Yes, there was no "widespread fraud".

Just numerous cases of localized fraud.

Well in GA they came up with consistent numbers too. It turns out that when you simply recount fraudulent ballots over and over, you still get the same result. Was NH conducting a forensic audit like in AZ?

I remember U.S. ambassador Susan Rice, during the Rwandan Genocide, telling the U.N. that "The U.S. is not calling it a genocide. We have seen individual acts of genocide."

A reporter then asked "How many individual acts of genocide does it take to be genocide?"

Same thing with "No widespread fraud". :>)

They want to keep sheeple thinking a recount audit with same fake ballots is the same as a forensic audit... lol

So there was fraud, just not widespread. Heard that.

Well, to anyone honest, this fraudulent “audit” is just now more widespread fraud, in corrupt service of all the massive, unambiguous, coordinated prior fraud.

I’d worry that the lying mainstream media would again allow these crooks to gaslight their way out of this again… but I know where all this is building to. These flailing fckers are well and truly doomed. And they know it easily as well as I do.

https://media.tenor.com/images/5d235fbaeb4ce4f82140682d044ab97b/tenor.gif

Ever just wanna BITCH SLAP certain people ??

No widespread fraud. Quantify widespread. How about any fraud?

This was a failure of the people who agreed to the protocols and procedures, nothing else. They didn't understand how widespread the corruption was and didn't consider that the Board of Selectmen for Windham would be in on the steal. They could have easily had the language necessary to prevent who was picked to audit these machines. They were all from the same company and that company had conflicts of interest. They conducted the audit in the most opaque manner possible and it was being run by the Asst AG, against the intent of the agreement. So the whole deal was one big clusterfuck from the get go and the people who were pushing the hardest for this audit were the ones who got tricked into an agreement that allowed the AG to rig it.

People know the difference between a recount and an true audit. When you recount, you are also counting the fraudulent ballots.

In Michigan, for example, the sample recount had many people questioning hundreds of ballots as being questionable. The SoS representatives outright told them (and this was all caught on video) that this was not about checking the ballots themselves but about simply recounting them.

This is far from over. Once the house of cards starts to crumble on the fraud this is going to get very bad for this country when it emerges how massive the fraud was (like maybe 20 million fraudulent ballots for Biden).

I have long held that the lid will eventually blow on this. It is too massive and too coordinated between multiple states (the very definition of conspiracy) to keep the lid on it. Furthermore, if they turn up in any of these audits that outside assistance from an foreign nation was involved - it is over. It will move from a domestic crime to national security issue placing it firmly under the purview of the military.

This was predictwd bybpeople everbsince they heard a left-leaning company was doing the audit. An audit is only as good as the people performing it.

Buyden needed to steal only 6 counties.

Kind of like mostly peaceful