We just going to pretend Lin Wood isnt trying to burn it all down?
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
that's a great point.
I'm not sure about the general playing semantics with "Q" vs. "QANON" but it's certainly probable.
I wrote in another thread that - IMO - this convo sounded stilted, scripted, and notably dissimilar to other times I've heard the General speak.....but that could just be my personal bias.....
Remember Flynn in that video with his family reciting the WWG1WGA oath? I do.
It was the Oath of Allegiance to the Constitution for the United States.
Not the Q oath, not the wwg1wga oath, not the qanon oath. I'm sure you knew this but just reiterating for the bunker buddies.
No. It was "Where We Go One We Go All".
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8491799/General-Michael-Flynn-leads-friends-reciting-oath-Constitution-QAnon-slogan-July-4th.html
Nothing about it said CIA.
NSA - yes.
DIA? Maybe.
Associate Directorate for Security and Counterintelligence? Welp by nature what do they do? Sit there live tweeting truth as part of CounterInt?
Nope.
As far as I am concerned these guys are all high fiving when the cameras are off because it's their own WWF style wrastling for disinfo. Don't care.
I got things to do on my side. When I am needed it will be made known.
Imagine thinking genuine conflict exists between them right now.
Do you feel all conflict is genuine or can you subscribe to the train of thought that conflict could be manufactured?
This is true, but what if you're wrong. Some of the accusations brought up are serious. There's a few things we can check on to verify if we are moving in the right direction, but everyone has their mind made up already that this is theater based on their own hunch.
I'm okay being wrong. We're sharing opinions and ideas, right?
I raised an eyebrow at the Pegasus thing and the Wood/Flynn call made me favor Wood more and Flynn less. But, I'm not coming to any conclusions based on it. To me, it seems like theater. So I'm not getting carried away with what-ifs.
That's fair. However, there was another phone call between Patrick Byrne and Lin Wood where Byrne brought some serious accusations against Sidney Powell. One of the things he mentioned was that Sidney Powell is working with Hillary Clinton's former lawyer, also implying that he was the one sabotaging all the election cases and the cause of the bad press. He also mentioned that the Arizona audit and the head of the Cyber Ninjas was not up to task, and that there's been a lot of moves to basically just keep us pacified. I'd like to know if this is true. I get that perhaps Patrick Byrne is playing a role and stirring up shit to manufacture conflict, but like I said, there are things in there that we can take a look at to see if it's something worth pursuing, or maybe just reserving judgment until it plays out. But every comment is quick to stifle any questioning of people's chosen heroes. At the end of it, I'll probably look like the fool that fell for the ploy, but this is just my take.
So to believe Q is a C eye A operation means we are to believe they wanted us to wake up, see the truth, do our own research and wake-up others?
This is the funniest part of all this. Like durrrrrr
Yea show me one thing that isn’t true or can’t come true out of the posts! I’ll be waiting a long while for a intelligent response.
I think Lin sees the crucial need for 2020 to get fixed ASAP and is in the process of realizing he's got to get out there himself to fix it.
I think this is part of it. There might be genuine feud happening but if that is the case I think it is because Lin isn't fully in the know and Mike can't provide him with the info he wants because it is classified.
Do we know what Q thinks/thought about Lin Wood? There are no posts where he is discussed for better or worse. Some have stretched pretty far to suggest a misspelling in post 6 is telling us to focus on what Lin Wood says.
As far as trying to burn it all down? Just an opinion, that isn’t his intention. What he seems intent on burning down is the DS, especially those who pretend to be patriots. Is he always right? Maybe not. We’ll have to wait for future to prove the past.
Not sure it’s your intent, but why did/do so many of us think Flynn was integral to this movement? He never gets a Trust Flynn from Q. If you go back and read the Flynn related drops they come across as warning us about Flynn.
Read post 1008 about Mueller going after inside plants? If that is what Mueller is doing and he is going after someone, what does that make them?
Q warned about outside comms and to be careful who we follow. Nowhere is it suggested we follow Flynn or Wood. Again, just an opinion, probably not a popular one.
There is also a possibility that Lin's recent phone drops have been put out as intentional disinfo and misdirection. Not aimed at the digital warriors or Qists but misdirection intended for the DS.
Care to elaborate?
We were told this would happen. That there would be infiltration. That the infiltrator(s) would wait for a time and then blow up in an effort to divide us.
For me the timing of this solidifies that the Maxwell and Smollett trials are so very important.
But we already knew that.
Stay focused on what is important.
But the ones stirring up trouble are the people involved and some of the accusations are treasonous.
Lin is always stirring up shit. Isn't that a Sun Tzu tactic, keep us riled up? That's all he does.
Prove this is a legit voice mail.
All distractions, fuck ‘em all for their participation in this smoke screen