According to WHO, Covid-19 Vaccine adverse reactions
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Sauce: http://vigiaccess.org/
Goto bottom and check "confirm" and click "Search Database"
Type "Covid-19 vaccine" in the search box
Thanks bubble!
Looking at the distribution by year there are reports as far back as 2014 (a little more than 100 total before 2020). I wish I could figure out how to see individual reports to see how those are being categorized as "covid-19 vaccine" reactions.
Did you also happen to see the distribution numbers? 50% of the reports are from Europe with the US at 38%. I am sure that the US numbers are dramatically underreported if VAERS is any indication. 39% are aged 18-44 followed by 31% aged 45-64. Women are 69% of the reports. Nervous system disorders appear to be the majority complaints at just shy of 1 million which is almost half of the reports. This is despite the fact that cardiac and blood disorders get most of the coverage of what is reported by main stream news. Could this be deliberate to deflect from where the real problems are lurking? Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders follow neurological issues and I am sure there is a common link between the two.
Since these are strictly voluntary reports, its difficult to say how much of this due to actual gender reaction differences and how much is due to social gender differences (men complain about pain less frequently than women e.g. (at least publicly)).
Each individual report can have multiple "adverse reactions". That doesn't negate the statement, but it is necessary context to keep in mind.
Looking at the breakdown of the "nervous system" reactions, about 2/3rds were "headache." A headache by itself is hardly surprising, and is a very likely outcome for any proper immune reaction (getting sick from a real virus, a "good" reaction to a real vaccine, etc.). Headaches to me are not concerning at all (as a statistical data point).
Most of the nervous systems disorders are really not that bad. Some are of course, and there may be long term nervous system effects (multiple sclerosis e.g.) caused by the autoimmune nature of these immunotherapies.
Its important to separate these two types of responses though, and recognize the likely impacts of each. Many (though not all) of the cardiovascular issues are caused by an attack of the spike protein on the ACE-2 receptor. While both types of responses can be debilitating, one is an immune response, the other is a toxin attack (in this case a venom since it is an injected toxin).
I don't think so. I think the reports give reasonably good statistics, but like all statistics you have to dig, and you have to recognize the regime that they are reporting. In this case they are only reporting short term effects. Long term effects require actual study and of course time. Both of these are currently insufficient in general, without any specific mal-intent outside of the general evil of the whole endeavor.
I imagine the underreporting rate is similar in both regions and all reaction types (that second may not be true). My guess is it is around 10-20 times underreported based on what info I have been able to put together. Its an educated guess, but only a guess.
These particular nervous system disorders are relatively rare by the numbers (at least short term reactions). While there is evidence these have occurred, and they will likely occur in the long term, they are still not in the same scope as the cardiovascular issues (toxin v. immune reaction) according to the data.
Thank you for your reply. I do understand that there could be several categories listed for a single report. That being said, these numbers are still extremely alarming when considering the fact that the real numbers could be higher by a factor of 10-20 times as you stated.
The fact that more women suffer from adverse vax reactions does not surprise me and I think this is a fairly reasonable reflection. Women are more likely to suffer neurological, autoimmune complications, and musculoskeletal complications, such as fibromyalgia, MS, and CFS. So, an approximate 2 to 1 reporting of women to men does not seem out of line considering the types of categories reported. When considering neurological complications due to things like CVA, there is crossover. The system is not designed to be precise, but as you stated, the statistics are reasonable and they do follow what we would expect to see in this type of distribution pattern. I should have stated that the side effects associated with the initial administration, such as sore arm, mild headaches, etc, was not my focus. There is a reason why there is a separate category for those types of milder reactions. These reporting systems are supposed to be an early warning system for vaxxine adverse reactions. The systems are doing their job - it is just that the information is being ignored by those with another agenda.
As far as "headaches" and "nervous system disorders" being "not that bad," I beg to differ. I have worked with many patients that suffered from a variety of those conditions due to vaxxine or drug injury and they were far from not being that bad. In many cases they were life altering and devastating. Vaxxine injuries that impact the nervous system can be severe. One only needs to look at the explosion in autistic spectrum disorders to know that something is terribly wrong. (This is one area where the boys outnumber the girls substantially.)
Some conditions, such as Bell's Palsy, are often self limiting and will resolve over time - but it no fun for the person that is afflicted with it. Shingles is not exactly a walk in the park either. My brother, 6 months post vax with rapid onset shingles, still cannot where a shirt and his skin is scarred. The more severe autoimmune and nervous system disorders as a result of vaxxine injury are often permanent and disabling and the vast majority of those that suffer from these injuries are women. We should not make the mistake of downplaying these injuries or the people that suffer from them like the press and government officials are often guilty of.
Deaths are not reported and that must also be taken into consideration when assessing the demographics by age. The reason the geriatric age group is lower could be due to the victim actually succumbing to the vax while their death is attributed to some other cause such as old age or cancer. So all of this must be taken with a grain of salt. My assessment of this report was only cursory, but I have worked in public health medical research so this information does not seem out of line with what I would expect to see given the demographics and conditions reported. It is just that the actual numbers would be higher across the board.
When scanning the symptoms and conditions of the report, which is not a perfect system and is similar to VAERS, I stand by my original assessment of neuro and skeletal muscular issues being the most reported and could cover several categories. I also believe that those numbers are only going to increase as time passes due to a later manifestation of certain types of neurological and autoimmune related conditions and their often delayed diagnosis - such as MS. We will not know the full impact of these more chronic conditions possibly for several years - although we are starting to see rapid onset MS and an increase in brain tumors and other types of new cancers or recurrent cancers that had been in remission. Unfortunately, most of this increase is not being connected to the jabs. The oncologists for the most part, have drank the Kool-Aid.
My point about the media reporting is that the cardiac and blood clotting adverse events appear to be taking center stage because they are often acute situations. Neurological disorders and the like, which can be acute but may also take time to manifest, are underreported in the news compared to the more headline grabbing heart and blood stories. The majority of the events in this report acute situations so I find the numbers alarming - considering this may only be the tip of a very big iceberg when the more chronic conditions begin to manefest. Since we know the media is a captured operation and is owned by Pharma, their choice in which adverse reactions they report to me always must be viewed with a bit of skepticism. Thank you again for taking the time to respond. Next time I will be clearer with my explanations. Have a great week.
I said specifically "as a statistical data point," not as an anecdote. Headache on a VAERS report could be anything from a mild inflammatory response, which would be expected for many vaccinations, real vaccine or otherwise, to brain cancer.
I agree, but you won't find the statistical inference on those injuries in the "headache" column. You will find it in the other checkboxes on the same report. That is why "headache" as a statistical data point is mostly meaningless (for the purposes of analytics of injury severity, which is what we are discussing).
I am looking at it from the perspective of extracting inference from the statistics (aka analysis of the data). It is important to understand the dataset in order to extract accurate inference. Looking at a catch all column for which the most likely outcome is "mild" is not meaningful for this purpose. You must look deeper into the data (the other checkboxes as mentioned above). What I am not doing is saying that all headaches are meaningless. I am not saying that at all. I am saying you must understand the dataset to get good analysis.
The oncologists ARE the Kool-Aid. Medicine as it is taught has little to do with health and everything to do with treatment. The medical industry was taken over in the early 20th century by the Rockefeller Foundation. All medicine is taught as allopathy. We have been taught to shun (shame) all other forms of health learning and research.
The Rockefellers own all of big pharma. They own all of the radiation machines. They own (or fund) all the medical schools, they own the AMA, they own the regulatory agencies, they own all the hospitals, they own the insurance companies, they own everything that exchanges a dollar in medicine. They founded allopathy as the primary source of medical teaching because they own all the money making sources derived from it.
We are 100% molecular machines derived 100% from food. "You are what you eat" is the most true statement that can be made about the human body. Yet despite this fact, nutrition is not taught in medical school at all. Whole body health is completely ignored. Non-pharmaceutical remedies (nutrition or other natural substances) are never researched outside of academia because you can't get funding for it from the primary funding sources (all owned by the Rockefellers), nor can you patent it, meaning no money can be made on it.
The basics of a doctors education is in biology, but they barely touch some of the more important parts of it (on the micro scale) as it relates to human health (in cell and molecular biology and molecular physiology). Only pharmaceuticals are taught in medical school, and doctors are told to rely on pharma reports for all their information on them. They are taught to hand over their critical thinking in cell and molecular biology and drug/receptor interactions over to pharma. That doesn't mean that all doctors follow this, and I know several that look much deeper into pharmaceuticals before prescribing them, but this is how it is taught. This is the medical establishment in a nutshell.
Sorry for the rant, but I have been disgusted with the medical community for a long time having worked with several doctors in my research. It is only recently that my (GA) research has led me to the reason for my disgust (Rockefellers).
No argument from me on this.
In the end, you and I are really on the same team. You are preaching to the choir. I have spent over the last 25 years from within the system doing public health research and private clinical practice, and it has not been easy. Those of us that walked the fine line between allopathic and alternative medicine always run the risk of the wrath of the licensing boards if we make waves and try to rock the boat. I know many that had to legally fight for their right to keep their licenses and their practices.
I think with Covid, more clinicians have come to an awakening of what the rest of us have been warning about for years. We operated within the old system that we could navigate to some extent while we kept our heads down, not drawing the attention of the ever watchful eye of the state licensing boards. It was far from perfect, but it was the best we could do and still practice and not end up broke and in jail. We knew the whole time that our education was lacking in many ways and was all about the prescription pad. Pharmaceutical companies have kept data bases on what types and how many drugs a practitioner prescribes. Many of us are targeted that way. All it takes is one well placed complaint to the board and they crawl up your ass with a microscope looking for any reason to strip a license and to be a warning to others thinking about straying off the plantation.
Insurance companies and the AMA created a monster that was already poor disease management and put it on steroids by handing patient care over to algorithms and AI - especially in critical care and the authority of the intensivist. I believe this closed system with our hospitals was one of the main factors this sham was allowed to manifest. The patient's own physician has no input regarding care and many people die as a result. The draw of money makes fertile ground for the unthinkable.
The ACA was the nail in the coffin to bury the old system, as broken as it was, which stopped us from operating with a little bit of autonomy. the ACA was the straw that broke many backs and several good clinicians called it a day and left. Others tried their hands at subscriber based practice with mixed results. Covid has now moved us into a nightmare that I can no longer be a part of any longer. I made the decision to leave rather than be a part of this genocidal insanity. I dealt with patients damaged by vaccines - myself included. I know I did help some of my patients - the ones willing to put in the effort to try another path to find health that didn't involve drugs. They have been worth all the aggravation trying to fight the machine.
Thanks for the discussion. You make some really good points. I will read over you comments again when I have some time to really chew on them.
Wow. I had totally forgotten about the pharma database on doctors. I vaguely recall having a conversation about that with a doctor a decade or more ago. Thank you for bringing that up. I will do a little digging on that. If you have more specific information on it that would be helpful in my report.
Thank you for your excellent response. I am sorry you feel it necessary to leave the system. It is exactly people that are willing to fight it from the inside that we need, though I also decided to leave academia almost a year ago for similar reasons so I get it.
After having an awakening and seeing the real causes of the corruption in the system I was unable to continue on that path. This was before mandatory vaccines, or even most of the blatant current crap. I just had finally understood the real force and intent behind the indoctrination I had been seeing all over for years and just couldn't stomach the disease formerly known as science I was a part of.
Yeah, I noticed that. Guess they're attributing covid vaxx deaths to covid.
Intended reactions don't end up on the list.
Kek
How convenient they left that category off the list?
And that's just the Reported cases.
Chances of death by "vaccine" = 0.52% Chances of death by the coof = 0.03% I'll take my chances with the coof, thank you. 😎
Right?
"Safe and Effective" for WHO?
The company making BILLIONS off of harming innocents...
WHO said it was safe and effective for WHO.
WHO?
I just told you who.
WHO?
WHO!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sShMA85pv8M
Who's on first and what's on second.
THAT"S WHAT I"M TRYING TO FIND OUT!!!
WHO benefits.
I don’t know, is on 3rd
2,183,912 REPORTED cases, not including outright death.
This is the sort of stuff that needs to get out on FB and twatter...
I stand corrected. Thanks, pede!
Check "Ivermectin" and "HCQ", too. Night vs. day! "Remdesivir" results weren't too bad as well. "Regeneron" didn't bring anything up though.
Nice! Also check ADR reports per year for both. Very revealing as well. Its getting late, otherwise I would have made a tiled image of all four ...
Clicking the arrows breaks the results down further also.
Yeah there is so much more here, have to continue tomorrow, but thanks for pointing out Ivermectin - good find.
Search “ influenza vaccine“, “pertussis vaccine“ and any other vaccine given to children for decades compared to a vaccine that is barely a year old. I use the word “vaccine” lightly I do not think the current COVID-19 jab is a vaccine, there are obvious other agendas at play, but you have to use that word when doing the search.
"Influenza vaccine" shows up as more risky than "Ivermectin" or "HCQ", but is still more safer than "Covid-19 vaccine".
Which one is the really bad one? Regeneron or Remdeisvir? I get those two confused.
Remdesivir is the bad one. Regeneron is what Trump took.
Regeneron is a brand name for monoclonal antibodies. Very helpful for tx of the China virus.
Remdesivir. Causes kidney failure.
https://www.metajournal.com/articles/1223992/remdesivir-acute-renal-failure-potential-safety-signal-disproportionality
Watch this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BKBpP5blJ21B/
I wouldn't risk taking Remdesivir, even though the numbers in this database were better than Covid-19 vaccine.
Wow, quite a bit worse than the actual virus. I think I will take the virus. Runny nose, maybe lose sense of taste and smell. Take Vit C, Zinc, HCQ or IVM and be over it in a few days.
Exactly! 😎👌
Also https://openvaers.com/
VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data
The human genome with inherited genetic markers/ailments held in check normally, but triggered by mRNA???
This is a great resource I am sharing!
What is "social circumstances"? Unfortunately it's the unvaxxed who suffer from social circumstances as a side effect (ie getting fired).
FTFY
Hmm it's almost like injecting yourself with a mysterious fluid is dangerous.
-Ron (Australia)
If this is what they're reporting there's a 100 times more cases than that. And they still have no idea the long term effects of these So called vaccines
BuT mY COVID syMptOmS weRe sO sMoLL.
5 million reported, how many not reported?????
I don’t see “swearing like a French Canadian lumberjack” when they realize they’ve been duped as a category. Should be #1.
Do the numbers in parenthesis represent the number of instances of each reaction??