Good. Maybe I'll never have to hear her average arguments get turned into god-like intellectual rebuttals by a bunch of simped out, milquetoast conservatives.
Take this into consideration. How many stories have people relayed on this board about how difficult it is to redpill their relatives, friends, or coworkers. The process takes months, and sometimes longer with people that are very intelligent.
So you're going to tell me that this woman saw the difference and flipped from lefty to conservative completely overnight -- that simply does not happen. People that change that fast are either a.) very stupid and easily influenced b.) want to be liked and appreciated, so they change to appease others c.) they change b/c there is an opportunity of some sort that will benefit them. Sorry if it offends, but she is a grifter, yes she says all the right things mostly, she is involved with the right people, but doesn't the rate at which all of that happened seem to be a little too quick?
Change takes time, unless you have a Jesus meeting Paul on the road to Damascus experience, people do not change that rapidly. Comprehension, understanding why there is the need to change, letting go of reasons why not to change, social pressure from others to not change, all play roles in the process. For example, when new people come to church and they are just on fire for the Lord, I tend to question the situation. Those people NEVER stick around, they never really understood why they are there, and usually stop attending or fade away in 3-4 months time, it is a 100% track record that I have seen. On the other hand, the people that ask questions, have difficulty with topics that hit home, that read and talk with others, these people that endure until they understand become solid believers. They took the time to overcome themselves, they took to the time to weigh the difference in belief or not believing.
A person that flips that fast is someone people should keep an eye on, not raise them on a pedestal and through accolades at them.
The article you linked is just a woke hit piece. Thought you had a counterpoint view; misrepresenting statements by a person is what establishment media does. we watched these stories unfold in real time and these so called “receipts” do not support your position.
What makes her so special? She flipped from being a hardcore lefty to a "conservative" overnight. She has yet to denounce her failed Social Autopsy project which is akin to the CCPs social credit score. There is nothing about her that makes her unique as far as conservatism is concerned -- yet people wet their pants when she says something edgy or throw out the inane "when is she going to run for office?" line, hells bells we can do much better.
Social Autopsy was unwise and naive, Candace was a bit arrogant, and the venture was rightly shot down. But it’s a far cry from the CCP social credit score — a technocratic control grid far more dangerous, you don’t know what and how they’re tracking.
Candace is pretty true to her same mission today, wiser in her approach. As for her “flipping” ... most among the “awakened” can identify a precise moment when the veil came down.
Personally, I love her commentary, but hope she does not run. Sad to see the awakened fall prey to celebrity. What makers her a great commentator would make her a terrible candidate.
Trump can get aways with because he’s never been a “commentator.”
You mean going all the way back, after the time of her TED talk on eating disorders, when she was still a liberal, before her YouTube channel “Red Pill Black?”
I’m asking because the way she was doxxed by a black leftist group posing as ‘right wing white supremacists’ was pretty well documented and I believe involved law enforcement investigation of threats. I’ve never seen a shred of evidence or hearsay that that incident was faked.
Just got done reading Mike Lindell's book. He had people come to "help him" with My Pillow, only to really try and stop him. Sadly, a common practice in all fields.
I've been off social media since the election, so I don't see Candice's posts. But I see her ads for her show when digging.
Two things jumped out at me. One, she's with Daily Wire (Shapiro). He's not to be trusted. He's a windsock like Goober Graham. Why did she join THAT platform, when there is Blaze and others?
The other thing that jumped out, the promos for her show looked like a fashion shoot more than anything that would provide substance. It felt like, "hey look we have a pretty like Beyonce, but CONSERVATIVE BLACK woman here to make a show to counter The View". It all feels forced and dumbed down.
The real question is: Is she getting duped like Lindell was at the time, or is this who she really is,a paytriot? Only time and her record of work will tell.
Umm... She had a child now. They are massively all encompassing, (in a good way). She is down throttled with politics whether she wants to be or not. Family comes first...
I always wondered about why she started up with the more polished looks which bring more attention to her physical features rather than her message. It definitely seemed like mixed signals to me and I started to question her authenticity. Your theory makes a lot of sense.
Contracts don't last forever. I'm sure she will evaluate the situation and adjust her plans in whatever way works the best to pursue her goals. She is intolerant of bullshit. You step on her neck, she chews off your foot. She'll work things out. As for bowing to money, much good is accomplished by wealth in the right hands.
She just interviewed Jenelle from the MTV show "16 and pregnant Teen Mom". For those not familiar, Janelle was the wild child on there. Issues with addiction and losing custody of her child. Fast forward to now, she's a conservative mother of 3, clean and sober. Her husband gets a lot of crap for killing a dog that had repeatedly bit their child. I was surprised that Candace would interview her, honestly. It seemed very beneath her. But, it may be a good way to get young voters away from the left.
Interesting take. I was hoping your theory was that she had infiltrated Daily Wire, but I think you’re right. Shapiro has tricked a lot of people, but you’d think Candace would be smarter than that. Most likely either she’s a lot less intelligent than we thought she was, or she’s a phony. I hope that is not the case, but it’s hard to see an alternative at this point.
Thanks for this. I haven't watched much of Ben for a while now, but it was just down to him spouting the same info over and over. I did not know his opinion on voter fraud or the other things mentioned in Mark Dice's video. Shapiro was what introduced me to the online conservative movement so I think he had some merit in that way, but that seems to all be out the window now. His views seem to change with who he perceives is President.
I watch her show on The Daily Wire. I think the first few were really good, it does seem to have gone the safe route talk show getting boring. At first I was looking forward to it, and now I think I am 2 behind. Interesting info on Ben. I don't watch him much, I had caught a few of his shows back in the day when my eyes were just being opened. But lost interest in him quickly. Perhaps I detected something was not right.
I would remind everyone of her liberal roots. When she very first started out she had an anti-bullying web page that had some seriously wack shit on it.
Candice has always been in this for money. It was especially obvious during her gamergate days with her social autopsy website she was trying to push...
Not saying she’s bad, or not on our side, just pointing out her main motivation.
She has a new baby. Momma need to be with their children not in front of cameras.
My thoughts exactly
Good. Maybe I'll never have to hear her average arguments get turned into god-like intellectual rebuttals by a bunch of simped out, milquetoast conservatives.
I concur, I have no idea why people think she is the cat's meow. Snarky comments do not a great intellect make.
I honestly think she is a fake.
Based on what?
Couldn't tell you. Just what i think.
degree 180, social autopsy. she isn't who she pretends to be.
Some other things
Take this into consideration. How many stories have people relayed on this board about how difficult it is to redpill their relatives, friends, or coworkers. The process takes months, and sometimes longer with people that are very intelligent.
So you're going to tell me that this woman saw the difference and flipped from lefty to conservative completely overnight -- that simply does not happen. People that change that fast are either a.) very stupid and easily influenced b.) want to be liked and appreciated, so they change to appease others c.) they change b/c there is an opportunity of some sort that will benefit them. Sorry if it offends, but she is a grifter, yes she says all the right things mostly, she is involved with the right people, but doesn't the rate at which all of that happened seem to be a little too quick?
Change takes time, unless you have a Jesus meeting Paul on the road to Damascus experience, people do not change that rapidly. Comprehension, understanding why there is the need to change, letting go of reasons why not to change, social pressure from others to not change, all play roles in the process. For example, when new people come to church and they are just on fire for the Lord, I tend to question the situation. Those people NEVER stick around, they never really understood why they are there, and usually stop attending or fade away in 3-4 months time, it is a 100% track record that I have seen. On the other hand, the people that ask questions, have difficulty with topics that hit home, that read and talk with others, these people that endure until they understand become solid believers. They took the time to overcome themselves, they took to the time to weigh the difference in belief or not believing.
A person that flips that fast is someone people should keep an eye on, not raise them on a pedestal and through accolades at them.
The article you linked is just a woke hit piece. Thought you had a counterpoint view; misrepresenting statements by a person is what establishment media does. we watched these stories unfold in real time and these so called “receipts” do not support your position.
What makes her so special? She flipped from being a hardcore lefty to a "conservative" overnight. She has yet to denounce her failed Social Autopsy project which is akin to the CCPs social credit score. There is nothing about her that makes her unique as far as conservatism is concerned -- yet people wet their pants when she says something edgy or throw out the inane "when is she going to run for office?" line, hells bells we can do much better.
Social Autopsy was unwise and naive, Candace was a bit arrogant, and the venture was rightly shot down. But it’s a far cry from the CCP social credit score — a technocratic control grid far more dangerous, you don’t know what and how they’re tracking.
Candace is pretty true to her same mission today, wiser in her approach. As for her “flipping” ... most among the “awakened” can identify a precise moment when the veil came down.
Personally, I love her commentary, but hope she does not run. Sad to see the awakened fall prey to celebrity. What makers her a great commentator would make her a terrible candidate.
Trump can get aways with because he’s never been a “commentator.”
Came here to say the same.
If she took the stable job to make her family life more normal, good on her.
Not everybody in this movement has to jump on the grenade.
No I demand all voices of all sizes to do more than I ever will from behind a keyboard with anonymity.
You mean going all the way back, after the time of her TED talk on eating disorders, when she was still a liberal, before her YouTube channel “Red Pill Black?”
I’m asking because the way she was doxxed by a black leftist group posing as ‘right wing white supremacists’ was pretty well documented and I believe involved law enforcement investigation of threats. I’ve never seen a shred of evidence or hearsay that that incident was faked.
Yes!
I like the cut of your jib.
Just got done reading Mike Lindell's book. He had people come to "help him" with My Pillow, only to really try and stop him. Sadly, a common practice in all fields.
I've been off social media since the election, so I don't see Candice's posts. But I see her ads for her show when digging.
Two things jumped out at me. One, she's with Daily Wire (Shapiro). He's not to be trusted. He's a windsock like Goober Graham. Why did she join THAT platform, when there is Blaze and others?
The other thing that jumped out, the promos for her show looked like a fashion shoot more than anything that would provide substance. It felt like, "hey look we have a pretty like Beyonce, but CONSERVATIVE BLACK woman here to make a show to counter The View". It all feels forced and dumbed down.
The real question is: Is she getting duped like Lindell was at the time, or is this who she really is,a paytriot? Only time and her record of work will tell.
Umm... She had a child now. They are massively all encompassing, (in a good way). She is down throttled with politics whether she wants to be or not. Family comes first...
Like Diamond and Silk better.
And they looooove Trump
I couldn't watch more than a few minutes.
Ah much like the anti q people I've spoken to who tell me I'm an idiot for following something they have never spent more than an hour reading. Mhmm.
I always wondered about why she started up with the more polished looks which bring more attention to her physical features rather than her message. It definitely seemed like mixed signals to me and I started to question her authenticity. Your theory makes a lot of sense.
Contracts don't last forever. I'm sure she will evaluate the situation and adjust her plans in whatever way works the best to pursue her goals. She is intolerant of bullshit. You step on her neck, she chews off your foot. She'll work things out. As for bowing to money, much good is accomplished by wealth in the right hands.
She just interviewed Jenelle from the MTV show "16 and pregnant Teen Mom". For those not familiar, Janelle was the wild child on there. Issues with addiction and losing custody of her child. Fast forward to now, she's a conservative mother of 3, clean and sober. Her husband gets a lot of crap for killing a dog that had repeatedly bit their child. I was surprised that Candace would interview her, honestly. It seemed very beneath her. But, it may be a good way to get young voters away from the left.
Interesting take. I was hoping your theory was that she had infiltrated Daily Wire, but I think you’re right. Shapiro has tricked a lot of people, but you’d think Candace would be smarter than that. Most likely either she’s a lot less intelligent than we thought she was, or she’s a phony. I hope that is not the case, but it’s hard to see an alternative at this point.
You might be interested in watching this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuKgtEtla2c
Thanks for this. I haven't watched much of Ben for a while now, but it was just down to him spouting the same info over and over. I did not know his opinion on voter fraud or the other things mentioned in Mark Dice's video. Shapiro was what introduced me to the online conservative movement so I think he had some merit in that way, but that seems to all be out the window now. His views seem to change with who he perceives is President.
Did she leave Pragerr U for Daily Wire, or is she doing both?
and some soldiers are placed in assignments that have strategic value at a later point.
Nobody is going to tell Candace what to say.
Ben shapiro is way too annoying to listen to.
I watch her show on The Daily Wire. I think the first few were really good, it does seem to have gone the safe route talk show getting boring. At first I was looking forward to it, and now I think I am 2 behind. Interesting info on Ben. I don't watch him much, I had caught a few of his shows back in the day when my eyes were just being opened. But lost interest in him quickly. Perhaps I detected something was not right.
She just had a baby, dude.
I agree
I would remind everyone of her liberal roots. When she very first started out she had an anti-bullying web page that had some seriously wack shit on it.
Candice has always been in this for money. It was especially obvious during her gamergate days with her social autopsy website she was trying to push...
Not saying she’s bad, or not on our side, just pointing out her main motivation.