This is the easiest point against their fake agenda thats not brought up enough. I mean according to the ACTUAL science theres a thing called photosynthesis. Ive thought this many times, why isnt this brought up when then whine about CO2.

Ive also wondered if the outdoor maskers are going to screw this balance up if they continue breathing it back in long enough

There was another study that showed that midwest corn fields make more oxygen than the rainforests. Funny how we don't hear these things.

In almost every commercial greenhouse they artificially add more CO2. To around 1500 ppm so the plants can grow larger and more healthy. The leftard greenies want that number to be zero. Even the vegans will starve to death. It's a funny thing that science stuff.

“If we release too much CO2, the plants will overgrow our cities and kill us!”

-The only argument they will have left when global warming never happens.

I remember four months ago some people on GAW still believing the GW lie. Good to see that's the DS is showing their hand on that lie more each day.

Take away gov funding, and all these "issues" we have just magically go away.

This was taught in grade school science. Of course CO2 helps plants grow.

Now you see why Klaus calls 4 billion people useless eaters. More food = more people = harder for them to control.

Without CO2, Earth is an ice planet.

It is no secret, plants love CO2. News won't tell you that though.

do you have Carbon Derangement Syndrome?

consider this analogy: AOC wants to solve the homeless problem by giving away free houses. she's an idiot. but would we make our case by claiming "there is no homeless crisis" because her solution is crazy and suicidal?

we are in the sixth mass extinction right now. their solution is Geo-Engineering - an "experimental vaccine" or "chemotherapy for the planet" which is being injected into the atmosphere without our informed consent.

if we expose their diabolical scheme we win the climate debate and put an end to one of the most monstrous experiments ever conducted on the web of life.

Nice find. Thanking you!

I remember reading that there are far more trees in the woods and forests of almost every region of the US than there were 100 years ago, because we began planting them and they started to spread out. Even logging and development of urban sprawl hasn't decreased it as much as they think it has.

Is it really did to CO2 though?

Let's examine one major policy change of any, as one example:

Vegetation has been treated as sacred to, and it has been left alone in large numbers even where it never used to be. Additionally the increase in major planting drives like the million tree charity thing that happened as one example.

Lots of reasons why vegetation has increased and it seems intellectually weak to pin it exclusively on CO2

For indoor gardening co2 is recommended because the plants under the lights will have scrubbed the room clean of atmospheric co2 in a few hours. The Co2 needs to be replenished or nothing will grow so there needs to be some sort of gas exchange or growth stalls out.

But also it is recommended because it can boost yeilds dramatically. Co2 is the most over looked plant nutrient.

Plants are able to process far more co2 then is in the atmosphere. The highest readings of atmospheric Co2 are about 400ppm, (I've also heard from 330-360ppm) but the recommended amount that you should give your plants is close to 1500 ppm.