether her story is true or not but I think that’s a bold move to make either way. Look how easy it was to discredit AOC? If rich and powerful people have a vested interest in protecting themselves, I hope I don’t succumb to the narrative they are trying to create.
Thanks for the link. Interesting stuff there.
The evil cabal is bigger than anyone can imagine. Trump is against the world in this fight. No one with a soul will accept anything less than eternal imprisonment/suffering for those who participated in any way in these abominations.
I was hoping the sex slave would be Kamala Harris
Some of us are eating here!
Idk about you but I'm always eating
?
WOOF
Michael Jaco was implying on his show 2 nights ago, that KamelToe was actually a man....
No, she wasn't forced. She's a pro
Riddles...More Riddles...That’s what we need. And yes...I have been here since Q post 1. The public is either awake or their not. Times up.
I'm thinking this is the girl whose father sold her to Hanks.
No, that was Sara Ruth Ashcraft (SRA)
SRA = Satanic Ritual Abuse...?
Check
I seriously only know the bit I have seen the last month or two I have been following her. I ordered her book. Her story seems horrific.
Did a quick search on DDG for "is Greece a haven for pedophiles?" Specifically did NOT seek out sources I believe are trustworthy. Instead I included several page 1 results than any (non-pilled) average Joe would find if they were curious.
"Fact-check" - lulz: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/13/fact-check-tom-hanks-greek-citizen-but-pedophilia-claim-false/3353055001/
"Greek disability groups expressed anger Monday at a government decision to expand a list of state-recognized disability categories to include pedophiles, exhibitionists and kleptomaniacs." - From 2012: https://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/pedophilia-disability-greece-uproar-allowing-pedophiles-kleptomaniacs-special-status-article-1.1004112
This blog pulled from ABC: https://jonathanturley.org/2012/01/10/greece-declares-pedophilia-a-disability-deserving-state-benefits/
But ABC removed the story: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/furor-greece-pedophilia-disability-15323309
Interesting Q&A: https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/549/pedophilia-in-ancient-greek-and-roman-culture
Inquisitive folks (first time I've heard of this forum): https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/15086229/all/i-guess-greece-doesnt-extradite-pedophiles-to-the-us
First time I've really contributed anything. Am I doing it right? Anyone have any Q connections to Hanks?
So, I've started going down an interesting rabbit-hole. So far, (if I'm reading this right), IF a military tribunal is called, they do have authority to handle rape and sexual assault cases.... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/818
Thanks for the research. Like others, I too was wondering why military tribunals? And here it is. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/920
This is where I get stuck: this just says that a military court can try such cases...but as far as I can tell, military courts generally only apply to people actually in the armed forces. One notable exception would be prisoners of war...but I really don't see how that would apply in this case.
Use your noggin. Military tribunal for pedo crimes?
No.
If the pedos were voting for or supporting Treason.
their previously concealed crimes are not in the same league as being active in a failed coup.
Then it becomes a Military matter.
Brave woman.
https://youtu.be/bCCNDsbRTlg
Thanks for posting. Will watch this later. I don’t know much about her and ordered her book. Her posts though sounds like she has been through the most horrific of experiences. Just saw they branded her, sold her and more.
Tom Hanks -
His last appearance - https://www.eonline.com/ap/news/1223008/tom-hanks-reveals-hes-now-bald-and-were-not-sure-how-to-feel?query=tom%20hanks
Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h87_Vjp4IR4&feature=emb_logo
No news of him after Dec 31 (from Article) - Video is from Dec 29th 2020 - That is a big gap till now without any news
George Soros -
Last Appearance i can find - https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/company-news/video/soros-says-he-s-committing-1-billion-to-start-global-university~1884021
Twitter is active, most likely managed.
Didn’t Tom Hanks attend the fake inauguration on Jan 20?
I didn't see pics.only news item.
No not her. Way too young.
her profile pick makes her look much younger than Daryl Hanah.
I hope this is really happening and is long lasting. Need child and adult human trafficking blasted to all billboards across America!
Need it blasted now! Support and justice for all victims now!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Madyson_Middleton
The creep that killed her still hasn't been tried and sentenced?
I never liked any one of Tom Hanks' movies. He's a lightweight.
Nah, he has some good movies. The hard part would be enjoying them now knowing all this. Personally I'm fine just not watching them ever again.
God bless her
But I thought Tom Hanks was "doing" the faux Biden inauguration.