That is a five star article that agrees with something I have been experiencing but did not know how to define.

Summary: We have moved from a past situation where an oral form of communication was predominant to one where a written form of communicatino was most predominant. In the most recent generation(s) we have moved or are moving back to an oral form of communication being predominant.

Persuasive Oral Arguments are considered as having higher value that well reasoned written arguments. An argument presented by an acknowledged respected (by that person) authority will be accepted without question, yet the same argument presented in written form will be ignored as it did not come from an accepted source or perhaps because it did not come in an accepted form (oral preferred over written).

I think it is something far simpler. We are in a post-Truth world. People have been brainwashed into accepting that so many observable facts are incorrect, that the populace was perfectly conditioned to accept anything (ANYTHING) that their programming told them. A simpler way would be to describe them as WokeTards, a form of mental retardation that can be inflicted through the non-stop assault of the Woke agenda. Strangely, history has provided us with the words of Voltaire "Those who can be convinced to believe absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities". When a proportion of population can be brow-beaten into accepting that a man is a woman because he says he is - that is an absurdity. And I think when the transgender narrative went mainstream, the NWO knew that the population was ready to be fed the Covid narrative which is an atrocity.

The author is definitely on to something, but it goes a bit deeper. History and meanings are being altered. Definitions are rewritten and changed in meaning and context. Data is being manipulated to change the narrative and the microwave mentality (20 second attention span) derives the warped synopsis and runs with it. If a perceived "High Priest" has pronounced it, it is gospel. So sayeth the God of Science. The root of the meaning of science has been warped by the religion of science. What has happened to the religions of the world has happened to science. They have used an age old playbook to manipulate and warp a religion to affirm control over a populace and used it on the field of science. The original foundations have been manipulated to make it a "sin" to question the annointed "priests", even self proclaimed priests. This is why mantra's like "follow the science" have lost their depth and meaning and have turned into hypnotic ritualistic utterings. The very foundation of science is to question, research and verify all data. This has been obscured so that only the "priests" can read the holy data and interpret their meanings to the masses. To question the "priests" is heresy and the inquisition is in full swing.

Thank you OP!

Thia felt like an orgasm! Since they started the injections, I have had same feeling as this website prove. They have simply been playing with words!

Aftet download all 3 PDFs, and read step by step what the author say, it tickles many parts on my body.

I'm going to use a yellow highlighter and show this to friends, family, and coworkers. And if they still don't see it, they deserve being Guinea pigs.

Thank you 👍

Very good article. I sent it to my family for us to discuss. Two kiddos ... one loves to read, one hates reading.

It is interesting how that trait reflects in them in many ways. Sadly, one shallow, one a deep thinker.

Dad is not a reader, no matter how many years I’ve tried. Seems it is a weirdly genetic trait, which translates into more of nature versus being able to nurture it.

Interesting observations. Thanks for posting.

This article is excellent; thanks for sharing.

Sometimes I feel like I’m the only one left who still reads lol.

I deal with this in a weekly basis. The younger generation either don’t believe the written word or never was taught to comprehend the written word. If you can’t Google or have a YouTube video telling them then it must not be true. It’s pathetic.

Thanks so much. First because I've been looking for these three documents. Second because the author's point about verbal vs. written knowledge/ authority has been a big concern of mine for years now. FTA:

As a result, reading, with its need for sustained attention and its requirement that one actively imagine for one’s self what it is the writer is trying to say, was extremely challenging for them. 

And because they cannot easily enter into dialogue with the written page, they had little understanding of the sense of power and self-possession that inevitably accrues to those that do. 

This right here is why people are "dumbed down" now, dependent on their smartphones. Literacy demands an electronic device. Aside from all speculation about effects of broadcast energy, this need to have a device to disseminate knowledge is crippling imo. You still need to put the info in a printed form to share, yet you are sharing with non-readers, it all has to be reduced to graphics. Why memes are real weapons. But memes are not deep, and the original digital versions can be edited and distorted by those who control media. Figuring out the truth turns into tiresome rewinding of videos and podcasts and endless arguments over pixel representations. Here we are daily questioning reality which was presented to us as a collection of light flashes.

While this does nothing to explain why Millennials eat tide pods, it brilliantly maps different ways the generations have learned to process data. Love it. Bravo. 👏