That is a fantastic legal angle of attack. More people need to do this, particularly conservative pundits, and journalists who can claim higher damages than an individual can.
This whole "movie" thing is a big stretch for me....BUT then you hear shit like this from supposedly astute political people. Trashaki sticking both feet in her mouth with that remark after China Joe put his foot in his mouth in PA when the Maricopa preliminary tease results are to be spoken the next day.
She must know Dr. Shiva's MA case is moving, the kernel of which is the Fascist connection between govt. and Social Media and MSM. How could she be so stupid? Bannon interviewed Cole about the Trump lawsuit strategy. Cole mentioned "prior restraint" and said that is settled law. No prior restraint allowed. I just find it hard to believe that she is that stupid. Is it arrogance? They know what's coming with the audits. I'm at a loss. It's just so frustrating for me, and pretty much everyone on this board, to be about a year ahead of the mindwipes timeline wise. We're on the audit train, rumbling along, seeing glimpses out the windows of other things happening. I just wish the gap was closing with the smooth brains and they could start to connect the dots.
If it makes any difference to your well-being, just remember America as a true republic was lost after the war of 1812. We were all born into a stillborn republic as debtor serfs when the British families wrote their debt notes on the backs of us future generations.
Imagine having lived and died thinking you were free between 1812 and 2019. We know we aren’t free, and are still breathing to be able to do something about it.
Imagine being the poor bastards forced under penalty of imprisonment from FDR who had to turn their gold over to them in exchange for toilet paper fed notes.
I want this over too, but damn if this isn’t an amazing time to be alive.
It was the executive order banned private ownership of gold, but it was still used as backing internationally as part of Bretton Woods agreement from the end of WW2 to Nixon closing the gold window in 71 preventing foreign governments from redeeming gold with US dollars held. (this after devaluations from 20.67$ per oz prior to FDR's act, where he immediately increased it to 35$ an oz, then was at 42 and some change by 71)
That's the best description - reality keeps falling in line with it. I suppose the "movie" analogy is too simplistic for me, but I do understand how timelines can converge and the more you try to wiggle out of an ending, the less room you have to act, like a movie script.
They didn't need to be that good, the cameras were only ever rolling if they were showing us something they wanted us to see.
Hollywood needed us to like their stars so they could tell us what to think, the less interested we are in politicks the better. They don't want too many eyes on that.
Imagine subpoenaing the press secretary of the fake communist regime to be a defendant to object to your lawsuit about big tech censorship and you ask for her opinion on exhibit A and it’s her dumb ugly face saying that they’re weaponizing big tech
There wouldn’t be enough rope.
I guess the saying is true sometimes you don’t even have to tie the knot or persecute somebody you just need to give them enough rope to hang themselves.
He's totally right. The federal govt can't use private companies to do things it would be illegal for them to do. Violating the First Amendment via FB, Google, YT, and Twitter? The Supreme Court has already ruled on this. ILLEGAL.
It's interesting, but Democratic congressmen have been calling for social media to do more to suppress 'fake news,' bigotry, etc. for months or even years. I distinctly remember AOC leaning on Zuckerbot to do more to 'combat racism', etc. on their platforms in open sessions of congress.
Seems like that would be more proof of government collusion with private industry, but I'm not a lawyer so I dunno...
It's going to be hilarious watching her try to tell the plaintiff attorneys, and the judge "I'll have to circle back to you," during cross examination questioning.
That is a fantastic legal angle of attack. More people need to do this, particularly conservative pundits, and journalists who can claim higher damages than an individual can.
Exactly. One week earlier he talks about what needs to be proved to win the case. Then BOOM!!! Psaki delivers it.
Loose lips sinks ships
Which lips on Psaki? Both sets are pretty loose.
🤮
Who would go there?
You know what my Great Great Aunt used to say?
"Any port in a storm."
Yarr, a fine lass to know when the weather be dire.
Totally read that in Mr Gibb's voice lol
Barry?
😂🤣
Ports n sewers are two very different things. Geeze drill a hole in an orange..you can have juice when you're done 🤣😂🍊🍌🍒😂🤣😂🤣😂
Don’t you mean grapefruit? Aka Texas Orange?
I know a donkey who is pretty loose.
Updoot 17. Not a strong enough emoji
Username checks out.
Loose because of all the circle backs
This whole "movie" thing is a big stretch for me....BUT then you hear shit like this from supposedly astute political people. Trashaki sticking both feet in her mouth with that remark after China Joe put his foot in his mouth in PA when the Maricopa preliminary tease results are to be spoken the next day.
She must know Dr. Shiva's MA case is moving, the kernel of which is the Fascist connection between govt. and Social Media and MSM. How could she be so stupid? Bannon interviewed Cole about the Trump lawsuit strategy. Cole mentioned "prior restraint" and said that is settled law. No prior restraint allowed. I just find it hard to believe that she is that stupid. Is it arrogance? They know what's coming with the audits. I'm at a loss. It's just so frustrating for me, and pretty much everyone on this board, to be about a year ahead of the mindwipes timeline wise. We're on the audit train, rumbling along, seeing glimpses out the windows of other things happening. I just wish the gap was closing with the smooth brains and they could start to connect the dots.
If it makes any difference to your well-being, just remember America as a true republic was lost after the war of 1812. We were all born into a stillborn republic as debtor serfs when the British families wrote their debt notes on the backs of us future generations.
Imagine having lived and died thinking you were free between 1812 and 2019. We know we aren’t free, and are still breathing to be able to do something about it.
Imagine being the poor bastards forced under penalty of imprisonment from FDR who had to turn their gold over to them in exchange for toilet paper fed notes.
I want this over too, but damn if this isn’t an amazing time to be alive.
Thought it was FDR in the 30s, with EO 6102, who did the gold confiscation, not LBJ.
Maybe it was a series of events. Nixon closed the gold window in '71.
It was the executive order banned private ownership of gold, but it was still used as backing internationally as part of Bretton Woods agreement from the end of WW2 to Nixon closing the gold window in 71 preventing foreign governments from redeeming gold with US dollars held. (this after devaluations from 20.67$ per oz prior to FDR's act, where he immediately increased it to 35$ an oz, then was at 42 and some change by 71)
You are correct, thanks for the correction. Edited.
That's the best description - reality keeps falling in line with it. I suppose the "movie" analogy is too simplistic for me, but I do understand how timelines can converge and the more you try to wiggle out of an ending, the less room you have to act, like a movie script.
I loved your description of the view from Trump Train. Very apropos 😎
'Movie' may be a stretch, but how about the Film?
Isn’t it fucking crazy that the left has Hollywood and has the shittiest actors in congress? They aren’t hiding it anymore.
They didn't need to be that good, the cameras were only ever rolling if they were showing us something they wanted us to see.
Hollywood needed us to like their stars so they could tell us what to think, the less interested we are in politicks the better. They don't want too many eyes on that.
It's a movie. Q said it. It's so
My favorite Psaki quote: vaccines can still kill you
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJifjR7j/jen-psaki-says-vaccines-can-stil/c/
Imagine subpoenaing the press secretary of the fake communist regime to be a defendant to object to your lawsuit about big tech censorship and you ask for her opinion on exhibit A and it’s her dumb ugly face saying that they’re weaponizing big tech
There wouldn’t be enough rope.
I guess the saying is true sometimes you don’t even have to tie the knot or persecute somebody you just need to give them enough rope to hang themselves.
Hehe.
He's totally right. The federal govt can't use private companies to do things it would be illegal for them to do. Violating the First Amendment via FB, Google, YT, and Twitter? The Supreme Court has already ruled on this. ILLEGAL.
enter text
Ha haaahh 😂
Wisdom from, "The Great One."
Reeeeeeeeee!
Kek, these people really are stupid
Yup. We will be circling back to that soon enough.
It's interesting, but Democratic congressmen have been calling for social media to do more to suppress 'fake news,' bigotry, etc. for months or even years. I distinctly remember AOC leaning on Zuckerbot to do more to 'combat racism', etc. on their platforms in open sessions of congress.
Seems like that would be more proof of government collusion with private industry, but I'm not a lawyer so I dunno...
Ginger-Pig thought Barry got rid of the 1st Amendment to get his Noble Prize.
Mistake,
or...
"mistake"?
It's going to be hilarious watching her try to tell the plaintiff attorneys, and the judge "I'll have to circle back to you," during cross examination questioning.