I'm getting really tired of this being called an mRNA vaccine. There is so much ignorance, confusion, and generalizations going around about this.
Most of the arguments about this assume 2 things,
1: the vaccine is mRNA (it's not)
2: DNA transcription goes one way, and the vac can't alter your DNA. (also not true)
Time to 'follow the science'
to start, a little about how DNA works.
searchx/startpage: "reverse transcriptase"
- Reverse transcriptase An enzyme that generates DNA
"A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription. Reverse transcriptases are used by viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B to replicate their genomes, by retrotransposon mobile genetic elements to proliferate within the host genome, and by eukaryotic cells to extend the telomeres at the ends of their linear chromosomes. Contrary to a widely held belief, the process does not violate the flows of genetic information as described by the classical central dogma, as transfers of information from RNA to DNA are explicitly held possible. "
normally info flows from DNA- RNA but we have latent code from old viruses AND DNA repair / anti-cancer code that will try to 'fix' DNA in your cells by repairing it with RNA.
kind of a "look at the RNA floating around, better make sure it source code is in the DNA" situation going on in the body. It doesn't happen 100%, as in it won't update the DNA in all your cells overnight, but it DOES happen, and if it happens in the sperm/eggs it can be passed down.
Now, most people DON'T have mRNA floating around in their blood. even the vaxxed. They mostly have the spike protein coursing through their bodies, which can be transmitted to you but won't directly alter your DNA. You will just make antibodies for the spike proteins you are exposed to.
The people that get vaxed have a not zero chance of DNA alteration in one or more cells in their body, but probably not their entire body.
Ok, now that we have that out of the way, onto the main attraction.
I have noticed this is something that people don't talk about at all. I would like to change this, so please help me spread some of this science info.
The vaccine is NOT mRNA!!!! There are enzymes in your body that go around looking for mRNA, find it, and break it down into component parts to be re-used. mRNA is supposed to create a message to do something, then vanish once that something is done. On-going effects, normally cause continuous streams of RNA to be made.
This was undesirable from the point of vac manufacturers.
So they 'stabilize' it. to keep this normal safe process from happening. How do you keep the RNA from breaking down so fast and sticking around longer? They change it so it's not real RNA and your body doesn't detect it to break it down normally. They do a TON of stuff, under the term 'stabilization', and play it off like all they are doing is adding salt to the mixture and keeping the vax cold. Nothing could be further from the truth.
They are doing 6 things to the 'RNA' that make it, well not really RNA...
-
A 'cap' is put on the start of the RNA. This cap is made out of 3 different sub caps stringed together. 'nucleotide methylation' This 'header' of non-RNA at the start of the RNA does 4 things, makes it hold together better, attracts transcription enzymes to make more than normal proteins out of it, stops the body from recognizing it as foreign, and stops the breakdown enzymes from attaching.
-
A flag is attached between the cap and the RNA that allows the transition enzymes attracted by the cap to latch on and transcribe easier than normal RNA. all 4 of the above molecules are NOT RNA and are NEVER found on normal RNA
-
nucloside modified 'mRNA' RNA normally consists of adenine (A), uracil (U), cytosine (C), and/ or guanine (G) strung together. The 'fraken-RNA' includes the incorporation of modified nucleotides in the mRNA sequence, such as methylated nucleosides or pseudouridine.
Cytidines can also be replaced with numerous chemical modifications, including 5-methylcytidine (m5C); uridines can be converted into 5-methyluridine (m5U), 2-thiouridine (s2U), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU), pseudouridine (ψ) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1ψ), while adenosines can be replaced by N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
So normally DNA / RNA has an alphabet consisting of 4 letters each, from a total of 5 letters. the DNA->rna process transcribed the 4th letter for the 5th, which is what makes DNA and RNA actually different.
The 'vaccines' introduce 8 new 'letters' to the RNA sequence, that do not get detected by your body as RNA. They get transcribed by the transcriber, sure. but it is NOT RNA. The current batch is using "pseudouridine (ψ)" as a substitute for uridine.
-
Another noncoding flag is put at the end of the sequence, further increasing stability and preventing the breakdown
-
followed by another artificial not even pretend RNA tail at the end to help hold shape for optimal transcription and to prevent breakdown.
-
Encapsulation: normally your body would detect a Frankenstein molecule like this as not RNA and destroy it before it ever gets into your cells to pretend to be RNA. However, the vaccines encapsulate it in something else to stop this from happening. 6a) lipid foam - wrapped up in vacuoles, pretending to be tiny not-cell cells, that look like tiny cells from the outside but are basically empty inside. Your white blood cells will consume these, travel to the heart, and die releasing them to build up in the cardio system (myocarditis) 6b) nanoparticles with iron cores, same problem as the lipid foam but ALSO these make you magnetic 6c) wrapped up in a viral shell, like old school vaccines.
source: National Institute of Health: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299225/
TL;DR RNA contains URIDINE (U) PSUDO RNA CONTAINS pseudouridine (ψ)
Human civilization survived for centuries without all these jabs, pills and invasions to our bodies. I don't begin to understand any of this but I do know that evil people are trying to control us, exploit us and kill us - so it's no jab for me.
All, please note my new post inspired by these facts, where I show that Forbes admitted last month, and Wikipedia still implies, that injections change lymphocyte DNA, potentially up to 1 in 400 cells in the human body; then the same day Forbes tried to scrub all evidence of that admission and spread a new lie, but failed.
And some new data that doesn't need its own post yet but someone might build on it.
WHAT is an OMICRON TEST?
Correct answer: Omicron (B.1.1.529) cannot be determined without sequencing, but for simplicity any presence of "SGTF" is allowed to be interpreted as a proxy marker of Omicron. WHO:
Most Omicron variant sequences reported include a deletion in the S gene, which can cause an S gene target failure (SGTF) in some PCR assays. Although a minority of publicly shared sequences lack this deletion, SGTF can be used as a proxy marker to screen for Omicron. However, confirmation should be obtained by sequencing, since this deletion can also be found in other VOCs [variants of concern] (e.g. Alpha and subsets of Gamma and Delta) that are circulating at low frequencies worldwide.
Translation: Instead of confirming every Omicron result as genetic Omicron, all reporters are allowed to treat every quick SGTF result as Omicron! That mean that if you have a positive Omicron test, you have either one of a majority of Omicron cases, or one of all Alpha cases, or one of some Gamma and Delta cases. Well no wonder every MSM in lockstep is reporting that Omicron represents 73% of all new cases! (Search "omicron 73" anywhere.)
Remember (FDA), Q: Do COVID-19 tests check for the delta and other variants? A: There are no authorized COVID-19 antigen or molecular tests that specifically report the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. I simply looked for how they do test for Omicron, and WHO told me in its initial release of 26 Nov, Several labs have indicated that for one widely used PCR test, one of the three target genes is not detected (called S gene dropout or S gene target failure) and this test can therefore be used as marker for this variant, pending sequencing confirmation. So the plot to use an existing-variant marker (known since Alpha) was all ready from the first official designation of Omicron (even though .529 data goes back to about March). The "one widely used PCR test" is called TaqPath by ThermoFisher Scientific (somebody check their stock). The dropout occurs in positions 69-70.
TLDR: Unless sequenced, an "Omicron positive" means either any Alpha, most Omicron but not all, or lots of Gamma and Delta: it doesn't mean Omicron only. That's why "Omicron positive" is reported by everyone as 73% of new cases.
That's also why Delta antibodies heal "Omicron", why Delta cases have nearly vanished when Omicron appeared, and why they claim to know what Omicron is without sequencing. They're taking four of the top five variants (Beta excepted) and calling them all Omicron. At the same time, the proxy is not catching a minority of sequenced Omicron cases so there are also false negatives.
Spread the talking points! Thanks again u/cosmicspiritwarrior.
Thanks to you and OP for the science explanation.
They didn’t live as long though but that I think was from their love of war.
Imagine, even in the Wild West. Didn’t Andrew Jackson fight in duels?
Look at how big of pussies are in congress now. Back then you disrespected someone in Congress you got shot. And no one said anything. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/settling-scores-the-duels-of-our-forefathers
I always take the life expectancy to be low from infant mortality being high but the ones that lived past it lived long lives.
Yep, that's the correct context.
But still a lot died before age 5.
Ever been to West Texas?
I mean, isn't our expected lifespan shortening? If the vaccines aren't lengthening life... Then what the fuck are we even doing outside lining pockets of money-driven "Mdical" Establishment?
What's the point?
Length of life has increased, but to just be a doddering blob in some rest home for the last ten years of your life is no life!
Life spans in the West have shortened by FOUR YEARS the last 22 months. This is the first time in modern history to see such a decrease, especially such a rapid one.
Life span has only went up the last 50 years. Nothing to do with the vaccine, but we take better care of ourselves now, exercise and the way we eat.
But for thousands of year the human life expectancy was in the 30s and 40s, in part because of infectious diseases, which used to be the leading cause of death.
Not saying the jab isn’t evil, but saying that there have been some benefits from modern medicine.
Lots of infectious diseases were spread from water ways that became eventually polluted. Almost all major civilizations from early history started near major rivers or near coastline for a reason.
So advances in clean water practices and sanitation was the huge leap for humankind's ability to reduce infectious diseases and increase life expectancy.
EXACTLY!!
NOT due to Medicine - modern or otherwise.
Sanitation on a citywide scale. Internal plumbing, sewer systems, the automobile (think about 10,000 horses crapping in the streets on a daily basis), showers / hand washing, etc).
THAT is what took humans from a 30-40 year life expectancy to a 80-100 year expectancy.
Soap, antibiotics
Kind of random comment from me here, but what if we aren't the peak of human society? Look into Tartaria. If you haven't learned yet that they lie to us about everything, try history. Gorgeous, stone buildings, perfectly symmetrical, of gigantic stature, etc. built in a time of horse and carriages? Those people likely had a far advanced understanding of medicine and health. Some who have done past life regressions speak of sound frequency manipulation as a tool for numerous things, one being healing.
I've also heard that the 30s and 40s life expectancy is overstated due to how many newborns didn't make it back then
Is there any modern proof of this tartaria it has a atlantis vibe. Youd think neighbouring countries like...uhh Japan would have extensive records
If you research old maps it's actually listed on there.
The low life expectancy was only when the super high infant mortality rate was factored in. Once you survived early childhood, it was not uncommon at all to live to be very old.
how old is " very old". From the limited research I have done, before modern medicine, people very rarely lived to be over 70, today, that's quite normal.
people used to live to be 100-200 years old, it was rare but not super rare like it is to hit 100 now.
I would guess a similar normalcy as now - 60s and 70s, with those of money and clean diets possibly going further (much more rare). Look at some of our Founding Fathers who had money.
Sanitation. It's all due to better sanitation. Clean water. Functioning sewer systems. Also no child labor anymore - kids died in factories and hellish factory conditions for all during industrial revolution times.
Why vaccinate children? There is another reason!!! It removes liability! Listen to this 2 minute video.
https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1475930299674636288?s=20