I knew the second the first tower fell that it was a demolition. If steel had actually melted like they say.the tops of those building should've leaned over before it free fell.that didn't happen.
you're 100% correct! yes some of the columns may have seen some heat, but not nearly enough to buckle... even if they did.. 70-80% of the columns would have seen minimal to no heat.... only a total loon would expect a total 100% even collapse of all those massive steel columns. sadly, most sheep are so blinded by the msm bullshit that they can no longer engage their brains and think for themselves.
There is also this thing called free fall. Those towers fell in its own footprint at free fall speed. Impossible unless demoed. Not to mention the molten steel that was around for weeks. Nano thermite is what scorched the towers with assistance from demolition and caused most of that steel to just dustify.
bullshit!! you get a massive pile of debris like that you have very little chance of the massive amounts of oxygen to enter the space where flammables are, c'mon folks... use your friggen heads!! the majority of the rubble was non-flammable... mainly carpets, furniture and office stuff... maybe some wooden walls and such... but never in a million years enough to generate heat sufficient for melting steel!
You're correct from Nano thermite molten steel was seen flowing at ground zero for at least a.week. Ive dug down this rabbit hole so far, I made it all the way to China.
How many ways can false statements be made? Let me count the ways ...
If softened under heat, which is a WELL KNOWN property of steel.
One of the MAIN REASONS they use steel in SKYSCRAPERS is because it TRANSFERS HEAT throughout the structure. If you have a 6" bar of steel, sure it could melt. But a 100+ story steel-framed building allows for A LOT of transfer of heat.
Steel loses something like 60% of rigidity at 1/2 its melting point.
No such building has EVER fallen due to heat/fire, except for 3 on 9/11 (which were blown apart). You canNOT reconcile your theory with the FACT that NO STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING HAS EVER FALLEN DUE TO "MELTING POINT."
Period.
Modern buildings are VERY much like a card towers too.
Bullshit.
They don't fall.
Period.
The downside is if you can make one major part fail, the whole building collapses because of the Cascade Effect.
More bullshit.
They don't fall.
(Except via explosives/incendiaries.)
Period.
However this also doesn't change truth that The Bush Administration planned 9-11 and it absolutely was an inside job.
Most likely, Bush himself was just told to go along. He's not smart enough to plan a cookout, much less a sophisiticated psyop like 9/11.
Tell me, lets get out Occam's razor.
Yes, let's do that.
Which is more plausible? That a MASSIVE team of government insiders all organized a huge conspiracy of thousands of people to rig the buildings, set up fake crisis actors....etc on and on and until you have somehow 100,000 people "in" on the crime of the century but somehow nobody talks?
That is a STRAWMAN argument, which is to say it has NOTHING to do with Occam's Razor.
Nobody is saying there were 100,000 people plotting anything.
Occam's Razor requires we look at ALL the known evidence, and THEN consider a simple explanation that INCLUDES ALL THE KNOWN EVIDENCE.
The FACT that there was a "re-cabling" in the twin towers just a few weeks before 9/11, where workers were in the elevator shafts of the buildings and occupants in the towers were forced to stay away from their offices for several days at a time is KNOWN because of eye witness testimony.
It is a FACT that Marvin Bush was head of the "security" company for both the twin towers AND Boston Logan airport, and only left the company shortly before the event.
A team of less than a dozen people could have easily planted devices inside the buildings (all 3 of them), and a handful of well-placed security people heading the important points of failure explains the fall of the buildings.
Those who planted the devices could have easily been killed shortly thereafter -- like the Seth Rich situation, or Seal Team 6.
No need for 500, much less 100,000.
Don't try to push ridiculous false claims past us.
Preset bombs and termite charges to cut steel beams. Multiple levels of culprits with compartmentalized knowledge of anyone else's involvement. It was not Osama who orchestrated it or even involved. He was just the scapegoat to start the war. Do you not remember how bad cell service was in 2001, you think he had good service on caves in Afghanistan?
Culprits like Bush, Silverstein, those who traded the Airline stocks, etc knew their part to do and did not know the extent of the entire crime. But their compartmentalized part kept them guilty and quiet
Not to mention the fact William Cooper predicted the attack in July based on comms hidden in plain sight in the media and was then assassinated later on that year.
Alex Jones stole Cooper's predictions and passed them off as his own without giving the man the credit he deserved.
Here's one for you slick.....how bout you watch the BBC reporter tell of the collapse of WTC7 30 minutes before it actually fell....then they cut her feed....whoopsie
Watch 'A' video? I've watched hundreds of videos, various angles, anything and everything there is and it was demoed using nano thermite, explosives and misses and definitely not planes. Also was said they took the passengers to a hanger, gave them scripts and then gassed them.
What evidence would need to be presented in order to bring you out of your shill existence and admit the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition?
Save your computer keys fren .. Lunatic liberals cannot be brought out of their shill existence , they believe they are right and they will take a shot proving it. There is no fkn way those towers weren’t blown up controlled demolition ...so many fireman and others who were there have proven it ,and in fact all the other proof not counting the controlled demolition is evident ..the insurance pushed through last minute etc etc .. don’t need to point to any video that goes boom boom ..the men at and in the towers heard the explosions, I think 35 and 40 year veterans who worked in building fires know explosive noises when they see and hear it .the end !
He's probably a 19 year old idiot. Wasn't even alive and if he was, he's dumb as steel bricks. We the pedes know it was a strategic demo using thermite, missiles, bombs and definitely fell as.free fall which is impossible any other way
So you are telling me that no high rise building as ever fallen from fires, but that day 3 fell exactly the same way? You really believe they fell from fires and pancaked all the way down?
What about the countless police and firefighters who claimed bombs went off?
I've been seeing the phrase "gaslit" and "gaslighting" more and more. Can someone tell me what that means? I've been guessing it means to inflame a topic and get people riled up and angry for some different cause.
In this case, gaslighting means that although it’s very obvious what happened and our own eyes can see that the buildings were torn down in a controlled demolition, yet the media, reddit bots, and shills will attack relentlessly calling you the stupid and evil one for believing that. Sometimes even hounding you on other platforms and attacking you on unrelated posts you write, etc. Ultimately not only making you question your own intelligence and your own instincts when it comes to this, but making you question yourself when it comes to everything. They try to mentally destabilize you and leave you weak and broken.
You’re not totally wrong, but in reality this site is a battlefield with shills on both sides pushing ‘the narrative,’ so of course regular people are caught in the crossfire. We have to accept that if we’re going to be here.
Shills push the crazy conspiracy angle and other shills (maybe the exact same people?) push the worship-media angle. But that’s why we must work on our own intelligence and personal responsibility and intuition individually and develop morals and principles, to try and help us sniff out the wrongness coming from all angles.
For a lot of people you can argue about "jet fuel doesn't melt steel' beams until you're blue in the face and not get anywhere. In reality the real "smoking gun" that shows foul play is the phone calls.
You wouldn't be able to get a connection at the height the planes were flying. And people said the quality is like the person was in another room. And also the timeline from the calls and from the FBI report doesn't make any sense at all.
The planes were flown out to a location outside of radar, swapped out for drones, and the original planes landed. The drones hit the towers, and they were brought down with controlled demolition. This also accounts for why the hijackers are still alive in SA.
I watched her video and then showed it to a few folks. None could explain how jet fuel could turn steel buildings into dust. Nor could they explain the minimal debris pile. Buildings that size would have left a pile about half their initial height.
I knew the second the first tower fell that it was a demolition. If steel had actually melted like they say.the tops of those building should've leaned over before it free fell.that didn't happen.
you're 100% correct! yes some of the columns may have seen some heat, but not nearly enough to buckle... even if they did.. 70-80% of the columns would have seen minimal to no heat.... only a total loon would expect a total 100% even collapse of all those massive steel columns. sadly, most sheep are so blinded by the msm bullshit that they can no longer engage their brains and think for themselves.
There is also this thing called free fall. Those towers fell in its own footprint at free fall speed. Impossible unless demoed. Not to mention the molten steel that was around for weeks. Nano thermite is what scorched the towers with assistance from demolition and caused most of that steel to just dustify.
Try harder shill
lol
ACTUAL MOLTEN METAL FLOWING FROM SOUTH TOWER
Literally burning and smouldering for months after. But sure it didn't melt the steel lmao.
temps up to 1400 degrees persisted for 4-5 months
http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/347-high-temperatures-persistent-heat-a-molten-steel-at-wtc-site-challenge-official-story.html
bullshit!! you get a massive pile of debris like that you have very little chance of the massive amounts of oxygen to enter the space where flammables are, c'mon folks... use your friggen heads!! the majority of the rubble was non-flammable... mainly carpets, furniture and office stuff... maybe some wooden walls and such... but never in a million years enough to generate heat sufficient for melting steel!
Thermite doesnt need air
Neither do nukes.
Thermite does not need air...because the oxygen required is found in the iron oxide.
Nano thermite to be precise
You're correct from Nano thermite molten steel was seen flowing at ground zero for at least a.week. Ive dug down this rabbit hole so far, I made it all the way to China.
You're an absolute troll. Nothing more, nothing less.
IIRC that's where they shipped the debris...
Excellent find!
How many ways can false statements be made? Let me count the ways ...
One of the MAIN REASONS they use steel in SKYSCRAPERS is because it TRANSFERS HEAT throughout the structure. If you have a 6" bar of steel, sure it could melt. But a 100+ story steel-framed building allows for A LOT of transfer of heat.
No such building has EVER fallen due to heat/fire, except for 3 on 9/11 (which were blown apart). You canNOT reconcile your theory with the FACT that NO STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING HAS EVER FALLEN DUE TO "MELTING POINT."
Period.
Bullshit.
They don't fall.
Period.
More bullshit.
They don't fall.
(Except via explosives/incendiaries.)
Period.
Most likely, Bush himself was just told to go along. He's not smart enough to plan a cookout, much less a sophisiticated psyop like 9/11.
Yes, let's do that.
That is a STRAWMAN argument, which is to say it has NOTHING to do with Occam's Razor.
Nobody is saying there were 100,000 people plotting anything.
Occam's Razor requires we look at ALL the known evidence, and THEN consider a simple explanation that INCLUDES ALL THE KNOWN EVIDENCE.
The FACT that there was a "re-cabling" in the twin towers just a few weeks before 9/11, where workers were in the elevator shafts of the buildings and occupants in the towers were forced to stay away from their offices for several days at a time is KNOWN because of eye witness testimony.
It is a FACT that Marvin Bush was head of the "security" company for both the twin towers AND Boston Logan airport, and only left the company shortly before the event.
A team of less than a dozen people could have easily planted devices inside the buildings (all 3 of them), and a handful of well-placed security people heading the important points of failure explains the fall of the buildings.
Those who planted the devices could have easily been killed shortly thereafter -- like the Seth Rich situation, or Seal Team 6.
No need for 500, much less 100,000.
Don't try to push ridiculous false claims past us.
We've been researching this thing far too long.
Preset bombs and termite charges to cut steel beams. Multiple levels of culprits with compartmentalized knowledge of anyone else's involvement. It was not Osama who orchestrated it or even involved. He was just the scapegoat to start the war. Do you not remember how bad cell service was in 2001, you think he had good service on caves in Afghanistan? Culprits like Bush, Silverstein, those who traded the Airline stocks, etc knew their part to do and did not know the extent of the entire crime. But their compartmentalized part kept them guilty and quiet
Not to mention the fact William Cooper predicted the attack in July based on comms hidden in plain sight in the media and was then assassinated later on that year.
Alex Jones stole Cooper's predictions and passed them off as his own without giving the man the credit he deserved.
BOOM!
Another Shill falling in on himself....
<see what I did there?>
Now do building 7.
WTC 7
Niiiice
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A0xlzyNybsKv/
Popular Mechanics and NIST used as sources.
Here's your sign....
LOL. Now, I KNOW you are either a shill or a fool.
That publication is nothing but lies.
Here's one for you slick.....how bout you watch the BBC reporter tell of the collapse of WTC7 30 minutes before it actually fell....then they cut her feed....whoopsie
Watch 'A' video? I've watched hundreds of videos, various angles, anything and everything there is and it was demoed using nano thermite, explosives and misses and definitely not planes. Also was said they took the passengers to a hanger, gave them scripts and then gassed them.
You know how many video's I've watched of that controlled demolition with the initial detonation taking out the top part of the building??
Hundreds...
What would count as "Sauce" for you?
What evidence would need to be presented in order to bring you out of your shill existence and admit the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition?
Let's hear it. What's your evidential criteria?
Save your computer keys fren .. Lunatic liberals cannot be brought out of their shill existence , they believe they are right and they will take a shot proving it. There is no fkn way those towers weren’t blown up controlled demolition ...so many fireman and others who were there have proven it ,and in fact all the other proof not counting the controlled demolition is evident ..the insurance pushed through last minute etc etc .. don’t need to point to any video that goes boom boom ..the men at and in the towers heard the explosions, I think 35 and 40 year veterans who worked in building fires know explosive noises when they see and hear it .the end !
He's probably a 19 year old idiot. Wasn't even alive and if he was, he's dumb as steel bricks. We the pedes know it was a strategic demo using thermite, missiles, bombs and definitely fell as.free fall which is impossible any other way
lol...you're funny. Looking for "sounds."
Nano thermite doesn't make big boom booms like the ones you lust after.
So you are telling me that no high rise building as ever fallen from fires, but that day 3 fell exactly the same way? You really believe they fell from fires and pancaked all the way down? What about the countless police and firefighters who claimed bombs went off?
Only because you ignore all the videos that DO show these things.
BTW, I hope you're not dumb enough to think that we should expect to hear things from cameras that had only video and no audio.
There were eyewitness firemen who were at the scene and reported both seeing AND HEARING the flashes and the bangs.
Yep, and there's no amount of jet fuel that is going to turn a 110 story building into literal dust. The building dustifies before it hits the ground.
Most of the jet fuel was gone right after impact. The was cold black smoke and then "magically" they both fell down.
The media gas-lit Jessie Ventura over the whole "thermite paint" thing. He might have been more right than you think.
Israel and the saudis did 9/11 together
I've been seeing the phrase "gaslit" and "gaslighting" more and more. Can someone tell me what that means? I've been guessing it means to inflame a topic and get people riled up and angry for some different cause.
In this case, gaslighting means that although it’s very obvious what happened and our own eyes can see that the buildings were torn down in a controlled demolition, yet the media, reddit bots, and shills will attack relentlessly calling you the stupid and evil one for believing that. Sometimes even hounding you on other platforms and attacking you on unrelated posts you write, etc. Ultimately not only making you question your own intelligence and your own instincts when it comes to this, but making you question yourself when it comes to everything. They try to mentally destabilize you and leave you weak and broken.
You’re not totally wrong, but in reality this site is a battlefield with shills on both sides pushing ‘the narrative,’ so of course regular people are caught in the crossfire. We have to accept that if we’re going to be here.
Shills push the crazy conspiracy angle and other shills (maybe the exact same people?) push the worship-media angle. But that’s why we must work on our own intelligence and personal responsibility and intuition individually and develop morals and principles, to try and help us sniff out the wrongness coming from all angles.
For a lot of people you can argue about "jet fuel doesn't melt steel' beams until you're blue in the face and not get anywhere. In reality the real "smoking gun" that shows foul play is the phone calls.
You wouldn't be able to get a connection at the height the planes were flying. And people said the quality is like the person was in another room. And also the timeline from the calls and from the FBI report doesn't make any sense at all.
The planes were flown out to a location outside of radar, swapped out for drones, and the original planes landed. The drones hit the towers, and they were brought down with controlled demolition. This also accounts for why the hijackers are still alive in SA.
WTC 7 /end thread
https://www.bitchute.com/video/t5NkcrY0QfDU/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A0xlzyNybsKv/
Pin this please because it is the 100% unadulterated truth!
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/evidence-overview
I bought Juddy Woods book anyone else read it?
I watched her video and then showed it to a few folks. None could explain how jet fuel could turn steel buildings into dust. Nor could they explain the minimal debris pile. Buildings that size would have left a pile about half their initial height.
I am expecting OBL to make an appearance anytime.
What do you think they did it with? Do you think they knocked all of those buildings down with just 2 planes?
nice try, shillary
This, from a team of BERKELEY Scientists -- 'Scientists Find Unignited Explosive Residues in WTC Dust'
Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction:
Molten metal flowing from South Tower:
Three Points of Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe that Anyone Can Understand:
lol nobody cares about your commitment to stupidity, buddy..
it's 20 years on and you're posting Youtube videos with your lame analysis
fucking joke, at this point.
lol call idiots idiots and shills, shills, is what I do, shilly boy
lol you must be the only faggot on GAW who thinks 1 and 2 were not demoed
how about 7? did that fall on it's own? What happened at 6 and 5?
Now is your chance. You going to post the NIST report, shilly boy?
Please... post the Popular Mechanics analysis. lol
You are a shill. You are shilling for the status quo and the 9/11 Commission Report
the very definition of SHILL