It follows that if viruses are parasites, and “viruses” are suspected to cause cancer (HPV supposedly causes cervical cancer), then cancer is actually just a parasitic infestation in a certain part of the body. This could turn the world on its head if it is released that curing cancer is that simple and cheap. I’m livid at the thought. I’ve been robbed of so many people because of cancer.
Haven't we all, lost my mother when she was 46 and I 19. I never got to experience the mother daughter friendship. Plus numerous other family who had cancer. 🤬
So sorry fren. Lost an uncle, a childhood friend, the aunt I’m named for, and never met my paternal grandfather—all down to cancer. It’s heartbreaking.
It's not going to turn the world on its head because naturopathic doctors have been able to cure cancer for years. Even the father of medicine Hippocrates gained his fame for curing cancer, among other ailments, with large amounts of crushed garlic.
Likewise, Vitamin C IVs have reversed stage four cancers under the care of naturopathic physicians and no one in conventional medicine cares. Sometimes the local news covers it and brings the cases to light. It's a conspiracy to suppress natural medicine. Most insulting, they do use it at Mayo Clinic now in conjunction with their normal chemotherapy so they can reap the benefits of its healing and cancer fighting properties, get better outcomes, while still charging for chemo.
That's not how Fenbendazole works. It impairs cancer's ability to feed via microtubules the same way that it does on worms.
There are many people in the forums who habe mafe miraculous recoveries with metabolic treatments, but it's a bit more complex that eating dog dewormer. The most successful almost always use it in conjunction with other therapies.
protip: you don't need someone else to archive this for you, simply copy the link and paste it into archive.is and it will save an archived copy that will allow you to bypass your regional restrictions.
It breaks my heart to see people who have family members who have died of "cancer" when it was preventable the whole time. The only cancer deaths are people who ignored all the good information on curing it.
If it does turn out to be a true cure, you can bet it will no longer be a $7 med. It'll be a $70k med so that the poor and elderly can't afford it, and it will then result in the death of our family pets. I truly hope there is truth to this though. And we can keep big ripoff pharma from raising the price astronomically high
if memory serves (and i can't remember where, sorry) the function here is that ivermectin protects only the healthy cells as it functions. this allows the body to not only attack the virus, but any unhealthy (cancerous) cells at the same time.
Its interesting that they don't use the name ivermectin or hydroxychloroquin because thats what it is. I'm giving it to my 10yr old dog right now for a tumor on his toe. His vet wanted to remove the toe.
But there was another monkey virus that polio researchers missed. Between 1954 and 1963, an estimated 10 million to 30 million Americans and scores of millions of people around the world were exposed to a virus that infected the kidneys of Asian rhesus monkeys imported mainly from India. The virus survived the formaldehyde that Salk used to kill his polio viruses. Since 1961 researchers have tested monkeys for SV40 - so called because it was the fortieth such simian virus identified - before using their kidneys for vaccine production.
SV40 was delivered straight into people’s bloodstreams along with their Salk shots and via sugar cubes in field trials of the weakened living virus developed by Sabin. Though it was later shown to cause cancer in hamsters and to ‘‘immortalize’’ human cells in test tubes - thus predisposing these cells to cancer - SV40 has not been proven to generate illness in human beings. Nevertheless, researchers at Johns Hopkins recently discovered that when they injected cells treated with SV40 into ‘‘nude’’ mice, which lack an immune system, the mice developed Kaposi’s sarcoma-like tumors, similar to those afflicting many AIDS victims. Remarkably, considering the large numbers of people who received the SV40-contaminated polio vaccines, no one has conducted a major epidemiological study in the U.S. to discover whether there is any pattern of illnesses caused by the virus.
Still, there are some troubling statistical associations. In 1968 a scientist in Australia described a correlation between polio immunization and cancers in children past one year of age. Much later, German scientists found evidence of SV40 in 30 out of 110 brain tumors, and later reports indicated a jump in the frequency of brain tumors among those who had received vaccine contaminated with SV40. And SV40 has been associated with other human cancers as well.
But when Koprowski, Salk and Sabin were doing their initial vaccine development in the Fifties, little was known about the simian viruses, and there were no federal regulations stipulating that the viruses be grown in a specific type of tissue culture. No one knew then about retroviruses like HIV that might take years to develop, and so it was assumed that if no viruses had shown up in preparations after a couple of weeks, then those vaccines were clean.
In 1988, when researchers in the Washington, D.C., area reexamined an earlier study run between 1959 and 1965 on nearly 59,000 pregnant women, they found a startling connection: The incidence of brain tumors in children of mothers who’d been injected with the Salk vaccine was thirteen times greater than that of offspring of mothers who hadn’t had those polio shots. Stored blood serum from these mothers still existed, and it was retested. The tests seemed to exclude SV40 as the cause. But if not SV40, what about the Salk vaccine might explain the increased risk of brain tumors in offspring of vaccinated women? The researchers asserted that some other infection was probably the culprit. After all, they noted, the Salk vaccine was known to have been contaminated with numerous monkey viruses.
It's good you're wondering. I have had the opinion since my back surgery in '06 that doctors are no more than advanced sales for the drug companies. That's when I found out who the largest lobby on K street is. By almost twice as large as all the rest.
To be honest I stopped trusting them back in 1980 when my father left UCLA oncology with malignant melanoma and was CURED at home by The Gerson Therapy. Now he's 84 and healthy.
Sorry, I have to laugh. The title sounds so funny. Like something off the rags at the check out counter of a grocery store. Maybe we need to start seeing vets instead of MDs? He better not slip on that rubber glove that goes up to the shoulder or there's going to be a problem of a different kind in the exam room.
They showed the blurred package of what I take, the low dose fenbendazole. I was sent home 20yrs ago and refused to die. I have been using many things to keep it down but found nothing that actually got rid of it completely. I am seeing very promising results and looks like my tumor is getting ready to fall out.
I am noticing other problems resolving also, especially my lower throat, that has been bothering me since I burned it yrs ago. My memory has improved, even though I didn't know there was a problem.
Glad to hear you're doing okay! Have you tried apricot kernels? Also my father beat malignant melanoma back in 1980 using the Gerson Therapy, and my mother saved the life of a woman who the doctors gave up on using the same method. The doctors said she can die at home or spend a lot of money and die at the hospital, so my mother with hardly a high school education cured her in 3 weeks. It wasn't cancer but it was still deadly. It was a grotesque skin rash enveloping her body and everything the medical establishment tried just seemed to aggravate it. The Wright brothers also did not finish High School.
Viruses are parasites. There has been a theory that cancer is caused by a virus for years. So it makes sense.
It follows that if viruses are parasites, and “viruses” are suspected to cause cancer (HPV supposedly causes cervical cancer), then cancer is actually just a parasitic infestation in a certain part of the body. This could turn the world on its head if it is released that curing cancer is that simple and cheap. I’m livid at the thought. I’ve been robbed of so many people because of cancer.
It likely as simple as you say sir.
Haven't we all, lost my mother when she was 46 and I 19. I never got to experience the mother daughter friendship. Plus numerous other family who had cancer. 🤬
So sorry fren. Lost an uncle, a childhood friend, the aunt I’m named for, and never met my paternal grandfather—all down to cancer. It’s heartbreaking.
It's not going to turn the world on its head because naturopathic doctors have been able to cure cancer for years. Even the father of medicine Hippocrates gained his fame for curing cancer, among other ailments, with large amounts of crushed garlic.
Likewise, Vitamin C IVs have reversed stage four cancers under the care of naturopathic physicians and no one in conventional medicine cares. Sometimes the local news covers it and brings the cases to light. It's a conspiracy to suppress natural medicine. Most insulting, they do use it at Mayo Clinic now in conjunction with their normal chemotherapy so they can reap the benefits of its healing and cancer fighting properties, get better outcomes, while still charging for chemo.
thats nonsense anyone who wants to learn what viruses are watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs
That's not how Fenbendazole works. It impairs cancer's ability to feed via microtubules the same way that it does on worms.
There are many people in the forums who habe mafe miraculous recoveries with metabolic treatments, but it's a bit more complex that eating dog dewormer. The most successful almost always use it in conjunction with other therapies.
You shouldn't be wondering you should KNOW by now the entire industry is a giant fraud that only cares about profits.
We could wipe out cancer whenever, they just don't wanna give up the cash cow.
Fenbendazole
The faggot author didn't name the drug.
upvoted if true
It is fenbendazole here is his blog: https://www.mycancerstory.rocks/single-post/2016/08/22/shake-up-your-life-how-to-change-your-own-perspective
Anyone's remember the long string of doctors or oncologist that were ending up dead some time back, all were on to the cure
Ivermectin...cures covid and possibly cancer
Ivermectin against cancer
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/
Thus book, is a great read if you want to know more about where some of these dangerous viruses really come from.
Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism & Toxic Warfare
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL3960780M/Death_in_the_air
Any chance of archiving this link? Being blocked by regional restrictions so can’t see.
https://archive.is/elpVS
protip: you don't need someone else to archive this for you, simply copy the link and paste it into archive.is and it will save an archived copy that will allow you to bypass your regional restrictions.
Mycancerstory.rocks is his website.
Im telling you, they are setting the conditions for disease. When you keep your body balanced disease can't touch you.
It breaks my heart to see people who have family members who have died of "cancer" when it was preventable the whole time. The only cancer deaths are people who ignored all the good information on curing it.
If it does turn out to be a true cure, you can bet it will no longer be a $7 med. It'll be a $70k med so that the poor and elderly can't afford it, and it will then result in the death of our family pets. I truly hope there is truth to this though. And we can keep big ripoff pharma from raising the price astronomically high
if memory serves (and i can't remember where, sorry) the function here is that ivermectin protects only the healthy cells as it functions. this allows the body to not only attack the virus, but any unhealthy (cancerous) cells at the same time.
Its interesting that they don't use the name ivermectin or hydroxychloroquin because thats what it is. I'm giving it to my 10yr old dog right now for a tumor on his toe. His vet wanted to remove the toe.
Any idea which product?
Fenbenzadole. Several brands available for animals.
What if cancer is the result of a man made virus meant to continually depopulate the planet?
http://www.mifami.org/eLibrary/Curtis-OriginOfAIDS-RollingStone.pdf
RN here. I've been wondering about a lot of the same things.
Would love to see results of the study. Sounds like it could be fast given 3 months to health from terminal cancer.
It's good you're wondering. I have had the opinion since my back surgery in '06 that doctors are no more than advanced sales for the drug companies. That's when I found out who the largest lobby on K street is. By almost twice as large as all the rest.
To be honest I stopped trusting them back in 1980 when my father left UCLA oncology with malignant melanoma and was CURED at home by The Gerson Therapy. Now he's 84 and healthy.
Sorry, I have to laugh. The title sounds so funny. Like something off the rags at the check out counter of a grocery store. Maybe we need to start seeing vets instead of MDs? He better not slip on that rubber glove that goes up to the shoulder or there's going to be a problem of a different kind in the exam room.
They showed the blurred package of what I take, the low dose fenbendazole. I was sent home 20yrs ago and refused to die. I have been using many things to keep it down but found nothing that actually got rid of it completely. I am seeing very promising results and looks like my tumor is getting ready to fall out.
I am noticing other problems resolving also, especially my lower throat, that has been bothering me since I burned it yrs ago. My memory has improved, even though I didn't know there was a problem.
Glad to hear you're doing okay! Have you tried apricot kernels? Also my father beat malignant melanoma back in 1980 using the Gerson Therapy, and my mother saved the life of a woman who the doctors gave up on using the same method. The doctors said she can die at home or spend a lot of money and die at the hospital, so my mother with hardly a high school education cured her in 3 weeks. It wasn't cancer but it was still deadly. It was a grotesque skin rash enveloping her body and everything the medical establishment tried just seemed to aggravate it. The Wright brothers also did not finish High School.
nowhere in the article does it state the medication
Search engine for ivermectin and cancer. You'll find all kinds of studies about ivermectin being used to treat cancer.
I think the first scientific reference about this is this paper
As far as I know nobody try to follow this research line. Scientific omertà