Singular Disney is going to be difficult for me when I'm calling out multiple Disney's at the same time....There shouldn't be a problem with Disney's...Eg "Disney's new production blah blah"...cant ban the plural of Disney in this respect I think...
You COULD spell it "Throatwarbler Mangroves" if you really wanted to :)
Kidding aside, in English the terminal -ey doesn't change to -ie before appending -s to form the plural.
monkey → monkeys (ree)
lackey → lackeys
attorney → attorneys
disney → disneys
Etc.
The single (needless) exception is one acceptable plural form for the word money, "monies"; I always use the more intuitive variant "moneys" to be consistent.
That said, there's no reason the common (lowercase) noun disney, meaning pedophile, can't be arbitrarily assigned an irregular plural that's the same as the singular—as with deer, elk, moose, sheep, caribou, and some other animals.
("Did you see all those disney getting arrested in the big trafficking sting yesterday? Two of the disney got shot dead, and they must have hauled away more than thee dozen other disney!") That would remove the problem of algorithms searching for and removing "disneyS".
They are, after all, animals. Though that's an insult to animals, who never torture, rape, kill, and drink the blood of their young for entertainment and exhilaration.
So... I went with my sister to a medical appt for her son today because he’s autistic and a handful. A fantastic handful but he dislikes doctors because he’s had a lot of tests in the past and could have gotten upset. He was a champ actually. Anyway, I was sitting in the waiting room and they had a big tv playing the Beauty and the Beast movie full volume and they were singing “Kill the Beast! kill the beast!” And then actively tried to kill the beast.
JFC..... nothing like some good, wholesome Disney, huh? I never paid attention before to words or songs. I don’t really even remember what I watched as a kid Disney-wise. It was shocking today to step inside that sick, violent world.
You ring a bell. I thought of "Hansel and Gretel." What can be more frightening than to be lured by a woman offering sweets, to a fate of imprisonment and being eaten? This was part of Grimm's Fairy Tales...and it is no joke to say that these are grim fairy tales. (I don't recall Disney doing anything involving Hansel and Gretel, and it may simply be a fact that some fairy tales are horror stories.)
Yes. Hansel and Gretel were horrors, the little demons. Greedy little useless shits. I hated that fairy tale, as it was a prime example of the demons winning.
Bumped and based!!
spread the word on the conservative and non-conservative websites with comment sections. I started doing it this week.
No, no.
They are all Disney
The point is to bypass search algorithms
Disney is already plural, like deer, Lego, moose, sheep, etc...
They can ban "disneys" and "disneyphile." Just stick with "Disney."
Singular Disney is going to be difficult for me when I'm calling out multiple Disney's at the same time....There shouldn't be a problem with Disney's...Eg "Disney's new production blah blah"...cant ban the plural of Disney in this respect I think...
Or "You Disney (in the plural) are crap." :)
The plural of Disney is Disneys (no apostrophe, obviously) but you could equally spell it "Disnies".
You COULD spell it "Throatwarbler Mangroves" if you really wanted to :)
Kidding aside, in English the terminal -ey doesn't change to -ie before appending -s to form the plural.
monkey → monkeys (ree)
lackey → lackeys
attorney → attorneys
disney → disneys
Etc.
The single (needless) exception is one acceptable plural form for the word money, "monies"; I always use the more intuitive variant "moneys" to be consistent.
That said, there's no reason the common (lowercase) noun disney, meaning pedophile, can't be arbitrarily assigned an irregular plural that's the same as the singular—as with deer, elk, moose, sheep, caribou, and some other animals.
("Did you see all those disney getting arrested in the big trafficking sting yesterday? Two of the disney got shot dead, and they must have hauled away more than thee dozen other disney!") That would remove the problem of algorithms searching for and removing "disneyS".
They are, after all, animals. Though that's an insult to animals, who never torture, rape, kill, and drink the blood of their young for entertainment and exhilaration.
/wordnerd
Underrated.
It's like the Disney word Jedi ... Both singular and plural.
So... I went with my sister to a medical appt for her son today because he’s autistic and a handful. A fantastic handful but he dislikes doctors because he’s had a lot of tests in the past and could have gotten upset. He was a champ actually. Anyway, I was sitting in the waiting room and they had a big tv playing the Beauty and the Beast movie full volume and they were singing “Kill the Beast! kill the beast!” And then actively tried to kill the beast.
JFC..... nothing like some good, wholesome Disney, huh? I never paid attention before to words or songs. I don’t really even remember what I watched as a kid Disney-wise. It was shocking today to step inside that sick, violent world.
It's almost like those who are trying to kill the Beast are the bad guys (regardless of how handsome they may be)
I feel like it was all a metaphor for something woke before woke was a thing. Blm. Beast lives matter....
You ring a bell. I thought of "Hansel and Gretel." What can be more frightening than to be lured by a woman offering sweets, to a fate of imprisonment and being eaten? This was part of Grimm's Fairy Tales...and it is no joke to say that these are grim fairy tales. (I don't recall Disney doing anything involving Hansel and Gretel, and it may simply be a fact that some fairy tales are horror stories.)
I did some reading in HS about Grimm’s fairy tales and how twisted they were. I’m with you!
I grew up with Barney. Lol idk what to say about that.
Yes. Hansel and Gretel were horrors, the little demons. Greedy little useless shits. I hated that fairy tale, as it was a prime example of the demons winning.
I like your thinking
Great idea!
Q did suggest it was more than 2-3 who are good, but yeah
It's a good idea, but "groomer" seems to be working better at the moment. Conniptions galore.
And there's always gro0mer, gr00mer, gr0om3r, gr00m3r, etc.
And "groorner" where you replace the m with r n. As in James 8. Corney and Barack Hussein Obarna.
Qeq
/wordnerd
Multiple tools for different situations
Small d.
They don't qualify for uppercase.
That's a great one!!!
Question:
If you access Pedo Onion sites does that mean you're a TOR-Pedo?
I'm never using codewords for paedos, they're the ones who need to be in hiding.
I'm already seeing it all over the place. Good job, anons!
Disneys to happen.