If you want to scratch around for clues as to who is pulling their strings, get a copy of the school budget.
My wife is the PTA president and couldn't understand how all the money for field trips and busing dried up, previously the district bragged how they got thousands in state grants to spend on the "kids".
Upon examination of the budget, she found that $10,000 went to a Superintendents "Association" and $11,000 went to a different "association" for all the principals in town.
Those associations are working with lobbyists who recommend Critical Race Theory, Gender Studies, Missing Children Groups, Scholastic News, Common Core and all the way down to certain food services and nationwide photography companies. All of them are utilized in our district coincidentally.
Questions redpill better than aggressive assertiveness and even PROOF.
When someone says they support Tech companies preventing people from sharing 'misinformation' ask them "So who decides what is the 'truth' and what is 'misinformation?'" and then follow up with "Are you aware people are having posts deleted from Facebook and are getting banned by linking the CDC, and the reason is that they're spreading 'misinformation?"
Makes them think. Good questions redpill. Aggressively challenging their worldview will only cause them to dig in their heels.
Behold all the pro-masking science you will ever need, straight from the CDC’s own website. I give you, the “Great Clips” study. Randomized? No. Double blind? No. Placebo controlled? Negative. Complete follow up? Not exactly. Total farce? That’s a bingo.
This is some of the mother fucking “science“ that lockdown and mask mandates were originally based upon.
You're doing it wrong. You need to demand that they have the children perform proper hand hygiene before putting on and taking off masks like surgeons do. The teachers also need to prevent them from touching their faces. They also need to hire specialists to ensure that the masks are the proper grade and are fitted. Masks are completely ineffective without that. There are plenty of doctors telling you how to properly use masks like that.
Make a complete fuss about the safety and demand impossible measures and threaten to sue.
Yes, I understand. But the "you're endangering muh child!!!" narrative from some parents is obviously going to win in the end. You need to out perform them and pretend to be organizing parents to sue them out of existence for not doing it properly.
They need to feel that they have to bend over backwards so much that it's better to just admit that children are at negligible risk.
Great idea, while you are at it here are a couple of associated concepts for you to use.
when mandating the use of ppe the employer is responsible for training everyone on the use of the ppe. What protocols are being put in place to ensure that bacterial infections are not caused by dirty masks? What sterilization protocols are in place? How long should a mask be used before it is either disposed of or sterilized? Who is expected to pay for theses masks?
There was a study from Florida where masks were analyzed. Filthy things covered in all kinds of pathogens that will make us sick.
since the school boards have declared schools to be hostile environments that are unsafe for human occupation without precautions; why are the schools relying only on ppe? Ppe is the least effective and most intrusive method of hazard control (reference to Wikipedia hierarchy of control). Engineered controls should be used and ppe only used as a last resort. What has the school done to implement air filtration (dentists have done great work here and are using air filters for operating rooms combined with calculations of how many times the entire volume of air is replaced per hour to come up with a risk factor) and germicidal ultra violet light Systems.
Why are the schools ignoring all of history when it comes to dealing with hazards in the workplace and placing all their hopes on the least effective and most intrusive control (I.e. ppe \ masks)
This is a good approach and reminds me of Powell's "three questions to ask liberals" (because seldom can their ideas answer all three) posted yesterday: Compared to what? At what cost? Do you have hard evidence? You are on the last step, the first two apply to ROI of mitigation efforts.
Of course they don’t have it, because the COVID hasn’t been isolated with scientific or factual proof… Boom 💥 problem solved. Trump taught us right!!🎁👀
Little known fact... it is typically paralegals that draft and write the letters, motions and they are substantially cheaper. Maybe post the job on the anti vax job board that’s stickied?
Edit: the reason you’re probably having a hard time finding an attorney is bc they have to adhere and rely on their reputations. Judges do not like cowboys. If you’ve ever gone to court for a ticket, you’ll noticed certain attorneys are called first. The last ones are typically not from the area or the court doesn’t know them. Gonna be hard to find an attorney willing to risk their reputation. Look what’s happened to Lin Wood. Look for an attorney out of the area, it may help
I would say don't stop at asking for proof it stops transmission, SHOW them the data that masks actually do harm. Then let them explain why they want to do harm. Be ready. Also, OSHA states that masks are PPE and therefore, must be prescribed by a doctor and properly fitted. Nobody is properly custom fitting the masks kids wear at school and those masks aren't adequate anyway, even if they do fit well.
I asked the local AG those questions and they refused to answer. Said basically I have to sue them. I wrote to the governor and got no reply.
I called the local police department and they could or would not give me information.
People get nervous when you ask such simple questions.
Do you have proof that Covid-19 is real.
Do you have proof that a mask will stop the transmission of Covid-19.
If they can show that Covid-19 is real, then the question becomes “Is it man-made?”
If someone is wearing a mask, ask them if that mask will stop Covid-19. Make it clear that the mask they are wearing is non-compliant.
I think you understand the line of reasoning because of your post, but asking simple questions makes these people very nervous.
If you want to scratch around for clues as to who is pulling their strings, get a copy of the school budget.
My wife is the PTA president and couldn't understand how all the money for field trips and busing dried up, previously the district bragged how they got thousands in state grants to spend on the "kids".
Upon examination of the budget, she found that $10,000 went to a Superintendents "Association" and $11,000 went to a different "association" for all the principals in town.
Those associations are working with lobbyists who recommend Critical Race Theory, Gender Studies, Missing Children Groups, Scholastic News, Common Core and all the way down to certain food services and nationwide photography companies. All of them are utilized in our district coincidentally.
Questions redpill better than aggressive assertiveness and even PROOF.
When someone says they support Tech companies preventing people from sharing 'misinformation' ask them "So who decides what is the 'truth' and what is 'misinformation?'" and then follow up with "Are you aware people are having posts deleted from Facebook and are getting banned by linking the CDC, and the reason is that they're spreading 'misinformation?"
Makes them think. Good questions redpill. Aggressively challenging their worldview will only cause them to dig in their heels.
Good job fren.
Behold all the pro-masking science you will ever need, straight from the CDC’s own website. I give you, the “Great Clips” study. Randomized? No. Double blind? No. Placebo controlled? Negative. Complete follow up? Not exactly. Total farce? That’s a bingo.
This is some of the mother fucking “science“ that lockdown and mask mandates were originally based upon.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6928e2.htm
You can thank this fucking dipshit CEO: https://mobile.twitter.com/SDECoxHealth?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
As well as this cuck boy doctor: https://mobile.twitter.com/tmanhornfan?lang=en
Truly appreciate your colorful expression, spit coffee out my nose trying to snort laugh!
I️ wish we could subscribe to pede's on here and get notifications when they post. I️ don't want to miss your follow up.
Best of luck, man!!
You're doing it wrong. You need to demand that they have the children perform proper hand hygiene before putting on and taking off masks like surgeons do. The teachers also need to prevent them from touching their faces. They also need to hire specialists to ensure that the masks are the proper grade and are fitted. Masks are completely ineffective without that. There are plenty of doctors telling you how to properly use masks like that.
Make a complete fuss about the safety and demand impossible measures and threaten to sue.
Yes, I understand. But the "you're endangering muh child!!!" narrative from some parents is obviously going to win in the end. You need to out perform them and pretend to be organizing parents to sue them out of existence for not doing it properly.
They need to feel that they have to bend over backwards so much that it's better to just admit that children are at negligible risk.
Great idea, while you are at it here are a couple of associated concepts for you to use.
There was a study from Florida where masks were analyzed. Filthy things covered in all kinds of pathogens that will make us sick.
Why are the schools ignoring all of history when it comes to dealing with hazards in the workplace and placing all their hopes on the least effective and most intrusive control (I.e. ppe \ masks)
GREAT JOB. Please post on the outcome !
It's called "Burden of Proof"
This is a good approach and reminds me of Powell's "three questions to ask liberals" (because seldom can their ideas answer all three) posted yesterday: Compared to what? At what cost? Do you have hard evidence? You are on the last step, the first two apply to ROI of mitigation efforts.
Good plan. Please post about how this goes.
Keep us informed fellow patriot. Godspeed
Of course they don’t have it, because the COVID hasn’t been isolated with scientific or factual proof… Boom 💥 problem solved. Trump taught us right!!🎁👀
Good luck.
Will you be paying the attorney fees? Are they working pro bono? Very interesting. Good luck and God bless you.
Little known fact... it is typically paralegals that draft and write the letters, motions and they are substantially cheaper. Maybe post the job on the anti vax job board that’s stickied?
Edit: the reason you’re probably having a hard time finding an attorney is bc they have to adhere and rely on their reputations. Judges do not like cowboys. If you’ve ever gone to court for a ticket, you’ll noticed certain attorneys are called first. The last ones are typically not from the area or the court doesn’t know them. Gonna be hard to find an attorney willing to risk their reputation. Look what’s happened to Lin Wood. Look for an attorney out of the area, it may help
You're definitely living up to your username. Good luck.
I would say don't stop at asking for proof it stops transmission, SHOW them the data that masks actually do harm. Then let them explain why they want to do harm. Be ready. Also, OSHA states that masks are PPE and therefore, must be prescribed by a doctor and properly fitted. Nobody is properly custom fitting the masks kids wear at school and those masks aren't adequate anyway, even if they do fit well.
Okay, well you have to go with the strategy you believe in. Please keep us posted! I'm sure we'd all like to hear how this plays out. Good luck!
Lol. Okay, I hope you find one.
Bump - DM me if you need help - I have all the mask research and info you will ever need to prove masks do not work.
Thanks friend. Some good info in there.
Check the Americas Frontline Doctors website for help with an attorney.