What kind of idiotic comparison, this is not an ' everyday visit ' or thing, this is a bioweapon, we are in fucking war, wake up.
Think if someone in your family went there to take the jab (THAT IS A BIOWEAPON NOT A REGOULAR VAX! AND THEY DON'T KNOW THIS.) and you got afraid for his/her life, only after a while, when people starts to drop around, you get to know that person has been injected with a placebo and it's safe
doctors are telling people they're getting a vaccine but giving an experimental gene therapy instead, I'm not sure how this is different from your example.. are you agreeing with us?
Informed consent is different from deceiving a patient. The bait and switch is what I have a problem with. Instead if she had provided the patients information about the vaccine and allowed them to make up their own mind, I would not have a problem. The deception is the issue.
can you really give informed consent if you have a family to support and your job or government requires injecting unknown substances into your body to keep that job? I don't think so, and big pharma doesn't disclose or have liability. the problem with your analogy is saline is 100% proven to be safe, and used as a placebo. Removing a kidney is obviously not, nor are experimental drugs.
Big pharma has not given information to people such that they can make an informed decision. I agree with you on that. People that are more or less being forced to choose between their job and their health freedom have been placed in a terrible position, everyone should have the choice.
The saline is safe, yes, but it was not what the patients agreed to be injected with. Its a moral issue. Am issue of deceiving someone whom you are supposed to trust. If I go to get a tetanus shot and they give me a flu vaccine instead, I'd be pretty angry, it was not what I asked for. This is my issue, not that the saline was safe or not, but that she deceived her patients.
So because they won't know the difference, it doesn't matter that they were decieved? If someone lies to me, I need to know, so that I do not trust that person any longer. I refuse to not learn from mistakes.
You can justify this saying we are at war and all options should be on the table, but we are talking about our fellow human beings. We are supposed to be coming together, not deceiving. How do you think these people will view this nurse and people like us after they find out they were deceived. Do you think they will now have any chance to be convinced to come to our side? (yes j know they probably wouldn't since they were already getting the shot, but what if the nurse had given them jnfo or warnings ahead of giving the shot, rather than just deceiving them?)
Next time you are at the doctor's, maybe they will remove a kidney without asking you? How would you feel?
What kind of idiotic comparison, this is not an ' everyday visit ' or thing, this is a bioweapon, we are in fucking war, wake up.
Think if someone in your family went there to take the jab (THAT IS A BIOWEAPON NOT A REGOULAR VAX! AND THEY DON'T KNOW THIS.) and you got afraid for his/her life, only after a while, when people starts to drop around, you get to know that person has been injected with a placebo and it's safe
.
I won't even waste time to give you an answer, DFTT/S
That guy's an obvious shill. Comparing non consenting organ harvesting to effectively a placebo.
What is DTFF?
doctors are telling people they're getting a vaccine but giving an experimental gene therapy instead, I'm not sure how this is different from your example.. are you agreeing with us?
Oh yeah! A genocidal jab!
Informed consent is different from deceiving a patient. The bait and switch is what I have a problem with. Instead if she had provided the patients information about the vaccine and allowed them to make up their own mind, I would not have a problem. The deception is the issue.
can you really give informed consent if you have a family to support and your job or government requires injecting unknown substances into your body to keep that job? I don't think so, and big pharma doesn't disclose or have liability. the problem with your analogy is saline is 100% proven to be safe, and used as a placebo. Removing a kidney is obviously not, nor are experimental drugs.
Big pharma has not given information to people such that they can make an informed decision. I agree with you on that. People that are more or less being forced to choose between their job and their health freedom have been placed in a terrible position, everyone should have the choice.
The saline is safe, yes, but it was not what the patients agreed to be injected with. Its a moral issue. Am issue of deceiving someone whom you are supposed to trust. If I go to get a tetanus shot and they give me a flu vaccine instead, I'd be pretty angry, it was not what I asked for. This is my issue, not that the saline was safe or not, but that she deceived her patients.
The deception came from the ones who created the gene therapy and then called it a vaccine. THEY are the guilty ones.
Agree with those here that she is a hero, but once again, this is not “gene therapy”
I absolutely agree with this statement.
war is war bro
i commend this hero.
none of these people will even know the difference since apparently vaccinated people catch "covid" just the same as anyone else.
The vaxxed make the covid. Util the Vax there was NO covid. It was all psyops.
So because they won't know the difference, it doesn't matter that they were decieved? If someone lies to me, I need to know, so that I do not trust that person any longer. I refuse to not learn from mistakes.
You can justify this saying we are at war and all options should be on the table, but we are talking about our fellow human beings. We are supposed to be coming together, not deceiving. How do you think these people will view this nurse and people like us after they find out they were deceived. Do you think they will now have any chance to be convinced to come to our side? (yes j know they probably wouldn't since they were already getting the shot, but what if the nurse had given them jnfo or warnings ahead of giving the shot, rather than just deceiving them?)
You are seriously stupid. She saved their lives. Fuck off until you can think logically.
Yes she saved lives, while doing nothing to build trust in an industry that will soon loose all public trust.
Placebos exist
So do patients rights.
What part of bio-weapon do you not understand? She saved a lot of lives by giving them saline instead of the death serum.
Taking my kidney versus not giving me poison. You may want to re think your bias.
<Insert 2 Button Meme>
Warp Speed was a good thing
The Vax is a bioweapon
<Nervous Sweats>