I keep seeing the question: Why is Trump taking credit for a vax that is killing people?
We have heard many explanations, including...
- He's in on it.
- He doesn't know the truth.
- He had to do it so we weren't locked down for 5 year.
- There are no deaths--that's all fake news from White Hats and the shots are saline (I heard this one just the other day).
- He has to sound like he still approves of it otherwise the media crushes him.
- A combination of the above.
Personally, I have always thought #5 was the most plausible explanation.
But my new thought is this: whoever smelt it, dealt it. Remember that from junior high? Same principle. Imagine if Trump came out against the vax and he highlighted the adverse effects. What would happen? He would be blamed. But by pretending to still praise it (while advocating for you to do your own research and make your own choice), he allows the blame to remain squarely on the pharmas and other bad actors. And if they try to blame him, he can say "All I did was clear the path to speed up the process... you're the ones who created poison."
He had to speed it up so they couldn't keep us locked down. And until he is back in the White House (which I still believe will happen), he must play "stupid".
Yes, people are dying and being maimed. But until Trump is in power and able to stop it, he can't do anything else except what he is doing. I have siad this before: I think his heart breaks anew each day that goes by that he is notable to stop it.
Thanks for reading. Have at it, Frens.
After experiencing what the media did when he suggested hydroxychloroquine - to the point where we have to beg for it - I believe he has taken the best path he could. This is WWIII. There’s been collateral damage, including my cousin and a father-figure for some of my loved ones. I absolutely do not blame DJT for this.
He said something like it was the hardest decision he ever made.
I didn’t know that, but I can surely see why he said it!
Yeah, I think he was referring to the vaxx as well with that statement.
"All I did was clear the path to speed up the process..."
And if this was his only repeated comment, I don't think anyone would have any issues with him saying that. In fact, saying that would support the belief that he rushed them out to stop the lockdowns in a much more compelling fashion than his ongoing promotion of the jabs.
True. But, in the various interviews if he doesn't go far enough with his words, then his lack of words/support becomes the story.
Call me an eternal optimist, but I just can't see Trump being evil. Sometimes less than gentlemanly with his behavior, of course. But not evil.
I didn't say he was evil and I'm only looking at what he says. The Alabama rally was not an interview, and all he had to do there was leave the jabs out of his speech.
Good point. So, new question: what's the chance that the vax is actually good (or just saline shots)... except for a handful of batches that were hijacked by the black hats??? I don't really think that. But, anything's possible at this point.
I doubt any batch of the vax is 'good', though some are apparently more immediately problematic than others. There have been reports that some only contained saline, including by a chemist who analyzed five different injections, three of which were saline only. I wouldn't want anything to do with what the other two contained.
Yeah, I think I am with you on all of that.
Do you ever think about the fact that we'll never know the truth? I mean, even if/when Trump is back, there isn't going to be a moment where the credits roll and we see who was playing what role. There won't be a "behind the scenes" DVD that explains it all.
There'll probably be some credits and some 'behind the scenes' DVDs, but I doubt they'll tell us everything.
I'm not sure Trump will be back. I believe NCSWISC, but I'm not sure the final outcome includes Trump as more than perhaps a senior statesman. Don't ask me who I think would take his place, though, as I have no idea. And it may be we get an outcome with an entirely different paradigm than we've known, and that includes the end of the two-party system. We may get a completely different form of government, and if I had my way it would entirely be that of trust based on truth and respect (horses live this paradigm, which is where I learned the beauty of it).
Can you think of any reason, or have you heard any Md worth their salt say, that suppressing a person's natural immune system is a "good thing"? Leaving them vulnerable not only to different kinds of coronaviruses, but also to formerly dormant diseases in their body like cancer? Look at all the toxic effects of spike proteins coursing through all jabbed peoples' bodies, crossing the blood/brain barrier, etc. This is the fundamental function of the mRNA technology in this "vaccine". Why would we have doctors and scientists saying the only conceivable purpose for this shot is a depopulation event?
Why would the entire DS/globalist cabal be going insane trying to jab every human being, down to infants, as fast as it can, for a "disease" that has a 99.9% survival rate? There is obviously a planned and adverse effect, or spectrum of effects, and it's highly likely that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg so far.
Like I said in my comment... "I don't really think that." I am on the exact same page as you. You articulated the concerns very well.
Given my personal experience with family members very slim chance that most are saline or harmless. When this whole thing started I didn't know anyone who had died of covid. Since the jab roll out I know 2 people who died of covid both fully jabbed. Within 6 months of being jabbed My step dad had a heart attack with no clogged arteries. My sister developed breast cancer, uncle had a stroke, MIL Iost the use of her arm, my sisters FIL died 12 hours after the booster, my daughter's friend got 2 brain clots and had a stroke at 19, SIL father is now seeing a cardiologist and her mom was just found unresponsive in her house soooo I think the chances are low!
I haven't responded to anyone because I just wanted to be a catalyst for discussion. But, to you I want to say that I am sorry for all of the loss. I can't even imagine the devastating impact the loss has had. I hope you can find the strength to hang in there. I am so sorry.
Thank you friend. It's been a rough couple months that's for sure
Your comment got me thinking (again) about all of it. If Trump comes out against the vax, and people stop getting vaxxed (or refuse boosters), it gives the cabal the right to fabricate new info and put us into lockdown. With the vax in place and still touted as a solution, the will among the people to fight lockdowns will remain strong. Sadly, the resulting harm in the wake of the vax is destroying families. Here we all are, caught in the middle among the warring powers. Hang in there as best as you can. I pray that God continues to give you strength.
Or a simple matter of "damned if you do, damned if you don't". Trump will not be the one that turns OFF the pandemic switch while the Biden team is in place and MSM is still toxic. Trump-haters will not believe him and Trump-supporters are already questioning the world we are in. He is supposed to be taking a backseat, sticking to his message on election fraud, backing new candidates for 2022 and allowing devolution to occur through its own momentum.
To me, its all pretty simple at this point. I either believe Trump is on our side or I don't. I understand people's concern about his position, but I am not giving up on him any time soon and picking at this scab is not going to change anything right now.
Well said.
I think he can broach this topic when there is more public attention given to the adverse effects (meaning some sort of public voice such as celebrities that convert). If he comes out against it, his message simply gets drowned out, and if his message sticks he then gets blamed.
Awhile back, another poster highlighted some of the federal laws regarding a declared state of emergency, including the fact that as a matter of black-and-white law, the president must defer to subject-matter experts in the government's response to the emergency. According to this, developing the vaccine even under extreme acceleration, was the only way out, especially after HCQ and was tanked by the media and the bought-and-paid-for subject-matter experts. The opposition repeatedly had said that the only solution was the vaccine as part of the HCQ smear campaign, so after their public declarations they couldn't walk it back and were truly taken by surprise when he pushed it through successfully. Under this scenario it's part of why he pushed HCQ so hard and why the DS mobilized everything to kill it. HCQ got almost no meaningful traction in terms of public support and media support, leaving the media space primed for the vaccine.
I'm afraid I don't have the relevant laws linked or on hand, but perhaps other anons have it. Might be in Patel's devolution series. Anyway, this is a motivation for your reason #3, sucking the wind from the DS while giving the public a big wedge to push for opening instead of lockdowns.
Yeah he can act shocked and deceived when it comes out.
Decent. I agree 1) that this is the most plausible, especially since he keeps advocating for choices, unlike the pro-vaxx mandate goverenors, who are now doing to the children in their states what they did to the elderly, and 2) the lock downs would most certainly have continued without a vaxx for at least one or two more years, maybe longer. So I'd go for 3 and 5 until I have evidence of more options or combinations being possible. What's causing steam to exit my ears is the whole 'vaxx for children' demon-inspired anti-science scheme!
Children neither get severe cases of Wuhan Flu, nor are they likely to spread it.
They are the most vulnerable to vaxx side effects, since they are still building their immune systems (BTW, the same applied to the ill-effects of both lockdowns and masking.)
My take is that most patriots that can rub a couple brain cells aren't taking it anyways. Which (much to my surprise) is actually a lot of people. Quite possibly the majority of we could ever get real numbers.
For him to come out against it now serves no purpose. Other then affirmation for Patriots who, again, haven't taken it. He's "not in control" at the moment, so the vax is going to be pushed regardless of what he says. It's literally a battle he couldn't currently win. No need to suffer unnecessary losses at this point. It also distances himself from the whole thing, so whatever happens/is happening can't be spun around to hurr Durr dictator Trump. I mean it will anyways no matter what he does, but only the hardcore CNN drinkers believe that shit or even care about what he's doing right now.
I go with:
#3 He had to do it so we weren't locked down for 5 years.
#5 He has to sound like he still approves of it otherwise the media crushes him.
Once a POTUS always a POTUS, which means receiving intelligence briefings etc. He is being told what to think and how to act via the briefings.
Could be blackmail.
I recall him meeting with RFK Jr, calling out autism, and possibly having him as an advisor, but then something changed and he went full blown Rockefeller medicine with Gates/Fauci.
He doesn't have to say anything!! Just shut the F-Up on the subject!! If someone dies because they now trust Trump on this... sorry, Trumps at fault!! With all the evidence out there, Trump must stop promoting the vax. This is the ONE issue that can blow up my opinion about Trump!!
THERE IS NEVER A GOOD TIME TO PROMOTE GENOCIDE, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Helps to explain. https://greatawakening.win/p/140cImFQrg/dr-shankara-chetty--the-vaccines/c/