Using predictive AI is almost certainly a part of the intelligence system that we call Q (or the intelligence system behind the whole operation). Supercomputers are also almost certainly a part of that system.
When Q prints predictions it helps a great deal if its already happened, and is only made public at a later time. That would be control. (Think no name death).
All of these together are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, I would say the first is essential for the second, given the scale of the operation.
These people aren't even looking at the content. "Oooooooh, it has the word "future" in it!" Yeah? And the most recent post is talking about the leadership of a corrupt Congress. So what if the post was timed intentionally because the BAD GUYS are now in control?
However, I'm no drop expert, so I personally just read and take in what other say and don't personally opine unless it's an absolutely stunning quincidence
Some people just can't accept that time date deltas are very important. Either they aren't versed in Q drops or they're jealous they didn't find the match first.
Lmao I have followed Q since December 2017, Fren. Still waiting for someone to point out to me where he said we should look to tweets from anyone but POTUS as direct comms.
Well idk where they ever said only Trump's tweets can be comms. One of the early Q proofs that was supported by Q was a National Geographic tweet about a new show, I think it was called Chain of Command, but I'm not too sure but it definitely related to Q and supported that they really do have a degree of control
That makes a whole lot more sense than quantum supercomputing, as badass as I'm sure that will be/is.
Using predictive AI is almost certainly a part of the intelligence system that we call Q (or the intelligence system behind the whole operation). Supercomputers are also almost certainly a part of that system.
When Q prints predictions it helps a great deal if its already happened, and is only made public at a later time. That would be control. (Think no name death).
All of these together are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, I would say the first is essential for the second, given the scale of the operation.
hold up, psychic what???
Is it just me or have the comms and Q proofs gotten more blatant and obvious lately?
High accuracy timings = control.
Medium accuracy = quantum prediction
Leadership and support of Congress(?). I just KEKked my Cheerios.
That's what makes me hate this datefag crap.
These people aren't even looking at the content. "Oooooooh, it has the word "future" in it!" Yeah? And the most recent post is talking about the leadership of a corrupt Congress. So what if the post was timed intentionally because the BAD GUYS are now in control?
No kidding. What are the odds of a perfect time date delta with a word from a Q post that had very few words? ??
Come on man! That's just a coincidence!
Ok now my goosebumps have goosebumps!
I am so thankful for people who can do this because my head just doesn't work that way. Great post. Thank you.
shit on me
Lmao literally means nothing
Create it.
In this case, I tend to agree with you.
However, I'm no drop expert, so I personally just read and take in what other say and don't personally opine unless it's an absolutely stunning quincidence
Some people just can't accept that time date deltas are very important. Either they aren't versed in Q drops or they're jealous they didn't find the match first.
You obviously are not a follower of Q which makes you a doomer/shill. Go back to MSDNC.
Lmao I have followed Q since December 2017, Fren. Still waiting for someone to point out to me where he said we should look to tweets from anyone but POTUS as direct comms.
Well idk where they ever said only Trump's tweets can be comms. One of the early Q proofs that was supported by Q was a National Geographic tweet about a new show, I think it was called Chain of Command, but I'm not too sure but it definitely related to Q and supported that they really do have a degree of control
No, you are not alone. "Future" is hardly a unique word.