Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition which may be true - may be not. My response was too someone outside of the MSM referring to Q by that name which you further reinforced by saying he 'interviews with the MSM and HBO".
Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.
There were actually a lot of anons that never used that word - because Q is Q and anons are anons. We knew Q as Q. It just felt weird to tack "anon" onto it. So it was pretty funny when Q said as much as a way to skewer the media. I've used it against Democrats since then - they get all wound up about QANON and when I say "there is no such thing as QANON" when I am actually wearing a Q logo....they just don't know what to do with themselves. It's very deflating.
Q said the name Qanon was designed to link Q to the actions of millions of random anons. That way you can do a violent FF with fake Q actors, and tar and feather Q and his info with the deranged actions of a [pseudo]anon.
Hence official CIA / FBI designation of Qanon as "dangerous domestic terrorist conspiracy theory bogeyman monster"
In fact, Michael Flynn's phrase was drawn from an inscription first "engraved on a bell on one of President John F. Kennedy's sailboats, acknowledging the unity of mankind," the suit stated.
Lmao. “It’s not Q. It’s JFK.” As if the graveyard isn’t a giant Q. For the lawsuit, it fulfills the need of being a great cover story. Hard to be against JFK. And for the rest of us here... we read you loud and clear!
It is a powerful moment in the film. The movie made the term (concept) familiar to those outside the Navy. If you’re on a ship you don’t have a choice to go your own way. Being on a boat forces you to work as a team because you either all make it back to port or you all make it to the bottom of the ocean. Granted, only half the crew died. But the ones that died, died because of the failure of one man.
A movie in 1996? If it was on Kennedy’s sailboat it’s safe to say the movie writers didn’t invent the phrase, although perhaps that’s a movie Q has seen.
With the giant Q cemetery JFK makes more sense to me.
Good gawd this article is trying SO HARD LOL. "Flynn who plead guilty" and "Powell who was sued for a billion gazillion dollars" and "Pappapoulos" who also plead guilty.
As a result, "CNN falsely accused Plaintiffs of being 'followers' and supporters of the 'dangerous,' 'violent,' 'racist,' 'extremist,' 'insurrectionist,' 'domestic terrorism movement – QAnon," the suit argued.
Wow. Pretty low blow coming from Flynn's brother.
I am non-confrontational, have never given a shot about race, don't know how to fire a gun. My "extremism" is that I want the US government to follow the damn constitution as it was written.
Well it doesn't say anything about General Michael Flynn denouncing Q...only Jack and Leslie Flynn...it also says nothing about General Charles Flynn that now commands the Pacific Command for the Army.
Agreed. I personally have always used qonline and there were alot of those sites to pick from to search Q posts from chans-kun; all with different names so that doesn't make one aggragate site the be all end all of Q. I wonder why they decided on that one name as their choice of wrongful mislabeling.
This only mentions two of the Flynn family members that have apparently no affiliation with Q. It says nothing of the other two Flynn family members, General Michael Flynn and his brother, General Charles Flynn who now leads the Pacific Command for the Army. This is just an attempt to get the spotlight off of the ones that are affiliated in my opinion.
im convinced the flynn appointment was a message from the military to the civilian agencies that enough is enough, you finally fucked with the wrong guy. that posting? of all people a flynn brother? which makes essentially means flynn is in charge. cmon. thats not a fucking accident, no way. those jobs are SUPER political. its a message.
As a result, "CNN falsely accused Plaintiffs of being 'followers' and supporters of the 'dangerous,' 'violent,' 'racist,' 'extremist,' 'insurrectionist,' 'domestic terrorism movement – QAnon," the suit argued.
Wow, we’re so nefarious and dangerous???
Not sure who QAnon is though?
And they deserve every penny after what they were forced to go through.
That aside, like shooting fish in a barrel, the 'Kennedy Bell' (whilst I believe is not insignificant in itself), is fantastic cover, for what we know he REALLY means!
As in.... "I don't know, what is it, what do YOU think it is.. ?" - cue cheekiest grin....
I've seen pictures, but realise that proves nowt, and you certainly shouldn't take my word for it.
But when it forms the basis of the Flynn family lawsuit, then that says enough for me.
I'd be grateful if you could post the pics you've seen. (or direct me to where you saw them). I started searching for evidence when I first read it wasn't true a couple of years ago. Searched again yesterday and all I come up with is articles about nothing being on the Kennedy bell, that the phrase is on the movie ship bell only.
If true, this is actually pretty genius. Either CNN is forced to produce evidence that Flynn is connected to Q or they are out of pocket $75mm.
Checkmate.
Not to mention there IS no "Qanon", so they cannot possibly prove the Flynn's are part of something that does not exist.
Not true. Codemonkey refers to Q as QAnon in the HBO documentary. Just trying to keep things accurate.
Codemonkey glows.
HINT: If we know your name, you are not anon.
HINT: If you're lining up to do interviews with the MSM and for HBO as an emissary of the Q community, you are not anon.
HINT: If your "biggest drop in history" is linking to NeonRevolt, another name faggot, you are not anon.
This is not a popular opinion here but it is on the chans
Be weary of namefags
STOP KICKING HIM HES ALREADY DEAD
Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition which may be true - may be not. My response was too someone outside of the MSM referring to Q by that name which you further reinforced by saying he 'interviews with the MSM and HBO".
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.
Codemonkey also asserts he is just the admin of a board Q has decided to use. He is just as capable of being wrong as any Normie.
The term was accurate and every anon was OK with it until late 2020s Q drop.
There were actually a lot of anons that never used that word - because Q is Q and anons are anons. We knew Q as Q. It just felt weird to tack "anon" onto it. So it was pretty funny when Q said as much as a way to skewer the media. I've used it against Democrats since then - they get all wound up about QANON and when I say "there is no such thing as QANON" when I am actually wearing a Q logo....they just don't know what to do with themselves. It's very deflating.
Q said the name Qanon was designed to link Q to the actions of millions of random anons. That way you can do a violent FF with fake Q actors, and tar and feather Q and his info with the deranged actions of a [pseudo]anon.
Hence official CIA / FBI designation of Qanon as "dangerous domestic terrorist conspiracy theory bogeyman monster"
To top it off, the suit isn't coming from Flynn himself but his family members lol.
It’s better than that.
Lmao. “It’s not Q. It’s JFK.” As if the graveyard isn’t a giant Q. For the lawsuit, it fulfills the need of being a great cover story. Hard to be against JFK. And for the rest of us here... we read you loud and clear!
I believe that wwg1wga is a reference in the movie White Squall.
It is a powerful moment in the film. The movie made the term (concept) familiar to those outside the Navy. If you’re on a ship you don’t have a choice to go your own way. Being on a boat forces you to work as a team because you either all make it back to port or you all make it to the bottom of the ocean. Granted, only half the crew died. But the ones that died, died because of the failure of one man.
Both are true. There is a picture of a bell from JFKs boat that also says it. This was a big part of the JFK Jr confusion, if I remember right.
I'd like to see a picture of that bell - on the Honey Fitz or any other Kennedy boat. Perhaps it's out there - I haven't seen it.
I've seen a picture of the bell. I find it interesting they are presenting it as fact that it is from JFK's boat, as that was much debated by anons.
I thought a version of that saying was from the Musketeers book/tales. 1844. Pre-dates JFK.
You are thinking of “All for one and one for all”
A movie in 1996? If it was on Kennedy’s sailboat it’s safe to say the movie writers didn’t invent the phrase, although perhaps that’s a movie Q has seen.
With the giant Q cemetery JFK makes more sense to me.
Good gawd this article is trying SO HARD LOL. "Flynn who plead guilty" and "Powell who was sued for a billion gazillion dollars" and "Pappapoulos" who also plead guilty.
I wonder if this will be another hallmark Lin Wood Defamation Case :D
It's so clever it literally wrinkled my brain
As a result, "CNN falsely accused Plaintiffs of being 'followers' and supporters of the 'dangerous,' 'violent,' 'racist,' 'extremist,' 'insurrectionist,' 'domestic terrorism movement – QAnon," the suit argued.
Wow. Pretty low blow coming from Flynn's brother.
I am non-confrontational, have never given a shot about race, don't know how to fire a gun. My "extremism" is that I want the US government to follow the damn constitution as it was written.
Double meanings exist. I wouldn't consider any of this a "low blow." Who cares? Take $75 million from the mockingbird media.
Exactly, CNN isn't exactly doing too well either, I doubt they have the liquid cash to sustain much longer without more funding lol.
Well it doesn't say anything about General Michael Flynn denouncing Q...only Jack and Leslie Flynn...it also says nothing about General Charles Flynn that now commands the Pacific Command for the Army.
Thry are suing the Qanon movement which as built up by media is all those things according to them because it doesn't exist.
Q is none of that, it isn't even named qanon.
I wouldn't take it personally. You aren't qanon and this isn't a cult and there is no sign up sheet to be part of the researching we do.
Only the website is qanon.pub
But that isn't run by Q, it's by anons
Agreed. I personally have always used qonline and there were alot of those sites to pick from to search Q posts from chans-kun; all with different names so that doesn't make one aggragate site the be all end all of Q. I wonder why they decided on that one name as their choice of wrongful mislabeling.
Maybe a sign up sheet would eliminate a lot of the retards.
That wasn't a low blow. That was a slug in the mouth.
Isn't CNN tired of being sued? They should try to speak factually to avoid having to pay out more money.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out, lol.
I guess the Commie News Network is not concerned about their 50% fall in viewership.
This only mentions two of the Flynn family members that have apparently no affiliation with Q. It says nothing of the other two Flynn family members, General Michael Flynn and his brother, General Charles Flynn who now leads the Pacific Command for the Army. This is just an attempt to get the spotlight off of the ones that are affiliated in my opinion.
im convinced the flynn appointment was a message from the military to the civilian agencies that enough is enough, you finally fucked with the wrong guy. that posting? of all people a flynn brother? which makes essentially means flynn is in charge. cmon. thats not a fucking accident, no way. those jobs are SUPER political. its a message.
There is no Qanon movement.
Better yet, use their tactic. "It's just an idea." KEK
But you're right, just Q, Q+ and the Great Awakening (anons)
And more so, literally, there is no organization. It IS just an idea.
But I am going to retract it, and let out the secret. Fuck it.
The Anon's have been organized for over 234 years now.
We also go by "We The People", maybe you have heard of us.
QAnon is a media fabrication though.
Wow, we’re so nefarious and dangerous??? Not sure who QAnon is though?
Wow. CNN is just bleeding money.
Before long, their owners will have to decide to close the doors for good.
Either that or they'll just keep siphoning money into it like Planned Parenthood from other foundations and fronts.
WOT?
There are millions of reasons to sue CNN, but that ain't one of them.
Damn.
https://files.catbox.moe/e5a5yg.jpeg
Why not? QAnon doesn't exist.
Any reason is a good reason to sue CNN.
Should've gone with a number high enough to bankrupt CNN.
So CNN just set foot in the libel trap. Should have done their research and found the original origin of the phrase.
HIS FAMILY, BUT NOT HIM??
I hope they win.
And they deserve every penny after what they were forced to go through. That aside, like shooting fish in a barrel, the 'Kennedy Bell' (whilst I believe is not insignificant in itself), is fantastic cover, for what we know he REALLY means!
As in.... "I don't know, what is it, what do YOU think it is.. ?" - cue cheekiest grin....
It's literally not cover though, the origin isn't from Q it's from a movie.
That phrase is for sure uttered in the movie 'White Squall'. I've never seen anything that shows that it came from a Kennedy boat.
Thing is....that is not inscribed on the bell of Kennedy's boat. I don't know how that belief came about.
I've seen pictures, but realise that proves nowt, and you certainly shouldn't take my word for it. But when it forms the basis of the Flynn family lawsuit, then that says enough for me.
I'd be grateful if you could post the pics you've seen. (or direct me to where you saw them). I started searching for evidence when I first read it wasn't true a couple of years ago. Searched again yesterday and all I come up with is articles about nothing being on the Kennedy bell, that the phrase is on the movie ship bell only.
In that case, I recall. My "research" is limited to picking up bits on here. Sounded convincing and for sure a lesson..
I mean, there is literally a video of Flynn reciting the exact 'oath' Q previously dropped. So, this is an obvious trap.
Are you enjoying the show?
The Deep State makes Movie Villains look like Einstein in comparison.
These people are stupid.