In this thread, please share something you learned about vaccines, that really blew your mind...
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/
I'll go first...
When i learned that vaccines caused "SIDS", it blew my mind,
but when i learned that SIDS was invented for the sole purpose of covering up the fact that vaccines kill babies, that really blew my mind!
First thing that comes to mind: Tetanus cases were nearly nonexistant and skyrocketed to a "new normal" after a vaccine was created. Tetanus rates had actually declined exponentially in the decades leading up to the creation of the vaccine simply due to better sanitation. There's no proof the vaccine prevents tetanus or ever did.
I watched a 4 hour long testimony by a former vaccine researcher who had been working with the government since the 50's I believe. The video seemed old if I recall, maybe from the 90's or 2000's. That testimony was like a bottle of red pills regarding the history of the vaccine industry. It runs sooooo much deeper than Autism etc.. I can't find it, maybe someone knows the video and can provide a link?
Same for fluoride, it began being used in toothpaste and water supplies shortly after WW2. It was credited with greatly improving the dental health of the country. Of course, you also had hundreds of thousands men who were taught basic oral hygiene in boot camp coming back home. Also, wartime factories that needed new goods to mass produce like toothbrushes. The United States Government found out that the Russians were putting fluoride in the water in their military prison camps, and it made the prisoners, not docile but rather more willing to comply with commands. So, fluoride was added to the American water supply. Yes, it may slightly improve teeth enamel, but that is not the reason for the giant leap in oral health after the war. Fluoride is a fun rabbit hole to go down. Did you know that the drug Prozac is 18% by weight Fluoride.
No study ever showed improvement due to fluoride, but many studies show ill health effects of fluoride.
And go ahead and call poison info lines, ask if it's bad that a kid ate a bottle of toothpaste, or even an adult, and see what they tell you.
Well, most will tell you that you'll have an upset stomach for a while as an adult.
It's kids that have the highest risk.
Drives me nuts that people look at you like a crazy person when you mention that fluoride isn't good for you and shouldn't be added to our water. Decades of brainwashing.
The problem is that fluoride is very difficult to filter out of water. About a year ago I bought a fluoride filtering water pitcher and I'm very happy with it so far. The downside is that the filters are very slow and quite expensive (around $40-45 per filter). Although a filter is good for about 6 months.
If anyone is interested, this is the pitcher I bought and they do post a 3rd party lab analysis document showing the efficacy: https://purewaterfreedom.com/fluoride-filters/water-pitcher.html
I have no stake, claim or association with the company. Just a product that I'm happy with and based on the lab analysis, seems to do a very good job of removing fluoride and other bad stuff from your water. I will say that there's a ton of chlorine in the municipal water in my city and chlorine is another very difficult element to filter out of water with a physical filter. I cannot smell even a slight hint of chlorine in the water the pitcher/filter produces.
We installed a reverse osmosis system when we moved into our current house, but I know the price of those systems can be cost prohibitive.
At our old home, we had 5 gallon bottles of spring water delivered and had a dispenser with a hot water tap like you see in offices. That's a much cheaper initial cost but it adds up over time.
Ceramic filters like the Berkey or your flouride filtering pitcher are also an option.
You can also create your own Berkey style filter on the cheap by using food grade plastic buckets and replacement Berkey filters-
https://thesafehealthyhome.com/make-a-diy-berkey-water-filter/
You bring up a really important point that I should have mentioned, PoP. I've heard that a good reverse-osmosis system can remove a good 90% of the fluoride from the water. The next home I purchase will definitely have a reverse osmosis system added to it.
The reverse osmosis system is especially appealing to me because I'm the only person in the house that refills the damn pitcher! My wife and son tend to stay on the "demand" side of things rather than the "supply" side when it comes to the filtered water.
But at least they use the thing lol.
Thank you! I’ve long wanted to buy a Berkeley but the cost held me back.
Bro..... Distillation.
Exactly like Rain.
Look to nature or God's creation to find the answer to your problems.
Sodium Flouride(what they treat our water with) is bad, Calcium Flouride actually fortifies teeth.
I've yet to meet a dentist that doesn't look at me like a retard when I say this.
Do you know fluoride causes cancers more rapidly than anything else?
Wasn't it the Germans, not the Russians
Truth be told I couldn’t remember when I was writing. Both executed most of their prisoners of war so I just picked one, you are probably right.
Here is some of the information about the tetanus vaccine:
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2013/05/why-you-never-need-tetanus-vaccine.html
Some quotes from that article:
"The following is taken from the Medical Press, Nov 3, 1948. “The not infrequent failure of tetanus anti-toxin prophylactically is indicated by the fact that deaths from tetanus occur in 7% of civilian cases and 50% of military cases, in spite of its use.” From the Medical History of the Second World War, Medicine and Pathology, we note, “It is disappointing to find that the case mortality is the same as in 1914-18. There is still no convincing evidence that anti-tetanic serum possesses curative value.”"
"The tetanus bacterium is ubiquitous. It is not here today gone tomorrow. It is found on the surface of the body, in the mouth, in the gastro-intestinal tract, in house dust and clothing."
"It is not the bacterium itself that causes the development of tetanus but the toxins it produces under anaerobic conditions. “Under normal conditions, no disease will occur if spores are introduced into a wound.”(J. Ark Med Soc Vol 80, No 3 p134) and “It is the compromised host, or traumatised patient, either by surgery or accident, who is most apt to develop tetanus.” (J Foot Surgery Vol 23, No 3 p235)."
"The vaccine is made from the tetanus toxoid inactivated with formaldehyde. To produce the toxoid the bacterium is cultured in liquid medium in large-capacity fermenters. The medium consists of digestive enzymes of milk protein, allegedly free of contaminants, which is harvested by filtration, purified and detoxified. The vaccine also contains aluminium hydroxide or phosphate, which acts as an adjuvant (any substance used in conjunction with another to enhance its activity), and thimerorsal, a mercury-containing compound, is found in the ingredients of some of the DTaP formulations which is claimed to prevent bacterial contaminant overgrowth."
Tetanus shots were never called vaccinations, as far as I know, so it makes sense that there would be information showing they don't really work.
Docs have been calling them vaxxes lately tho. Not sure why. and they're pushing them harder, at least from where I see.
They've created such a strong narrative around the safety of vaccines that now they call anything they want to sell in a syringe a vaccine.
I watched parts of it and know what you speak of. Medicine is hijacked as education to be used against humanity!
What do you mean? Tetanus has been around for a looong time, and is incredibly dangerous
Yes, but the rates of tetanus increased significantly after scientists started messing with it ~100 years ago. I'm sure I recall this being said and wish I could find the testimony video.
In the meantime, here's an alternative perspective:
"Tetanus incidence and mortality declined by more than 99 percent prior to the development of the tetanus vaccine in the 1940s. This decline is cited from medical sources in the book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Z. Miller:
“During the mid-1800s, there were 205 cases of tetanus per 100,000 wounds among U.S. military personnel. By the early 1900s, this rate had declined to 16 cases per 100,000 wounds--a 92 percent reduction. During the mid-1940s, the incidence of tetanus dropped even further to .44 cases per 100,000 wounds. Some researchers attribute this decline to an increased attention to wound hygiene.”
Post tetanus vaccine history It is clear that knowledge of sanitation and wound hygiene are the main factors decreasing both the incidence and death rate of tetanus. While the tetanus vaccine was allegedly developed to prevent tetanus, there is no proof this vaccine has ever prevented a single case of tetanus. Tetanus is a problem of wound hygiene; not vaccination status"
https://proliberty.com/observer/20100317.htm
Isn’t it far more likely that science became better at diagnosing tetanus 100 years ago? Its also fair to say World War 1 had a pretty big impact on that as well
It’s the same thing with autism, did it grow because of vaccines or because we got better at diagnosing (and also they expanded what was considered signs of autism) and because parents stopped being pussies about their kids not being perfect and free of issues.
I added more to my post, please check out the link. I may be incorrectly remembering the claim of a drastic increase post vaccine. I will try to dig and find the video in question. However it is clear that tetanus rates dropped to an almost insignificant number before the vaccine was created. 66% of tetanus cases were among vaccinated in one study and there doesn't seem to be any direct proof that the vaccine has ever prevented a case of tetanus.
Doesn’t that just indicate that people were better at finding it though? Of course sanitary conditions helped to curb rates of infection, but I don’t see how you figure that the vaccine helped to cause tetanus disease
Rates declined significantly between the 1850's and 1900 and again between 1900 and the 1940's so no I don't think improvement in detection was a factor. It was almost nonexistant by the time the vaccine came around to save the day.
It seems the key takeaway is that improved sanitation and wound cleaning essentially wiped out tetanus, not the vaccine. As for my indication that the vaccine caused an increase, I can't find the video to back it up and it's possible I was mistaken.
I’m supposed to get a tetanus booster this year…
Before you do, a 2016 study suggested a booster every 30 years instead of 10 and a more recent one suggested the booster is useless if you were fully vaccinated as a child.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200225075120.htm
https://news.ohsu.edu/2016/03/22/study-shows-tetanus-shots-needed-every-30-years-not-every-10
Bless you, thank you for this. I was already hesitating on getting it this year. This is solid info.
I believe I was vax injured by the tetanus vaccine. I can't say for sure because they also gave me a flu vaccine at the same time. But I had flu vaccines previously with no adverse reactions.
I didn’t know that adults scheduled tetanus shots. I’ve always heard of getting a shot after some sort of puncture wound or cuts, etc.