I get this, but the variation in these make us look stupid. The price of the guns and truck keep changing over and over. First is was a 1800 DD AR15 and a 40 thousand dollar truck.
Well his grandfather said he didn't go to school at all this year, and often took him to work with him. That's the only way I can see him having the money to buy this unless his grandparents were the type to do whatever they could to keep him happy.
Who took him to get the rifles, I want to know. That would have entailed multiple trips and they didn’t notice what he brought home? I’ve got a strong suspicion his grandpappy is in it deep.
I’ll go out on a limb, grandma worked in the fields so she had a company truck because it was her responsibility to pick up the day laborers? It’s the only logical explanation.
I'm assuming it was the grandfather's. Not super far fetched, though. My grandma is in her 80s and still drives an extended bed GMC pickup that my grandpa drove before he passed away
I'm not saying asking questions is stupid. Just how we keep making memes quoting cold hard numbers that have nothing to back them up.
First it's a 40 thousand dollar truck, then it's a 50 thousand dollar truck, now it's 70 thousand. Not even 24 hours later it comes up that it isn't even his truck.
I'm not a fan of sharing things that can be easily bunked, and hurt our reputation.
The truck is a stupid talking point it doesn't matter. What's relevant is why and how did a kid has a $1000 optic on a Daniel defense rifle. Even the most fervent firearm enthusiasts are hard pressed to drop the capital it costs to obtain "bomb proof" government contract equipment like that.
If you want a disclaimer for fucking twitter I have no idea if DD or eotech is under government contract or not. What I can tell you it is top of the line. Unless you are dropping out of helicopters there's absolutely no reason to go with that level of equipment.
The buffalo shooter had sordins. I'm not going to let you nit pick what model is exactly $657 or $567 because it doesn't matter. The truck is a red herring. Minute details about prices are pointless. There's no damn reason for him to have sordins unless he's communicating with someone.
These shooters have advanced equipment that only the most hardcore of LARPers would even bother entertaining their use. Given their age, the kit, and the cost it suggests they are being supplied by an organization. By whom and to what end is the question.
Its real simple, the kid wasn't the shooter. Nothing about this is true, its all a movie.
IF there even WAS a shooter? How many of us can verify that the victims are actually real people who died outside using some Liberal-controlled news source?
I mean do we have any accounts of annons who were actually in town and witnessed anything about this even as it was happening?
Anything is possible when the media is all controlled by the singular source and the media and government are in cahoots with each other.
I remember a few months ago there was a lawsuit over sandyhook coming up. One of the gun manufactures wanted report card and student records, but they were "destroyed". Convenient...
I get this, but the variation in these make us look stupid. The price of the guns and truck keep changing over and over. First is was a 1800 DD AR15 and a 40 thousand dollar truck.
Now we're over 5k in guns and a 70K truck?
Well his grandfather said he didn't go to school at all this year, and often took him to work with him. That's the only way I can see him having the money to buy this unless his grandparents were the type to do whatever they could to keep him happy.
I think it was his “grandmother’s” truck. He supposedly shot her in the face and then took off with it. But who knows the real story.
That's what I'm thinking too.
In this interview with the grandfather, he says the kid didn't have a drivers license or know how to drive.
https://abc7.com/elementary-school-shooting-texas-shooter-salvador-ramos-uvalde-tx/11893076/
Who took him to get the rifles, I want to know. That would have entailed multiple trips and they didn’t notice what he brought home? I’ve got a strong suspicion his grandpappy is in it deep.
Have they identified the gun dealer yet? Background check, etc?
He was 18. He didn’t need permission or supervision to buy guns.
His grandmother drove an F250? that sounds far-fetched
I’ll go out on a limb, grandma worked in the fields so she had a company truck because it was her responsibility to pick up the day laborers? It’s the only logical explanation.
I'm assuming it was the grandfather's. Not super far fetched, though. My grandma is in her 80s and still drives an extended bed GMC pickup that my grandpa drove before he passed away
Didn’t they say he was made fun of at school for his clothes, because they were poor?
The optic alone is closer to $1000 than not. Asking how an 18 year old aquired top shelf equipment isn't "stupid".
I'm not saying asking questions is stupid. Just how we keep making memes quoting cold hard numbers that have nothing to back them up.
First it's a 40 thousand dollar truck, then it's a 50 thousand dollar truck, now it's 70 thousand. Not even 24 hours later it comes up that it isn't even his truck.
I'm not a fan of sharing things that can be easily bunked, and hurt our reputation.
The truck is a stupid talking point it doesn't matter. What's relevant is why and how did a kid has a $1000 optic on a Daniel defense rifle. Even the most fervent firearm enthusiasts are hard pressed to drop the capital it costs to obtain "bomb proof" government contract equipment like that.
If you want a disclaimer for fucking twitter I have no idea if DD or eotech is under government contract or not. What I can tell you it is top of the line. Unless you are dropping out of helicopters there's absolutely no reason to go with that level of equipment.
The buffalo shooter had sordins. I'm not going to let you nit pick what model is exactly $657 or $567 because it doesn't matter. The truck is a red herring. Minute details about prices are pointless. There's no damn reason for him to have sordins unless he's communicating with someone.
These shooters have advanced equipment that only the most hardcore of LARPers would even bother entertaining their use. Given their age, the kit, and the cost it suggests they are being supplied by an organization. By whom and to what end is the question.
Thanks, you are right. It's so easy to get caught up in all this stuff and it doesn't help anything.
Its real simple, the kid wasn't the shooter. Nothing about this is true, its all a movie.
IF there even WAS a shooter? How many of us can verify that the victims are actually real people who died outside using some Liberal-controlled news source?
I mean do we have any accounts of annons who were actually in town and witnessed anything about this even as it was happening?
Anything is possible when the media is all controlled by the singular source and the media and government are in cahoots with each other.
Good point.
I remember a few months ago there was a lawsuit over sandyhook coming up. One of the gun manufactures wanted report card and student records, but they were "destroyed". Convenient...
I already own guns and a truck and still the armor is too expensive for me, and I am 37
Maybe used Grandmas credit card??
Could this kid have been running drugs for the Cartel??
That would give reason for the Border Control police being involved.
And the cash. And the "above a poor teenager's means" truck and expensive phone.
I was thinking the same thing. That could explain the amount of money he had.
I can’t even afford gas and milk
The guns are expensive yes, but the armor part of the story was corrected (no armor) and the truck wasn't his.
The story they are putting out makes no sense, correct. That's actually one of the more believable points at this time.