CDC confirms Stanford Study on Harmfulness of Facemasks.
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Ok, so what don’t they end the mask mandates tomorrow? Because it’s about control. If nobody walked around with a mask on, you would never know we are supposed to be in a plandemic/scamdemic!
That’s what I tell people everyday, turn off the tv and take off the masks. You’d never know the difference.
This. It ends when you quit playing.
https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
Destroys your immune system too.
It is illegal to mandate an experimental an experimental drug.
I don’t!
he was obviously referring to the vax, it's cute that you act as if you didn't realize this.
I know what OP originally posted, but Lonegunman is talking about the vax, maybe he posted on the wrong thread. but his post implies vax, he knows masks are not a drug.
The local government is going to make sure the businesses mandate it. I think that's the plan.
Here is a snopes counter piece. Notice how they spend most of the time attacking the source.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/stanford-nih-mask-study/
Good point showing the DS at work.
I'll take your word for it. I wouldn't click on a snopes link if I were on fire and that was the only way to put it out.
Normally I never click on Snopes but for the heck of it, I just did. Gosh, they really insult the reader. It says, "Really depends on how you define these words: Stanford, NIH, Study, Conclude, Mask, and Work. " I swear...
thats some slick willy logic. depends on what your definition of "is" is...
Ha! I thought the same thing.
Just picking up where you left off fren!
Because it wasn't a Stanford study, the NIH had nothing to do with it, it wasn't a peer-reviewed... etc. etc.
Trust the science bro!
Let it burn!
Only the doomed 4-6% take snopes seriously
Back in the '90s, Snopes was interesting and useful. They exposed stuff like subliminal imagery in Disney movies, talked about how people who die at Disneyland are never pronounced dead until after they are removed from the theme park, dispelling fraudulent chain emails, etc. Snopes was fairly useful 25 years ago.
TBF, Snopes is correct in pointing out that it was not a Stanford study, and the CDC did not confirm it.
https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2020/06/10/ppe-burden/
again, not a Stanford study, and not the the one linked, and nothing to do with normal use
i dont care about Stanford. its on the CDC.
"CDC Confirms Stamford Study" is a false statement. What was linked to is not what was posted by the CDC. The CDC referenced study was very specifically about long term uninterrupted n95 use by medical workers. The point was that the Snopes stuff was accurate.
I'm mostly concerned about how this will affect brain development in children. Breeding a generation of criminals.
The liberal left is bat sh__ crazy for sure.. so many of them highly “edikated” . All that “edikation” means is they’re good at memorizing and regurgitating.. and they excel at arrogantly doing just that.. don’t even realize they were never taught to think for themselves, making them useful, witless little sheeple for their handlers..
Credentialed doesn't mean you are educated necessarily.
I’m not sure how long this has been going on, but I learned how to do these things called “persuasive speeches” starting in middle school, and I’m 25 now. The point was to structure a speech in such a way that it appeals to the listener and encourages them to do what you want them to do.
Looking back on it, they basically filled our heads with rhetoric and programmed us to use it. I even persuaded my parents to buy me a RuneScape membership, among other things, using these newly acquired skills. No shame here, I just did not know any better back then.
So THIS is what the bullshit verdict was trying to hide ...
Yesterday my daughter picked my granddaughter up from preschool & the teacher told her there will be full time mask wearing starting on Monday April 26. They’ll be able to eat & nap without them. My daughter told her teacher to grab all of my granddaughters stuff because she won’t be coming back. We all need to take a stand against the crap they’re trying to feed us. We’re in Michigan & Whitmer thinks she has control.
Something Official must be done about this, so the people can show businesses and police that this is correct.
#banmasks
If Fauci truly knows anything about pandemics, he already knows this and has enacted it anyway. The Spanish Flue pandemic in 1913 already confirmed that face masks were hazardous. They did it for control and to make sure everyone was sick with something.
Fauci is following the globalists and is actively killing 90% of the world's population.
Unfortunately, the CDC article talks directly about N95 masks specifically, not the standard surgeon masks and or homemade ones the majority of people wear. This makes this not as significant as I wished it was.
"reduction in cognition – altered judgement"
Top side effect of mask wearing... would explain a heck of a lot. Masks are a chess move against the Awakening.
Not just a control mechanism from a PR standpoint.
They try to stall us while they prepare.
Because the deterioration of your health is the ultimate goal.
What the hell??????? ????
"non-mainstream scientific ideas."
Wat?
Probably more correct to call the Stanford publication an “analysis” or “review.” Unless I’m wrong, the guy (hero) didn’t run any experiments, he compiled available data from others into a review article. It is still a solid piece of work, but calling it a study mischaracterizes it.
To those who believe the Scientific Method is one of last objective defenses against lies, the type of analysis done is incredibly important. It’s about the hierarchy of medical evidence. On the lowest tier is a Review Article, which this is. These can be helpful and informative, but the approach is to assemble already available data. To answer your question, a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a large number of subjects is the most impactful evidence. And, I don’t need one, because a Danish one was already done last year on the useless of masks - Bundgaard et al Annals of Internal Medicine 2020
It is also not a Stanford publication.
I went to the CDC study and first thing I see is “ Please note that this blog is specifically about respirators used by healthcare workers during long shifts and not facemasks worn as barrier control to stop the spread of COVID.” This might be a nothing burger to be honest.
I love that they added this addendum to that link on the CDC site: "Please note that this blog is specifically about respirators used by healthcare workers during long shifts and not facemasks worn as barrier control to stop the spread of COVID." Masks are still useless!
Well then, that settles it, give China Jobama and his ho “veep” all the masks they want. Pile ‘em on. Quadruple layer, octuple.
The sheer idiocy of the “wear a mask” lunatics mantra is more understandable upon quick review of the actual study.