I passed a car on the road last week with a bumper sticker that made me chuckle. It read: “Critical thinking — the other national deficit.” I’ve been thinking about that bumper sticker a lot lately — ever since my essay “What is Luciferase” (exclusively on Substack) set off a firestorm. The corporate media issued the same blanket denial with the same regurgitated sentences (a cut and paste journalism job if ever there was one!) seemingly around the world: there’s no such ingredient secretly hiding inside the experimental vaccines!
Did any of these so-called journalists do the homework? Did any of them actually perform a fact-check? Of course they didn’t. Most of them didn’t even read the essay. (Let’s be honest: most of them don’t read anything at all.) I had left the instructions for fact-checking my claim right there for everyone to see:
-
Go to the MODERNA website.
-
Click: the PATENTS page.
-
Click: PATENT US 10,703,789
-
Do a keyword search for: Luciferase.
This was too difficult a task for our dishonest horde of corporate journalists. At least one brave soul bothered to do it — and that honest man happened to be a Google software engineer named Zach Vorhies.
Let me repeat: Luciferase is INCLUDED in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent! So I’m right — and the corporate media is wrong. Does this surprise anybody?
The corporate press has already admitted that Luciferase was used in the testing phase of the vaccines as well. So it’s listed in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent AND it’s used in the testing of the vaccines but I’m a conspiracy theorist?
One more thing: the new COVID-19 antibody test is called SATiN and it uses Luciferase. No, I’m not kidding. Just click here to see for yourself.
Let me repeat that information: the antibody test is called SATiN.
I don’t know about you, but I’m not getting anywhere near this dark stuff. Just listen to how the SATiN test works:
“We basically incubate those three little molecular biological pieces with a prick of blood,” Stagljar says. “And if there are antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood, these antibodies will ‘glue’ the three parts of luciferase into a functional molecule that will start shining.”
In other words, you need to have COVID-19 antibodies present to make the enzyme glow. When the glow occurs, the researchers can then measure the amount of light emitted with an instrument called a luminometer. The more antibodies a person has, the brighter the luciferase will shine. There’s something very wrong here. You know it and I know it. You don’t have to be a Christian to understand: names matter. It’s not an accident that they’ve given this name to this test. It’s a warning.
He who has ears, let him hear.
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/luciferase-was-bad-but-it-gets-worse
Names do matter.
The name "Lucifer" is translated from the Hebrew word הֵילֵל, which transliterated is pronounced "hêylêl." This is how it was originally written in the Bible, and it means "morning star" or "bright one."
https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/eng/hebrew/1966.html
Since not everyone can read Hebrew, translators used a Latin word to translate. "Bright one" became "light bringer." In Latin, this is the word "lucifer."
Lucifer's name was one that we gave him based on a direct translation from the Hebrew term for the entity. It wasn't given by God. It wasn't chosen by Satan. It's a name we used to best fit what the Hebrews had called him.
Since "lucifer" literally just means light-bringer, that word has uses outside of simply referring to a religious evil. It can also just literally mean "light bringer." Luciferase is an enzyme that works on luciferin to... bring light.
Lucifer: = lux (light) + ferre (carry)
It's found in fireflies, which are probably not evil. It's also found in snails, which are also probably not evil.
Also, I did read your article, which I have posted here.
https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf
Page 46 (Table 4) has the table you're worried about, but it is not what you claim. Luciferase is not included in the mRNA sequence of the vaccine. Table 4 does not list anything that is actually in the vaccine.
That table refers to tools you can optionally use in order to visualize a cDNA template during PCR.
Which is used to help develop and test a vaccine. It's not actually the sequence they're using for the vaccine itself.
Per the paper:
In other words, you can create the cDNA template (which is used to create the resulting mRNA) using a luciferin primer if you'd like. If you use it, you can evaluate how well everything is transcribing by measuring the amount of light produced when it's bound to luciferin.
But you don't have to. It's just there as information to help you test if you'd like. That's what the table shows.
It does not anywhere in that paper suggest that luciferin is actually in the vaccine itself. This is a patent to show the process they used to test and validate their results. If you're interested in how it is used during PCR and what your patent paper is describing, there's another article you can read here (full PDF is available on the link on the page):
https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/15/1-2/193/915631
Thank you. This is what I thought from previous research into this, but I didn’t document my findings so I wasn’t sure. This post is at least partially wrong and your comment should be up top.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefly_luciferin
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10703789B2/en
Well done
Tip top. Tippy top.
I’m sorry. You present yourself as a researcher, so I was under the impression I wouldn’t need to clarify what “cite” meant.
So either I did copy my specific argument and you can’t find it, or I didn’t and you are making baseless accusations as if they were evidenced.
Neither shows much in the way of your own research competency. Please remember this next time you decide to accuse me of having no idea what I’m doing as a researcher.
I feel like it's rather insulting to the nature of this board and your cohorts for me to have to explain to you that linking to a search engine is not citing proof that I copied my argument from the mainstream media. I'm looking for direct evidence that this is true.
Can you find ANYONE who talks about this paper specifically in the media? Anyone who analyzed the pages that I did? Anyone who referred to the OP's question as specifically as I was able to?
If you can't find the evidence to back up your belief that I did not write this analysis based on my own research, then you either failed to base a conclusion off of any evidence, or you failed to obtain evidence that you are certain must exist.
Either way, it's a bad look for researcher, especially one who is as confident in your conclusions as you are. I'm going to leave you here to consider that and exactly how you should approach your research topics in the future.
Cheers.
The only people who worry about IQ numbers are the people who struggle to demonstrate their intelligence through any other means. You're better than that.
Sounds like they may be trying to cross-engineer humans with nephilim blood.
No they are trying to lower human immunity and alter our DNA to make us more receptive to inorganic compounds. They want to turn you into a biomechanical machine devoid of free will.
Phyrexians, it would seem are real. A like comparison is the star trek borg, but Phyrexians are a more accurate description because it's inhuman entities driving the bus in the background.
Look at the black goo from Prometheus, the stuff of nightmares indeed.
5G enters the chat
Gonna need a lot of plains to counter this evil shit.
And they get Nephilim blood from where exactly? And your answer cannot be....from Nephilim.
Jacob Rothschild?
Seriously, old dude ain't human.
Nephilim from Antartica?
...cross...breeding angels and humans?😁
.
...Sorry couldn't resist... 😁
That’s where it originally came from. Nice!
mostly shitposting, lmao.
The Draconians.
and remember ... epstein wanted is dna in EVERYONE ... you know, gates friend?
Seriously all of the scientists, heads of the CDC, NIH, FDA, anyone mandating this shit or taking part in it needs to be executed for all to see. Hanged or firing squad and then thrown in a fire so we can be assured they are dead.
Right out in the open. They no longer hide it anymore. They seem to be compelled to announce their intentions in advance. Isn't that a requirement of the D*vil, now? When you sign on the dotted line, you are required to constantly advertise your affiliation.
This is truly scary and concerning!
In case anyone wants to verify:
https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf
https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10577403.pdf
https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10442756.pdf
I will never get another test in my life. What are they looking for? For Jesus? What is the luciferian mean when lighting?
And what exactly are they doing with this activated Lucifer shit they need antibodies for?
wtf
fiiiickkkkk they really ARE looking for a bloodline, and they did not found it so far
Hmmm, the bloodline of Christ??? after all, Christ wasn't an only child... J/S
umh ... I read the Holy Grail books, really compeling story about Ren Le'Chateu but it can also be a red herring. With all this nonsense and them owning all the book stores libraries over the world.... I dont know, we are like on total control grasp on history from them with big monies
Do optogenics next
I just looked it up and whoa
Interesting. Wonder if they can use the light emitted from our cell to do that
Did some digging on was Gaussia Luciferase is, found a page selling an "assay kit," whatever that is, gave some interesting info.
Source
https://www.promega.com/-/media/files/resources/protocols/technical-bulletins/0/luciferase-assay-system-protocol.pdf
Distances.
An assay kit is a test kit, or an evaluation kit. The chemical gives off light in the proper conditions, specifically at 470 nm apparently, which would make it bluish green.
Alright thanks. =) Honestly, I just thought it was interesting is all.
I'm with you on this. No freakin way.
Old news.
Have you read about the babies being born from jabbed parents - with no white in their eyes, holding their heads up at 2 weeks and walking at 2 months - I think their evil plan includes modifying DNA for very specific reasons and they are not good at all.
I'd like to read about that. Do you have the source?
Pandemic baby holds head up: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7g10BE2oTheb/
Pandemic Babies with music: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ljY33n55E3vs/
Pandemic Babies: La Quinto Columna: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NH4sX1DYPBQ7/
BLACK EYED PANDEMIC BABIES! - NEW footage and babies you probably haven't seen https://www.bitchute.com/video/XGQp5unqbQ7T/
Pandemic Babies: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0jTGJnKVGV39/
Their black eyes have hardly any white sclera, like an alien's eyes. Could they have added something?
Do you have any actual research on this I could read? These are videos of random babies taken of TikTok, and a lot of them look pretty filtered, as is common on TikTok. I'm not sure how I can verify literally any of the claims in these videos just by looking at them.
No, this is just information I collected when I saw it. Most of it I took from Bitchute. Actual research needs to be done if indeed this a true phenomenon. Someone needs to check their DNA to see if they're 100% human. They all need to be identified and watched over time.
You could do that in an alternate world where you can track down random TikTok babies and obtain DNA samples and then find someone who actually knows what they're doing to analyze it for non-human DNA.
...or you could research the video itself. Where did it come from? Who made it? What resources did it pull to compile the information? Can I contact this person and verify their credentials? Can I find some secondary source that verifies this stuff?
The goal of research isn't to assume everything is true until you can't prove that it is. That would allow almost everything to be taken as truth without verifications.
Verify, THEN trust. Not the other way around.
I'm not trusting. I am taking note of what is being reported. I stated it still needs to be researched to find out IF it is indeed a phenomenon.
Consider the Covid jab contains mRNA. It is not out of the question this could have an affect on babies. In many of the reports they are saying both parents were injected before conception of the baby. We already know that the spike proteins are concentrated in the female and male gonads - ovaries and testes.
If events are happening more often than normal, it needs to be at least noted and investigated.
Observation is a big part of science.
Observing verifiable phenomena is a big part of science.
Believing what you see from the media is not, as u/Zeitreise is fond of reminding everyone.
If I watch something happen in a microscope, that's science. If I do a mathematical breakdown of a metanalysis, that's science (as long as I show my work and have it checked). I can observe that it thunders after every lightning strike, because I can verify that information myself.
This video says it's showing babies gaining superpowers and weird medical symptoms as a result of being born to two unvaccinated parents.
Is it? What part of that statement can I actually verify?
Can you verify no filters are making the babies look weird?
Can you verify that these babies might not have legitimate medical conditions unrelated to the vaccine from this video?
Can you verify that these babies definitely came from vaccinated parents?
Can you verify who put these videos together and what their motivation to do so might be? Could they potentially be a nutjob, or someone who wants to make you look like a nutjob?
Can you verify anything about these babies at all?
Watching a video on the internet is not research. Believing a video on the internet is not research. It's just believing what's on the internet.
Asking scary questions is the easy part, but it's 5% of research. If you can't even verify that this video is asking a question based on a valid observation of reality (because you can't verify anything about it), then you can't really claim it within the realm of science or evidence. It's just a scary video on the internet.
My niece (pre Covid) held her own head up the day she was born. The only one from myself, or my siblings children. It is rare & does happen.
Not sure about the black eyes.
Grandnephew due any day. I’ll be on the lookout for vaccine effects, as mother was jabbed prior to this unplanned pregnancy.
I've read about them and seen "pictures". It seemed like a hype a few months ago, but I would expect it to be much more talked about if it were anything to it.
Kind of like the magnets thing a while back.
Tell you hwhat, I'll do a little catch-up and update myself. I'll share if I find anything.
Update 2:
Ok, I don't know much about babies but some of the video examples from 7m15s outwards seems fucking freaky.
Baby seemingly at the hospital with its mom, caption "Day 1", baby supports it's own head and looks around - Even though I've been told by mothers that I have to support the head while holding a month old babby since they supposedly can't do it themselves.
A lot of stuff like that. I'll leave it up to people who've had kids to judge but to me babies trying to crawl and stand up at a few weeks of age (reportedly) is just something else.
Update:
The closest thing I found to a summation, I don't know mang...
https://thirdexodus.media/thewatchers/index.php/articles/plagues/1251-black-eyed-babies-pandemic-babies
"Ricardo Delgado: As promised, I'll show you the video of these births... children whose parents were vaccinated at the end of December 2020 and the beginning of January 2021. Before conception, logically, before pregnancy and childbirth.
So, what we're seeing is that these children have sort of a syndromic effect. They have several characteristic features, such as the blackish color of the eyes when they're usually light when they are born. Then they acquire the color they're going to have when the retina and the iris are formed.
But let's proceed to see the images, and you judge according to what you see.
It's as if there was premature aging. And, physical qualities that should be seen at a year or a year and a bit, these babies already express them at very early ages, such as attempts to crawl at 2 weeks. Things that aren't normal. Apart from those black eyes, which is not exactly normal.
We have shown, in the beginning, a video a bit worrying on the subject of the 'black eyes,' as they call the children born in 2021. Babies born after the previous vaccination of the parents. And what you see... Well. As we say, we're taking these cases 'with a pinch of salt,' until we have more material to give more credibility to the subject.
But what we observe is as if there were an aging or premature development in them. Children of 3 months can walk, for example, when the normal is from... I think the closest month that I have seen is nine or ten. Something like that.
But the eyes, indeed, attract a lot of attention. And it's necessary to observe everything related to these children to know what kind of children are being born after vaccination."
Pour the sauce good fren