Considering an 82-90% vaccination rate, depending on sources, I'd say that the vaccine does not work, because the percentage of vaccinated people is correlated with the percentage of hospitalised people with Covid. What a bummer, for those who went and got jabbed - it does nothing. Oh wait, it does, but that will be a too bitter a pill to swallow for them.
The thing is, they only claimed their vaccines would reduce chances of bad outcomes. That's not something that's easy to prove.
The issue is that the media control (shifting focus at a fast cadence so you're outraged under their control) had people forget that and focus on the word vaccine, which used to mean immunity.
I mean, sure.... we all pointed out how they changed that definition and that of herd immunity
But none of that matters because for 99% of the country, their concerns, outrage, and issues are what they're told to be mad about.
The target changes fast enough that you lose all ability to understand why you're mad, so you can remember it later.
For fucks sake, most people forgot about the swamp!
No, they claimed the vaccine would immunize you from covid. They also claimed it was safe. They also claimed that once 70% got vaccinated we would reach herd immunity and could go back to normal.
Since it became clear the vax didn’t work they changed their tune (and the definition of what a vaccine is/does) to gaslight all of us.
Yup...shifted their narrative to cover the fact jab doesn't work as originally sold to the public. Unfortunately most of those that bought in and took the jab are not critical thinkers (at least regarding covid) and have every reason to continue to decieve themselves. "Easier to fool people, than convince them they've been fooled." I suspect when the double vaxxed get treated like non-vaxxed, they'll start to turn, since the main motive for many to take the jab was convenience and not health. Once they are "inconvenienced" they'll think differently.
lol...
If 1+1 =2 then 3+1 must equal 2 as well, because at one time 3 was 2 and 1's next number is 2.
Literally your argument. Cope harder. Your math is autistic.
100 people - 87 are vaccinated, 13 are not vaccinated.
If the vaccine worked, 87 should not be in hospital. It should be 13 people in hospital, with maybe a few fringe cases of vaccinated thrown in.
A vaccine, even if its shitty and barely works, should not result in vaccinated people IN hospital. Those people should have some benefit from the vaccine. The 13 people should be the only people in hospital if the vaccine actually worked.
We'll do it again. 100 people. 80 of people are vaccinated. 20 aren't.
40 people are in hospital.
35 (87%) are vaccinated. - 43.75% of 80 people are in hospital.
5 (13%) aren't vaccinated. - 25% of 20 people are in hospital.
It gets even worse if you make it a lesser amount of people "in hospital".
10 in hospital. 87% vaxxed, 13% unvaxxed.
9 vaxxed, 1 unvaxxed.
11.25% is bigger than 5%.
The 13% of the 20% is always going to be lesser than fucking 87% of the 80%.
Sorry but that's fucking awful odds for a vaccine. Almost making the situation worse you could say.
You've been played. Hard.
Was trying to figure out what the person was trying to say but the comment is now deleted.
From the BBC article:
Broken down, the hospital admissions rate for the under 60s is 3.5 times higher for unvaccinated, compared to those vaccinated. It is also 1.9 times greater for those unvaccinated who are over 60 and those who have been vaccinated.
I'm guessing they are trying to point out that the hospitalization is greater, percentage-wise based on the population of that group, for unvaccinated.
As an example:
100 population
80 vaxed
20 unvaxed
20 people in hospital
15 vaxed
5 unvaxed
from hospitalized group:
75% vaxed
25% unvaxed
percentage hospitalized based on that population group:
15/80 = 19% vaxed
5/20 = 25% unvaxed
And just in case anyone is wondering, no I'm not vaxed and don't plan to get vaxed. I believe natural immunity is much better than vaccine immunity, especially with what we're seeing with these new vaccines.
I'm guessing the formatting of my example won't look too good. Not sure how to force blank lines in a comment/post. Feel free to shed some light on that for me if you have the answer.
The fact that with just 20% left of the population being unvaccinated, still 87% of those at hospitals are unvaccinated is undeniable evidence that the vaccines do work.
The article states that 13% of those admitted to hospitals are unvaccinated, and 87% are vaccinated. I think you may have just gotten a number switched around.
Furthermore....
Even if all the jab does is reduce/mask your symptoms, as they have revised their claims to state...those vaxxed people should be in the hospital for something else......sort of like all of those shooting and car accident victims who just happened to die of wu-flu so the hospitals could collect tgeir $47,000 government check.
Considering an 82-90% vaccination rate, depending on sources, I'd say that the vaccine does not work, because the percentage of vaccinated people is correlated with the percentage of hospitalised people with Covid. What a bummer, for those who went and got jabbed - it does nothing. Oh wait, it does, but that will be a too bitter a pill to swallow for them.
The truth has painful side effects....
Yup. It hurts.
The thing is, they only claimed their vaccines would reduce chances of bad outcomes. That's not something that's easy to prove.
The issue is that the media control (shifting focus at a fast cadence so you're outraged under their control) had people forget that and focus on the word vaccine, which used to mean immunity.
I mean, sure.... we all pointed out how they changed that definition and that of herd immunity
But none of that matters because for 99% of the country, their concerns, outrage, and issues are what they're told to be mad about.
The target changes fast enough that you lose all ability to understand why you're mad, so you can remember it later.
For fucks sake, most people forgot about the swamp!
No, they claimed the vaccine would immunize you from covid. They also claimed it was safe. They also claimed that once 70% got vaccinated we would reach herd immunity and could go back to normal.
Since it became clear the vax didn’t work they changed their tune (and the definition of what a vaccine is/does) to gaslight all of us.
Yup...shifted their narrative to cover the fact jab doesn't work as originally sold to the public. Unfortunately most of those that bought in and took the jab are not critical thinkers (at least regarding covid) and have every reason to continue to decieve themselves. "Easier to fool people, than convince them they've been fooled." I suspect when the double vaxxed get treated like non-vaxxed, they'll start to turn, since the main motive for many to take the jab was convenience and not health. Once they are "inconvenienced" they'll think differently.
We're on iteration four or five of what [They] say the jab actually does.
Bad outcomes like death?
I wouldn't believe the rates spread by the mainstream media.
lol... If 1+1 =2 then 3+1 must equal 2 as well, because at one time 3 was 2 and 1's next number is 2.
Literally your argument. Cope harder. Your math is autistic.
100 people - 87 are vaccinated, 13 are not vaccinated. If the vaccine worked, 87 should not be in hospital. It should be 13 people in hospital, with maybe a few fringe cases of vaccinated thrown in.
A vaccine, even if its shitty and barely works, should not result in vaccinated people IN hospital. Those people should have some benefit from the vaccine. The 13 people should be the only people in hospital if the vaccine actually worked.
We'll do it again. 100 people. 80 of people are vaccinated. 20 aren't. 40 people are in hospital. 35 (87%) are vaccinated. - 43.75% of 80 people are in hospital. 5 (13%) aren't vaccinated. - 25% of 20 people are in hospital.
It gets even worse if you make it a lesser amount of people "in hospital". 10 in hospital. 87% vaxxed, 13% unvaxxed. 9 vaxxed, 1 unvaxxed. 11.25% is bigger than 5%.
The 13% of the 20% is always going to be lesser than fucking 87% of the 80%. Sorry but that's fucking awful odds for a vaccine. Almost making the situation worse you could say. You've been played. Hard.
Was trying to figure out what the person was trying to say but the comment is now deleted.
From the BBC article:
I'm guessing they are trying to point out that the hospitalization is greater, percentage-wise based on the population of that group, for unvaccinated.
As an example:
100 population 80 vaxed 20 unvaxed
20 people in hospital 15 vaxed 5 unvaxed
from hospitalized group:
75% vaxed 25% unvaxed
percentage hospitalized based on that population group:
15/80 = 19% vaxed 5/20 = 25% unvaxed
And just in case anyone is wondering, no I'm not vaxed and don't plan to get vaxed. I believe natural immunity is much better than vaccine immunity, especially with what we're seeing with these new vaccines.
I'm guessing the formatting of my example won't look too good. Not sure how to force blank lines in a comment/post. Feel free to shed some light on that for me if you have the answer.
You created an account to be this fucking retarded? I salute you.
The article states that 13% of those admitted to hospitals are unvaccinated, and 87% are vaccinated. I think you may have just gotten a number switched around.
Furthermore.... Even if all the jab does is reduce/mask your symptoms, as they have revised their claims to state...those vaxxed people should be in the hospital for something else......sort of like all of those shooting and car accident victims who just happened to die of wu-flu so the hospitals could collect tgeir $47,000 government check.
lol shills gonna shill.
no-one is that dumb, find another job.
You got the math wrong my fren. Its the other way around - 87% were vaccinated since the title said 13% were _un_vaccinated