I feel it is my civic duty to point out though, that violence is often the answer and that even though general violence will not be needed by the people in this instance, selective violence will be perpetrated against all who have their necks stretched.
Violence is often the answer in human affairs and has solved many problems for the victors over the length and breadth of history.
In the Hobesian jungle of the dark ages violence was often the ONLY answer......
The thoughtless cliche of "violence is never the answer" pisses me off..... and I am not violent.
You cannot, however, dispute the pure wisdom of "The SUPREME art of war is to subdue the enemy without ever fighting..."
Well said. This reminds me of a saying I picked up in the military; “no one prays for peace more than a soldier.” Do I want violence? Not at all. Am I prepared to use violence? Yes. And having tasted war, I pray that day never comes.
Violence never solved anything.... except freeing Europe and the Orient from totalitarian armies, ending slavery in America, winning our independence from the British monarchy, and a few other things along the way.
Violence is sometimes needed, its having the wisdom and intelligence to know your not instigating unless it crosses lines. Self defense, is one good example that everyone can agree on. However if you don't need to use violence even in a self defense situation and can talk you way out that makes you a much better human being.
That being said, if the line is crossed, and we the people take up arms against oppressors, as show in history it will be bloody,and extremely violent. Those peaceful people who are forced to defend their way of life will be very angry as this will change them forever.
Everyone has a threshold as to how much or what they will tolerate. every situation is different and if you as a group role played it everyone would come at if from experience and wisdom. There is no real right answer, its what can you live with and justify your choices in life.
Correct. However... while I do hope that Q has contingencies in place, once the people who wanted to be left alone get involved, that's it. No one, not even Trump will be able to stop them once it starts.
I hope it doesn't, but if the three letter bois cause another Ruby Ridge or Waco, well... that's that.
Violence is absolutely the ONLY answer. When a cop arrests someone that is always done with the threat of violence behind it. Why do you think they have guns strapped to them? We absolutely need and should condone violence. Its exactly what we need. We need honest actors to arrest these lunatics.
What we don't need is 1-2 people to act interdependently and be violent for violence sake. Don't get stupid.
If you can't convince (not threaten or coerce) at least a dozen or more other people with a well laid out argument that whatever you're about to do is necessary and they are willing to help you do it... then you probibly shouldn't do it. We need to act as one. We need to agree on how we react to these lunatics.
To be clear there are some lines we shouldn't allow them to cross. And we absolutely should react violently to. IE if they start going door to door collecting guns. But you will know when that moment happens because you won't be alone in reacting that way.
IMHO - we should be reacting to them detaining the Jan 6th hostages. We all know they are political prisoners... but that apparently isn't quite enough.
Bottom line... the only thing these lunatic communists understand is violence. Thus the only way to get rid of them will be violent. Whether that will be police or a mob is a whole other question, but don't delude yourself... there will be violence.
If two people concoct a plan, that's a 50% chance the other person is fed, police, etc. Five or more, that's potentially 4/5 that are feds/police.
I've been saying for a while that feds/police would be working undercover in a bowling beer league. It seems they must know everything about as many people as possible.
VIOLENCE is NOT the answer...
We neither need nor condone the use of force or violence to win. We battle in the sphere of information with ideas, logic, and reason...
We are NOT vigilantes. We are smarter, kinder, and wiser than (they) are. The SUPREME art of war is to subdue the enemy without ever fighting...
You are correct.
Rant on:-
I feel it is my civic duty to point out though, that violence is often the answer and that even though general violence will not be needed by the people in this instance, selective violence will be perpetrated against all who have their necks stretched.
Violence is often the answer in human affairs and has solved many problems for the victors over the length and breadth of history.
In the Hobesian jungle of the dark ages violence was often the ONLY answer......
The thoughtless cliche of "violence is never the answer" pisses me off..... and I am not violent.
You cannot, however, dispute the pure wisdom of "The SUPREME art of war is to subdue the enemy without ever fighting..."
Rant off.
Well said. This reminds me of a saying I picked up in the military; “no one prays for peace more than a soldier.” Do I want violence? Not at all. Am I prepared to use violence? Yes. And having tasted war, I pray that day never comes.
Amen...
And awomen! 🤣🤣🤣
I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace. - Thomas Paine
^^^ THIS ^^^
Violence never solved anything.... except freeing Europe and the Orient from totalitarian armies, ending slavery in America, winning our independence from the British monarchy, and a few other things along the way.
Correct. Those where times wher the enemy was an identifiable force and coul be fought.
Today the enemy is hidden, attacked by infiltration, is global and can only be completely purged after fully exposing it to everyone to see!
Therefor the information warfare we are in. [Their] most powerful weapon is the MSM / Big Tech...
Violence is sometimes needed, its having the wisdom and intelligence to know your not instigating unless it crosses lines. Self defense, is one good example that everyone can agree on. However if you don't need to use violence even in a self defense situation and can talk you way out that makes you a much better human being. That being said, if the line is crossed, and we the people take up arms against oppressors, as show in history it will be bloody,and extremely violent. Those peaceful people who are forced to defend their way of life will be very angry as this will change them forever. Everyone has a threshold as to how much or what they will tolerate. every situation is different and if you as a group role played it everyone would come at if from experience and wisdom. There is no real right answer, its what can you live with and justify your choices in life.
Civil War is not the awnser. However violence can be constructive and not destructive depending on the scenario.
It's not destructive for a person to defend themselves from am assailant; just as its.not destructive for a nation to defend itself from bad actors.
There is a distinct difference between "blind civil war" and intently focused targeting of bad actors.
Correct. However... while I do hope that Q has contingencies in place, once the people who wanted to be left alone get involved, that's it. No one, not even Trump will be able to stop them once it starts.
I hope it doesn't, but if the three letter bois cause another Ruby Ridge or Waco, well... that's that.
We are already involved and we are pissed!!
I just wanted to.live my life,play with my cars and be happy. But here we are.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j03rZojm/normies-awakening--then-they-cam/c/
Bad actors. Buildings with certain concoctions, tests. I agree
Violence is absolutely the ONLY answer. When a cop arrests someone that is always done with the threat of violence behind it. Why do you think they have guns strapped to them? We absolutely need and should condone violence. Its exactly what we need. We need honest actors to arrest these lunatics.
What we don't need is 1-2 people to act interdependently and be violent for violence sake. Don't get stupid.
If you can't convince (not threaten or coerce) at least a dozen or more other people with a well laid out argument that whatever you're about to do is necessary and they are willing to help you do it... then you probibly shouldn't do it. We need to act as one. We need to agree on how we react to these lunatics.
To be clear there are some lines we shouldn't allow them to cross. And we absolutely should react violently to. IE if they start going door to door collecting guns. But you will know when that moment happens because you won't be alone in reacting that way.
IMHO - we should be reacting to them detaining the Jan 6th hostages. We all know they are political prisoners... but that apparently isn't quite enough.
Bottom line... the only thing these lunatic communists understand is violence. Thus the only way to get rid of them will be violent. Whether that will be police or a mob is a whole other question, but don't delude yourself... there will be violence.
The Tree of Liberty thirsts.
If two people concoct a plan, that's a 50% chance the other person is fed, police, etc. Five or more, that's potentially 4/5 that are feds/police.
I've been saying for a while that feds/police would be working undercover in a bowling beer league. It seems they must know everything about as many people as possible.
Mate the drop is literally about the military using force to achieve ends.
Awesome point eloquently stated!
You're both right.
WE (you and I personally and the rest of the patriots posting here) don't need to commit violence.
WE as a civilized society do need to use violence against the intractably evil among us, and even to kill many of them.
So we have hired and trained other men to do the violence on our behalf, and they are ready to rock.
Anyone who doesn't recognize that we're in the middle of an unconventional but very violent war at this time hasn't been paying any attention at all.
The weapons include bio weapons, weather manipulation, arson and many conventional guns and bombs.
Wake up, people.