I'd be interested to know frens views on Assange.
For me, there are primarily two possible explanations for what has been going on with Assange.
One, the corrupt system has him in it's control, and is screwing around with him, short of outright suiciding him, is making things so difficult and arduous that he will eventually be removed.
Two, Assange is being watched over and is under the protection (control) of the White Hats, and is being held in the UK until the right moment when he will be released (extradited) to the US, where he will then be able to be 'tried', and can testify and spill the beans on Seth Rich and all the other shenanigans the Swamp has been doing that Assange knows directly about.
If this second scenario is true, then it means the authorities in the UK that have been refusing to allow extradition are White Hat controlled, as well.
Another third possibility is that there is a tug of war and a battle going on between the Cabal/Swamp and the White Hats over Assange, the kind of behind the scenes war that we can easily understand has constantly been taking place everywhere else while the Q and the White Hats have the upper hand and are herding the Swamp into checkmate.
At the least, if we are to believe Q at face value, they indicate that they have Assange within their area of control.
Q1595
Ostensibly in regards to wikileaks: "You may have the site but we have the source."
Desperate agencies do stupid things.
Dead cat bounce.
You may have the site but we have the source.
https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1011441579565953025📁
Panic is good.
Panic is right.
July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.
Conspiracy no more.
Time to FEED.
Q
Q1842
Again, in conjunction with Assange and wikileaks: "Do you believe in coincidences? We have the source."
These people are stupid!
https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.com📁
"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."
Discovery.
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/400882-wikileaks-says-senate-panel-requested-assange-testimony-in-russia-probe📁
Do you believe in coincidences?
We have the source.
Q
I find the second or third of these scenarios to be the more plausible, although my mind boggles at how this might be being managed.
Either way, the issue is timely now, because of a looming deadline.
According to this BBC article "Julian Assange: Does Wikileaks founder have a powerful ally in new Australian PM?" Date: June 11, 2022, the deadline looms for the UK Home Secretary (Similar to the US Secretary of State?) to act.
After a long legal battle in the UK, the courts in April referred the US extradition request to the Home Secretary for her final decision. Priti Patel has until 19 June - exactly 10 years since Mr Assange was last free - to make it.
Looking at the timing, with the convergence of Durham, Election Transparency (i.e. Mules), and other elements, this June 19 deadline seem noteworthy.
However, if Assange is released from the UK and NOT extradited, will he stay in the UK, or what? Also, if he is NOT brought back to the US for trial, then how could he be utilized to provide testimony re: Truth regarding the Swamp and DNC, Rich, etc? Can he enter the US freely if the charges are not dropped, or he is not pardoned by POTUS, for example? Being invited to testify before Congress, for example, would require that he was NOT facing charges, wouldn't it?
So, if the UK Home Secretary decides against the extradition, could Assange stay in the UK at his leisure, until things turnover in the US, and the charges are dropped or he is pardoned? Would he be able to go to Australia, for example, without once again facing the extradition request from the US?
What is truly noteworthy is that Assange now has such a high profile international status, particularly with the more left-leaning masses, who are always open to emotional exploitation by the Cabal, that he has the potential to be an incredible 'mainstream' red-pill dropper, bigger than Musk, for example.
Why? Because traditionally, the leftist leaning softies are the ones who have supported Assange the most. If (and when?) Assange comes out and exposes the real corruption, it would send massive shock waves through that whole sector of society:
"Wait? You mean Obama isn't the glorious virtue hope giver? You mean, the Left has been the core underpinning of the corruption? You mean, Donald Trump isn't the most evil person in the world? Etc"
Note: by "Left-leaning Softies", I do NOT mean the hard core ideological Marxists, Communists and Globalists, but rather those emotionally mislead, well-intentioned people who in ignorance have believed the lies and propaganda of the media and the ideological Agents, and so have supported the the Left's agenda, because they think this is being compassionate, or saving the planet, or such - most of my family fall into this category.
I haven't done a lot of digging on Assange, but it certainly seem that the Assange situation is worthy of a prolonged and sustained attention from anons and frens in the Great Awakening. In other words, keep your eyes on this.
NB: Credit to u/Ehjax78 for first posting the BBC article.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEhLFXVp/after-more-than-a-decade-spent-t/c/
Correction: Sean Rich > Seth Rich. (No disrespect intended.)
I'll go with scenario 2. It's just a matter of when. Didn't Q write June ETA?
Agreed. I have trouble believing the Deep State wouldn't suicide him the moment they had the chance
Funny we're talking about JA. He was in the deltas yesterday:
https://qalerts.app/?n=1462
The server brings down the house.
I was gonna say the same thing. Maybe Assange is the first "arrest" that would signal direction and cause a mass awakening.
That’s an interesting take - hadn’t thought about him being arrested as the way to enter evidence.
Only thing that makes me unsure of 2 was Assange was still afraid to be extradited here while Trump was president. He said he was unsure of Trump and actively fought against being extradited.
To me, Trump wanted Assange extradited for his protection, because Trump never pardonded him (that would have put him at risk) It felt this is what Trump quietly wanted and it seemed like forgien courts and leftist were trying to prevent it at the time.
I think its very hard for Assange to get the memo. He is very isolated and id imagine every communication he has is heavily monitored. So all Assange has to go on is his own conclusions and it would have been a huge leap of faith to just trust Trump from where he stands.
Maybe assange is saying that to make the enemy think different
Yes, this combined with Trump’s deciding not to pardon Assange. Trump could have pardoned him at any time, but did not. This silence speaks volumes
Why do you think Pompeo said he wanted to kill Assange?
Could be misdirection
My thoughts on it are that Assange could have made things a lot easier for the white hats but did not, hence the anger. Rudy met with Assange to negotiate a pardon & my guess is that Assange didn't agree with the terms. Pretty stupid of him but that's his choice. Now the white hats are going on plan B whatever that is. IDK if Assange has a role to play in that or not. My guess is not.
I think its very hard for Assange to get the memo. He is very isolated and id imagine every communication he has is heavily monitored. So all Assange has to go on is his own conclusions and it would have been a huge leap of faith to just trust Trump from where he stands.
I can't imagine that the whitehats/Q team would have enough power to protect Trump, but not have enough power to get whatever message/comms they wanted to Assange.
Maybe it's the other way around. Maybe Trump/Q weren't sure enough of Assange to reveal certain things.
OPTICS.
Pride 🌈 comes before the fall.
So I say end of June then it holy things get hot.
Some Google engineer just talked about sentient AI, which is the transhumanism beast. Julian has all the goods on HRC the cult and elite epstein folks. This brings the house down.
And June it is! Also the 17th. And your uptick is 17. And my epeen is.....well it’s June!
Happy days fren. Buckle up, no mask required!
All of these dates come and go and then we wait again for the next date... June? It's been how many years we are waiting for June? 2021? 2020? 2019? 2018? But I am sure it's 2022 this time around. Sure! Or maybe it's 2023.... nah... probably 2024.... etc etc
"All these dates...." This is what date-fagging is. It's not Q and it's not really critical thinking applied with due diligence. Serious anons will avoid datefagging.
Note: the reason I mentioned the June 19 deadline is nothing esoteric. It's when the UK home Secretary is apparently required to decide, by law, what to do with Assange. So, it is an obvious inflection point.
I wonder who downvoted you? June 19th for the UK Govt is a deadline, not a datefag.
I will say though, for myself, I've moved on from the Assange thing a long time ago. To me, it's low hanging fruit. And a distraction. If he really had anything of any real value and was indeed being treated poorly, any same person would've released what they have, not continue to sit on it and languish in one of the worst prisons in the UK. So, either he has nothing and this is all a giant distraction, or he's an idiot and is still trusting the wrong people.
Yes, this. If there is no timeline or expectations, then what are we even doing? The whole “datefagging” thing seems like a cop out. What good is the plan if it takes so long that we are all long dead before it takes place?
This wasn't against your post but the guy above saying June ETA. Tired of the dates...
Yeah, I got that. I was just pointing out that datefagging (like someone who datefags, aka the guy above) isn't Q and isn't consistent with the Q message. Which I was able to do because you highlighted that.
Thanks.
Your negative piece of your statement shows how much you don’t understand about war. But the rest is also true about changing timelines. I wonder how long the French Underground and citizens of Poland thought what you did during WWII before help finally did arrive? I think it was about 4 years for the French, and 6 years for Poland. Oh right, and Poland had 6-7 million of bodies (counting Jews, Gypsies, other political/camp prisoners, Citizens, dead soldiers on both sides), to clean up for the next 3-4 years after. It’s war, with a fluid timeline, ever changing. Dates are nothing but disinformation.
Oh I know we are in a war... and it feels like we keep losing. My comment is out of frustration with the datefags. At this point we need to stop waiting for "help" and help ourselves. When you wait patiently for someone to come rescue you then you become a passive part of the issue. Meaning you aren't contributing. If you are here talking among people that agree with you then you aren't out there trying to change things.
Yep I got your frustration. I didn’t think you were dooming. I feel the same way sometimes too. It’s just being human. But don’t worry, We Will Win.
It's a shame that people couldn't understand the point you were expressing, and just reacted to your frustration. Perhaps it was the notable sarcasm...
I got it, tho. It should be clear that you are expressing frustration with the datefag approach, but I guess it seemed to spill over into (looked like) frustration with the "lack of progress".
That frustration is something all freedom fighters and anons have to digest and deal with. As Brent points out. Datefaggers certainly do not help, as they highlight the mental attitude of hanging on something others are doing.
I think the members of this board who are not active and who are in that passively-hanging-on camp are in the minority. But we have newbies coming in all the time....
Frustration is difficult to digest. The feeling that "we keep losing" probably stems from what you are focusing on or paying attention to.
I had to digest a lot of difficult feelings for the first 6 months of 2021, after the November thing. Not easy. I limit what I pay attention to, if it drags my spirit down, and I try to focus on positive developments, and what I can do myself. The things I cannot control, which are outside my control, I don't give much attention to if they are not positive things.