In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.
We've only done rapid antigen testing, which I've gotta say seems to work quite well. It has 3% false positive rate but if the dude who was positive was able to give me my positives on my take home test, it is accurate enough
Tell us more about rapid antigen testing, with sources please.
Am curious, as I have read that there is no source of the [virus?] for testing. Reference testimony from guy in Alberta Canada. [If you need the link, ask me and I will provide.]
You what’s crazy, if you search it about 10 different fact checks come up that say this is just 1 test and not the PCR test in general so we’re all wrong for thinking it’s a bombshell. No matter how I read this it’s a bombshell, test was never reliable and couldn’t determine difference between flu and covid.
I've been waiting for a honest law firm to start a class action suit against the CDC and the pharma Companies .... maybe the USA citizens can join another country's lawsuit,
My cousin is a lab tech in a hospital. We were talking last week after a long time and I steered the conversation towards the PCR test. She told me something is strange. The doctors in her hospital started requesting the regular flu swab test also when they have a COVID test done. She said quote- “in almost a year not one single flu test came back positive, not a smaller than normal amount. ZERO! I haven’t seen that in 15 years doing them.” And I asked what does that mean and she just said “ we don’t know we can’t figure it out, but it’s fucking strange”
There is no more important proof of the criminal Lie that Fauci and the CDC, FDA, AMA, WHO AND the criminal MSM have committed the greatest crime in history against America and the world. There Never was a Test, which means there never was a Case. That is why the CDC called ALL flu deaths, COVID from the start. Seat a Federal Grand Jury and show them these lies.
Well duh, their bioweapon was a dud and they needed "cases" in order to scare people to take their depopulation vax. It explains why the media narratives never made sense and always contradicted themselves.
This is the kind of frustrating garbage that could only be written by ideologues with no molecular biology background at all. Go ahead and down vote ... or consider:
In Feb 2020, we only had a dozen or so cases in NYC and WA state, all travelers from China. CDC had the samples of the virus, but apparently wasn't sharing with FDA. Why? Because CDC was handling the PCR testing entirely in-house, as they typically do for small outbreaks of emergent diseases. The initial series of PCR tests that were being used world wide, 10s of thousands of them, were all produced in-house by the CDC.
No one really cared that there was no FDA-approved diagnostic test that early. We still thought we had this thing contained until 3rd week of February when we had our first community-acquired (ie, no known infected contact) case. Panic didn't really start til it spread down the west coast and the NBA and MLB started cancelling games in the 1st and 2nd weeks of March 2020.
There's been a narrative that no one had isolated the virus and it was all fake. That was never true. We got the gene sequence early in January 2020 and we got it from somewhere, folks. We got it from the samples we were getting out of Thailand and Japan in January 2020. We had scanning electron micrographs of it that early which means we had it and could visualize the dead virus. Live virus is a little trickier because you need a human cell line to grow it in and the right growth conditions. That can take longer to get right in the lab.
So, if you don't have live virus, you go back to your grad school training, pull up the BLAST sequence and design primers using the computer database. They teach this in introductory Biochemistry undergrad courses now. It's not hard. It's not controversial science at all, and it's accurate. As long as the primers are designed well, they can be used with high confidence.
By the 2nd week of March 2020, CDC was overwhelmed. It had a huge batch of tests fail because of faulty negative controls. There was enormous demand for new tests, so academia answered the call. Using the techniques I described in #4, virologists in medical schools and academic medical centers around the country started developing their own in-house tests to treat the patients they had in their EDs. This is when Trump called in Quest and Labcorp and got the major commercial labs involved, and FDA accommodated.
Yes, they should have validated those tests against patient specimens. Under normal circumstances, those are requirements for FDA approval, but with the EUA process, FDA could overlook that and let these highly competent scientists do a relatively simple task in good faith. They'd go back later, require validation and pare down the list. That's what they're doing now. It should've been done during the lull in cases in May 2020, but bureaucracies are slow and inefficient and FDA was worried about remdesivir, convolescent plasma, HCQ, etc at this time.
Fast forward and now FDA's getting rid of the EUA for the CDC's initial PCR test. Ok, fine. There are better ones out of the over 200 of them FDA still has out there under EUA. And the linked documents in that blog show that. That doesn't mean there was fraud in the test design. There are over 200 different tests here, not just one.
If there was fraud, it was in running the PCR test (regardless of which primers were used) for too many cycles. This creates false positive results. Any student knows this because we have all at least once amplified dust in the air and f'ed up a run before by not being careful enough with our aseptic technique. Again, this isn't an issue of the the primers. If the primers were bad, you would get NO amplification. The test would be too stringent. You'd get a negative result. We were seeing the opposite. The problem was the cycle number.
And lastly, you're thinking "but didn't the CDC just say their tests couldn't distinguish between COVID and flu"? No, that's spin. PCR can identify one gene sequence with high specificity. We have PCR tests for SARS-COV2 (COVID). We have other tests for flu, and not just any flu broadly, but for both types A and B. What CDC was saying in that press release is that because the use of these tests clinically is for influenza-like symptoms, it stands to reason that they would want any commercial test to do the logical thing and test for both viruses. That is, they wanted a product developed that tested any specimen received for both, so they could give doctors a meaningful answer, so the doc wouldn't have to order a COVID test and a flu test, but instead just order the ILI (influenza-like illness) panel, which makes sense.
If we're going to accuse the CDC of being corrupt we need to understand how they conducted their fraud. Running the PCR tests too aggressively, with too many cycles generates false positive results. Some king in Ghana got a positive COVID test off of a sample of papaya juice he sent in. This is how they got that. The vast majority of it was in manipulating the data and the data collection.
Think of it like the election fraud. They can't get away with gross fraud, having some guy shredding ballots or whatever. Those people get caught and they can't create enough fake votes to be convincing. So they do it behind the scenes with the computers. We've all seen the Mike Lindell symposiums showing the algorithms they used. CDC was running a similar data manipulation racket with COVID data. It was conflating ILI (flu and COVID regarded as the same thing and called COVID). It was conflating deaths with COVID and deaths from COVID to boost the numbers, etc. They "disappeared" the 2020-2021 flu season, attributing it all to COVID. They disavowed "breakthrough" COVID cases in the vaccinated, so they could claim all new cases were in us dangerous unvaccinated people. That's how they work these scams. The know no one looks at the data collection methodology, so they exploit that. That's where the fraud is.
Have you or any researcher you know ever examined a specimen of Covid19? And can you prove it? Many believe is doesn't exist. In fact, this whole "PLANNEDdemic of fear and hysteria and intentional mis-treatment of symptoms leading to death & pushing a stab that doesn't work could have been ginned up during any of the past 10-20 particularly harsh seasonal flu seasons we've had. Esp since internet, compliant media, social media, etc.
I have responded to this story multiple times. The recall was not a result of the test being faulty. It’s in favor of a test that can detect both covid and the flu. The old test could ONLY detect covid, not the flu, but it found covid just fine.
I can write out the whole thing again, but an article came out just a few days ago, so I don’t have to.
The test was FAULTY from day one. Had to cycle 40 times to find dead cells...couldn't differentiate cv19 from any other virus or bacteria infection... it was never created for CV19 testing per the inventor of this test. That's pretty darn faulty
The tests only detected one thing, the thing that "they" wanted to blame for cause of death. But relying only on such a test would help exclude the possibility of another thing actually contributing to and/or being the direct cause of death. All a way to pump up the numbers.
Thesis: Covid is DeAdLiEsT ViRus EvEr!
Evidence A: test detects trace of covid
Evidence B: patient dies
Attempted correlation: B must have been the result of A
Conclusion: therefore, thesis is true
Circular reasoning. Starting with a thesis and then twisting data to support that thesis.
I remember when the democrats were screaming to high heavens about how everyone needed to be corona virus tested immediately- knowing that a test did not exist, or was in limited supply.
Why all the need for everyone to be tested for a disease with no cure? What's the point? Was it really that important for everyone to know if they had a cold germ with a 99.8% (much better for young people) survival rate? Of course not.
And now we see the evidence for why they were making such ludicrous testing demands. They knew the fraud test kits could be used to push their tyrannical, corrupt agendas.
All they had to do was make the fraud test kits spit out enough fake "covid cases," and bingo, the public masses could be fooled into a panic mode, and comply with whatever absurdities the NWO political leaders wanted their sheep to do.
The NWO gang literally terrorized the public into spending (giving to them) trillions of tax dollars, giving up their freedoms, and spending money on useless bullshit, just to try to save themselves from the over-hyped CCP death plague. I bet some some people are still sitting on cases of hoarded toilet paper from back in March of 2020.
But you see, the democrats could not create the public hysteria without those fraudulent "covid cases" numbers to show the public, and have "the experts" like Dr. 'Faux Pas' Fauchi, the CDC, and the pharma gang all supporting the validity of the fraudulent test kits.
That's why they really needed the public (sheep) to hurry up and take those covid tests. Because if nobody was taking the tests, then they couldn't show the rigged (too many cycles, oopsies) false positive numbers to create the hysteria, and the chaos they needed as a catalyst for their wicked agendas. "PLandemic."
Take away:
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.
Center of Deception and Confusion
Center of Deception and Control.
The inventor said that months ago that is should NOT be used but that means it MUST be used because the false positive rate was (is) astronomical.
This came out in July-I was actually shocked everyone stopped talking about this juicy little nugget!
Same here!!
“According to the CDC, shows them article the PCR doesn’t even differentiate between any other virus.
Who takes the PCR test anyway?
We've only done rapid antigen testing, which I've gotta say seems to work quite well. It has 3% false positive rate but if the dude who was positive was able to give me my positives on my take home test, it is accurate enough
Tell us more about rapid antigen testing, with sources please.
Am curious, as I have read that there is no source of the [virus?] for testing. Reference testimony from guy in Alberta Canada. [If you need the link, ask me and I will provide.]
3% false positive rate
For a disease that only a tiny fraction has
Sounds like Bayes has a word for us
(No one has covid)
I still can’t figure this out. If they do not have a sequence of covid in general, like in the court case in Alberta, how do you test accurately?
How is it possible to say definitively that any one test result is covid, when there is nothing to compare it to? Couldn’t it be any coronavirus?
You what’s crazy, if you search it about 10 different fact checks come up that say this is just 1 test and not the PCR test in general so we’re all wrong for thinking it’s a bombshell. No matter how I read this it’s a bombshell, test was never reliable and couldn’t determine difference between flu and covid.
I've been waiting for a honest law firm to start a class action suit against the CDC and the pharma Companies .... maybe the USA citizens can join another country's lawsuit,
Are there any? Maybe I missed something?
Well, uh, there's this:
Massive Legal Litigation on the Covid-19 Fraud Commenced by Dr Reiner Fuellmich (Video) Posted on June 13, 2021 by State of the Nation
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=68948
https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/sutton-served/?vgo_ee=Mb1%2B1AognRYs7rgx6%2Ftkb1b9clrLpg0Fb7OQ5vhiPds%3D
That's great, can Americans join? I can't watch it now. :). But I will when i get home
Fuck off
And "they" wonder why people are anti-covid "vaccine."
Everything the CDC says is a lie. They are just like the MSM. You are better off believing the opposite of everything they say.
“Dr Fauci was very good at what he did. Everything he recommended, I did the opposite and it worked out great!” - DJT
My cousin is a lab tech in a hospital. We were talking last week after a long time and I steered the conversation towards the PCR test. She told me something is strange. The doctors in her hospital started requesting the regular flu swab test also when they have a COVID test done. She said quote- “in almost a year not one single flu test came back positive, not a smaller than normal amount. ZERO! I haven’t seen that in 15 years doing them.” And I asked what does that mean and she just said “ we don’t know we can’t figure it out, but it’s fucking strange”
They know deep down exactly what it means. But oh no! We don't want to be called conspiracy theorists now do we!?
CDC Admits PCR Tests Don’t Work For Like The 5th Time*
Same article from July.
There is no more important proof of the criminal Lie that Fauci and the CDC, FDA, AMA, WHO AND the criminal MSM have committed the greatest crime in history against America and the world. There Never was a Test, which means there never was a Case. That is why the CDC called ALL flu deaths, COVID from the start. Seat a Federal Grand Jury and show them these lies.
aka we have a new test where everyone is 100% positive for covid for covid22
Sooo when will they be returning all the billions they profited off the purchases of them.
Not to mention the restitution to every business and employee that lost everything based on their known fraudulent test?
Asking for a friend
I don't understand why the CDC would lie to us!
Well duh, their bioweapon was a dud and they needed "cases" in order to scare people to take their depopulation vax. It explains why the media narratives never made sense and always contradicted themselves.
This is the kind of frustrating garbage that could only be written by ideologues with no molecular biology background at all. Go ahead and down vote ... or consider:
If we're going to accuse the CDC of being corrupt we need to understand how they conducted their fraud. Running the PCR tests too aggressively, with too many cycles generates false positive results. Some king in Ghana got a positive COVID test off of a sample of papaya juice he sent in. This is how they got that. The vast majority of it was in manipulating the data and the data collection.
Think of it like the election fraud. They can't get away with gross fraud, having some guy shredding ballots or whatever. Those people get caught and they can't create enough fake votes to be convincing. So they do it behind the scenes with the computers. We've all seen the Mike Lindell symposiums showing the algorithms they used. CDC was running a similar data manipulation racket with COVID data. It was conflating ILI (flu and COVID regarded as the same thing and called COVID). It was conflating deaths with COVID and deaths from COVID to boost the numbers, etc. They "disappeared" the 2020-2021 flu season, attributing it all to COVID. They disavowed "breakthrough" COVID cases in the vaccinated, so they could claim all new cases were in us dangerous unvaccinated people. That's how they work these scams. The know no one looks at the data collection methodology, so they exploit that. That's where the fraud is.
Pau Pau Fruit
Whatever you say, Dr. Handshake.
Thanks for participating.
either you didnt read the full post, didnt understand it, or blindly close your ears to different opinions op
All I know is that the CDC and all the companies that made PCR tests and equipment are full of shit.
Nothing more than pigs feeding at the fear and money trough.
Sauce please. Provide links to sources for your information. It will strengthen your points, or not.
Have you or any researcher you know ever examined a specimen of Covid19? And can you prove it? Many believe is doesn't exist. In fact, this whole "PLANNEDdemic of fear and hysteria and intentional mis-treatment of symptoms leading to death & pushing a stab that doesn't work could have been ginned up during any of the past 10-20 particularly harsh seasonal flu seasons we've had. Esp since internet, compliant media, social media, etc.
We knew this probably two months ago. So sad that the Mormon’s don’t care
Don't you mean SMOCKING GUN??
This is old news here on GWA isn't it?
Lol Normies
Yeah, we wrote them letters telling them. So we know they know
No test...no covid. .period you need to k ow no more than that. Flu is all it was.
I have responded to this story multiple times. The recall was not a result of the test being faulty. It’s in favor of a test that can detect both covid and the flu. The old test could ONLY detect covid, not the flu, but it found covid just fine.
I can write out the whole thing again, but an article came out just a few days ago, so I don’t have to.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/pcr-test-recall-can-the-test-tell-the-difference-between-covid-19-and-the-flu
I would encourage you to read it and the reread the recall notice, and see if you still agree that this is a bombshell.
The test was FAULTY from day one. Had to cycle 40 times to find dead cells...couldn't differentiate cv19 from any other virus or bacteria infection... it was never created for CV19 testing per the inventor of this test. That's pretty darn faulty
The tests only detected one thing, the thing that "they" wanted to blame for cause of death. But relying only on such a test would help exclude the possibility of another thing actually contributing to and/or being the direct cause of death. All a way to pump up the numbers.
Thesis: Covid is DeAdLiEsT ViRus EvEr! Evidence A: test detects trace of covid Evidence B: patient dies Attempted correlation: B must have been the result of A Conclusion: therefore, thesis is true
Circular reasoning. Starting with a thesis and then twisting data to support that thesis.
Yep.
Null Hypothesis is supposed to save scientists from nature rolling random dice.
And the covid nightmare fails it everytime.
We already know about bad colds. There's nothing special about 2019 other than the hype.
So all this crap that was mandated, dictated, and advised was founded on fraud. And fraud vitiates everything. Let's see what happens. Popcorn time!
Lol how is this a smoking gun? This has been known for months. Doesn’t matter, people are conforming morons still walking around in masks
I remember when the democrats were screaming to high heavens about how everyone needed to be corona virus tested immediately- knowing that a test did not exist, or was in limited supply.
Why all the need for everyone to be tested for a disease with no cure? What's the point? Was it really that important for everyone to know if they had a cold germ with a 99.8% (much better for young people) survival rate? Of course not.
And now we see the evidence for why they were making such ludicrous testing demands. They knew the fraud test kits could be used to push their tyrannical, corrupt agendas.
All they had to do was make the fraud test kits spit out enough fake "covid cases," and bingo, the public masses could be fooled into a panic mode, and comply with whatever absurdities the NWO political leaders wanted their sheep to do.
The NWO gang literally terrorized the public into spending (giving to them) trillions of tax dollars, giving up their freedoms, and spending money on useless bullshit, just to try to save themselves from the over-hyped CCP death plague. I bet some some people are still sitting on cases of hoarded toilet paper from back in March of 2020.
But you see, the democrats could not create the public hysteria without those fraudulent "covid cases" numbers to show the public, and have "the experts" like Dr. 'Faux Pas' Fauchi, the CDC, and the pharma gang all supporting the validity of the fraudulent test kits.
That's why they really needed the public (sheep) to hurry up and take those covid tests. Because if nobody was taking the tests, then they couldn't show the rigged (too many cycles, oopsies) false positive numbers to create the hysteria, and the chaos they needed as a catalyst for their wicked agendas. "PLandemic."
I hate clickbait shit like this.
Stealthily?
Dude, they don't hold daily fucking press conferences on everything. They just collect information.
They hide everything in plain site because the information doesn't get sought, there's no dopamine in data