They quote the same experts who insist that a man who thinks he is a woman becomes one and you are anti-science if you presume a person with a penis and testicles is male.
The description of “mass formation psychosis” offered by Malone resembles discredited concepts, such as “mob mentality” and “group mind,” according to John Drury, a social psychologist at the University of Sussex in the U.K. who studies collective behavior. The ideas suggest that “when people form part of a psychological crowd they lose their identities and their self-control; they become suggestible, and primitive instinctive impulses predominate,” he said in an email.
It's perfectly fine to yell "Fire" in a crowded theater, according to the new rules. In addition, the people who flip over cars and burn sofas after their city's sports team wins the big game never had self control to begin with, and their identity revolves around lighting things on fire to celebrate.
"There is no evidence to suggest a “mass formation psychosis” has occurred during the pandemic, experts told Reuters..." said the creeps who pushed Mass Formation Psychosis.
EDIT: This is no different from a thief telling the cops that no, he is not a thief.
The same Pravda that shouted for years there was 'irrefutable' evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, now say there is no such thing as Mass Formation Physchosis.
I keep thinking of the TNG episode - there are four lights! The the most telling scene of that episode is the final one where Picard admits he was ready to break and that he started to believe he could see five.
War Crimes here; so, they cannot admit to this horrific act. We are now proceeding with our offensive, and they damn well know it. Consequences, we want them, we need them, and we shall have them.
There's some weaseling going on here. Mattias Desmet warned Malone to use the phrase Mass Formation without the term Psychosis, because the latter has a very specific definition.
I suggest that this is how these experts are discrediting the phenomena while retaining a cloak of respectability.
"They investigated themselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing."
Which will keep working on those trapped in their Confirmation Bias paradigm.
Sit back, observe, be objective, eventually you have less and less ways to say it’s not happening.
This is the way.
Move along, wouldn’t want to become suicidal now would we?
There are two rules when it comes to the media: Rule 1: the media lies to the public Rule 2: see rule one
So when they collectively blanket the airwaves with denial, I know the opposite is more likely to be true.
We also know that “THEY’RE PANICKING!!”™️
Only rule:
If any entity establishes itself as an authority on information - be suspect. Nobody has authority great enough for you to ever believe them.
If you are not willing to do your own research - you can’t see what you’ve been told as authoritative.
They’re playing the devil’s favorite game.
Technically, what they’re saying is correct: “mass formation psychosis” isn’t a thing.
Technically, it’s called mass formation.
So they can write this article, omit the truth, and justify it in their twisted, compromised souls.
These people are sick.
They quote the same experts who insist that a man who thinks he is a woman becomes one and you are anti-science if you presume a person with a penis and testicles is male.
It's perfectly fine to yell "Fire" in a crowded theater, according to the new rules. In addition, the people who flip over cars and burn sofas after their city's sports team wins the big game never had self control to begin with, and their identity revolves around lighting things on fire to celebrate.
The standard playbook is invoked again.
CIA KUBARK
MILITARY GRADE PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
"There is no evidence to suggest a “mass formation psychosis” has occurred during the pandemic, experts told Reuters..." said the creeps who pushed Mass Formation Psychosis.
EDIT: This is no different from a thief telling the cops that no, he is not a thief.
The same Pravda that shouted for years there was 'irrefutable' evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, now say there is no such thing as Mass Formation Physchosis.
Yeah, totally believeable.
"it's very dangerous for our democracy"
The U.K. government admitted using it when the Plandemic began and since.... its open source from the government’s advisory committee.....
WWG1WGA
What's funny is mass formation psychosis is barely known. Like, normies aren't talking about it. This is pretty fringe stuff.
So when the media starts talking about refuting it something that is basically never talked about, you're on target.
Updoot for "butter my buns and call me a biscuit"... Pure Gold... ☕☕☕
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/united-states-of-fear-mark-mcdonald-md/1140518087?ean=9781637583197
Like alcoholism if you deny it means it’s true 😆
That’s because they call it.... assimilation.....!
WWG1WGA
I still call it good old fashion brainwashing.
I keep thinking of the TNG episode - there are four lights! The the most telling scene of that episode is the final one where Picard admits he was ready to break and that he started to believe he could see five.
It is HILARIOUS!!!!!
War Crimes here; so, they cannot admit to this horrific act. We are now proceeding with our offensive, and they damn well know it. Consequences, we want them, we need them, and we shall have them.
There's some weaseling going on here. Mattias Desmet warned Malone to use the phrase Mass Formation without the term Psychosis, because the latter has a very specific definition.
I suggest that this is how these experts are discrediting the phenomena while retaining a cloak of respectability.