What was the full title of Charles Darwin's "origin of species" ?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
I look forward to the day when the masses understand Darwin and Sanger for who they really were.
https://youtu.be/dfPTaBlheGA?t=268
Start posting this all over in plan sight. Post it on lamp posts, on buses, inside subway cars, everywhere. Then people will realize that Darwin was a racists and his book will be cancelled, as well as his ridiculous theory, which has been thoroughly debunked.
I feel like this is going to spur a debate between those who believe in Intelligent Design / Creationism and Darwinism.
I also vaguely remember during high school biology, the teacher said he was instructed by law to teach creationism and briefly talked about it and added that his personal views of this is that it was a load of bullshit. The next day, he read a prepared statement apologizing that he had offended a student and that it was not his intention to defame religions. Then he said that there are also other beliefs like the flying sphagetti monster and proceeded to briefly talk about it and explained how science is based on theories and how some views can be proven, and some cannot through observations. And how evolution is the leading theory.
Anyway, point is that even scientific theories and discoveries can be accomplished by terrible people.
It's the same as the people credited with discovering DNA actually stole the research work from another lady who was in the middle of writing her thesis on it.
Since you brought up DNA. DNA is a digit self correcting code which is informational in its sequencing. DNA is the final nail in the bio-evolutionary theory. All cells have DNA which is the information code needed for life. Information does not evolve. Information demonstrates intelligence and design. People who want to believe in the big bang (first there was nothing and then it exploded) and bio-evolution (life came from non-life) have greater faith in their religion than I have in my belief that says "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Gen 1:1.
Nope :)
I actually believe in some of the ideas of intelligent design. I just don't think high school is the right place to teach it.
Do believe High School should teach lies or truth?
yes, you're right.
they should be teaching it in Kindergarten.
our entire world change if children realized that they were important, and made by a God that loves them.
from the section of the Bible referred to as the Q-Source-Geneva Bible 1599;
Luke 12:7
Yea, and all the hairs of your head are numbered: fear not therefore: ye are more of value than many sparrows.
It has been debunked in your eyes... I imagine it didn't take much to convince your bias
Wrong. I was taught evolution in school and believed it until I started thinking about the theory critically. Where did DNA come from? Where did time, matter, energy, and space come from? How did complex life forms begin since evolution goes against the second law of thermodynamics? How do symbiotic relationships (two different organism rely on each other for survival) form in a world of 'survival of the fittest'? Once a person begins to question the logic of life against the fantasy of evolution, it is not hard to see that the theory is no longer valid.
Evolution and the laws of thermodynamics are not equivalent they work on different scales entirely...
Because the animals that allowed the symbiotic relationship to occur benefited more highly from the relationship than those that didn't and it carried on over millions of years with MANY MANY mistakes inbetween
Can you prove your hypothesis? Can you create a scientific experiment that measures outcomes that proves you statement? In a symbiotic relationship, how are two organisms going to have simultaneous mutations that increase the survival of both species when the miniscule mutations don't benefit either species? In other words, the process must be complete for the organisms to survive. Increasing the process by millions of years doesn't change the dynamic. Unless the mutations have created a completed process simultaneously, resulting in the increased survivability of the species, then according to Darwin's theory, the mutations die out.
Can you do the same but for your belief? And not just put pseudo-science into a sentence and claim the award. Simultaneous mutations... you're taking 1 aspect of evolution theory and trying to make it fit each category. When people say simultaneous mutations they are in general referring to when 2 species have developed a trait even though they are half a world apart. Eyes and blood being good examples. Having the symbiotic relationship WAS the "mutation" People are inherently bad at big time and that is why it is hard to think of but just because something is difficult doesn't mean it is wrong
Please explain how IQ and race are related?
yes, it's all about IQ. like Q says 'these people are stupid'.
and 'stupid' is a defect/someone not aligned with God. think many of the idiots we're encountering are the 'tares' from the Bible; they're empty.
There is only one race or kind. Not a popular truth here, however.
Yes, there is only one race. There are many different ethnicities.
There is only one race, God.
So I am God?
Of course he was a racist. Without an eye for racial differences it cannot be gauged what the contributing factors are for survival, procreation and gene-heridity.
But I bet, most of those here have never read his book, and simply have no clue what they are talking about.
Comparing a 1910 biplane with the horten-229 and the B2 bomber clearly shows the artificial process. Quite an evolution, is it not?
Or how about comparing a musket with an ar-15. Quite an evolution, is it not?
This process can be observed in all instrumentalities of man.
We even accept these process in plants and dogs, cats, horses, cows etc. Where do you smart-asses think doberman, rotweiler, husky, etc come from? God did not make them. Man made them as they bread for certain favored characteristics. Artificial selection.
With death, drought, heavy rains, warmth, cold, abundace of food or lack thereof, Nature excerts the same kind of power. Natural selection.
The comparison is simple and elegant and quite fitting.
But go ahead. Shoot yourself in the foot.
Starts as plane. Ends as plane.
Starts as gun. Ends as gun.
Starts as cat. Ends as cat.
Starts as dog. Ends as dog.
Trillions of observations by billions of people over thousands of years tell us that life forms are fixed.
Evolution is a lie.
Your confusing evolution with metamorphosis This isn't pokemon...
We have observations of evolution. The ancient auroch found across all of Europe is the ancestor of all domesticated cattle species today.
Species adapting to the part of the earth they are on is NOT what the “theory of evolution” teaches. Species don’t change, they stay in their “animal family” and don’t switch when enough time has passed.
The auroch was in general a cow. Even a child can see that.
That's where people fail when they try to debunk Noah's ark. The Bible said there were examples of each "kind" of animal. In other words, there were two "cats" which could later expand in the multitude of varieties we have today.
A "kind" is not the same as a species.
This
Learn the difference between micro and macro.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution. The process behind “micro” and “macro” evolution are the same. The only change is the time scale.
Yeah, and an icecream starts as such and ends up like shit.
Exactly. Entropy.
I am glad you are happy with keeping and bearing arms : enjoy your musket. Or is your musket already subject to entropy and turned into an AR-15? Which one would you prefer?
Did it just lay there and turn into an AR-15 over time, or did an intelligent designer build one?
Idiot.
Ah .... : your cup of tea. The discarded intelligent design blabla.
idiot = person so mentally deficient as to be incapable of ordinary reasoning;
I do grant you, the word ordinary is quite strategic here. It depends on what one would consider ordinary. I am sure, Giordano Bruno was not very revered when he published his conclusion that a heliocentric worldview would rather fit the observed phenomena. Tycho Brahe had the fortune of being quite well set. Tycho was wrong Giordano was right. Giordano died because of heresy, Tycho died because of bachus.
Yet both man had good reasons to produce their models and they were very close. Tycho was closer than Giordano. Keppler turned it upside down by using elliptical courses instead of circular and Newton showed why these planetary courses were elliptical rather than circular. It took 2 to 400 years to bridge that.
If anything, when it comes to these kind of things, you are showing a remarkable closed mindedness precluding you from making a rational argument, that in other areas of inquiry is quite present. I often find myself agreeing with you, but then again, on this subject, I have to burst your bubble once again.
Resorting to name calling is not your best argument. In fact, it is your worst performance as it is not an argument but a judgement and a derogatory one at that.
With this out of the way, you wrote:
An idiot would agree with you. A wise man would ask himself: what is the time-frame between a musket and an AR-15 and who is this designer?
The answer along the lines of your simplicity touted as rational argument is: an intelligent designer.
The musket itself knows a development or evolution of 300 years before being retired for other types of rifles. The AR-15 is a scaled down version of the AR-10 of 1959. At the very least, based on these conditions, your claim is falsified:
as more than one intelligent designer worked on "rifle development" over the course of 600 years, and the looks and characteristics of rifles vary over this course of time, and we know their names.
Another simple distinction you appear to fail to take into account is the difference between animate and inanimate objects. The latter cannot procreate by itself, but is in dire need of copy paste or better said: cloning when wood rot and rust have taken their toll.
Yet, it is subject to death, to hunger (no powder and shot) too much rain making it a perfect club.
animate objects are different. Procreation is an art. And in our case, as souls in a body, we get to experience such dance of life. However, if your closed mindedness makes it highly likely you get to mate and produce offspring by a mate, then logic dictates you will do so. And you will be teaching your children your closed mindedness is the way to go.
Looking down on people with a different mind than yours, calling them idiots, is equal to what Giordano Bruno experienced. Maybe, once you stood at that fire in campo di fiore and cheered for his demise. And now, you resort only to name-calling. Quite an evolution.
Looking outside of your enclosure is dangerous.
...Bad soil. We're done here.
Apologist for the anti-humans. I am sure they will give you extra chocolate rations if you are a real good boy.
Am I in luck. Chocolate is not.my schtick and I am too bad failing for.good.
There's more to this than Darwin's theory, the basis of which was influenced by the Book of Genesis. Even Darwin's work is twisted and misrepresented for Evil Doers, who know quite well the Pharmakeia (sorcery; using influence of authority to purposely mislead and harm) they are committing. The removal of Nature's Order set in motion by the Creator Himself has led to the proliferation of genetic diseases that show themselves not only chemical imbalances but through microchimerism.
Microchimerism is a field of study that is greatly suppressed and confined to the narrowest reporting. Otherwise, to venture outside of this permitted framework is a career ending endeavor.
The presence of DNA/cells that originate from another individual, and are genetically distinct (racially) from the cells of the host individual, can cause certain types of autoimmune diseases. This is known as microchimerism and occurs from having sexual intercourse from a genetically different partner (racially different; outbreeding). The DNA/cells from a racially different sex partner has a deleterious effect to the female's own immune system, it’s homeostasis, and her mental equanimity. The DNA or RNA from sperm of a non-kindred male sexual partner influences the women's own phenotype. It also influence the traits of their subsequent offspring. This phenomena is passed on to future generations. If you have ever wondered why historically multicultural societies consistently implode into crime ridden societies, this is a possible explanation warranting further investigation.
Evidence shows that the male's cells/DNA from a sexual encounter has been found living in the brains of women some 38 years later. Its not just in the brain where these male cells/DNA are found. Women carry the cells/DNA of all their sex partners. The female uterine wall is not an impervious fortress, in many ways it is quite the opposite.
Her blood supply passes from and to it. In return, the fetus provides hormones (through bloodstream) as a feedback to the mother. Even prior to conception, sperm and DNA can pass through the uterus wall and into her blood stream. By Nature's design this is for a very important reason. Females who have never been pregnant and have had no embryos of any kind ever, have DNA in their bodies and brains from men's sperm alone. Ten percent of nulligravid (never pregnant) females are proven to have male DNA in their bodies in large numbers of cells: sperm DNA up to 20.7 male cells per 100,000 female cells in never-pregnant females from unprotected sex.
If the male is from a similar genetic background, the DNA/cells are beneficial to the mother and baby's immune system. However, it becomes increasingly more likely that a female will have cells/DNA from multiple sex partners that will conflict with the mother's immune system. It is known the cells/DNA from a racially different partner are in conflict with the mother’s immune system and are attacked through what is known as a cytokine storm. The body's own immune system becomes the greatest threat to the health and longevity of the female (and baby). The health consequences can be immediate and neuro-immunological diseases involving inflammation are evident through many diseases producing systemic sepsis, as defined by persistent hypotension, hyper- or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and often thrombocytopenia. Viral, bacterial, and fungal pulmonary infections all cause the sepsis syndrome, and these etiological agents are difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds. In some cases, persistent tissue damage without severe microbial infection in the lungs also is associated with a cytokine storm and clinical manifestations that mimic sepsis syndrome. In addition to lung infections, the cytokine storm is a consequence of severe infections in the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, central nervous system, skin, joint spaces, and other sites. Other diseases take hold many, many years later.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. In understanding this, the best health provided to a couple and its offspring is one based on monogamy and avoidance of different sexual partners.
This doctrine replaced teaching of the Bible in schools in 1963. This is how it started to really go downhill quickly after that.
"And we refined the theory since then. Duh."
I once had this rubbed in my face when I pointed the full title out.
You should ask "Refined it for what? To hide its eugenic agenda?"
thanks for teaching me something new today, had no idea it said that.
When I saw the meme somewhere I myself could not believe it. Had to go and search for the manuscript myself to confirm its true.
Sometimes when it all feels surreal and we start thinking "C'mon, there is no way they have been lying to us for decades. It must all be just recent phenomenon", and then see something like this and it helps us get grounded back into the morbid reality.
exactly. it's like a wife that finds out her husband is a serial killer; good to have proof that we're not the crazy ones, it's them. they can't gaslight us anymore.