71
posted ago by RedPillQ17 ago by RedPillQ17 +73 / -2

AIDS found to originate from heavy "poppers" (highly toxic nitrite inhalant drug) usage among male homosexual community and the disease is NOT contagious. This has been known since 1981 - but was totally suppressed by the powers-that-be.

SOURCE: America's Frontline Doctors

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/the-real-cause-of-aids-known-to-health-officials-since-day-one/

Comments (60)
sorted by:
13
seasonedcastiron 13 points ago +14 / -1

It's beri-beri, basically, the body is starved of nutrients. Without proper nutrients, the immune system can't protect the body and the body can't sustain itself or repair injuries. Those in the homosexual lifestyle often used the drugs that stopped absorption of important nutrients plus had internal injuries in their colons and intestines. The immune system is in the gut. Just a lose-lose-lose set of choices. AIDS likely can be caused by other factors, toxins along with poor nutrient absorption of one kind or another (poverty being one). I think many cases were caused by the toxic drugs prescribed after a FALSE-positive test.

-5
SeeAreJay -5 points ago +1 / -6

Your anus can pass a baseball with ease. Losen up karen

0
imissvoat 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not my anus.

8
SvbHvman 8 points ago +16 / -8

Try telling that to the thousands of families of "clean" heterosexual partners of bisexual persons who contracted AIDS and died. You're an idiot.

7
Dogsoldier2 7 points ago +7 / -0

How do they know they "contracted" AIDS? For that matter gays aren't the only users of poppers. Millions of teens and young people have used them partying. I live in rural America and spend a lot of time in the woods. I can't count the number of times I've found piles of those little popper canisters at the end of a dirt road.

7
FreeKyleRightNow 7 points ago +7 / -0

Those are nitrious oxide and a different drug, still an inhallent. Poppers are like nail polish they huff so their buttholes go lose and they can be fucked.

10
pearlrevolver 10 points ago +10 / -0

Welp, you learn something new everyday.

3
boystupid 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. I sell those N20 chargers as a part of my job. It's not the same thing and I'd say most buyers are frat boy party types or stoners, less so gay partiers but they do buy them also.

It's definitely not healthy, but I seriously doubt it's causing AIDS. That goes for both.

Poppers are probably much worse for you. They're not known to be especially dangerous either though, EXCEPT when used with Viagra or Cialis - some people claim this can lead to deadly acute hypotension. Like your blood pressure will drop to nothing and you'll drop dead on the spot - but even that I've never personally heard of actually happening and I have a lot of customers who I know are doing exactly that, and I know some of them are using meth on top of that so it might just be a myth.

Don't recommend trying it though. It might not cause AIDS but that shit can't be good ....

The people who use them regularly... don't seem like healthy people at all.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's definitely not healthy, but I seriously doubt it's causing AIDS. That goes for both.

Dr. Peter Duesberg is the scientist who discovered retroviruses. He was ostracized from the scientific community for refusing to budge on HIV = AIDS hypothesis.

His theory is recreational drug abuse and frequent anal sex in bathhouses is what was causing the immunosuppression in AIDS patients in the United States.

This is from a 1986 study-

Epidemiological evidence exists for chemical immunosuppression resulting from antibiotics and other prescribed and recreational drugs prior to the current AIDS crisis.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3642210/

Archived link - https://archive.ph/Ok4N6

And in the case of African AIDS cases, which the MSM widely reported affected both men and women equally?

Duesberg's theory was the immunosuppression in African AIDS patients was caused by malnutrition, parasitic infections and poor sanitation.

-2
tittysprinkles24 -2 points ago +2 / -4

you speak from experience it sounds like.

2
FreeKyleRightNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve never been ducked or used poppers, nitrious oxide the dentist provides. With that being said, I’m not against a little male bonding and don’t think there is anything wrong with it.

5
ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +5 / -0

The ones who didn't take AZT survived.

Magic Johnson and Easy-E were diagnosed with HIV at the same time.

Both of them began taking AZT but Magic Johnson quit taking it a couple weeks after he was first prescribed the medication. Easy-E continued taking AZT and died within a couple months.

The people who died from HIV/AIDS in the 1980s were either homosexuals (most of these used a variety of party drugs such as cocaine and poppers), intravenous drug users (many were former Vietnam vets strung out on heroin), or taking their AZT religiously.

3
RedPillQ17 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you think Americas Frontline Doctors is NOT a reputable source?? Look at the SOURCE.

2
RedPillQ17 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

The article says:

Before HIV was known, three controlled studies compared 20 homosexual AIDS patients to 40 AIDS-free controls … each study concluded that the "lifetime use of nitrites"... was a 94% to 100% consistent risk factor for AIDS…

2
inquimous 2 points ago +2 / -0

The article says that nitrites are toxic to the lungs and immune cells, and that damage was what lead to AIDS and especially Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, which did kill about 16,000 gay men because FAUCI would not allow the use of a known cure. Imagine that. Anyway, it is a coincidence that this group showed what happens to a damaged immune system which is more important than the particular agent doing the damaging. Lots of people used poppers, gays just used them more, and after poppers were quickly banned from OTC sale, people still got AIDS.

0
SeeAreJay 0 points ago +2 / -2

And who authored the study?? The 80s were riddled with biased homophobe researchers

1
tittysprinkles24 1 point ago +1 / -0

came here to say this. OP is stupid

7
Shalomtoyou 7 points ago +7 / -0

I read this in Kennedy's book on Fauci. Even he said it was a theory -- but an important one and there may be some "there, there."

I knew of people who died of AIDS from blood transfusions, so how does this explain that?

And on the other hand, there were the "buyer's club" of gay men buying medicines from Mexico that actually did help with AIDS symptoms... because Fauci blocked all treatments except AZT (sound familiar?). There was even a movie on this subject.

3
JeremiahKassin 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. I know a pastor whose father contacted HIV and died from it back in the 80s. I have trouble believing the man was using illicit drugs and having homosexual sex.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did the pastor's father take AZT? That drug is a chemotherapy drug and is literally a DNA chain terminator.

AZT is mutagenic. A mutagen permanently changes genetic material AKA DNA and increases the frequency of mutations. Anybody who's studied cancer at a deeper level knows carcinogens, cancer causing substances, are also mutagens.

Azidothymidine and other chain terminators are mutagenic for template-switch-generated genetic mutations

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341039/

https://archive.ph/oEdsy

The above study was downplaying the damage AZT is doing and trying to pass off its mutagenic behavior as a good thing, but the bottom line is that AZT destroys DNA.

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea, but I wouldn't be surprised.

4
Logic20xx 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think that’s too narrow a cause, even if it’s one factor, but it’s better than a ‘virus’ that materialised out of nowhere the blink of an eye ago in human history.

3
Crunchy_Bites 3 points ago +4 / -1

so how do normal people catch it then?

6
Zeitreise 6 points ago +6 / -0

Read the mechanism for injury. It's far more complicated than "blood borne illness."

The powers that be have obfuscated the damage caused by specific chemicals and heavy metals that appear to MANIFEST as immunodamage.

It's possibly disease has been misclassified with half-truths for a long time.

5
RedPillQ17 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The article says: Before HIV was known, three controlled studies compared 20 homosexual AIDS patients to 40 AIDS-free controls … each study concluded that the "lifetime use of nitrites"... was a 94% to 100% consistent risk factor for AIDS…

4
FreeKyleRightNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think this is a correlation instead of causation. Back then only the people that had the most gay sex partners were likely to get aids. I would like to see a study that included heterosexuals.

2
Logic20xx 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Catch”? That’s a loaded question.

1
MileHiLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

kek'd & ashamed

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

HIV infection is simply a marker for risky behavior, according to Dr. Peter Duesberg, the scientist who first discovered retroviruses.

3
SaveAmerica2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dont know about the article but I do remember these vhs head cleaners being sold in the local Quik e Marts and thinking

Who da fuk is buying this shit, no one owns a vhs anymore....lol

Of course years later I was thinking the same about so called "bath salts"

3
MileHiLife 3 points ago +3 / -0

I run a thrift for major (ahem) non profit and you wouldn't believe the amount of VHS tapes purchased, including VCRs...and especially the ol' box style TV's w built-in tape player. Even DVDs/players demand confounds me, but then again, boomer

3
FreeKyleRightNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

I bought one for my dad so he can play duck hunt. And I like the vhs more then dvd cause no woke shit. Nostalgia is a drug brother.

2
test_pattern 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a badly written article promoting an unviable theory. Before you all take the bait with the new shiny object of the day, be a digital soldier:

•Is the article sourced? No.

•Who is the author? Unknown.

•Who posted? Eliyahu Tulshinski.

•Bio and background? Missing.

•Same person previously posted on United With Israel and World Israel News?

•Who is behind America’s Frontline Doctors besides Simone Gold? Who is really behind AFLD?

Why does AFLD Mission Statement promote medical freedom on the back of a fake Benjamin Rush quote?

Ironically, Rush was a zealous advocate of the medicalization of personal and social problems and their coercive control by means of ‘therapeutic’ sanctions. In short, he was a pioneer champion of pharmacracy and the therapeutic state.

Not disparaging Simone Gold. She’s got guts and was one of the first to run into cannon fire. But while FLCCC has been piling up tank loads of clinical evidence to support their position, AFLD has been drifting to fringe.

2
BabylonNTing 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is about believable as the post last week where a few rapists from India gangbanged a lizard monitor...

2
RedPillQ17 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because America's Frontline Doctors are so full of shit. Is that what you think? LOL!

1
BabylonNTing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your comment but further down:

The article says: Before HIV was known, three controlled studies compared 20 homosexual AIDS patients to 40 AIDS-free controls … each study concluded that the "lifetime use of nitrites"... was a 94% to 100% consistent risk factor for AIDS…

I think poppers may have lowered the immune system, but it does not cause aids/hiv on its own. You know why I believe this? Because I tried poppers before when I was a teenager which was in the 80s.

Looking forward to you explaining why I didnt get aids/hiv.

AZT was the catalyst to giving someone aids/hiv, and loved ones of the deceased protested Doc Fraudci..

https://principia-scientific.com/dr-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

1
RedPillQ17 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

For starters, occasional poppers use is different than constant/frequent use. And HIV is not the same thing as AIDS.

I don't have all the answers - I merely shared an article posted by America's Frontline Doctors, which I deem a highly credible source. Go argue with them - I didn't write the article, I merely shared it because I found it interesting and thought-provoking.

Who's to say that the cabal didn't totally engineer that whole plan-demic and rig the diagnostic tests, just like they've done with COVID? That could have been their trial run to perfect their techniques and tactics used for future plan-demics.

1
BabylonNTing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that what you think?

You asked me for my opinion and merely expressed my experience with you..

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you take poppers on a daily basis and have anal sex with thousands of partners a year as part of your experimentation?

It wasn't people who occasionally took poppers that were becoming immunosuppressive. It was the people who took poppers, amphetamines, ethyl chloride, cocaine, speed, and/or heroin on a nearly daily basis.

We called them junkies prior to the 1980s and nobody blinked an eye when a junkie died from the common cold before HIV/AIDS was a supposed thing.

1
PepeSee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a friend who is (and also who's husband is also) HIV +. They certainly didn't do all that.

While I simply roll my eyes at this kind of nonsense, they would be quite offended.

Note: Friend always thought was always being safe but given condoms don't prevent pregnancy 100%, and that whole sperm vs virus size delta....

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

The truth offends a lot of people.

And HIV+ does not equal full blown AIDS.

HIV infection is simply a marker for risky behavior.

Magic Johnson has been HIV+ since the 1990s, and he quit taking AZT and is doing quite well, isn't he?

Maybe it's because he's not abusing recreational drugs and is continuing to eat healthy and work out?

How is it nonsense to declare abusing recreational drugs can lead to immunosuppression? It's common knowledge and I've even posted government studies elsewhere in this thread that admit that very thing...

1
PepeSee 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL

1
Hope70 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this does not make your blood boil, nothing will. Many a pregnant AIDS patient was taking HIV medications and then newborns were immediately started on a similar regimen after birth. Mothers were told they needed to have a C-section for delivery to prevent AIDS to their newborn. What were the toxic effect of all of those meds on newborns? What are the longterm effects?

1
Dogsoldier2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes sense, Occam's Razor. But just like the scamdemic they parlayed it to create a billion dollar industry. Makes you wonder what else we think is some terrible disease that cost us our health, lives and millions of dollar.

1
Hope70 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cancer?

1
RedPillQ17 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, we may find out that Ebola is caused by something bonkers like a certain brand of mouthwash being used in conjunction with a certain brand of toothpaste - or something totally bizarre like that. Almost nothing would surprise me anymore.

2
Dogsoldier2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Q Drop #1010

CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START].

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thankful my mom used vinegar to mop the floor.

1
Mr_toads_meh_ride 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea .. all those raped African children that get aids from all those poppers they do ....

-1
PepeSee -1 points ago +7 / -8

This is stupid.

Edit: Sad that this is on AFD website of all places. Lord.

6
test_pattern 6 points ago +7 / -1

Exactly. And the way this board is falling for every new conspiracy is 180 degrees away from the brief glory days of 4ch.

3
PepeSee 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yep, and just like other stuff no matter how nuts (f--- e----) I looked into this stuff and it's just farcical. I'm really tired of people chucking ALL science just because some disciplines of it are either bad or biased (e.g. climate, go against the narrative, no funding for you).

MOST established science is exactly that....

1
FreeKyleRightNow 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s because people are hungry for answers. They aren’t looking close enough before they take a bite.

1
RedPillQ17 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you think Americas Frontline Doctors is NOT a reputable source?? Look at the SOURCE.

1
RedPillQ17 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you think Americas Frontline Doctors is NOT a reputable source?? Look at the SOURCE.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr. Peter Duesberg's career was destroyed by Gallo, Fauci, and the American medical establishment for pushing the theory that immunosuppression in HIV patients was caused by either recreational drug abuse and/or AZT prescribed for treatment.

Additionally, he attributed the emergence of so-called African AIDS to be immunosuppression caused by malnutrition, parasitic infections and poor sanitation.

https://duesberg.com

Knowing what we know now about remdesivir killing kidney functions and given to Covid patients on ventilators, it's worth revisiting Duesberg. I actually discovered him in 1998 thanks to the Internet. I've been into conspiracy facts for a long time.

1
PepeSee 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was the AZT part that was the problem - THAT is what they had to suppress.