You've completely missed my point and started slinging mud immediately.
You say "Anytime somebody says they have something big tomorrow it has actually meant nothingburger."
However, isn't that what we're getting from Q? The military is in control, don't worry justice is coming?
We can clearly point to people who deserve to be held accountable. Biden is decreeing policy, Milley is working back channels with China... But no one is being held accountable. Things continue to walk down a path of Nazi Germany with wear your star (masks), and show me your papers (vaccine passport). Now we are getting the narrative of "Pandemic of the unvaccinated" further driving people apart and creating a second class out of Americans.
So my question is, how is the promise of tomorrow any different when it comes to Q? If we wait for a prophecy that is never delivered we will perish. This is driven home by the "First they came" poem from our history. This is a serious question, how about a conversation instead of ignoring my point and throwing mud?
So you would say Q is more of an idea than a person/org? It doesn't seem that there has been any movement on Q posts since before the election. Has it been considered if this was a psyop and is there any evidence supporting against that?
Do you really not think millions of people who follow Q, many of them autists, have not already asked and answered these questions? Do your own actual research - don’t just watch the TV - and perhaps you could answer these questions for yourself too!
I'd love to see those answers... Can you point me in the direction of the current consensus?
I'll be honest, I see more recent news here/memes here and haven't see much on the lines of Q other than possible "new" findings which are far and few between.
Maybe if you understood my question you would have had a different response. I'm trying to understand more if there's something I'm missing. I have my doubts about Q posts and proofs. However, I enjoy some of the content here regardless.
I thought I could interact here and someone might enlighten me. Instead, it appears perceived as an attack and met with sarcasm meant to strike down my questions.
The downvotes are a good indication to me that questions and civil discussion is not as important here as I thought.
I know how wild this sounds but I’ve been following this guy for months and he NEVER makes claims like this nor displays this much confidence about a story. He’s more inquisitive and just films what he sees. Surprising to see him make a claim this boldly imo.
Or don't even mention timeframe AT ALL...if you got legit dirt that will blow the lid off of something significant, then keep your mouth shut and just release it when ready. Drop that surprise offensive because there is no better way to throw the DS back onto their heels.
I am so sick of the, "I have proof!! and I will be releasing it tomorrow/next_week/October!"
Imagine if he did have real, rock solid proof. Telegraphing his intentions only gives the DS a chance to silence him, or plan their countermove.
Isn’t he the “journalist” that claimed to have lived in DC most of his life, yet doesn’t seem to know even the basic knowledge that folks from that city have?
I have always said Babbit is alive. The lack of Babbit’s family being in the media and enraged, the quick “cremation”, the sprinkling of ashes in the water, lack of media delving into the memorial service, etc. was highly suspicious. The lack of blood, lack of panic, lack of resucitation attempts at the Capitol shooting was all bad acting.
And....his proof appeared to be some google queries that are interesting bug IMO fell short of being definitive.
Ashli Babbit is definitive in that the video of her getting shot doesn't show someone being shot. No blood smatter on the wall, gun angle didn't match with wound location, and many other issues.
George floyd we don't have as much evidence because the death wasn't on tape only the stressful interation with police.
This is exactly why I don't follow any of these people who have accounts and use them for self-promotion: "Hey, look at me. I have information that will awaken the masses and destroy the DS. I will release it if I get enough likes before X day".
Should have mentioned that - it's actually just a video of him driving listening to "In the Air Tonight" by Phil Collins so I don't think the location has much to do with the announcement.
Anytime somebody says they have something big tomorrow it has actually meant nothingburger.
Either give us the information, or don't.
None of this 'tomorrow' crap.
Amen fren. The best signal you're dealing with a shill or paytriot - "come back tomorrow! big news!!1!!!"
I hate that you're right. 😟
How is this different from the Q movement? Just asking...
How is a random post from a random person different from loosely knit group of millions of people who think for themselves, and question everything?
IDK. How is a pencil different from a planetary system. Tell me all the differences.
You've completely missed my point and started slinging mud immediately.
You say "Anytime somebody says they have something big tomorrow it has actually meant nothingburger."
However, isn't that what we're getting from Q? The military is in control, don't worry justice is coming?
We can clearly point to people who deserve to be held accountable. Biden is decreeing policy, Milley is working back channels with China... But no one is being held accountable. Things continue to walk down a path of Nazi Germany with wear your star (masks), and show me your papers (vaccine passport). Now we are getting the narrative of "Pandemic of the unvaccinated" further driving people apart and creating a second class out of Americans.
So my question is, how is the promise of tomorrow any different when it comes to Q? If we wait for a prophecy that is never delivered we will perish. This is driven home by the "First they came" poem from our history. This is a serious question, how about a conversation instead of ignoring my point and throwing mud?
First of all, Q is information or pointing to information that we the readers/researchers take and learn.
Second, Q never datefagged.
What do you mean by datefagged?
So you would say Q is more of an idea than a person/org? It doesn't seem that there has been any movement on Q posts since before the election. Has it been considered if this was a psyop and is there any evidence supporting against that?
Do you really not think millions of people who follow Q, many of them autists, have not already asked and answered these questions? Do your own actual research - don’t just watch the TV - and perhaps you could answer these questions for yourself too!
I'd love to see those answers... Can you point me in the direction of the current consensus?
I'll be honest, I see more recent news here/memes here and haven't see much on the lines of Q other than possible "new" findings which are far and few between.
See rule #1 over here to your right --->
What are you doing here?
Who threw mud? Did I make a personal attack? Because I don't remember that.
Maybe if you understood my question you would have had a different response. I'm trying to understand more if there's something I'm missing. I have my doubts about Q posts and proofs. However, I enjoy some of the content here regardless.
I thought I could interact here and someone might enlighten me. Instead, it appears perceived as an attack and met with sarcasm meant to strike down my questions.
The downvotes are a good indication to me that questions and civil discussion is not as important here as I thought.
It’s called concern trolling and we don’t fall for it. Do your own research. Pay attention. Learn.
Sorry I do not believe you.
You came here to be a troll. Which can be fun, I admit. But being a whiny little bitch when people don't like it is a not a good look.
The internet truly is toxic. I suppose it's not worth continuing the conversation.
By prove it, anything less then them being interviewed doesn't count.
I don't care about crumbs. He was sighted here, she was seen at the mall. None of that will help anything.
No. Unless we hear directly, this is all easily dismissed.
Totally agree. It’s got to be rock solid proof. So solid the MSM has no choice but to report it.
And I could almost imagine it happening. The biggest redpill to the nation and the world. All of that battling for nothing.
It would open the door to so much.
“If I was lied to about this, what else am I being lied to about?” - Normies
My God it would be beautiful.
I wont take anything less than Floyd being tackled by another cop - otherwise its simply not realistic.
*Memory hole it
Probly has the same amount of evidence as Bigfoot, or Elvis being alive…
I know how wild this sounds but I’ve been following this guy for months and he NEVER makes claims like this nor displays this much confidence about a story. He’s more inquisitive and just films what he sees. Surprising to see him make a claim this boldly imo.
Let’s see what happens.
Isn't he the guy that caught the shredding trucks at an election center a few days after the election? I can't remember which state.
Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow....I can't wait for the day when someone says, "right now".
They gonna start saying "right now" on tomorrow
LOL...perfect.
Or don't even mention timeframe AT ALL...if you got legit dirt that will blow the lid off of something significant, then keep your mouth shut and just release it when ready. Drop that surprise offensive because there is no better way to throw the DS back onto their heels.
I am so sick of the, "I have proof!! and I will be releasing it tomorrow/next_week/October!"
Imagine if he did have real, rock solid proof. Telegraphing his intentions only gives the DS a chance to silence him, or plan their countermove.
Seriously, we are at war! OpSec is key!
Something major is brewing!
Winds in the east, most coming in, like something is brewing, about to begin....
Can't put me finger, on what lies in store, but I feel what's to happen... has all happened before.
TG has become the platform for fakers to thrive on playing our side as fools.
Isn’t he the “journalist” that claimed to have lived in DC most of his life, yet doesn’t seem to know even the basic knowledge that folks from that city have?
I have always said Babbit is alive. The lack of Babbit’s family being in the media and enraged, the quick “cremation”, the sprinkling of ashes in the water, lack of media delving into the memorial service, etc. was highly suspicious. The lack of blood, lack of panic, lack of resucitation attempts at the Capitol shooting was all bad acting.
And....his proof appeared to be some google queries that are interesting bug IMO fell short of being definitive.
Ashli Babbit is definitive in that the video of her getting shot doesn't show someone being shot. No blood smatter on the wall, gun angle didn't match with wound location, and many other issues.
George floyd we don't have as much evidence because the death wasn't on tape only the stressful interation with police.
Put UP.......or SHUT UOP!
“Hello George”
Shit or get off the pot.
Free beer tomorrow
So what happened. How did he prove it?
This is exactly why I don't follow any of these people who have accounts and use them for self-promotion: "Hey, look at me. I have information that will awaken the masses and destroy the DS. I will release it if I get enough likes before X day".
I'll prove it shortly....LOL whatever.
Let JFK, Jr bring them out.
Seems like a 'suicidal' thing to post.
That picture reminds me of an entrance to Cheyenne Mountain or some such place?
Should have mentioned that - it's actually just a video of him driving listening to "In the Air Tonight" by Phil Collins so I don't think the location has much to do with the announcement.
Ahh ok, just trying to make sense of things.