-
Kamala Harris has no idea how to react to question about whether she will visit the border, so she … laughs? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-laughing-border-question-backlash-cornyn
-
Kamala’s racist niece tweets that the Colorado shooter was yet another violent white man, has to delete it when she learns he was Syrian https://www.foxnews.com/media/boulder-colorado-shooter-meena-harris-kamala-niece-tweet
-
Majority of Black and Hispanic voters support voter ID https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/03/23/poll-majority-of-black-and-hispanic-voters-support-voter-id/
-
Dem Rep Cuellar releases images of border crisis in effort to spur the Biden Admin to act https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-cuellar-migrants-released-without-notice-appear-court
-
Biden Admin withdraws candidate for Deputy Secretary of Interior under questions about her opposition to oil and gas https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-pulls-biden-interior-nominee-elizabeth-klein
-
Alabama passes resolution to lower its flags in memory of 61 million babies killed through abortion https://www.lifenews.com/2021/03/22/alabama-passes-resolution-to-lower-its-flags-mourn-61-million-babies-killed-in-abortions/
-
Trump endorses and applauds Project Veritas and James O’Keefe for their efforts https://youtu.be/LBtWHVdl0CI
-
Dem handwriting analyst says 9% of absentee ballots in Arizona had signature issues, which would be 190,000 fake ballots https://www.thewashingtongazette.com/2021/03/9-of-absentee-ballots-in-arizona-could.html
-
Liberals came out of their shoes to pin the Boulder shooting on white extremism, now utterly silent after shooter is identified as Syrian-born Muslim who hated Trump https://nypost.com/2021/03/23/police-identify-ahmad-alyssa-21-as-suspect-in-boulder-shooting/
See you tomorrow.
Thank you winsanon! We appreciate these summary posts!
#8 Is Important!
Thanks, WinsAnon!
It's actually a story from months ago and doesn't mean shit because the judge is a partisan hack.
He said that non matching signature wasn't grounds to reject a ballot. Instead the claimant has to track down every single voter involved and get them to declare to the court that it's not their signature.
How many are needed to track down for there to be proof of material change in the outcome?
Nevermind, looked it up myself. It is 10,457.
Ahhh, there’s my favorite daily post!!!❤️? thank you!
Kameltoes is a dunce. Laughing is her default setting.
James O Keefe has surpassed Tom Fitton IMO. That guy is doing God's work and getting results. Fitton files a lot of lawsuits that go nowhere. NOT all his fault though since the DS own the corrupt court system.
Liberals are NOT totally silent. They are now calling to keep the killers name quiet so people don't learn the truth that he wasn't white. Evil days . . .
Tom Fitton and his organization do incredible work on behalf of truth and liberty, but they’re just a little less flashy than Project Veritas. It’s not a competition; thank you to both organizations!
(I haven’t been able to give up Amazon yet, but PV is my “smile”-program charity recipient?)
They make a great tag team. Tom drowns them with legal motions, while James seduces them and then records them.
Thank you for taking the time to put these together!
Yes Kamala, kids getting raped, and dying is really hilarious stuff. /s
Gitmo might even be too good for these people.
I saw a retard comment that said women are EXPECTED to behave cheerful & friendly, but that men are not. As a woman, this floored me!! Maybe a female maid or cashier is expected to be cheerful, but the Queen of England or Chancellor of Germany is not! Women who wield power over others are expected to treat serious matters with sobriety & solemn respect. Harris is a maniacal FOOL.
Thanks for these posts. A lot of good happening. I was dooming pretty bad but with all the news and a talk with a friend my faith has been restored. High on hopium.
Thank you, WinsAnon for another edition of "Wins of the Day". It's starting to feel like the momentum is increasing each day! Methinks you will be reporting some VERY interesting news in the coming weeks!! :)
Hat tip to you for continued excellence! ?
IMO likely Q links and proofs belong on here. The Evergreen ship stuck in the Suez being the big example today.
Who needs hopium when the reality is so hot.
All sooo rich and spicy!!
I am almost at the point of foregoing all other snooz for your daily wins. Truly a life-enhancing service to humanity if ever there was one.
This is one of the better days of wins! Thanks!
Democrats are so retarded its unbelievable
And now I can go to sleep! :-)
As a part of my morning routine, I've been copying/pasting these daily gems in an email to my son, who is deployed. I got a reply from him this morning letting me know how much he appreciates them, as they are the highlight of his day.
Thank you for your efforts.
That's awesome. Imagine how much he is spreading the Wins to other troops! This comment made me very happy. Thank you son for his service from us, please. ✌️
Yes, please.
Thanks, once again for this really day-enhancing post?
Hold the line! ?
Re #4: A Dem stepping out of party line to criticize the Biden regime? What is this timeline anymore? Lmao
Love number 6. God bless Alabama.
Thank you.
i really needed this one.
That was a dirty day
Thanks for your service WinsAnon. ?️?️?️
Syrians are Caucasians. Just saying.
"White"- European descent, Christian, believe in "conserving" rules, morals, law that build and maintain healthy culture.
This is why the "hidden hand" must attack and destroy white.
#8 This is what they were referencing when writing the article:
"First, as Plaintiff admits, that this group of signatures lacks more than one comparator signature does not mean that “the signatures were invalid or fraudulent.” [...] Second, the standards that forensic document examiners use are not the same as the standards used by county elections officials. Forensic document examiners are often used in criminal cases; for example, they may be used to determine whether a criminal defendant has committed forgery or fraud. (...) The standards in such cases—often, beyond a reasonable doubt—are plainly not the same as those used by trained, but non-expert, county officials to adjudicate signature matches in the elections context, where the presumption is that a vote is valid."
Then from the article itself:
"There was also a Republican hand writing specialist who concluded that 6% of ballots had problematic signatures, which is significantly lower than the 8-10% figure reportedly cited by the Plaintiff from handwriting experts in the case."
I don't believe that's going anywhere. Which shows that the article was written to make it seem like it is going somewhere even though it isn't.
Providing false hope for clicks. If so then fuck that website.
If I'm wrong I'd be happy to hear it so please let me know if I'm missing something.
Disappointing!
EDIT: The first quote I'm referencing what they linked in the article if you click where it says "9% of the signatures" Sorry for not being clear!
I assume your first block of quoted text is from another source as I'm not seeing it in the article linked here...
I'm not quite on board with what you're conclusion is, although I do appreciate your skeptical eye towards reporters excluding facts from a piece to strengthen their case, regardless of which "side" they're on.
BUT to me, I'm reading the first quote as saying, simply, that poll workers are not necessarily as well trained to spot forgeries as handwriting experts would be. And further, they are under less supposition to be actively looking for fraud then an expert, called in to investigate, would be. Taken together, the first quote and the cited news article indicate simply that possible fraud is being discovered only due to the fact that experts are being called in to examine. In my eyes, this is to highlight the fact that expert analysis is critical to a claim of fraud.
I'm no lawyer though, in fact I'm pretty ignorant to the workings of these types of proceedings. I do think you raised a very good question, and would love to see some other opinions. ?
Oh hey! So yeah I definitely should have explained where I got that first quote from, for context.
So if you go to the article linked in #8, not very far down you'll see the words "9% of the signatures" as a clickable link. That'll take you to what they (and I) are referencing.
I used the ctrl+F find-in-page thing and searched....I think the word "handwriting" and found handwriting experts and where they got the 9% and all that. Maybe check that out and reply again? If you don't mind.
I super appreciate the reply though I felt like I was just being a party pooper. When really I just don't like the manipulation of the right and I don't like feeling like I'm stupid and will believe whatever I want to be true or something. I'm only suggesting that some of these sites think that way and use it for clicks. And that it shows through here when you read the thing they are referencing because it's written in a way that is clearly doubt and arguing against fraud claims and suggesting the claims were going nowhere, while the article written about it suggests the opposite it seems.
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to let this one go. Time's been very short here lately, and I'm checking this between laundry, dishes and dinner lol. Didn't want to leave you hanging, because I know how frustrating that can be on forums.
That said, I believe you posted the pertinent part of that 9% link, so I hopefully got the gist of it. And trust me, I'm as suspicious as you are about media (I worked in mass media as a journalist - pop culture mag out of NYC, and a few other outlets and I know first hand how journalists are typically left to their own devices at best, and encouraged to create and pitch their own leads... And it's shady. Hopefully not as content driven at Hard News outlets, but I'm skeptical) on any side of the political spectrum. My experience was that journalists only eat if they can create content. So stories get... Created. You dig?
Unfortunately, back to the grind for me. I'll say this though, you're not stupid lol. Anyone who actively reads the actual articles, much less follows embedded sources gets a healthy dose of respect from me.
Have a good night. Phew!