I notice that some brands state this but others don't, when they're all made of the same material. It's literally printed there and NPCs will still say "WeAr ThE mAsK yOu MuRdErEr!"
Retailers who cash in on community fears about SARS by exaggerating the health benefits of surgical masks could face fines of up to $110,000.
NSW Fair Trading Minister Reba Meagher yesterday warned that distributors and traders could be prosecuted if it was suggested the masks offered unrealistic levels of protection from the disease.
Hey Fren, what type of work do you do? How do you have this "opportunity" at your work? Did you get a bunch of your co-workers to open their brains to alternative information?
Ok, so maybe I don’t have an actual opportunity, but I was asked to make my case as to why I refuse to wear a mask and I accepted.
Later I plan on taking all the links posted here and reorganize into a presentable format. I intend on keeping the forum up to date on my progress unless someone seems it off topic. Wish me luck.
I work in a office, as a programmer who does mostly IT work.
Hopefully you won't be surrounded by Reddit-fags who "deboonk" everything under the sun by parroting MSM talking points and acting like they're enlightened. Keep us updated!
Masks increase bacteria in mouth. Dentists report all time high cavities. Bacteria also make it into throat and lungs. Bacteria in lungs can lead to lung cancer.
Breathing through a mask = breathing microplastic fibers. Also bad for lungs.
Show them the box. It clearly states that it does not protect against COVID. Bring in multiple types of masks. Go to an old navy/target get cloth ones. Get a box of the surgical ones. The more examples the better. Visuals are best. Ask them which mask they want you to wear since none of the examples you provided are adequate.
Almost every report on masks in favor of masks looks at transmission of water droplets of various sizes. I have read quite a few of them, and they all stop at sizes far above the size of the virus itself. I have found no actual scientific experimental evidence that the primary mode of viral transmission occurs within the droplet sizes that are being studied in these papers. Without that key element of inquiry, these papers by themselves are completely useless.
The only real scientific study on a real group of people that I could find of actual cloth and surgical mask viral transmission is this one.
This paper suggests that wearing a mask may be more harmful than wearing nothing at all. How could that be?
Dr. Fauci wrote a paper back in 2008 that said quite plainly that in all pandemics for which there is available data (since the Spanish Flu ~1918) pneumonia has been the leading cause of death. It also happens to be the time when wearing masks became fashionable.
Please note I am talking about the type of masks most people use and the way they wear them: people put them on, take them off, set them down on the counter, set them down in the car, put them in their pocket, put them back on, put them by their bed at night, put them back on when they leave, etc. Even if people wash them, unless they are using an autoclave they are almost certainly harboring a ton of bacteria, including the bacteria that causes pneumonia. This article is an excellent exposition on masks.
The modern human immune system has evolved to deal with germs for well over 50,000 years. Doctors didn't even know what a fucking germ was until ~175 years ago. The science (of nature) says we don't need masks to survive germs; "the science is settled."
My experience is that people respond to emotional arguments much more readily than to facts, so use that information to your benefit. That means if you present the "Masks-cause-pneumonia" paper, don't just state the facts. If your audience is a touchy-feely group, talk to them about the fear of getting pneumonia, and lead them to believe they should be afraid of pneumonia. That way they feel smarter when they acquire a new fear instead of feeling dumb because they were wrong. Conversely, if your audience is your HR manager, talk about how you are afraid of pneumonia, and about how they are discriminating against big-nosed people (because they suffer more from the press against the nose) or against small-nosed people (because the masks impinge upon the mouth more than other people), or anything where they can agree to the issue and get fear of a lawsuit. You're just looking out for the good of the company, after all, and want it so everybody feels safe and gets treated fairly. Any fact can be presented on emotional terms, so leverage that.
Fact-based arguments are easily overturned by people who feel threatened and end up inventing facts to fit whatever situation makes them comfortable. 10 pages of facts can dissolve in the face of one fearful crybaby with a Facebook post. They have a tougher time inventing feelings. My two cents. Good luck!
Sorry no links to provide you with, but here to say 'ROCK ON'!!! No doubt you'll have great success with the help here. Please let us know the outcome (which will be that you won your case) as I'd like to congratulate you. This is, afterall, a WIN site, right? kek
How come biohazards waste bins weren’t everywhere for those mask and gloves. Super duper fake deadly plague. 14 days to stop the spread turned into 12 month to destroy the middle class and small business
this is the most concise and easily understood media ive found so far that explains viruses it is a little bit long but they get into the meat and patates really fast
This is the more in depth for those interested. Sry for formating I copy pasted.
FLU – Viral Tools Improve Health
by aajonus vonderplanitz, phd nutrition
Influenzas, also called flu, are primarily viral. Colds are mainly bacterial. As I stated in my books and as you will find in any notable biochemistry book, VIRUSES ARE NOT ALIVE. What the biochemistry books will not explain is that viruses are proteinconstructs that disassemble and/or dissolve organic and inorganic structures and
particles. Those books lead us to believe that viruses are radical protein structures
that indiscriminately destroy cells, causing disease. However, viruses are highly
specific solvents produced by cells. The body resorts to viruses when the intercellular tissue structures are very contaminated with non-bioactive chemicals. The
non-bioactive chemicals can be any thing from processed food to industrial waste. In such cases, the tissues are so contaminated that our bodies natural janitors,
bacteria, fungus and parasites, are poisoned to death. The body has no alternative
other than to produce and utilize non-living solvents – viruses - to disassemble
and/or dissolve industrial toxin-damaged tissues and the toxins that caused them.
Supporting that serious diseases are the result of industry, U.S.-government
employed anthropologist Vilhjalmur Stefansson in his book Cancer – Disease of
Civilization, states that he found cancer did not exist in primitive tribes. Cancer is
caused by industrial chemicals, processing and waste. Viruses are ultimately the only tool we have to cleanse ourselves of industrial toxicity. Oncologist Don Morris at Calgary's Tom Baker Cancer Centre said, "It's common to hear that cancer patients who pick up a virus get a regression of their disease."
Viruses do not multiply. When added to fertile petrie dishes that sustain cellular life,
not one additional viral protein structure appears. Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. That is because petrie dishes are not the proper environment for cells. Also, the solutions used in petrie dishes that sustains cellular life, are sterilized and toxic, causing intercellular damage that requires viruses to cleanse and maybe even destroy the natural cellular life in the unnatural petrie dishes. In a sterile environment, cells cannot use their normal detoxificationmethods that are bacterial, fungal and parasitical. Therefore, viral waste should be expected in petrie dishes containing live cells. Cells produce viruses for self-cleansing in a sterile or industrial toxic environment.
Now that we understand viruses a lot better, I will broach the latest daily medical
media hype causing most people to worry about a foreboding, impending AVIAN flu.
Although there has never been a killer flu in history, they say it is an impending
reality that will find us and kill or maim us. I perceive many of you thought as you
read that last sentence, “What about the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 in which
PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 9 millions of people died.” Let’s look at it. Considering only one factor inspires understanding that reality: It was the first time that a flu vaccine was internationally offered by pharmaceuticals. Millions did not die of the flu; they were killed by the flu vaccine. According to researcher R B Pearson who witnessed the Spanish flu “epidemic”,(1) few people died who received natural therapies during that period. Seventeen of twenty people died employing medical assistance, especially the vaccine. The vaccine was the epidemic.
When I was heavily researching vaccines through the 80’s and early 90’s, I began
where anyone might. I studied everything I could on Louis Pasteur’s work. I was
shocked to learn, and it is not well known, that not one of Pasteur’s laboratory
animals survived vaccination. At the time, and as it is today, many physicians
wholeheartedly believed in forced immunization. They seemed to ignore the fact
that everyday people were exposed to every natural and industry particle. Daily
people were naturally inoculated and building resistance, unless they were
overdosed or on very poor diets.
What was different in 1916-18 was that the pharmaceutical industry, spearheaded
by super-wealthy, supposedly philanthropic, Rockefeller and Carnegie, wanted to
prove vaccines worked. They envisioned pharmaceutical miracles and great profits.
Like Pasteur, they claimed to believe that vaccines would cure many ills. The Spanish flu vaccine took its toll. How philanthropic were Rockefeller, Carnegie and the injecting physicians? Did they accept responsibility for millions of deaths from their vaccine, or did they blame the Spanish flu? Rockefeller, Carnegie and physicians everywhere knew that if their vaccines were to blame, they would be legally liable.
Pharmaceuticals funded the coverup stories written by doctors and writers quoting
physicians. They claimed the first recorded killer flu epidemic had finally fallen upon
the human race and they were there to fight it with their vaccines. Without any
evidence, they claimed that the vaccine prevented millions of deaths. The fluvaccine failed people but profited Rockefeller and Carnegie. Probably, those
responsible believed that it was an important experiment and the casualties were
worthwhile. They probably assumed that as pharmaceutical technology progressed,
vaccines would ultimately prove helpful to mankind. Has advanced medicine proved
flu-vaccines? Canada's first attempt to prove that flu-vaccines are effective failed miserably. Canadian researchers at the University of Ottawa used their universal free flu vaccine as the proving ground beginning in 2000. It cost Ontario taxpayers more than $200-million. The researchers published in the journal Vaccine that the average monthly incidence of flu virus jumped over the first five years of the program. "All we do know is rates haven't decreased, and there has been a lot of money spent," PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 10 said professor Dianne Groll who led the study. "The program was designed to reduce
the incidence of flu, and this hasn't yet happened." A faulty plan of the research
structure is that it did not measure the extreme and unusual cases that affect the
vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
Viral truth:
Viruses are extremely specific solvents to disassembling and/or dissolving exact
cellular structures, in many cases preventing cellular death and rendering cells only
temporarily nonfunctional. If we were to compare cells to a mechanic, the mechanic
finds the specific problem part or system, chooses specific tools (viruses) and
removes the specific part of the machine and replaces or fixes it. When viewed from a short-sighted perspective, viruses look destructive. However, if viewed long-term without medical intervention, viruses prove to be beneficial. They provide our
bodies with the cellular ability to regenerate themselves. Viruses completely change
at least every 72 hours. The cell allows itself about 72 hours of detoxification with a
specific virus or set of viruses. Then, it will produce a different virus or set of viruses
for different cleansing. The medical and scientific communities identify that as viral
evolution. Yet, they know viruses are not alive. Any flu vaccine that is produced is
specific to a virus that was obsolete six to eighteen months prior to distribution of
the vaccine. Big pharma knows that. If they know that then the vaccine business is aracket all about money.
Nothing in science supports the THEORY that viruses leap from creatures to man.
How can viruses leap when they are not alive? Every animal has viruses that
disassemble or dissolve similar tissue-structures but putting them in the category of
contagion is the same as saying laundry soaps are contagious. The theory is
preposterous. Those theorists should be hired only by Hollywood to write inane Bclass horror stories.
Does anyone remember the dreaded impending SWINE flu of the mid 1970’s? For
about one year several times daily, parroting the pharmaceutical and medical
industries, media warned us of the swine flu that was leaping from the supposeddirtiest of creatures, pork, and was going to kill us unless we all received the vaccine.
President Ford received his swine-flu vaccine on national TV to prove its safety.
Guess who was our vice president? Rockefeller. His pharmaceutical company
received $7 billion dollars of U.S. citizens’ hard-earned tax dollars that funded the
government-sponsored national assault on the dreaded impending swine flu
epidemic of the century. Does anyone remember the death toll? The standard yearly estimate of 30,000-50,000. Does anyone remember why the government-sponsored program disappeared 2 weeks after the free vaccines were initiated?
PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 11 The government swine-flu escapade was exposed by national consumer advocate Ida Honorof and Dr. E. McBean, PhD, ND. Ida was syndicated in hundreds of national radio programs. She and Dr. McBean filed a lawsuit against President Ford, VP Rockefeller, the Surgeon General and the US Government for creating and sponsoring the dangerous flu-vaccine. Honorof and McBean predicted that thousands of elderly and children would die as a result of the vaccine and that the Swine flu epidemic was a hoax. The media and medical professionals were ready to prove them wrong or not. Honorof’s reputation was impeccable so the media covered the story many times daily for weeks. During the two weeks of giving the “free” vaccine, approximately 2,300 people died within days after receiving the vaccine. Because of media exposure, the vaccine program was stopped.(2) And guess what? There was no Swine flu epidemic that killed millions of Americans.
Guess who is still paying for the storage of the $7 billion of swine flu vaccine? The tax payers. Why are we storing it? Will it be relabeled Avian flu vaccine? If you think that is preposterous, consider this: In the mid and late 1960’s, AZT was a new herald chemical for fighting cancer. A year later, it was banned by the FDA as too toxic. Then in the 1980’s, it was pulled from pharmaceutical vaults and prescribed for AIDS patients. There was no research proving or disproving efficacy of AZT with AIDS patients but pharma needed to make a profit from its flop. The FDA approved it. Nearly every AIDS patient who received AZT died and pharma made a grand profit.
Finally, to the point: Since flu are a natural response to bodily toxicity, and viruses are created by cells to self-cleanse, we should not focus on stopping flu. Stopping flu causes the accumulation of toxicity and waste that would lead to severe diseases. If we focus on helping our bodies virally detoxify with diet and lifestyle during each flu, we will rid our bodies of some of the dangerous disease-causing waste. There is no other rational approach to influenzas.
If we believe and analyze the observations of Dr. Weston Price and similar
researchers, we can safely assume that cooked food causes no more than 10% of
diseases. Industrial toxicity, even in our modern technologically sanitary world,
causes 90% of all diseases, and their chronic and fatal extremes. If we believe and
analyze the work of Dr. Francis Pottenger, MD and Edward Howell, we can also safely assume that in such a toxic world, a near 100% raw-food diet that is heavy in fat is disease-preventative and disease-reversing.
Read the disclaimer on the side of the mask box.
I notice that some brands state this but others don't, when they're all made of the same material. It's literally printed there and NPCs will still say "WeAr ThE mAsK yOu MuRdErEr!"
The first one is a link to 14 science papers all saying that masks don't work or have issues.
https://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739%3ABlogPost%3A2035264
https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/08/07/european-health-experts-agree-with-the-association-of-america-physicians-and-surgeons-wearing-a-mask-is-useless/
https://truepundit.com/swedens-lead-epidemiologist-wearing-face-masks-is-very-dangerous/
https://twitter.com/trusthetruth84/status/1303095615304298497
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/09/11/can-a-face-mask-prevent-coronavirus.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20200911Z1&mid=DM647803&rid=962066973
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgIHvdDGycw&app=desktop
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/cdc-first-said-not-wear-masks-wear-masks-masks-better-vaccines-now-new-evidence-shows-masks-dont-work/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/wth-cdc-admits-no-time-cdc-guidance-suggested-masks-intended-protect-wearers-video/
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/10/19/journals-are-afraid-to-publish-negative-mask-study.aspx
https://www.smh.com.au/national/farce-mask-its-safe-for-only-20-minutes-20030427-gdgnyo.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tghN-VsPsfM
WOW.....
Apparently we had more common sense in 2003 than we do in 2020 / 2021
https://www.smh.com.au/national/farce-mask-its-safe-for-only-20-minutes-20030427-gdgnyo.html
NSW Fair Trading Minister Reba Meagher yesterday warned that distributors and traders could be prosecuted if it was suggested the masks offered unrealistic levels of protection from the disease.
THIS FUCKING COVID SCAM HAS GOT TO STOP.
Well yeah we didn’t have communist propaganda blasting 24 hours a day back in 2003
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/18/major-study-finds-masks-dont-reduce-covid-19-infection-rates/
Hey Fren, what type of work do you do? How do you have this "opportunity" at your work? Did you get a bunch of your co-workers to open their brains to alternative information?
Ok, so maybe I don’t have an actual opportunity, but I was asked to make my case as to why I refuse to wear a mask and I accepted.
Later I plan on taking all the links posted here and reorganize into a presentable format. I intend on keeping the forum up to date on my progress unless someone seems it off topic. Wish me luck.
I work in a office, as a programmer who does mostly IT work.
Nice, I wish you the best of luck!
Hopefully you won't be surrounded by Reddit-fags who "deboonk" everything under the sun by parroting MSM talking points and acting like they're enlightened. Keep us updated!
Masks increase bacteria in mouth. Dentists report all time high cavities. Bacteria also make it into throat and lungs. Bacteria in lungs can lead to lung cancer.
Breathing through a mask = breathing microplastic fibers. Also bad for lungs.
Show them the box. It clearly states that it does not protect against COVID. Bring in multiple types of masks. Go to an old navy/target get cloth ones. Get a box of the surgical ones. The more examples the better. Visuals are best. Ask them which mask they want you to wear since none of the examples you provided are adequate.
Almost every report on masks in favor of masks looks at transmission of water droplets of various sizes. I have read quite a few of them, and they all stop at sizes far above the size of the virus itself. I have found no actual scientific experimental evidence that the primary mode of viral transmission occurs within the droplet sizes that are being studied in these papers. Without that key element of inquiry, these papers by themselves are completely useless.
The only real scientific study on a real group of people that I could find of actual cloth and surgical mask viral transmission is this one.
This paper suggests that wearing a mask may be more harmful than wearing nothing at all. How could that be?
Dr. Fauci wrote a paper back in 2008 that said quite plainly that in all pandemics for which there is available data (since the Spanish Flu ~1918) pneumonia has been the leading cause of death. It also happens to be the time when wearing masks became fashionable.
Please note I am talking about the type of masks most people use and the way they wear them: people put them on, take them off, set them down on the counter, set them down in the car, put them in their pocket, put them back on, put them by their bed at night, put them back on when they leave, etc. Even if people wash them, unless they are using an autoclave they are almost certainly harboring a ton of bacteria, including the bacteria that causes pneumonia. This article is an excellent exposition on masks.
Meanwhile on Reddit:
"YoU cAnT gEt PnEuMoNiA fRoM a MaSk"
https://www.citizensforfreespeech.org/blaylock_face_masks_pose_serious_risks_to_the_healthy?page=1
The modern human immune system has evolved to deal with germs for well over 50,000 years. Doctors didn't even know what a fucking germ was until ~175 years ago. The science (of nature) says we don't need masks to survive germs; "the science is settled."
And the Germ Theory is ass backwards anyhow.
My experience is that people respond to emotional arguments much more readily than to facts, so use that information to your benefit. That means if you present the "Masks-cause-pneumonia" paper, don't just state the facts. If your audience is a touchy-feely group, talk to them about the fear of getting pneumonia, and lead them to believe they should be afraid of pneumonia. That way they feel smarter when they acquire a new fear instead of feeling dumb because they were wrong. Conversely, if your audience is your HR manager, talk about how you are afraid of pneumonia, and about how they are discriminating against big-nosed people (because they suffer more from the press against the nose) or against small-nosed people (because the masks impinge upon the mouth more than other people), or anything where they can agree to the issue and get fear of a lawsuit. You're just looking out for the good of the company, after all, and want it so everybody feels safe and gets treated fairly. Any fact can be presented on emotional terms, so leverage that.
Fact-based arguments are easily overturned by people who feel threatened and end up inventing facts to fit whatever situation makes them comfortable. 10 pages of facts can dissolve in the face of one fearful crybaby with a Facebook post. They have a tougher time inventing feelings. My two cents. Good luck!
I dont have it here but someone pull faucis paper admitting the 1920 flu more people died from masks than the actual flu
Sorry no links to provide you with, but here to say 'ROCK ON'!!! No doubt you'll have great success with the help here. Please let us know the outcome (which will be that you won your case) as I'd like to congratulate you. This is, afterall, a WIN site, right? kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLNBw7XCM4Q
https://imgur.com/a/BhMKO37
https://en-volve.com/2021/03/10/damning-new-scientific-study-finds-zero-evidence-stay-at-home-orders-reduced-covid-deaths/
https://truth11.com/2020/11/05/death-by-mask-lessons-learned-in-1918-mask-wearing-bacterial-pneumonia-infections-and-the-1918-spanish-flu-the-unmasked-were-burying-the-masked/
go into a cold storage and vent your mask, it doesnt stop moisture.
or how the longest it should be on is an hour as then it is too moist and blocks air flow.
operating rooms have high o2 saturation as mask are designed to prevent contaminations of OPEN wounds.
That makes sense, as if I remember correctly, o2 saturation kills bacteria and viruses outright, correct?
o2 kills everything, in high enough doses.
fauci studies spanish flu, and all the flues after we did not have mask.
because most deaths were caused by masks.
http://philosophers-stone.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MasksDon-twork-4.pdf
This study was quietly published March 5, and is buried on the CDC website. Guaranteed we aren't going to hear a word of this in mainstream media. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7010e3.htm?s_cid=mm7010e3_w
How come biohazards waste bins weren’t everywhere for those mask and gloves. Super duper fake deadly plague. 14 days to stop the spread turned into 12 month to destroy the middle class and small business
this is the most concise and easily understood media ive found so far that explains viruses it is a little bit long but they get into the meat and patates really fast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs
Once the germ theory of disease is exposed publicly big pharma will go bankrupt
This could help people who still believe in vaccine science
https://miepbos.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/email-prik-2019.pdf
This is the more in depth for those interested. Sry for formating I copy pasted.
FLU – Viral Tools Improve Health by aajonus vonderplanitz, phd nutrition
Influenzas, also called flu, are primarily viral. Colds are mainly bacterial. As I stated in my books and as you will find in any notable biochemistry book, VIRUSES ARE NOT ALIVE. What the biochemistry books will not explain is that viruses are proteinconstructs that disassemble and/or dissolve organic and inorganic structures and particles. Those books lead us to believe that viruses are radical protein structures that indiscriminately destroy cells, causing disease. However, viruses are highly specific solvents produced by cells. The body resorts to viruses when the intercellular tissue structures are very contaminated with non-bioactive chemicals. The non-bioactive chemicals can be any thing from processed food to industrial waste. In such cases, the tissues are so contaminated that our bodies natural janitors, bacteria, fungus and parasites, are poisoned to death. The body has no alternative other than to produce and utilize non-living solvents – viruses - to disassemble and/or dissolve industrial toxin-damaged tissues and the toxins that caused them. Supporting that serious diseases are the result of industry, U.S.-government employed anthropologist Vilhjalmur Stefansson in his book Cancer – Disease of Civilization, states that he found cancer did not exist in primitive tribes. Cancer is caused by industrial chemicals, processing and waste. Viruses are ultimately the only tool we have to cleanse ourselves of industrial toxicity. Oncologist Don Morris at Calgary's Tom Baker Cancer Centre said, "It's common to hear that cancer patients who pick up a virus get a regression of their disease." Viruses do not multiply. When added to fertile petrie dishes that sustain cellular life, not one additional viral protein structure appears. Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. That is because petrie dishes are not the proper environment for cells. Also, the solutions used in petrie dishes that sustains cellular life, are sterilized and toxic, causing intercellular damage that requires viruses to cleanse and maybe even destroy the natural cellular life in the unnatural petrie dishes. In a sterile environment, cells cannot use their normal detoxificationmethods that are bacterial, fungal and parasitical. Therefore, viral waste should be expected in petrie dishes containing live cells. Cells produce viruses for self-cleansing in a sterile or industrial toxic environment. Now that we understand viruses a lot better, I will broach the latest daily medical media hype causing most people to worry about a foreboding, impending AVIAN flu. Although there has never been a killer flu in history, they say it is an impending reality that will find us and kill or maim us. I perceive many of you thought as you read that last sentence, “What about the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 in which PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 9 millions of people died.” Let’s look at it. Considering only one factor inspires understanding that reality: It was the first time that a flu vaccine was internationally offered by pharmaceuticals. Millions did not die of the flu; they were killed by the flu vaccine. According to researcher R B Pearson who witnessed the Spanish flu “epidemic”,(1) few people died who received natural therapies during that period. Seventeen of twenty people died employing medical assistance, especially the vaccine. The vaccine was the epidemic. When I was heavily researching vaccines through the 80’s and early 90’s, I began where anyone might. I studied everything I could on Louis Pasteur’s work. I was shocked to learn, and it is not well known, that not one of Pasteur’s laboratory animals survived vaccination. At the time, and as it is today, many physicians wholeheartedly believed in forced immunization. They seemed to ignore the fact that everyday people were exposed to every natural and industry particle. Daily people were naturally inoculated and building resistance, unless they were overdosed or on very poor diets. What was different in 1916-18 was that the pharmaceutical industry, spearheaded by super-wealthy, supposedly philanthropic, Rockefeller and Carnegie, wanted to prove vaccines worked. They envisioned pharmaceutical miracles and great profits. Like Pasteur, they claimed to believe that vaccines would cure many ills. The Spanish flu vaccine took its toll. How philanthropic were Rockefeller, Carnegie and the injecting physicians? Did they accept responsibility for millions of deaths from their vaccine, or did they blame the Spanish flu? Rockefeller, Carnegie and physicians everywhere knew that if their vaccines were to blame, they would be legally liable. Pharmaceuticals funded the coverup stories written by doctors and writers quoting physicians. They claimed the first recorded killer flu epidemic had finally fallen upon the human race and they were there to fight it with their vaccines. Without any evidence, they claimed that the vaccine prevented millions of deaths. The fluvaccine failed people but profited Rockefeller and Carnegie. Probably, those responsible believed that it was an important experiment and the casualties were worthwhile. They probably assumed that as pharmaceutical technology progressed, vaccines would ultimately prove helpful to mankind. Has advanced medicine proved flu-vaccines? Canada's first attempt to prove that flu-vaccines are effective failed miserably. Canadian researchers at the University of Ottawa used their universal free flu vaccine as the proving ground beginning in 2000. It cost Ontario taxpayers more than $200-million. The researchers published in the journal Vaccine that the average monthly incidence of flu virus jumped over the first five years of the program. "All we do know is rates haven't decreased, and there has been a lot of money spent," PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 10 said professor Dianne Groll who led the study. "The program was designed to reduce the incidence of flu, and this hasn't yet happened." A faulty plan of the research structure is that it did not measure the extreme and unusual cases that affect the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Viral truth: Viruses are extremely specific solvents to disassembling and/or dissolving exact cellular structures, in many cases preventing cellular death and rendering cells only temporarily nonfunctional. If we were to compare cells to a mechanic, the mechanic finds the specific problem part or system, chooses specific tools (viruses) and removes the specific part of the machine and replaces or fixes it. When viewed from a short-sighted perspective, viruses look destructive. However, if viewed long-term without medical intervention, viruses prove to be beneficial. They provide our bodies with the cellular ability to regenerate themselves. Viruses completely change at least every 72 hours. The cell allows itself about 72 hours of detoxification with a specific virus or set of viruses. Then, it will produce a different virus or set of viruses for different cleansing. The medical and scientific communities identify that as viral evolution. Yet, they know viruses are not alive. Any flu vaccine that is produced is specific to a virus that was obsolete six to eighteen months prior to distribution of the vaccine. Big pharma knows that. If they know that then the vaccine business is aracket all about money. Nothing in science supports the THEORY that viruses leap from creatures to man. How can viruses leap when they are not alive? Every animal has viruses that disassemble or dissolve similar tissue-structures but putting them in the category of contagion is the same as saying laundry soaps are contagious. The theory is preposterous. Those theorists should be hired only by Hollywood to write inane Bclass horror stories. Does anyone remember the dreaded impending SWINE flu of the mid 1970’s? For about one year several times daily, parroting the pharmaceutical and medical industries, media warned us of the swine flu that was leaping from the supposeddirtiest of creatures, pork, and was going to kill us unless we all received the vaccine. President Ford received his swine-flu vaccine on national TV to prove its safety. Guess who was our vice president? Rockefeller. His pharmaceutical company received $7 billion dollars of U.S. citizens’ hard-earned tax dollars that funded the government-sponsored national assault on the dreaded impending swine flu epidemic of the century. Does anyone remember the death toll? The standard yearly estimate of 30,000-50,000. Does anyone remember why the government-sponsored program disappeared 2 weeks after the free vaccines were initiated? PDN #02 Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 11 The government swine-flu escapade was exposed by national consumer advocate Ida Honorof and Dr. E. McBean, PhD, ND. Ida was syndicated in hundreds of national radio programs. She and Dr. McBean filed a lawsuit against President Ford, VP Rockefeller, the Surgeon General and the US Government for creating and sponsoring the dangerous flu-vaccine. Honorof and McBean predicted that thousands of elderly and children would die as a result of the vaccine and that the Swine flu epidemic was a hoax. The media and medical professionals were ready to prove them wrong or not. Honorof’s reputation was impeccable so the media covered the story many times daily for weeks. During the two weeks of giving the “free” vaccine, approximately 2,300 people died within days after receiving the vaccine. Because of media exposure, the vaccine program was stopped.(2) And guess what? There was no Swine flu epidemic that killed millions of Americans. Guess who is still paying for the storage of the $7 billion of swine flu vaccine? The tax payers. Why are we storing it? Will it be relabeled Avian flu vaccine? If you think that is preposterous, consider this: In the mid and late 1960’s, AZT was a new herald chemical for fighting cancer. A year later, it was banned by the FDA as too toxic. Then in the 1980’s, it was pulled from pharmaceutical vaults and prescribed for AIDS patients. There was no research proving or disproving efficacy of AZT with AIDS patients but pharma needed to make a profit from its flop. The FDA approved it. Nearly every AIDS patient who received AZT died and pharma made a grand profit. Finally, to the point: Since flu are a natural response to bodily toxicity, and viruses are created by cells to self-cleanse, we should not focus on stopping flu. Stopping flu causes the accumulation of toxicity and waste that would lead to severe diseases. If we focus on helping our bodies virally detoxify with diet and lifestyle during each flu, we will rid our bodies of some of the dangerous disease-causing waste. There is no other rational approach to influenzas. If we believe and analyze the observations of Dr. Weston Price and similar researchers, we can safely assume that cooked food causes no more than 10% of diseases. Industrial toxicity, even in our modern technologically sanitary world, causes 90% of all diseases, and their chronic and fatal extremes. If we believe and analyze the work of Dr. Francis Pottenger, MD and Edward Howell, we can also safely assume that in such a toxic world, a near 100% raw-food diet that is heavy in fat is disease-preventative and disease-reversing.