To be fair Mary, that is a question you could ask of all secret Trans who have allegedly had babies. You could ask it of Michelle Obama, you could ask it of Beyoncé https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbgcs5lg_sk
You could ask it of Barbara Bush. The fact is that pregnancies are well able to be faked. A moonbump for instance. https://www.moonbump.com/
Your question is always the first one unbelievers respond with but it’s simply not the insurmountable obstacle people think it is. EVERYTHING is a lie don’t forget.
Did Q not say “the deeper you go the more unrealistic it all becomes”?
Then on what basis do you rest on your laurels and abandon your pursuit of truth?
At what point do you think you have possession of that extremely unrealistic truth that Q was alluding to? Is that not complacency?
I’m showing you things for your own edification Mary. You can accept or reject but you cannot boldly claim that you are in possession of truth when the whole trans thing is laced throughout the whole Bible and where Q repeatedly says its biblical.
I rest my laurels on Jesus Christ. He is the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. Perhaps you need to rededicate your life to him, if you haven't already.
Next you'd be saying I am a tranny even though I have given birth to a son and a daughter. You can delve as far down the rabbit hole as you like; perhaps you are in the wrong hole. I assume YOU are the one who needs to truly search for the TRUTH, and Jesus sure isn't down no rabbit hole. Amen.
She was not hostile or militant. U are actually the one blindly believing ur own understanding. She is saying u are leaning on ur own understanding rather than Christ. I agree trans stuff is a problem they are pushing but dont agree on ur assessment of like half the people u named. I WILL PRAY FOR U. GOD BLESS. GOOD DAY
Perhaps you may need to check the plank in yours. I stand in defense of my Lord and the Truth. And this Tranny stuff you are stating on here does not stand for any truth that I know of. Thank you and I NO longer wish to talk to you at this time.
I truly pray for God to bless you and keep you and please, please have a wonderful week.
You are clearly not of Christ but speak from a demon.
Go over the fleshly sins again with humility instead of pride. Ensure that you are dead to sin by crucifying the flesh with its passions and desires (Gal 5: 24) and recommit to a love of the truth and the courage to see it and to hear it.
You have NO CLUE what “This is Biblical” means. I think you need to research and listen to Kim Clement from 2007-2015 to understand. Then match Exodus and Revelations up to what he discusses. Then match current events up to all of these things. Oh wait, let me help give you a jumpstart:
It’s possible, but with all the deception and the fact that she was a First Lady you shouldn’t just rule it out in the basis that you like her and trump.
Here is MrE3000s video on Melania. At least give it a watch and then decide
Newsflash: Not all women look the same. Many have masculine features. I know plenty of women who look like the women here who you have labeled clearly trans. Including myself. No hips. No stretch marks. Oh no. I'm a man. Who birthed 4 babies. I'm a miracle
I have a HUGE jaw and broad shoulders, but of course also have hips and soft facial features. 100% woman. Genetics are a hell of a thing. Some men are spindly and have thin sloped shoulders, doesn’t make them less of a man. OP needs to get some help. People who disagree with you aren’t demonically inspired 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
That’s true but that chap said that makeup is what made the difference. Whereas there are actually skeletal differences such as a brow ridge, angular mandible, broader shoulders, narrower pelvis and longer limbs in males.
If you believe in biological facts then you just can’t dispute that there are biological differences.
If you are going to support an argument that there are no biological, as in skeletal, differences then you are well on your way to being co-opted by the trans acceptance folk.
I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it
Look, if you want to be one of those ones who say that gender and sex are functions solely of the mind and feelings and in no way connected to biology, that's up to you to do so.
You're wrong and deluded but that's your choice.
You can tell male and female skeletons apart with some telltale signs - shape of the pelvis, broadness of the shoulders, angle of the jaw, size of the skull, a brow ridge which causes the male eyes to appear more recessed, limb length, hip to shoulder proportions, head to shoulder proportions.
No one is saying that any given female can't have one or two male skeletal markers or vice versa but if you have them all then guess what?
Here is P!NK the singer. Just face it - Pink is a male. Look at the adonis belt, strong shoulders. You KNOW in your heart of hearts you are looking at a male.
Appreciate your point of view. I do not agree and the arguement set forth FOR these ppl being trans is not supported. Other pictures are out there and just flat out not supported.
The devil is at work in our world for sure. There are many trannies in Hollywood, politics and NWO globalists everywhere. Some are very obvious and others are not. I think it is all very sick and I know God will deal with it in His own good time.
In the meantime, it is not worth arguing about who is or is not a tranny. MTF trannies routinely become "mothers" - it is part of their deception (see prostetic baby bump). Just because someone claims to be a "mother" does not mean they are not a tranny (look no further than Big Mike). They have surrogate mothers birth the baby and then they assume the baby as their own. Sick people.
The devil is the great deceiver. We need to stay steadfast in our faith in Jesus. He will deal with this and all the evilness in the world. We need to make sure that we keep telling the world about the Good News of Jesus Christ and to live a life that is pleasing to Him.
You're seeing what you want to see to fuel what you have decided to believe. Many of us are simply pointing out that the basis for your conclusions is faulty. We've explained it and given clear examples (ourselves, our friends, our loved ones). You don't "know" what you are looking at and the more you insist you do, the less credible you become
You are simply in denial. I know it's a lot to take in but try to think about all the crazy trans push in the media. What do you suppose is behind it all?
Trans are fucking gross. Regardless. They should not be accepted in society and should be shunned like Sodom and Gommora for their heinous lifestyle. Majority of ~trans~ turn into women so they can prey on children and unsuspecting victims.
The trans lifestyle is a lifestyle of idolatry of self. They are blatantly telling God “YOU made me wrong so I will recreate myself the “right” way!”
Sad and unfortunate people that are choosing to reject the Father.
Sure, but wouldn't we want to spread the Word to those who do not know it? This is what the congregations is supposed to do, be spreaders of His word. To lead those lost to the faith. Not to be like...fuck off cuz you wear lipstick and have a dick.
The same reason that some women are short and some women are tall.
Genetic variation.
Also you’re using too many pictures of older women.
These older women are not getting the crap ton of female hormones circulating in their bodies in the same way that young women have.
“Oh look at that 80-year-old man, he has no muscle mass so he must be a woman”
That is the reason famous women get plastic surgery. It's because they can't hold back their tru nature from re-emerging.
Real normal women don't become masculine with age, they just become older women. But transwomens inherent masculinity has a resurgence which is why they get plastic surgery.
There is certainly genetic variance within both males and females, I grant you. But the basic form - the skeleton - follows rules. It's chromosomal. It's at a cellular level. I don't make the rules, god does. I'm just pointing out that practically all the famous females in movies, politics, royalty, big business, mmodelling, sports etc all conform to the male biology.
What they are saying with the laying it out neat part is this. U either have ur own personal agenda or ur obsessed with one issue. Neither are of Christ. Lean not on your own understanding.
Dude you either you’re mentally ill or you’re paid to try and make other people mentally ill.
Does Michelle Obama have a penis, I actually think it’s about 60% probable especially since her children don’t look like her and instead look like her best friends from Chicago.
Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
I don't see evidence of some glaringly different skeletal structure in that photo. I've known women to look that way (sans those big muscles) Again, I don't know that you have the life experience to make these judgements. In other words... I'm not sure you've seen enough real women.
Pacrosby, you can try to insinuate some sort of lack of experience on my part if you like, as though that were a valid argument against the proposition (it isn’t. It simply speaks to your inability to argue and willingness to resort to adolescent level mockery).
Can I take it from your comments that you are a lesbian? ie with your allusions to having more experience of naked women than me and you being admittedly manly yourself?
You haven’t known women to look that way if you then go on to say sans the muscles.
You are looking at a biological male when you look at pink.
Here’s a question. Why DO you think there’s been such a hasty push to expedite the trans thing on society? What are your genuine thoughts on why that is or might be so?
Not giving birth is a major part as to why some women don’t have wider hips. As a female who has yet to give birth I lack certain “shape” cause my pelvis hasn’t stretched while birthing.
I have a friend who has given birth, is pregnant with her second and STILL doesn’t have super feminine hips.
God creates us ALL differently. I wish I had super voluptuous hips, but God planned otherwise.
Yes, but your pelvis is still shaped differently to that of a man. And your belly button still occupies a different relative level., even if your hips aren't wide.
There are narrow female hips, and there are male pelvises. A female pelvis and a male pelvis are fundamentally and structurally different.
The pelvis is the surefire way to identify the sex of a skeleton. Nevertheless, there are clusters of skeletal clues, not just the pelvis.
Can you answer me something honestly? Can you take a look at this famous actress and answer me this: Are you looking at a biological male or a biological female, just based on the skull and face alone?
I agree, our skeletons are unique to our sex (male or female).
But sometimes it’s not as visible on the outside as much as others, that is what I’m pointing out.
I've read through this entire thread more than once now. Honestly? You come across like a troll trying desperately to prove that the GA folks are stupid. I realize that may not be the case. But it's so outrageous that that that's how it sounds
there's no need to put words in my mouth or derail or second-guess motives.
I'm just saying to you that the whole mainstream push for trans acceptance and the rachel levine 4-star general, elliot page, all of that nonsense isn't for nothing. It isn't organic.
It's paving the way for an inevitable disclosure that will rock the world.
They are trying to mould the minds of the general public to be not just accepting but celebrating of all things trans, in order to pave the way for their new world. It's so jarring because they are expediting their process of brainwashing such that it becomes apparent to some how odd and out of kilter it all is.
If you accept freemasonry has a major part to play in the shape of the world and in all the secret goings-on that people on here ostensibly research, then you have to also accept that freemasonry is a religious order. They follow a bastardised version of the bible and are luciferian in nature. They are also pagan and worship egyptian gods and other myths like Hermes and Aphrodite and their offspirng 'Hermaphrodite'. If you are familiar with the Baphomet, which is so popular with celebrities and elites then you must know that the Baphomet is an adrogynous being.
There's a whole religious element to this trans stuff and it's not new by any stretch of the imagination. It goes back millennia. It has always been prevalent amongst elites and ruling classes and 'celebrities' or artists of all descriptions, its just been kept hidden - such is the nature of 'secret' societies.
However, like Q said 'you have more than you know'. It's been in our faces the whole time if we could only perceive it.
Here is Virginia Jenckes for example - one of, if not thee, first female senator. Look at those eyes. Man in drag.
I'm not a troll at all. I'm here to show you one further deception and how it ties in with the mainstream push for 'trans rights'. It completely comports with Freemasonry's religious beliefs and Luciferianism.
I didn't put any words in your mputh, I stated how this comes across. You insist you are right.. And insist. And insist. Despite not knowing any of these people personally. Despite many here stating that you would likely say the same about them or women they know if only based on photos or select videos. But you are all-knowing. So you insist. And insist some more, Trying to sway people. But you have failed.
If trolling, you have failed. If not? You have still failed
Pacrosby, you keep coming back because you know that it is truth.
Step forth, child, to the well of truth and sup awhile. Drink. Quench your thirst to lift the veil, to pierce the illusion, to graduate the delusion.,
Answer me this, dearheart. Which photo I showed you were you not convinced by? What were your thoughts on Pink? on Glenn Close? Glenn is even a mans name, same with Daryl Hannah. Sandra Bullock - a Bullock is a castrated bull. Courtney COX, Debbie HARRY. Jane RUSSELL.
Here is Simone Biles but I assume you will just tell me that is the natural body of a gymnast and not of a dude.
Rather than confront the possibility that everything you have believed up until this point has been a deception of such magnitude, you would shoot the messenger. Discard the message on instinct rather than on open inspection.
That's fine, but Trans Day of Visibility will come upon us at some point and you won't be able to ignore it any longer.
The trans acceptance and trans normalization is being hurriedly put into place for a reason - it is not an organic, grassroots-led rights movement. It is an assault on your mind. An attempt to gaslight ahead of the big reveal.
I have just given you an advance preview but you choose not to believe. It is not me who is seeing things unclearly - it is you who is deciding to take the blue pill on matters that are too uncomfortable, too fantastic to swallow.
You didn’t even watch the link I sent. And I will not “swallow” any Satanic filth! You’re lucky I even let this post stand instead of removing it. I only left it for lame education but it may yet vanish.
THEN WHO GAVE BIRTH TO BARRON?
Believe half of what you hear and some of what you see and you'll be okay. The Lord will show you the way and the truth.
All opinions welcome. God bless.
Such a beautiful response. Well said sister. God bless.
Thanks Slechta. I'm still fighting for Jesus.
To be fair Mary, that is a question you could ask of all secret Trans who have allegedly had babies. You could ask it of Michelle Obama, you could ask it of Beyoncé https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbgcs5lg_sk
You could ask it of Barbara Bush. The fact is that pregnancies are well able to be faked. A moonbump for instance. https://www.moonbump.com/
Your question is always the first one unbelievers respond with but it’s simply not the insurmountable obstacle people think it is. EVERYTHING is a lie don’t forget.
You go right ahead and believe what YOU want.. I'll stick to my guns and believe what the TRUTH really is. God bless and have a great day.
I’m trying to open your eyes to a truth Mary.
Did Q not say “the deeper you go the more unrealistic it all becomes”?
Then on what basis do you rest on your laurels and abandon your pursuit of truth?
At what point do you think you have possession of that extremely unrealistic truth that Q was alluding to? Is that not complacency?
I’m showing you things for your own edification Mary. You can accept or reject but you cannot boldly claim that you are in possession of truth when the whole trans thing is laced throughout the whole Bible and where Q repeatedly says its biblical.
I rest my laurels on Jesus Christ. He is the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. Perhaps you need to rededicate your life to him, if you haven't already. Next you'd be saying I am a tranny even though I have given birth to a son and a daughter. You can delve as far down the rabbit hole as you like; perhaps you are in the wrong hole. I assume YOU are the one who needs to truly search for the TRUTH, and Jesus sure isn't down no rabbit hole. Amen.
Why so militant and offensive?
Galatians 5 19-21 lists all the things that are of the flesh, which includes contentions, outbursts of wrath and dissensions.
How can you be of Christ if you have not nailed those fleshly sins to the cross?
Pharisee! Hypocrite!
Take the plank out of your own eye before casting your judgement on me.
She was not hostile or militant. U are actually the one blindly believing ur own understanding. She is saying u are leaning on ur own understanding rather than Christ. I agree trans stuff is a problem they are pushing but dont agree on ur assessment of like half the people u named. I WILL PRAY FOR U. GOD BLESS. GOOD DAY
Perhaps you may need to check the plank in yours. I stand in defense of my Lord and the Truth. And this Tranny stuff you are stating on here does not stand for any truth that I know of. Thank you and I NO longer wish to talk to you at this time.
I truly pray for God to bless you and keep you and please, please have a wonderful week.
You are clearly not of Christ but speak from a demon.
Go over the fleshly sins again with humility instead of pride. Ensure that you are dead to sin by crucifying the flesh with its passions and desires (Gal 5: 24) and recommit to a love of the truth and the courage to see it and to hear it.
Do not rest on your laurels.
Good day.
You have NO CLUE what “This is Biblical” means. I think you need to research and listen to Kim Clement from 2007-2015 to understand. Then match Exodus and Revelations up to what he discusses. Then match current events up to all of these things. Oh wait, let me help give you a jumpstart:
https://godinanutshell.com/2021/05/21/two-presidents-prophecy/
what makes you so sure?
I think that Melania, although tall, has typical female proportions.
https://www.trueactivist.com/first-lady-melania-trumps-topless-and-naked-photos-that-president-donald-trump-does-not-want-the-world-to-see-gallery-t2/46/
It’s possible, but with all the deception and the fact that she was a First Lady you shouldn’t just rule it out in the basis that you like her and trump.
Here is MrE3000s video on Melania. At least give it a watch and then decide
https://archive.org/details/BitChute-vBvn1SCEL41o
I’m ashamed to say that a few years ago that I did see a nude photo of our former First Lady.
What I saw below the belt was not the workings of a plastic surgeon.
oh right, and here's me thinking that being trans meant having your penis cut off and inverted into a fadge.
One of us must be mistaken. Funny, I could have SWORE that becoming trans meant having surgery on the genitals.
https://s.smutty.com/media_smutty_2/p/r/o/c/b/procrastibator-wqy4q-db999d.jpg
https://thumb-p2.xhcdn.com/a/FXsGyqSrq2pLwYsaHMWaVQ/000/396/533/722_1000.jpg
my apologies for doing this to you by the way
Maybe you are a faggot…
that's the hallmark of someone who has lost.
never mind raver - I won't judge you for continuing to beat your meat mercilessly to shemales.
Have at it!
THEN WHO GAVE BIRTH TO BARRON?
Believe some of what you hear and half of what you see and you'll be fine. The Lord will show you the way.
All opinions welcome.
Newsflash: Not all women look the same. Many have masculine features. I know plenty of women who look like the women here who you have labeled clearly trans. Including myself. No hips. No stretch marks. Oh no. I'm a man. Who birthed 4 babies. I'm a miracle
I have a HUGE jaw and broad shoulders, but of course also have hips and soft facial features. 100% woman. Genetics are a hell of a thing. Some men are spindly and have thin sloped shoulders, doesn’t make them less of a man. OP needs to get some help. People who disagree with you aren’t demonically inspired 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
Look at Anniston again and tell me she couldn’t pass as Adam Sandler in a wig.
And no, it’s not the norm for women to look masculine. Makeup is not what distinguishes female faces from male faces - it is the underlying skull
Plenty of women have masculine features as plenty of men have feminine features. What are you smoking?
That’s true but that chap said that makeup is what made the difference. Whereas there are actually skeletal differences such as a brow ridge, angular mandible, broader shoulders, narrower pelvis and longer limbs in males.
If you believe in biological facts then you just can’t dispute that there are biological differences.
If you are going to support an argument that there are no biological, as in skeletal, differences then you are well on your way to being co-opted by the trans acceptance folk.
I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
I agree that some women have masculine features but every woman has a broader pelvis than their male counterparts.
Facts which cannot be denied and cannot be ignored.
Biology matters.
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it
they're not mutually exclusive.
Look, if you want to be one of those ones who say that gender and sex are functions solely of the mind and feelings and in no way connected to biology, that's up to you to do so.
You're wrong and deluded but that's your choice.
You can tell male and female skeletons apart with some telltale signs - shape of the pelvis, broadness of the shoulders, angle of the jaw, size of the skull, a brow ridge which causes the male eyes to appear more recessed, limb length, hip to shoulder proportions, head to shoulder proportions.
No one is saying that any given female can't have one or two male skeletal markers or vice versa but if you have them all then guess what?
Here is P!NK the singer. Just face it - Pink is a male. Look at the adonis belt, strong shoulders. You KNOW in your heart of hearts you are looking at a male.
https://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/1009090/images/o-PINK-BIKINI-PHOTOS-facebook.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c5/97/1d/c5971df87fb11442418bfaa9e8fa937f.jpg
Just accept the truth. Pink is actually a secret trans
https://www.hawtcelebs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/pink-in-bikini-at-a-beach-in-tulum-02-27-2019-6.jpg
Fuck off.
why?
Appreciate your point of view. I do not agree and the arguement set forth FOR these ppl being trans is not supported. Other pictures are out there and just flat out not supported.
The devil is at work in our world for sure. There are many trannies in Hollywood, politics and NWO globalists everywhere. Some are very obvious and others are not. I think it is all very sick and I know God will deal with it in His own good time.
In the meantime, it is not worth arguing about who is or is not a tranny. MTF trannies routinely become "mothers" - it is part of their deception (see prostetic baby bump). Just because someone claims to be a "mother" does not mean they are not a tranny (look no further than Big Mike). They have surrogate mothers birth the baby and then they assume the baby as their own. Sick people.
The devil is the great deceiver. We need to stay steadfast in our faith in Jesus. He will deal with this and all the evilness in the world. We need to make sure that we keep telling the world about the Good News of Jesus Christ and to live a life that is pleasing to Him.
I agree with everything you said.
People should have truth shown to them. Isn't it what this particular website is supposed to be about? Researching the deceptions of the world?
If they don't want to see, fine. You can't make anyone see it. If they disagree, fine too. I know what I'm looking at and it is HUUUGE.
You're seeing what you want to see to fuel what you have decided to believe. Many of us are simply pointing out that the basis for your conclusions is faulty. We've explained it and given clear examples (ourselves, our friends, our loved ones). You don't "know" what you are looking at and the more you insist you do, the less credible you become
You are simply in denial. I know it's a lot to take in but try to think about all the crazy trans push in the media. What do you suppose is behind it all?
Trans are fucking gross. Regardless. They should not be accepted in society and should be shunned like Sodom and Gommora for their heinous lifestyle. Majority of ~trans~ turn into women so they can prey on children and unsuspecting victims.
The trans lifestyle is a lifestyle of idolatry of self. They are blatantly telling God “YOU made me wrong so I will recreate myself the “right” way!” Sad and unfortunate people that are choosing to reject the Father.
Thou shalt not judge.......I may have read that in one of my books somewhere....
Hate the sin, not the sinner. Also in there as well.
Sure, but wouldn't we want to spread the Word to those who do not know it? This is what the congregations is supposed to do, be spreaders of His word. To lead those lost to the faith. Not to be like...fuck off cuz you wear lipstick and have a dick.
Just pointing this out, but some women don’t have “hips” for one reason or another and it doesn’t mean they are trans.
can you tell me what one of those reasons might be?
The same reason that some women are short and some women are tall. Genetic variation.
Also you’re using too many pictures of older women. These older women are not getting the crap ton of female hormones circulating in their bodies in the same way that young women have.
“Oh look at that 80-year-old man, he has no muscle mass so he must be a woman”
-same logic
That is the reason famous women get plastic surgery. It's because they can't hold back their tru nature from re-emerging.
Real normal women don't become masculine with age, they just become older women. But transwomens inherent masculinity has a resurgence which is why they get plastic surgery.
Debbie Harry. How did her neck become so thick and powerful? She was a sprightly little thing but now has powerful jaw and neck? https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tZzqY0x52ro/maxresdefault.jpg
Deep set eyes, big skull https://img.apmcdn.org/e7d60f5245a8e94e07957d2aae7fc0db22c8cf63/uncropped/3f42a2-20190402-still-from-punk-documentary-on-epix-04.jpg
simply put, male.
Glenn Close, a male: https://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/glenn-close-oscars-2019-red-carpet-3.jpg
Look, I didn't make these things so mate - I'm just pointing them out to you for your own edification and so you might have more of a clue as to the exact nature of the entire deception of the world: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
https://www.evercoream.com/wp-content/uploads/daryl-hannah-plastic-surgery-beforea-and-after-photos.jpg
Don't just look. Perceive https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=kathleen%20turner&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=kathleen%20turner&sc=8-15&cvid=9CB97D94D64B4193B7031C91792F63AB&first=1&tsc=ImageBasicHover
There is certainly genetic variance within both males and females, I grant you. But the basic form - the skeleton - follows rules. It's chromosomal. It's at a cellular level. I don't make the rules, god does. I'm just pointing out that practically all the famous females in movies, politics, royalty, big business, mmodelling, sports etc all conform to the male biology.
Here is Jacinda Aherne where it appears her cock has broken free of its holster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7YiFQFk6fc
Sports Illustrated: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fmbBTwZRsNNt/
You’re really wasting a lot of time aren’t you?
Is this the most important issue you could find?
If we uncover all the secret trans-men, will they put Trump back in office?
How much do you get paid for pumping out this crap 24 hours a day?
Finally, you sure do you have it formatted and laid out very well for someone who just spontaneously responded to my comment.
Haha that last part was the give away for me to. It seemed like someone with an agenda rather than someone sharing the truth.
to be fair, you are being dishonest in that the timing of your response left you no time to have watched the last part.
Why lie?
Finally, you sure do you have it formatted and laid out very well for someone who just spontaneously responded to my comment.
My response was to raver about this sentence. There was no lie.
Oh dear please don't hit me with that paid government whatever nonsense.
So what are you suggesting, that we just ignore the obvious massive deception?
Your comments on me having laid it all out neatly I'll take as a compliment.
Have a look at this one again.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
Do you agree that we are looking at a man?
Looks a bit like that trans in the shop that was shouting at the guy, if you know who I'm referring to ("It is MA'AM!!")
What they are saying with the laying it out neat part is this. U either have ur own personal agenda or ur obsessed with one issue. Neither are of Christ. Lean not on your own understanding.
or secret option number 3 - I'm just not a luddite.
Dude you either you’re mentally ill or you’re paid to try and make other people mentally ill.
Does Michelle Obama have a penis, I actually think it’s about 60% probable especially since her children don’t look like her and instead look like her best friends from Chicago.
But you’re really wasting your time on this.
wasting my time? How so? You think Michelle Obama is the only one?
Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
An athletic female is not equivalent to a male. Now, you need to look beyond the smoothness and the makeup and the superficial feminisation but here is a fitness model called Jamie Eason. Looking past the paintwork, the superficiality, are you looking at an athletic female body, or an athletic trans body? https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QKE2hscyw5o/TfrH-SpnhHI/AAAAAAAAAL0/Z8qR6PEa_ys/s1600/jamie-eason-bikini-58.jpg
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
You can take all the drugs you like to be a bodybuilder but you cannot exercise or medicate your way into a different skeletal structure.
I don't see evidence of some glaringly different skeletal structure in that photo. I've known women to look that way (sans those big muscles) Again, I don't know that you have the life experience to make these judgements. In other words... I'm not sure you've seen enough real women.
Pacrosby, you can try to insinuate some sort of lack of experience on my part if you like, as though that were a valid argument against the proposition (it isn’t. It simply speaks to your inability to argue and willingness to resort to adolescent level mockery).
Can I take it from your comments that you are a lesbian? ie with your allusions to having more experience of naked women than me and you being admittedly manly yourself?
You haven’t known women to look that way if you then go on to say sans the muscles.
You are looking at a biological male when you look at pink.
Here’s a question. Why DO you think there’s been such a hasty push to expedite the trans thing on society? What are your genuine thoughts on why that is or might be so?
Not giving birth is a major part as to why some women don’t have wider hips. As a female who has yet to give birth I lack certain “shape” cause my pelvis hasn’t stretched while birthing. I have a friend who has given birth, is pregnant with her second and STILL doesn’t have super feminine hips. God creates us ALL differently. I wish I had super voluptuous hips, but God planned otherwise.
Yes, but your pelvis is still shaped differently to that of a man. And your belly button still occupies a different relative level., even if your hips aren't wide.
There are narrow female hips, and there are male pelvises. A female pelvis and a male pelvis are fundamentally and structurally different.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/7b/2b/5e/7b2b5ea41f7d9cfa4841f6a89f201c5e--human-anatomy-vs.jpg
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3034/2283718939_0939370dc0_z.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1Qm7d4cCt8
The pelvis is the surefire way to identify the sex of a skeleton. Nevertheless, there are clusters of skeletal clues, not just the pelvis.
Can you answer me something honestly? Can you take a look at this famous actress and answer me this: Are you looking at a biological male or a biological female, just based on the skull and face alone?
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/03/article-0-1A20262E000005DC-72_634x708.jpg
I agree, our skeletons are unique to our sex (male or female). But sometimes it’s not as visible on the outside as much as others, that is what I’m pointing out.
that's true, however what was your answer to my last question re Glenn Close.
Is that photo one of a male or female?
I've read through this entire thread more than once now. Honestly? You come across like a troll trying desperately to prove that the GA folks are stupid. I realize that may not be the case. But it's so outrageous that that that's how it sounds
there's no need to put words in my mouth or derail or second-guess motives.
I'm just saying to you that the whole mainstream push for trans acceptance and the rachel levine 4-star general, elliot page, all of that nonsense isn't for nothing. It isn't organic.
It's paving the way for an inevitable disclosure that will rock the world.
They are trying to mould the minds of the general public to be not just accepting but celebrating of all things trans, in order to pave the way for their new world. It's so jarring because they are expediting their process of brainwashing such that it becomes apparent to some how odd and out of kilter it all is.
If you accept freemasonry has a major part to play in the shape of the world and in all the secret goings-on that people on here ostensibly research, then you have to also accept that freemasonry is a religious order. They follow a bastardised version of the bible and are luciferian in nature. They are also pagan and worship egyptian gods and other myths like Hermes and Aphrodite and their offspirng 'Hermaphrodite'. If you are familiar with the Baphomet, which is so popular with celebrities and elites then you must know that the Baphomet is an adrogynous being.
There's a whole religious element to this trans stuff and it's not new by any stretch of the imagination. It goes back millennia. It has always been prevalent amongst elites and ruling classes and 'celebrities' or artists of all descriptions, its just been kept hidden - such is the nature of 'secret' societies.
However, like Q said 'you have more than you know'. It's been in our faces the whole time if we could only perceive it.
Here is Virginia Jenckes for example - one of, if not thee, first female senator. Look at those eyes. Man in drag.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/96/69/70/966970fab2209448d7297e772e6c4100.jpg
Artist Georgia O'Keefe: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3iFLdMZ85yI/Tm3LgcAPXDI/AAAAAAAAAVk/jMyFLfoYJmM/s1600/display_okeeffe-08bw.jpg
https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/gettyimages-107214194-1565188217.jpg?crop=0.828xw:1.00xh;0.131xw,0&resize=480:*
Here is the very first female movie star Florence Lawrence:
https://www.timelessbeauty.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/florence-lawrence-header-1024x673.jpg
https://www.altfg.com/film/wp-content/uploads/images/2014/09/florence-lawrence.jpg
perceive the boy underneath the disguise.
https://img6.bdbphotos.com/images/orig/7/5/75t6am4jcbpbmaj5.jpg?skj2io4l
I'm not a troll at all. I'm here to show you one further deception and how it ties in with the mainstream push for 'trans rights'. It completely comports with Freemasonry's religious beliefs and Luciferianism.
a skinny little gay queen in a dress: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/32/bc/fc/32bcfce86143d78302b42925b2fa65e5.jpg
same gay thesp: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ab/af/8a/abaf8a807719a19ee3ac2827e2c14214.jpg
I didn't put any words in your mputh, I stated how this comes across. You insist you are right.. And insist. And insist. Despite not knowing any of these people personally. Despite many here stating that you would likely say the same about them or women they know if only based on photos or select videos. But you are all-knowing. So you insist. And insist some more, Trying to sway people. But you have failed.
If trolling, you have failed. If not? You have still failed
Pacrosby, you keep coming back because you know that it is truth.
Step forth, child, to the well of truth and sup awhile. Drink. Quench your thirst to lift the veil, to pierce the illusion, to graduate the delusion.,
Answer me this, dearheart. Which photo I showed you were you not convinced by? What were your thoughts on Pink? on Glenn Close? Glenn is even a mans name, same with Daryl Hannah. Sandra Bullock - a Bullock is a castrated bull. Courtney COX, Debbie HARRY. Jane RUSSELL.
Here is Simone Biles but I assume you will just tell me that is the natural body of a gymnast and not of a dude.
http://www.robertsealeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Robert_Seale_Biles-7.jpg
Elliot Page actually DETRANSITIONED.
Adding flair because this post needs a lot of shovels to get Jacobin out! Dude, I’m not sure if we can dig fast enough! You just may be SOL! Hahaha.
You've been shown an uncomfortable truth.
Rather than confront the possibility that everything you have believed up until this point has been a deception of such magnitude, you would shoot the messenger. Discard the message on instinct rather than on open inspection.
That's fine, but Trans Day of Visibility will come upon us at some point and you won't be able to ignore it any longer.
The trans acceptance and trans normalization is being hurriedly put into place for a reason - it is not an organic, grassroots-led rights movement. It is an assault on your mind. An attempt to gaslight ahead of the big reveal.
I have just given you an advance preview but you choose not to believe. It is not me who is seeing things unclearly - it is you who is deciding to take the blue pill on matters that are too uncomfortable, too fantastic to swallow.
Truth is stranger than fiction though.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KRXbGuCsZLv1/
You didn’t even watch the link I sent. And I will not “swallow” any Satanic filth! You’re lucky I even let this post stand instead of removing it. I only left it for lame education but it may yet vanish.
what are you some kind of power-crazed Mod who has let it all go to his head or something?
Take your threats Brent and either make good on them, or shove them up your arse.
.