Bullshit, I don’t buy that for a second. Because documentary’s that get sold to HBO or that are developed “in-house” have contracts that are signed by everyone interviewed stating what the documentary is about. If it’s not disclosed to the interviewee HBO and the production co. would be on the hook with a massive lawsuit. HBO and their lawyers would never risk losing a lawsuit if disclosures weren’t forthright. And it wouldn’t surprise me if it turns out Codemonkey is a silent, uncredited producer, of the doc.
I sign and have signed these contracts personally with every major studio in Hollywood, Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, Dreamworks, Sony, Paramount, etc., so when you say that “I’m talking out of my ass” I’m not going to argue with you, I guess you would know (umm, okay). Here’s what I do know, I know damn well what I’m agreeing to when I sign these contracts, I know what I am to expect and what I am releasing my rights to and/or more specifically “the terms” of the contract/agreement.
The producers would be in breach of contract if they said to Ron “we want to interview you about free speech in a documentary about free speech that will be titled Freedom of Speech.” And two weeks later tell him (or better yet, not tell him at all), oh we decided to make a documentary about Q instead and we’re going use parts of your interview from the “Freedom of Speech” doc you thought we were making. Uh uh, get out of here with that shit. You’d be laughed out of a court of law if you tried - as a producer - to do an end-around on a client/work for hire like that. Unless Ron agrees and signs a new contract stating he consents that his likeness can be used in this newly re-branded Q doc, they can’t use his footage. So, he knew and is acting surprised for whatever reason… probably for the exact reason you stated, he’s “a publicity hound.”
If I signed a contract with Disney to make “Beauty and the Beast Part II” and I did what I was hired to do for them and then six months later they decide to change direction and turn it into “Beauty and the Beast” the “porno” I can guarantee you that they would be in breach of my original contract 100% without first having me sign an agreed upon amendment contract. It’s not unusual to sign amended contracts after the fact because something that was originally agreed upon was changed.
Also, Ron doesn’t have the clout to have a final edit clause and that goes for almost everyone in Hollywood, with the exception of people like Tom Cruise - who is always a producer even if not credited as one on screen. Cruise is in the edit bay from start to finish ever since “Days of Thunder” so he’s not concerned about how he is portrayed. But my theory is Ron was brought on as an uncredited consultant/producer for this HBO project from the beginning anyway so this is all for naught.
Not necessarily, he agreed to be interviewed and signed a contract agreeing to take part in the interview/filming. And unless he has it in writing that they can't ask him if he's Q or even insinuate, then they are free to speculate.
I can say I think 4liberty is Q, hey everybody, 4liberty is Q! You are Q right? Good luck proving defamation.
The production value and symbols in the trailer, the white rabbit and 'into the storm', etc. The fact that HBO has been putting out pro redpill stuff lately. I'm not confident it will be, but I'm hopeful.
No, the HBO documentary is a far stretch from the Grassley tweet. The main thing of relevance from Grassley is that transparency/DECLAS of FISA happens this week. We’ll see soon enough. If nothing happens, this will only be the thousandth time anons made incorrect decodes or found some more disinfo.
I watched a Cullen Hoback doc What Lies Upstream the other day. He dives into the water crisis in West Virginia that happened in 2016 I think. It was a small red pill into government corruption, the CDC, the EPA, how lobbiests essentially write our laws for us. Still not sure how he stands politically, but he seems very capable as a documentary filmmaker at getting to the truth and had some big balls in a few parts. I’m open minded to his series on Q. The title alone is better than most the hit pieces as he doesn’t call it Qanon. It’s Q.
I've been watching their Woody Allen doc this week. I turned it on thinking they'd whitewash him but it's been the complete opposite. Interviews with mia farrow and the kid he molested in the first episode
I'd be shocked if this HBO doc is not a hit piece.
Recent HBO 'red pill' docs...
The NXIUM doc after Raniere and the Bronfman sisters have already been tried and convicted - totally expendable.
The Epstein doc after Epstein had 'suicided' himself. Again, totally expendable.
The Woody Allen - Mia Farrow doc about a now 85 year old man following the MeToo movement. Totally expendable.
The Epstein and Allen sagas have been known for decades and been plausibly denied by the mainstream, aka the HBO's of the world. The NXIUM thing, while more recent, has been known of for many, many years.
Unless "white hats" really are in control of major sectors of the country right now, including media outlets such as HBO. (deals of reduced sentences for people being charged with major crimes has a way of influencing what happens with their lives and businesses :) ) The steady drip of information and enlightenment going on with MSM seems pretty unusual, so perhaps it does indicate that the good guys are in control, and just softening up the masses to the truth.
If AT&T owns HBO, is there a tie in with the Nashville event?
It could be a even minded doc where all considerations are not made fun of like SP but actually looked at especially after that event. Could have been taken over.
Hard to say, hoping it's not a hit piece. Hoback is only one part and I'll have to watch his docs again to feel it out. Ponyboy72 can be right based on how things only come out way after to quiet or distract from current events.
Still, people will see it. More conversation other than CNN.
If Hollywood is involved in trafficking, all of their friends are listed on IMDB.
Also The Sounds Of Freedom came out March 14th. Jim Caviezel always seems like a good guy. So maybe things are turning and Q Before the Storm will be good.
you seem like a glass half-full type person while i'm of the glass half-empty persuasion. i'm not gonna try to detract from your optimism. i'll guess we'll see when the doc is released. i'm not holding my breath and hope to be pleasantly surprised - nah, check that, pleasantly shocked.
I'm pretty much a glass that is both half full and half empty kind of person :) So many things seem to be so weird right now, I don't discount any possibility. I do know that if "The Plan" turns out to be true, there will be celebrating like there never has been in the country. Those who don't celebrate will just be in a daze until they come to terms with it, but for the rest of us, it will be hard to deal with the adrenaline rush!
Allow me to call myself out here. This doc may not be "as bad" as I assumed it would be. If this Variety reporter is unhappy with it, it may be not as scathing as I originally thought. Perhaps, a tiny little bit even-handed. I'll draw a final conclusion when I watch it.
Umm, watch the link in the original post? I never said anything about the Grassley tweet. The tweet, along with the HBO doc, are two of the data points in the link to further the Q post. To put more simply, the Grassley tweet is just one part of the overall argument.
Most obviously, a direct reference to CORN. That’s not a mistake or random coincidence. Corn = corny = Comey and all that. Also popcorn.
Second, Dan scavino posted a 15 second video of a jet. Not sure if is an f22 or f35 but still relevant. And, though this is a stretch, you could make an argument that the jet is drawing a Q in the sky.
thanks, it wouldnt let me upload it to another source i have..
Thanks for this, telegram needs a phone number to register, screw that.
"Transparancy brings accountability "
Soooooo how about the satanic pedo shit, ok, Q?
Also reference specifically to corn. That’s not a coincidence that’s clearly intentional. This is 100% a comm.
Also Dan scavino posted a video of a fighter jet. Not sure if it’s an f22 or f35 but still the connection is there.
So DOD, grassley are prepping for the HBO documentary to come out????
Unless it's produced by Dan Scavino, it's gonna be a left wing hit job.
Stupid
Didn't we just learn it's from codemonkey?
Nope. He’s interviewed in it and wasn’t aware they were going to hit him up about Q in it. He thought it was about free speech.
Bullshit, I don’t buy that for a second. Because documentary’s that get sold to HBO or that are developed “in-house” have contracts that are signed by everyone interviewed stating what the documentary is about. If it’s not disclosed to the interviewee HBO and the production co. would be on the hook with a massive lawsuit. HBO and their lawyers would never risk losing a lawsuit if disclosures weren’t forthright. And it wouldn’t surprise me if it turns out Codemonkey is a silent, uncredited producer, of the doc.
I sign and have signed these contracts personally with every major studio in Hollywood, Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, Dreamworks, Sony, Paramount, etc., so when you say that “I’m talking out of my ass” I’m not going to argue with you, I guess you would know (umm, okay). Here’s what I do know, I know damn well what I’m agreeing to when I sign these contracts, I know what I am to expect and what I am releasing my rights to and/or more specifically “the terms” of the contract/agreement.
The producers would be in breach of contract if they said to Ron “we want to interview you about free speech in a documentary about free speech that will be titled Freedom of Speech.” And two weeks later tell him (or better yet, not tell him at all), oh we decided to make a documentary about Q instead and we’re going use parts of your interview from the “Freedom of Speech” doc you thought we were making. Uh uh, get out of here with that shit. You’d be laughed out of a court of law if you tried - as a producer - to do an end-around on a client/work for hire like that. Unless Ron agrees and signs a new contract stating he consents that his likeness can be used in this newly re-branded Q doc, they can’t use his footage. So, he knew and is acting surprised for whatever reason… probably for the exact reason you stated, he’s “a publicity hound.”
If I signed a contract with Disney to make “Beauty and the Beast Part II” and I did what I was hired to do for them and then six months later they decide to change direction and turn it into “Beauty and the Beast” the “porno” I can guarantee you that they would be in breach of my original contract 100% without first having me sign an agreed upon amendment contract. It’s not unusual to sign amended contracts after the fact because something that was originally agreed upon was changed.
Also, Ron doesn’t have the clout to have a final edit clause and that goes for almost everyone in Hollywood, with the exception of people like Tom Cruise - who is always a producer even if not credited as one on screen. Cruise is in the edit bay from start to finish ever since “Days of Thunder” so he’s not concerned about how he is portrayed. But my theory is Ron was brought on as an uncredited consultant/producer for this HBO project from the beginning anyway so this is all for naught.
Okay, so since the documentary claims Ron Watkins is Q even though he denied it, I guess he can sue HBO. https://www.the-sun.com/news/2522119/qanon-leader-q-revealed-ex-8chan-administrator-ron-watkins/
Not necessarily, he agreed to be interviewed and signed a contract agreeing to take part in the interview/filming. And unless he has it in writing that they can't ask him if he's Q or even insinuate, then they are free to speculate.
I can say I think 4liberty is Q, hey everybody, 4liberty is Q! You are Q right? Good luck proving defamation.
Thanks for the info (including your previous replies). I appreciate your effort in educating us. Very interesting.
Thanks. I'm still hopeful it'll be more than a hit piece.
Synopsis already said the doc illustrates the dangers of unfettered free speech. I wouldn't hold my breath.
Did it? Ugh, I must've misread it. It thought it was pro free speech.
The production value and symbols in the trailer, the white rabbit and 'into the storm', etc. The fact that HBO has been putting out pro redpill stuff lately. I'm not confident it will be, but I'm hopeful.
Stay positive, mate. Have you lost your way?
No, the HBO documentary is a far stretch from the Grassley tweet. The main thing of relevance from Grassley is that transparency/DECLAS of FISA happens this week. We’ll see soon enough. If nothing happens, this will only be the thousandth time anons made incorrect decodes or found some more disinfo.
I watched a Cullen Hoback doc What Lies Upstream the other day. He dives into the water crisis in West Virginia that happened in 2016 I think. It was a small red pill into government corruption, the CDC, the EPA, how lobbiests essentially write our laws for us. Still not sure how he stands politically, but he seems very capable as a documentary filmmaker at getting to the truth and had some big balls in a few parts. I’m open minded to his series on Q. The title alone is better than most the hit pieces as he doesn’t call it Qanon. It’s Q.
I've been watching their Woody Allen doc this week. I turned it on thinking they'd whitewash him but it's been the complete opposite. Interviews with mia farrow and the kid he molested in the first episode
I'd be shocked if this HBO doc is not a hit piece.
Recent HBO 'red pill' docs...
The NXIUM doc after Raniere and the Bronfman sisters have already been tried and convicted - totally expendable. The Epstein doc after Epstein had 'suicided' himself. Again, totally expendable. The Woody Allen - Mia Farrow doc about a now 85 year old man following the MeToo movement. Totally expendable.
The Epstein and Allen sagas have been known for decades and been plausibly denied by the mainstream, aka the HBO's of the world. The NXIUM thing, while more recent, has been known of for many, many years.
Again, I'd be shocked if this isn't a hit piece.
Unless "white hats" really are in control of major sectors of the country right now, including media outlets such as HBO. (deals of reduced sentences for people being charged with major crimes has a way of influencing what happens with their lives and businesses :) ) The steady drip of information and enlightenment going on with MSM seems pretty unusual, so perhaps it does indicate that the good guys are in control, and just softening up the masses to the truth.
If AT&T owns HBO, is there a tie in with the Nashville event?
It could be a even minded doc where all considerations are not made fun of like SP but actually looked at especially after that event. Could have been taken over.
Cullen Hoback https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1730895/ Terms and Conditions May Apply What Lies Upstream Seems ok.
Adam McKay https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0570912/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 Lots of Will Ferrell and SNL connections so I don't like that Produced this Mexican Donald Trump (low effort) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0noDEI2nLY (sorry for YT, couldn't find BT link)
Hard to say, hoping it's not a hit piece. Hoback is only one part and I'll have to watch his docs again to feel it out. Ponyboy72 can be right based on how things only come out way after to quiet or distract from current events.
Still, people will see it. More conversation other than CNN.
If Hollywood is involved in trafficking, all of their friends are listed on IMDB.
Also The Sounds Of Freedom came out March 14th. Jim Caviezel always seems like a good guy. So maybe things are turning and Q Before the Storm will be good.
Edit. Nevermind. Seems fishy.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkvrLree/ron-/c/
you seem like a glass half-full type person while i'm of the glass half-empty persuasion. i'm not gonna try to detract from your optimism. i'll guess we'll see when the doc is released. i'm not holding my breath and hope to be pleasantly surprised - nah, check that, pleasantly shocked.
I'm pretty much a glass that is both half full and half empty kind of person :) So many things seem to be so weird right now, I don't discount any possibility. I do know that if "The Plan" turns out to be true, there will be celebrating like there never has been in the country. Those who don't celebrate will just be in a daze until they come to terms with it, but for the rest of us, it will be hard to deal with the adrenaline rush!
Allow me to call myself out here. This doc may not be "as bad" as I assumed it would be. If this Variety reporter is unhappy with it, it may be not as scathing as I originally thought. Perhaps, a tiny little bit even-handed. I'll draw a final conclusion when I watch it.
enter text
Why do you assume Grassley is talking about an HBO show?
Umm, watch the link in the original post? I never said anything about the Grassley tweet. The tweet, along with the HBO doc, are two of the data points in the link to further the Q post. To put more simply, the Grassley tweet is just one part of the overall argument.
this was really worth the watch - SERIOUSLY Q
Can you give a synopsis for us non-tme’s
u/#Correct
Hhooooooooollllyyyyyyy shiiiitttttttt
☀️ ENGAGE MAXIMUM SUNLIGHT ☀️
Hmm, yeah, that could've been tied into that video.
This is why I come here every day.
NCSWIC
I'm so excited! And I just can't hide it!
And I know I know I know I know I know I want two (terms) I want two (scoops)
that profile pic is honeypot clickbait. Interesting info shared though.
LOL its melq's telegram profile.. I didnt set it.
No mainstream HollyWeird documentary will EVER be truthful. Half baked truths with full blown lies, is more than likely what it'll be from HBO/Vice.
Don't fool yourselves going into this. It'll just let you down and piss you off.
Oh I'm sending her a creepy PM tonight...
"Hey baby, you uh... Q around here often?"
hahahaha
Just don't send her that Family Guy clip of Quamire: "Does this look like a Q to you? How about now?"
;)
https://t.me/stormypatriotjoe21/1172
direct link
That’s what she said
Username/comment/placement checks out
We have the highest IQ's, let me tell you.
2 other notable things.
Most obviously, a direct reference to CORN. That’s not a mistake or random coincidence. Corn = corny = Comey and all that. Also popcorn.
Second, Dan scavino posted a 15 second video of a jet. Not sure if is an f22 or f35 but still relevant. And, though this is a stretch, you could make an argument that the jet is drawing a Q in the sky.
NCSWIC WWG1WGA
I liked this video a lot more when it was called A Beautiful Mind and had Russel Crowe in it.
N
C
W
I think Grassley was one of the senators that voted to confirm Merrick Garland for AG
wouldnt of matter if he voted no.
thats melQ
LOL shes pretty
Does this help?
https://i.maga.host/wXgjEDO.png
Yup. Thanks.
Clearly Rose in the glass. I dont think you can see that well through a light toned red.
She’s “real world” hot
DS tactic! Pretty girl! Squirrel! Haha.
You’re doing fantastic, fren. Masters of our domain!
Hold this great pic side-by-side of that mangled heap of an excuse for Assistant Health Secretary; an excellent summary of the sides of this conflict.