Pfizer themselves state their "vaccine" shot is NOT FDA approved, contradicting MSM, legacy media, "authoritative sources" reporting
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
Saw this in a comment from fellow anon u/Greatheart/
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
Sauce https://www.pfizer.com/products/product-detail/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
Great sauce to use for redpilling normies.
Needs a date on the page. Normies will say "It's old info, conspiracy theorist!"
At Bottom of page it shows 2022'.
That's the copyright notice, and it will always be current, regardless of when the contents of the page are posted.
It means nothing in this case. Except that... .the content of the page is obviously CURRENT otherwise they would have updated it.
So the fact that it is there is clear and direct evidence that this statement is CURRENT, i.e. active, regardless of when it was posted.
No logical basis in the page itself to say that "its old".
THIS!
If you scroll all the way to the bottom of the page it does say 2022.
It doesn’t matter what you post, they won’t believe it. I just used this in an argument and I was told I don’t post anything truthful. Pfizer’s website is apparently only credible when it suits them.
In this case, i just agree with them and remind them to make sure they get the booster!
Can’t save ‘em all
The arguement is the Comiranty is approved.
But Comirnaty is not actually available on the market in the US
Ultimate gaslighting
Sauce on this? I’ve literally been aguring for months and finally got the normie to realize biontech is not approved.
Another anon here found this page on the FDA web site which admits Comirnaty is not available yet https://greatawakening.win/p/141YE0chtg/x/c/4OTO8bkqkSH
You just linked to this post?...
No it links to u/COLNE68601's post
The CDC admits that the "Approved product" Comirnaty is not available in the US and yet the media proclaims the vaccine to be "FDA-Approved". There is a billboard here in my city which really pisses me off.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html#codes
And you also have Walgreens conflating the two and using them interchangeably https://www.walgreens.com/topic/promotion/covid-vaccine.jsp
Which is completely contradictory to what the FDA said
Circular firing squad
Read the fda EUA. Comirnaty is fda approved but is legally distinct from Pfizer jab and Comirnaty is not available until at least 2023, then it goes on to extend the EUA for Pfizer, Merck and j and j (no liability). If one was actually fda approved, can’t have an EUA. Not that fda approval will change my mind on experimental gene therapy, though has led me to question vaccines under the original definition.
Yes, many of us already saw the FDA's announcement/release, but the damning information is buried in the details and that made it difficult for use with redpilling normies. Whereas this one is very much in your face.
Lawyers at Pfizer are shoring up their position. I wonder what the hell they caught wind of coming down the pike. Companies better pay close attention to this because if they don't, and continue to move forward with mandates for an experimental EUA product, they are going to be hit with all kinds of lawsuits. Pfizer is protecting their own legal ass and is throwing everyone else under the bus by clarifying what they had deliberately left vague when Comirnaty was approved. Pfizer and the others have to be dealt with by going after their liability shields. Once that is taken down due to criminal intent, they will withdraw all the clot shots on their own despite what the swamp wants.
Let me guess what the normies would say "You can't take a billion dollar company's word for it" !!
Then your response should be: then you should be extra concerned about this, because the shot being NOT FDA approved means Pfizer and FDA have ZERO liability if something goes wrong.
thanks for the spicy sauce!!! this will surely give heartburn to those sheep who took the toxic sludge cuz my TV told me to!
IMO even the EUA is illegal as there are many other highly effective treatments. Trials can't start soon enough.
Right, they only managed to get the EUA by suppressing the other available treatments
I went to pfizer . Com and searched "biontech"
That search took me to this exact page....did it today, February 01, 2022.
My large employer said there was an FDA vaccine approved on their intranet page. I had to send them an email informing them that they were misleading their employees. Never heard back, but I should look and see if it were removed yet.
You mean "disinformation"??
Propaganda media
The media better ban them from every platform for spreading misinformation from the toilet stream media’s covid narrative.
Get the fakenews out and say the opposite in official channels to get your ass covered legally. They're doing this purposefully.
So are all those EU soccer players getting comniraty instead of the us version?
FDA said their contents, safety, and efficacy are equivalent...but legally distinct.
So if that's true then they're equally deadly but the legal distinction let's them mislead the public and then let their MSM friends spin it into a lie.
Follow the link to the other info:
https://www.cvdvaccine.com/
So if i hasn't been approved by the FDA, and only is used under a EUA
"has not been approved or licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)"
This means it IS "an investigational drug, and its safety and efficacy have not been established"
But let's mandate the shit out of this anyway....
<facepalm>
I get why normies are confused. They cannot think straight, and the Powers like it this way. Did anyone say P= MF/2?
Psychosis = mass formation squared.