So there was watermarks!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (284)
sorted by:
Has anyone watching the live feed actually seen any ballots yet that did not pass the black light test? Watch the water...Q has a fuckin' sense of humor, I'll give him that.
How dare you assume Q's gender. :)
They, them.
We, Us.
Touché, fren!
Touche, fren!
Yea, grandma's are running this sting; at the very least keeping hope alive. The very best researchers on the steal have been woman, bravo. Please do not relax your jaws, you've got'em.
Ah! But what is it testing for? Is it really for a watermark? To address your comment, if it is for a watermark, my guess is that it will be whole boxes that will fail the test at once.
I just want to know if anyone has actually seen one fail yet. I saw in another thread that they sent one ballot back for review in a flurry of activity, so maybe they have found one. Just getting anxious is all. Waited too long for this, and want to spread some actual hope to my circle of friends who don't watch these boards. I agree that when it strikes, there will likely be hundreds if not thousands.
Wish I knew precisely what it was they were looking for. You'd think they could tell us. What harm could it do now?
well inversely with the amount of fraud we know happened, what if they havent even found a real ballot yet? lol
Yes! I talked about this from the very beginning, and everyone thought it was too far-fetched.
Yes. I don't think Fincham has mentioned they will specifically be looking for watermarks. Maybe it's because this is really a big surprise party? I hope...
I'm hoping during these months of procrastation that the Dems didn't already eliminate the "boxes of bad" ballots.
The fake ballots are hardly Trump votes? So if they removed the fakes before the audit, the Biden votes would be reduced in the same number. It’s a win-win. Either we find fake Biden votes, or the Biden votes will lower after the audit.
I would prefer that we find fake ballots, because then a forensic examination might reveal who printed, distributed and filled them in.
If the dems managed to “burn them in a great barn-fire”, Trump would still win, but it would be harder to prove foul play.
How do you know these aren’t failing? We can’t see close enough really to examine if a watermark is present from this camera view.
I wonder too, if they are looking to see if there is a "fold" in the paper ballots.
They would be looking for a lack of creases, yes.
Notice how the light box is not a manufacturered item. It is made of cardboard and taped together as if something new and recent has called for the need of such a device. I would presume if this was an existing practice, the light box would have been made out of a more durable material.
I'm not sure I understand your question. Are you saying that all the ballots looked at so far have been authenticated? I'm not sure how the process works.
There was a rumor right after the election that a secret QFS watermark was printed on ballots. It was quickly "debunked". If this is the case and it turns out to be true it's huge. DHS claimed they didn't watermark the way it was claimed. As for how many/and where is a good question. I myself haven't heard anything tangible since roughly Dec. (Around this time was also a gif circulating of Admiral Akbar saying "IT'S A TRAP!")
Dr Steve Pieczenik broke they use watermarks on Alex Jones very early.
The DHS.gov site said they use watermarks on ballots also.. I'm not sure if it's still there or not but I saw it with my own eyes.
Exactly
Tony Shaffer was first I think.
Yeps I also disregarded it as disinformation but one thing that I recall everyone was in such a hurry to dismiss it it should have rung a few alarm bells in me.