I agree, but on this occasion in 2001 , BBC was reporting what was common knowledge at the time, need to find out who told the fire fighters the building was going to collapse.
Please try not to sound like a mindless moron repeating things.
You aren't making sense to me. Of course nobody round the world had any interest in a random skyscraper (WTC7) in NY before 9/11 It was just an office building full of spooks.
Most of the world didn't know what the WTC7 was before 911
And the BBC was told that WTC7 had collapsed by sources on the ground. Fire fighters had been evacuated as they were inexplicably told the building was going to collapse , from fire...
I was researching the Oklahoma City event in my spare time when 9/11 happened. I can remember the feeling when WTC 7 and the Pentagon occurred and for a brief moment I thought all three were connected, but I didn't know how. Obviously everyone was distracted by WTC 1 & 2 for months afterwards; so was I. It took another year or so for me to clear my head. Now, I see almost any event in history, at least the ones the media and historians make a big fuss about as a false flag.
So far as that 2nd clip, Flight 175 came in from the other side. The explosion is blasting through the building. And that clip actually shows the plane incoming from the upper right...
EYEWITNESS AT PENTAGON ON 9/11 SAYS THERE WAS NO PLANE DEBRIS AND ACTUAL VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE
February 11, 2020 Russ Winter Articles by Russ Winter, Crime, Hidden History, US News
Very strong evidence including eyewitnesses and video - No Plane. Also the width of a plane's wings is > 100 feet. The width of the damage was 65 feet.
Yeah, I saw the video elsewhere. It is BS. The length of the supposed missile is about the height of the Pentagon, which is 71 feet. There are no cruise missiles of that length today. There was also no indication of wings or stabilizers, which hints at how crappy the image was. The likelihood is that the camera was seeing a sun glare off the fuselage of the 767. It would help if you guys would actually study what you are pointing at.
Yes but there was also footage of fire fighters and other safety personnel inexplicably believing that a building on fire was about to collapse which was a world first basically .
So why did fire fighters of all people believe that the building was going to collapse due to fire.
Uh, maybe because they have had 'way too much experience being in structures that collapsed due to fire. Don't you realize that is what happens to buildings that are engulfed in fire?
Yes but there was also footage of fire fighters and other safety personnel inexplicably believing that a building on fire was about to collapse which was a world first basically .
So why did fire fighters of all people believe that the building was going to collapse due to fire.
The BBC preknowledge of WTC7 collapse was a major redpill for me. It ended the BBC for me,
Don't blame the BBC, blame the people who were relaying the info that a building was about to fall from a fire...
It's clear that somebody was instructing fire personnel to evacuate as they believed the fire was going to cause a collapse...
Don't blame the BBC, blame the people who were relaying the info that a building was about to fall from a fire...
It's clear that somebody was instructing fire personnel to evacuate as they believed the fire was going to cause a collapse...
BBC = MSM = DISINFORMATION
I agree, but on this occasion in 2001 , BBC was reporting what was common knowledge at the time, need to find out who told the fire fighters the building was going to collapse.
Please try not to sound like a mindless moron repeating things.
I'm not a mindless moron, but looking at your comments on this board today and previously you are a shill. Blocked.
She could have verified the building was standing by looking behind her!
Anyway the BBC has always been the most professional and most pernicious disinfo outfit the cabal had in the 20th century,
Total scum.
Most of the world had no idea what building 7 was before 9/11.
You aren't making sense to me. Of course nobody round the world had any interest in a random skyscraper (WTC7) in NY before 9/11 It was just an office building full of spooks.
This is the very thing that broke the 9/11 narrative to me.
Building #7 was known to have immense empathy and sensitivity and fell down in compassion and solidarity with Building #1 and #2.
Why?
Most of the world didn't know what the WTC7 was before 911
And the BBC was told that WTC7 had collapsed by sources on the ground. Fire fighters had been evacuated as they were inexplicably told the building was going to collapse , from fire...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq9nUPs2RAk&feature=youtu.be
Going to collapse ≠ has collapsed.
Can you give a timestamp? The video is about five hours long.
I was researching the Oklahoma City event in my spare time when 9/11 happened. I can remember the feeling when WTC 7 and the Pentagon occurred and for a brief moment I thought all three were connected, but I didn't know how. Obviously everyone was distracted by WTC 1 & 2 for months afterwards; so was I. It took another year or so for me to clear my head. Now, I see almost any event in history, at least the ones the media and historians make a big fuss about as a false flag.
Every shooting the media has focused on in the last 10 years is ALWAYS linked to the FBI. Hmmmmmm.
Also, footage that shows explosion at Pentagon - no plane.
https://truth11.com/2020/09/11/on-the-anniversary-of-9-11-we-remind-us-all-that-no-planes-were-used-two-videos-showing-the-real-footage/
So far as that 2nd clip, Flight 175 came in from the other side. The explosion is blasting through the building. And that clip actually shows the plane incoming from the upper right...
EYEWITNESS AT PENTAGON ON 9/11 SAYS THERE WAS NO PLANE DEBRIS AND ACTUAL VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE
February 11, 2020 Russ Winter Articles by Russ Winter, Crime, Hidden History, US News
Very strong evidence including eyewitnesses and video - No Plane. Also the width of a plane's wings is > 100 feet. The width of the damage was 65 feet.
https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/02/april-gallop-eyewitness-at-pentagon-on-911-says-no-plane-debris/
Army Major: “I Have Proof That A Missile Hit Pentagon On 9/11” https://newspunch.com/army-general-missile-hit-pentagon-911/
VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE STRIKING THE PENTAGON
https://defendingthetruth.com/threads/the-pentagon-on-911-a-cruise-missile-struck-the-building.14045/
Yeah, I saw the video elsewhere. It is BS. The length of the supposed missile is about the height of the Pentagon, which is 71 feet. There are no cruise missiles of that length today. There was also no indication of wings or stabilizers, which hints at how crappy the image was. The likelihood is that the camera was seeing a sun glare off the fuselage of the 767. It would help if you guys would actually study what you are pointing at.
Kazarian demon Silverstein said “pull it”
Yes but there was also footage of fire fighters and other safety personnel inexplicably believing that a building on fire was about to collapse which was a world first basically .
So why did fire fighters of all people believe that the building was going to collapse due to fire.
Uh, maybe because they have had 'way too much experience being in structures that collapsed due to fire. Don't you realize that is what happens to buildings that are engulfed in fire?
Yes but there was also footage of fire fighters and other safety personnel inexplicably believing that a building on fire was about to collapse which was a world first basically .
So why did fire fighters of all people believe that the building was going to collapse due to fire.
So what was important about #7 then? I'll dig around of course, but just curious if there are some common theories.
Glowies occupied building
On the surface this is the list of tenants:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tenants_in_7_World_Trade_Center
The alphabets plus that cutthroat bank occupying most of the building definitely makes me scratch my head a little.
WTC 7 was a command HQ for several agencies and had been rebuilt only a few years before.
WTC7 completely blew my mind.
It's a condition known as the "Fox" syndrome
The BBC was parroting what was being said on the ground at the time.