The vaccine manufacturers' immunity from liability has nothing to do with the current FDA status of these vaccines. Our government gave them immunity over 30 yrs ago.
"No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
The key word is "vaccine". The mRNA gene therapy is NOT a vaccine by any of the requirements under law. Just because Merriam-Webster dictionary, Wikipedia, and the CDC's web page changed the definition to fool the public doesn't change the legal definition found under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Again, the definition has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
it would be farther back. US code usually puts definitions at the front. when i found the area, "vaccine" was not one of the words defined. however, a change to the definition would not have a retroactive effect. one would not expect a law from the 1950s that used the word "web" to be referring to the internet.
Protections but far from immunity. They are required a certain level of competency. The real issue is the definition of "vaccine" and are these jabs vax's at all. Here is legal def...https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/vaccine Big difference from the new as of 1/1/20 dictionary definition! If not a vax, full liability!
But let me ask this, that immunity can't be unrestricted immunity, it only covers Properly Manufactured vaccines, right? If for example a vaccine manufacture knowing distributed a contaminated vaccine, that would not be covered under the act. And the act has requirements that must be met by the manufacture to qualify for immunity.
*Note that I know nothing on this subject, I am just trying to pose some counter thought to your statement of immunity.
*
Informed consent and adverse event reporting.
For example, the act required that providers administering certain vaccines provide a Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) to the vaccine recipient or a legal guardian. The VIS lists the risks and benefits of a particular vaccine. The NCVIA also established a system for reporting suspected vaccine-related adverse events (VAERS.)
Now consider that they are not disclosing the true risk of vaccine, and are exaggerating the benefit, and the CDC is not reporting true adverse events in VAERS, it seems to me that they have not lived up to the deal. In other words, that have not meet the requirements for immunity as stated in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), or the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).
The key word is "vaccine". The mRNA gene therapy is NOT a vaccine by any of the requirements under law. Just because Merriam-Webster dictionary, Wikipedia, and the CDC's web page changed the definition to fool the public doesn't change the legal definition found under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Again, the definition has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
I know there's more because I saw it earlier. There's several qualifiers to be a vaccine. Even this definition does not fit the mRNA gene therapy injectoid. Moderna has stated publicly that it does not prevent disease (COVID-19).
It also doesn't fit the listing for a 'Taxable vaccine':
(1) Taxable vaccine The term “taxable vaccine” means any of the following vaccines which are manufactured or produced in the United States or entered into the United States for consumption, use, or warehousing: (A) Any vaccine containing diphtheria toxoid. (B) Any vaccine containing tetanus toxoid. (C) Any vaccine containing pertussis bacteria, extracted or partial cell bacteria, or specific pertussis antigens. (D) Any vaccine against measles. (E) Any vaccine against mumps. (F) Any vaccine against rubella. (G) Any vaccine containing polio virus. (H) Any HIB vaccine. (I) Any vaccine against hepatitis A. (J) Any vaccine against hepatitis B. (K) Any vaccine against chicken pox. (L) Any vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis. (M) Any conjugate vaccine against streptococcus pneumoniae. (N) Any trivalent vaccine against influenza or any other vaccine against seasonal influenza. (O) Any meningococcal vaccine. (P) Any vaccine against the human papillomavirus.
Every Statute/Code/Law has a 'glossary' of definitions. You might have to go back a level or two to find the definitions. They must be defined or definitions of words would be changed willy-nilly. 'Up' would become 'down' and vice versa.
At the beginning of Trumps presidency, he was going to set up a vaccine safety commission. He even invited Kennedy and Del Bigtree to the whitehouse. Supposedly, it was a meeting with Bill Gates that ended the commission. I’ve been a rabid antivaxxer for 12 years. This was my number one goal with Trump in office and it completely fell through. For some reason the libs were vehemently against the safety commission.
All of the Vaccine's that are currently mandated for schools and military are FDA approved. PharmCo is not liable for adverse reactions to any of them.
The vaccine manufacturers' immunity from liability has nothing to do with the current FDA status of these vaccines. Our government gave them immunity over 30 yrs ago. "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22
The key word is "vaccine". The mRNA gene therapy is NOT a vaccine by any of the requirements under law. Just because Merriam-Webster dictionary, Wikipedia, and the CDC's web page changed the definition to fool the public doesn't change the legal definition found under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Again, the definition has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
That is very interesting. I looked up that legal code you mentioned, but I can not find the definition you speak of in it.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22
Can you direct me to where "vaccine" is legally defined in that code?
it would be farther back. US code usually puts definitions at the front. when i found the area, "vaccine" was not one of the words defined. however, a change to the definition would not have a retroactive effect. one would not expect a law from the 1950s that used the word "web" to be referring to the internet.
Protections but far from immunity. They are required a certain level of competency. The real issue is the definition of "vaccine" and are these jabs vax's at all. Here is legal def...https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/vaccine Big difference from the new as of 1/1/20 dictionary definition! If not a vax, full liability!
The legal and regulatory set up Big Vaccine has right now is a license to print money.
Ah! Warning! Warning! Danger! Danger!
But let me ask this, that immunity can't be unrestricted immunity, it only covers Properly Manufactured vaccines, right? If for example a vaccine manufacture knowing distributed a contaminated vaccine, that would not be covered under the act. And the act has requirements that must be met by the manufacture to qualify for immunity.
Here is my reference
*Note that I know nothing on this subject, I am just trying to pose some counter thought to your statement of immunity. *
Informed consent and adverse event reporting.
For example, the act required that providers administering certain vaccines provide a Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) to the vaccine recipient or a legal guardian. The VIS lists the risks and benefits of a particular vaccine. The NCVIA also established a system for reporting suspected vaccine-related adverse events (VAERS.)
Now consider that they are not disclosing the true risk of vaccine, and are exaggerating the benefit, and the CDC is not reporting true adverse events in VAERS, it seems to me that they have not lived up to the deal. In other words, that have not meet the requirements for immunity as stated in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), or the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).
/u/tewdryg
They already are immune to lawsuits. Vaccine injury normally end up in the vaccine court and taxpayers pay the bill.
The key word is "vaccine". The mRNA gene therapy is NOT a vaccine by any of the requirements under law. Just because Merriam-Webster dictionary, Wikipedia, and the CDC's web page changed the definition to fool the public doesn't change the legal definition found under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Again, the definition has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
I read all that legal jargon but did not see it define vaccine.
Here it is:
26 U.S. Code § 4132 - Definitions and special rules (2) Vaccine The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases.
I know there's more because I saw it earlier. There's several qualifiers to be a vaccine. Even this definition does not fit the mRNA gene therapy injectoid. Moderna has stated publicly that it does not prevent disease (COVID-19).
It also doesn't fit the listing for a 'Taxable vaccine': (1) Taxable vaccine The term “taxable vaccine” means any of the following vaccines which are manufactured or produced in the United States or entered into the United States for consumption, use, or warehousing: (A) Any vaccine containing diphtheria toxoid. (B) Any vaccine containing tetanus toxoid. (C) Any vaccine containing pertussis bacteria, extracted or partial cell bacteria, or specific pertussis antigens. (D) Any vaccine against measles. (E) Any vaccine against mumps. (F) Any vaccine against rubella. (G) Any vaccine containing polio virus. (H) Any HIB vaccine. (I) Any vaccine against hepatitis A. (J) Any vaccine against hepatitis B. (K) Any vaccine against chicken pox. (L) Any vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis. (M) Any conjugate vaccine against streptococcus pneumoniae. (N) Any trivalent vaccine against influenza or any other vaccine against seasonal influenza. (O) Any meningococcal vaccine. (P) Any vaccine against the human papillomavirus.
Every Statute/Code/Law has a 'glossary' of definitions. You might have to go back a level or two to find the definitions. They must be defined or definitions of words would be changed willy-nilly. 'Up' would become 'down' and vice versa.
Agreed. This was Reagan's doing when he bowed to the bigpharma vaxmakers in the 80's.
Make bigpharma accountable again. Do it by Presidential executive order. Fix it.
Amen, brother. Taxpayers should not be on the hook for this at all! And those who are shot happy employers should also bear part of the costs!
Yep. Chips falling all over the crib.
Proof that the vaxes are poison. https://rumble.com/vlhkwe-irrefutable-evidence-that-sould-send-all-who-knowingly-cooperated-to-prison.html
I agree but get into your way back machine to 1986 when the government gave them immunity against vaccines.
All vaccines are immune and have been since Reagan.
At the beginning of Trumps presidency, he was going to set up a vaccine safety commission. He even invited Kennedy and Del Bigtree to the whitehouse. Supposedly, it was a meeting with Bill Gates that ended the commission. I’ve been a rabid antivaxxer for 12 years. This was my number one goal with Trump in office and it completely fell through. For some reason the libs were vehemently against the safety commission.
They won't. Those bastards own the world.
Yeah and there are likely a million lawsuits waiting to be filed S soon as they do.
Is big rx immune from any other vax/rx liability???
No
Now you're talking!
All of the Vaccine's that are currently mandated for schools and military are FDA approved. PharmCo is not liable for adverse reactions to any of them.
How in the fuck could any of these be approved?! At all... if the short-term clinical trials are still active until 2023/2024...
Serious question.