Until it is approved by the FDA and not experimental, if they do that they are in violation of federal and international law. Most likely state law as well, depending on where you live.
All you would have to do is show them those laws.
Once it becomes approved, I'm not sure. I am sure it is still illegal and unconstitutional, but proving that becomes problematic.
It's not supposed to be able to be approved for over a year due to the length of the phase three trials, but in our current world, who knows.
Hopefully the FDA won't be able to approve it once they are forced to admit HCQ, Ivermectin and other therapies cure it. It might be a race against the clock but I think the FDA typically takes a long time to approve vaccines.
If they let the cure cat out of the bag to the general public its gonna be a shitshow. Everyone heard Trump talk about HCQ. It was all over the news. Love him or hate him, everyone heard about it. Everyone also knows we haven't been allowed to talk about it.
Once it is shown that it was not "disinformation", and that we've had actual evidence of efficacy and safety for over a year, the S will HTF.
"Approval" will be the least of the talking points if that happens.
When Immunity from Liability Applies
When the Secretary determines that a threat or condition constitutes a present or credible risk of a future public health emergency, the Secretary may issue a PREP Act declaration. The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration or use of covered countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions identified in the declaration.
[Bolded for emphasis]
It says nothing here (or in the rest of that page) anything about it being restricted to only under an EUA. Instead it seems to give the determination to "the Secretary" on whether or not a threat exists.
"Thus, in order to meet the definition of a qualified pandemic or epidemic product, a product
(1) must be used for COVID-19; and
(2) must be
(a) approved, licensed, or cleared by FDA;
(b) authorized under an EUA;
(c) described in an EUI; or
(d) used under either an Investigational New Drug (IND)
application or an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). 6"
I may not be interpreting this correctly, and I did not read the entire opinion, but this seems to state that an FDA approved product also qualifies for the exemptions laid out in the Prep Act.
I'm not 100%, but it seems they will retain their immunity from liability after FDA approval.
On the other hand, I'm not convinced that the Prep Act is legal at all. So we shall see.
This is a bioweapon. The virus and the jab -- both bioweapons
The CDC was funded by the vaccine companies, and the CDC used those funds to engineer the virus. The vaccines were created before the virus was released.
All provable statements.
However, unless it goes before a court of law that is not Cabal controlled, there is no way to prove willful misconduct.
There is no reason that couldn't have already happened, yet it hasn't. I think it is very likely it will happen eventually, but there is no reason to suspect it will happen before it is FDA approved, especially if they rush it.
There is evidence because the receiver can sue big pharma for damages from the vaccine upon approval. The main advantage of EUA is big pharma doesn't need to be liable for anything.
It's awfully strange that you don't need to prove if you're an atheist, or if you say you are a member of the Jedi religion- nobody would even question you.
But the very minute you try to use that religious exemption thing... "Whoa whoa whoa, hold on there buddy- Who Do You Think You Are?"
If anyone can just make up a religion then why not make up your own that says whatever you want. Think of how many illegitimate religions there are out there that go totally uncriticized. Like dude, Rastafarians probably don't take vaccines (jk idk).
Make them sign an agreement that they will show you evidence of injection safety with a long term safety study, and accept full liability for any adverse reactions. Of course don't actually inject either way
If they're willing to go this far about the injections, what else may they decide to impose on you? I can understand loving your work, but do you really want to be associated with an organization and people who think this way?
I'd be sure to get from them IN WRITING that since they require you submit to an experimental treatment they will accept full liability including ....add whatever like college for your kids, pay off mortgage, medical bills for life..... Then try to drag it out. When fellow employees start dropping off you could apply for your boss's job.
americans frontline doctors. Get in touch and they can help you get out of it or sue your employer. Relgious exemption also still works as an excuse in many states.
You can dig up the information and send it to your management and advise you want them to put in writting they will pay for all adverse effects including death. They cannot force that. You can also just say no if they fire you take them to court. There are people that help with that.
I've contemplated and my pop even suggests using the Bible to argue against it. It is your Christian duty (if you be one that is anyways xD) Your body is a temple and it isn't in your religion to wilfully injure yourself with no actual benefit to anyone else other than to appease a corrupt medical industry when there's proven dangers and examples of the vax harming people. With the right lawyer they wouldn't dare especially if they have religious discrimination rules. Nobody bats an eye and jehovahs have been using that argument for ages before we Christians recently woke up as well against pharma. Is there any chance of sitting your employer down and begging them not to do this before you resort to a lawyer? They may be willing to retract the statement if you have a good relationship with them. Elsewise, let them know in advance you're pursuing legal action for religious discrimination. And get a good lawyer for it.
Pastor Greg Locke has stated that he will send a religious exemption ri anyone who asks for one.
My organization (a regional children's hospital) has stated the jab will be mandatory for everyone who has patient contact, or is in contact with those who do. I work from home, no decision has been made for us at this time. I will make them fire me, collect unemployment and sue if that happens.
On an even more disgusting note, this organization is planning to start jab trials on babies as young as 6 months old. Why not, we are already on the puberty blocking bandwagon?
Fake the vax.
Talk to any nurses you know... and tell them you will gift a $150 bottle of fine Irish Whiskey to any nurse that gives you a saline shot and records it as your first Covid "vaccine" injection. Nurses have friends. They know several in your area that would be willing.
You'll then give them 2 free concert tickets to any concert they want in exchange for the 2nd fake injection, recording it as a vaccine.
For less than $250... you should have full verification of having been vaccinated. You will also make a nurse very happy.
Claim your HIPPA rights, or let them fire you, collect unemployment off them, then find a better, higher paying job.
The job market is a set your own pay free for all right now.
It's a violation of the ADA for an employer to ask personal medical questions for things that don't directly impact your ability to do your specific job you were hired for. You do not legally have to answer whether you have received the shot or not. If they fire you for not disclosing you have a civil rights suit against them. According to the ADA this in no different than them firing you for not disclosing that you had an appendectomy, for instance. It's your own private medical history that they don't need for the job you do and they can't fire you for not disclosing yes or no.
They can’t require the experimental gene therapy shot because it’s under EUA. No matter how official sounding they make it. I would contact ICAN:
https://www.icandecide.org/successful-challenges-to-employer-university-covid-19-mandates/
Until it is approved by the FDA and not experimental, if they do that they are in violation of federal and international law. Most likely state law as well, depending on where you live.
All you would have to do is show them those laws.
Once it becomes approved, I'm not sure. I am sure it is still illegal and unconstitutional, but proving that becomes problematic.
It's not supposed to be able to be approved for over a year due to the length of the phase three trials, but in our current world, who knows.
Hopefully the FDA won't be able to approve it once they are forced to admit HCQ, Ivermectin and other therapies cure it. It might be a race against the clock but I think the FDA typically takes a long time to approve vaccines.
If they let the cure cat out of the bag to the general public its gonna be a shitshow. Everyone heard Trump talk about HCQ. It was all over the news. Love him or hate him, everyone heard about it. Everyone also knows we haven't been allowed to talk about it.
Once it is shown that it was not "disinformation", and that we've had actual evidence of efficacy and safety for over a year, the S will HTF.
"Approval" will be the least of the talking points if that happens.
FDA won't approve it because it will open up the liability for their masters aka big pharma.
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction (from below, but moved up so its part of the page).
From Liability Immunity Provisions from the Prep Act on Public Health Emergency .gov
[Bolded for emphasis]
It says nothing here (or in the rest of that page) anything about it being restricted to only under an EUA. Instead it seems to give the determination to "the Secretary" on whether or not a threat exists.
From an HHS Advisory Opinion on this act:
"Thus, in order to meet the definition of a qualified pandemic or epidemic product, a product
(1) must be used for COVID-19; and
(2) must be
(a) approved, licensed, or cleared by FDA;
(b) authorized under an EUA;
(c) described in an EUI; or
(d) used under either an Investigational New Drug (IND) application or an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). 6"
I may not be interpreting this correctly, and I did not read the entire opinion, but this seems to state that an FDA approved product also qualifies for the exemptions laid out in the Prep Act.
I'm not 100%, but it seems they will retain their immunity from liability after FDA approval.
On the other hand, I'm not convinced that the Prep Act is legal at all. So we shall see.
This is a bioweapon.
The virus and the jab -- both bioweapons.
Sounds like willful misconduct to me.
The CDC was funded by the vaccine companies, and the CDC used those funds to engineer the virus. The vaccines were created before the virus was released.
All provable statements.
However, unless it goes before a court of law that is not Cabal controlled, there is no way to prove willful misconduct.
There is no reason that couldn't have already happened, yet it hasn't. I think it is very likely it will happen eventually, but there is no reason to suspect it will happen before it is FDA approved, especially if they rush it.
Will it?
What is the evidence for this?
If true, it might happen because of this reason.
Evidence is big pharma lied, people died.
So there is no evidence that big pharma will be liable if the FDA approves it?
They currently have no liability. I was wondering if that might legally change upon FDA approval.
There is evidence because the receiver can sue big pharma for damages from the vaccine upon approval. The main advantage of EUA is big pharma doesn't need to be liable for anything.
I hear you saying these things. I believe you believe them. Can you point me to any evidence that supports these claims?
Look up Liability Immunity Provisions from the Prep Act and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2697102/. A simple search on any engine should show you the results.
Hold the line , make them fire you, then you can proove "harm".
This could help you: https://vaxxchoice.com
Take care friend
You maybe able to find assistance here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/
As well specifically legal information here. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/vaccines-the-law/
say you can't for religious reasons
it's not something that really can be proven so I wouldn't believe so. imagine them asking for your catholic ID card haha
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141457/
Does faith have to be proven? You could even say it's against your personal religion. They can literally go suck an egg.
It's awfully strange that you don't need to prove if you're an atheist, or if you say you are a member of the Jedi religion- nobody would even question you.
But the very minute you try to use that religious exemption thing... "Whoa whoa whoa, hold on there buddy- Who Do You Think You Are?"
If anyone can just make up a religion then why not make up your own that says whatever you want. Think of how many illegitimate religions there are out there that go totally uncriticized. Like dude, Rastafarians probably don't take vaccines (jk idk).
Make them sign an agreement that they will show you evidence of injection safety with a long term safety study, and accept full liability for any adverse reactions. Of course don't actually inject either way
If they're willing to go this far about the injections, what else may they decide to impose on you? I can understand loving your work, but do you really want to be associated with an organization and people who think this way?
I'd be sure to get from them IN WRITING that since they require you submit to an experimental treatment they will accept full liability including ....add whatever like college for your kids, pay off mortgage, medical bills for life..... Then try to drag it out. When fellow employees start dropping off you could apply for your boss's job.
americans frontline doctors. Get in touch and they can help you get out of it or sue your employer. Relgious exemption also still works as an excuse in many states.
No jab, no matter how nice is worth your life.
There are other nice places to work. Just do due diligence and start looking now.
Also they cannot force you - yet.
You can dig up the information and send it to your management and advise you want them to put in writting they will pay for all adverse effects including death. They cannot force that. You can also just say no if they fire you take them to court. There are people that help with that.
Religious discrimination?
I've contemplated and my pop even suggests using the Bible to argue against it. It is your Christian duty (if you be one that is anyways xD) Your body is a temple and it isn't in your religion to wilfully injure yourself with no actual benefit to anyone else other than to appease a corrupt medical industry when there's proven dangers and examples of the vax harming people. With the right lawyer they wouldn't dare especially if they have religious discrimination rules. Nobody bats an eye and jehovahs have been using that argument for ages before we Christians recently woke up as well against pharma. Is there any chance of sitting your employer down and begging them not to do this before you resort to a lawyer? They may be willing to retract the statement if you have a good relationship with them. Elsewise, let them know in advance you're pursuing legal action for religious discrimination. And get a good lawyer for it.
Anyways, God bless you in Jesus name fren. Amen
All of this except for warning them in advance you'll be pursuing legal action.
Find a lawyer if you're going to do that and follow their instructions.
Pastor Greg Locke has stated that he will send a religious exemption ri anyone who asks for one.
My organization (a regional children's hospital) has stated the jab will be mandatory for everyone who has patient contact, or is in contact with those who do. I work from home, no decision has been made for us at this time. I will make them fire me, collect unemployment and sue if that happens.
On an even more disgusting note, this organization is planning to start jab trials on babies as young as 6 months old. Why not, we are already on the puberty blocking bandwagon?
Fake the vax.
Talk to any nurses you know... and tell them you will gift a $150 bottle of fine Irish Whiskey to any nurse that gives you a saline shot and records it as your first Covid "vaccine" injection. Nurses have friends. They know several in your area that would be willing.
You'll then give them 2 free concert tickets to any concert they want in exchange for the 2nd fake injection, recording it as a vaccine.
For less than $250... you should have full verification of having been vaccinated. You will also make a nurse very happy.
Forcing an employee or student to take an EUA vaccine violates federal law..Show him this notice: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/chd-notice-for-eua-vaccines.pdf
Claim your HIPPA rights, or let them fire you, collect unemployment off them, then find a better, higher paying job. The job market is a set your own pay free for all right now.
Leave.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j08SZMRe/link-to-legal-docs-to-file-exemp/
It's a violation of the ADA for an employer to ask personal medical questions for things that don't directly impact your ability to do your specific job you were hired for. You do not legally have to answer whether you have received the shot or not. If they fire you for not disclosing you have a civil rights suit against them. According to the ADA this in no different than them firing you for not disclosing that you had an appendectomy, for instance. It's your own private medical history that they don't need for the job you do and they can't fire you for not disclosing yes or no.
https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws
Should find everything you need here. This is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission site.
They also can't legally even request an antibody test.
Make them fire you. At least you have some recourse.
they can't require you to do anything you can't undo when you leave work.
Send this to your bosses, HR and perhaps other employees:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v8F2OrQKjVO6/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YcErFhnb66nq/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ix0iYXsp1WWH/
Keep in mind, they may target you for sharing info.
Lying is not the answer.
Satan is the father of lies, after all.
I didn't know being a pussy and lying to the commies was the right answer until you clued us in, John Durham.
No, don't get injected, get fired, and fight the commies in court.
Your vagina is showing.